Latino Liberty and the Meaning of Security: On Prison Nations and Liberal States

Number: 42 October 1, 2015
Michael García
EN

Latino Liberty and the Meaning of Security: On Prison Nations and Liberal States

Abstract

Critics view the prison system as a mechanism and an institution that produces and reproduces prison populations that reflect institutional racism in society. Alternatively it is said that democratic societies fail to protect society’s most vulnerable members, and thereby erodes prisoners’ liberty. The only way to ensure the liberty of anyone is to protect it for everyone, and the only way to safeguard the freedom and security of the democratic majority is to also guarantee liberty, equality, and justice to democracy’s minorities. American prisons reify these notions, give them concrete form. Predation and extortion casts in lurid reflection unfair advantages in society outside the prison, such as through white privilege the tyranny of the majority as ethnic gang and by ever-increasing transfers of wealth to the rich — without any subsequent mechanisms of redistribution

References

  1. Alexander, Michelle. The New Jim Crow: Mass Incarceration in the Age of Colorblindness. Rev. ed. New York: The New Press, 2012. Print.
  2. Althusser, Louis. “Ideology and Ideological State Apparatus: (Notes towards an Investigation).” Lenin and Philosophy and Other Essays. Trans. Ben Brewster. 85-126. New York: Monthly Review Press, 2001. Print.
  3. Anderson, Benedict. Imagined Communities. London: Verso, 1991. Print.
  4. Baca, Jimmy Santiago. Working in the Dark: Reflections of a Poet of the Barrio. Santa Fe: Red Crane Books, 1992. Print.
  5. Beltrán, Cristina. The Trouble with Unity: Latino Politics and the Creation of Identity. New York: Oxford UP, 2010. Print.
  6. Cofer, Judith Ortiz. The Latin Deli: Prose and Poetry. New York: Norton, 1995. Print.
  7. Dostoevsky, Fyodor. 1861. The House of the Dead. Trans. Constance Garnett. London: Heinemann, 1915. Print.
  8. Guinier, Lani. The Tyranny of the Majority: Fundamental Fairness in Representative Democracy. New York: Free Press, 1994. Print.
  9. Hamby, Alonzo L. Liberalism and its Challengers: From F.D.R. to Bush. 1985. 2nd ed. New York: Oxford UP, 1992. Print.
  10. Hobbes, Thomas. Leviathan. 1651. Ed. C.B. MacPherson. Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1985. Print.
APA
García, M. (2015). Latino Liberty and the Meaning of Security: On Prison Nations and Liberal States. Journal of American Studies of Turkey, 42, 227-247. https://izlik.org/JA53TT85MM
AMA
1.García M. Latino Liberty and the Meaning of Security: On Prison Nations and Liberal States. JAST. 2015;(42):227-247. https://izlik.org/JA53TT85MM
Chicago
García, Michael. 2015. “Latino Liberty and the Meaning of Security: On Prison Nations and Liberal States”. Journal of American Studies of Turkey, nos. 42: 227-47. https://izlik.org/JA53TT85MM.
EndNote
García M (October 1, 2015) Latino Liberty and the Meaning of Security: On Prison Nations and Liberal States. Journal of American Studies of Turkey 42 227–247.
IEEE
[1]M. García, “Latino Liberty and the Meaning of Security: On Prison Nations and Liberal States”, JAST, no. 42, pp. 227–247, Oct. 2015, [Online]. Available: https://izlik.org/JA53TT85MM
ISNAD
García, Michael. “Latino Liberty and the Meaning of Security: On Prison Nations and Liberal States”. Journal of American Studies of Turkey. 42 (October 1, 2015): 227-247. https://izlik.org/JA53TT85MM.
JAMA
1.García M. Latino Liberty and the Meaning of Security: On Prison Nations and Liberal States. JAST. 2015;:227–247.
MLA
García, Michael. “Latino Liberty and the Meaning of Security: On Prison Nations and Liberal States”. Journal of American Studies of Turkey, no. 42, Oct. 2015, pp. 227-4, https://izlik.org/JA53TT85MM.
Vancouver
1.Michael García. Latino Liberty and the Meaning of Security: On Prison Nations and Liberal States. JAST [Internet]. 2015 Oct. 1;(42):227-4. Available from: https://izlik.org/JA53TT85MM