From Realignment to Dealignment : The Changing Electoral Behavior in the United States

Year 1999, Issue: 9, 3 - 16, 01.04.1999

Stefano Luconi

Abstract

This article provides a critical survey of the literature concerning the notion of realignment and examines to what an extent this theory can still account for electoral changes in present-day United States. Specifically, it checks the views of the major works on this topic against political developments and argues that, despite significant revisions, such a formulation no longer holds and adealignment perspective better reflects the contemporary dynamics of the American party system.

References

• Abramowitz, Alan I. “Explaining Success and Failure in the 1998 Midterm Elections: Comparing the Influence of Swing Voters and Core Party Supporters.” PS 32.1 (March 1999): 60-61.
• Abramson, Paul R., John H. Aldrich, and David W. Rohde. Change and Continuity in the 1980 Elections. Washington, DC: CQ Press, 1982.
• -----. Change and Continuity in the 1984 Elections. Washington, DC: CQ Press, 1987.
• -----. Change and Continuity in the 1996 and 1998 Elections. Washington, DC: CQ Press, 1999.
• Bartels, Larry M. “Partisanship and Voting Behavior, 1952-1996.” American Journal of Political Science 44.1 (January 2000): 35-50.
• Beck, Paul Allen. “The Changing American Party Coalitions.” In Green and Shea. 28-49.
• -----. “Party Realignment in America: The View from the States.” Party Realignment and State Politics. Ed. Maureen Moakley. Columbus: Ohio UP, 1992. 259-278.
• -----. “A Socialization Theory of Partisan Realignment.” Richard D. Niemi et al., The Politics of Future Citizens. San Francisco: Josey-Bass, 1974. 199-219.
• Berg, John C. “Beyond a Third Party: The Other Minor Parties in the 1996 Elections.” In Green and Shea. 212-228.
• Brady, David W. Critical Elections and Congressional Policy Making. Stanford, CA: Stanford UP, 1988.
• Burnham, Walter Dean. “The Changing Shape of the American Political Universe.” American Political Science Review 59.1 (March 1965): 7-28.
• -----. Critical Elections and the Mainsprings of American Politics. New York: Norton, 1970.
• -----. “Critical Realignment: Dead or Alive?” The End of Realignment? Interpreting American Electoral Eras. Ed. Byron E. Shafer. Madison: U of Wisconsin P, 1991. 101-139.
• -----. “Realignment Lives: The 1994 Earthquake and Its Implications.” The Clinton Presidency: First Appraisals. Ed. Colin Campbell and Bert A. Rockman. Chatham, NJ: Chatham House, 1996. 363-395.
• Busch, Andrew E. Horses in Midstream: US Midterm Elections and Their Consequences, 1894-1998. Pittsburgh: U of Pittsburgh P, 1999.
• Campbell, Angus et al., The American Voter. New York: Wiley, 1960.
• Carmines, Edward G., John P. McIver, and James A. Stimson. “Unrealized Partnership: A Theory of Dealignment.” Journal of Politics 49.2 (May 1987): 376- 400.
• Ceaser, James and Andrew Busch. Losing to Win: The 1996 Elections and American Politics. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield, 1997.
• -----. Upside Down and Inside Out: The 1992 Elections and American Politics. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield, 1993.
• Chubb, John E. and Paul E. Peterson. “Realignment and Institutionalization.” The New Directions in American Politics. Ed. John E. Chubb and Paul E. Peterson. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution, 1985. 1-30.
• Claggett, William, William Flanigan, and Nancy Zingale. “Nationalization of the American Electorate.” American Political Science Review 78.1 (March 1984): 77- 91.
• Clymer, Adam and Janet Elder. “Poll Finds Greater Confidence in Democrats.” New York Times (10 November 1999): A1, A19.
• Clubb, Jerome M., William H. Flanigan, and Nancy H. Zingale. Partisan Realignment: Voters, Parties, and Government in American History. Beverly Hills: Sage, 1980.
• Dahl, Robert A. “Myth of the Presidential Mandate.” Political Science Quarterly 105.3 (Fall 1990): 355-372. Dionne, E.J. Why Americans Hate Politics. New York, Simon and Schuster, 1991.
• Doppelt, Jack C. and Ellen Shearer. Nonvoters: America’s No-Shows. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 1999.
• “Electorate Swings to the Right.” USA Today (9 November 1994): 9A. Erickson, Robert S. “Economic Conditions and the Presidential Vote.” American Political Science Review 83.2 (June 1989): 567-573.
• Fiorina, Morris P. Retrospective Voting in American National Elections. New Haven, CT: Yale UP, 1981.
• Flanigan, William H. and Nancy H. Zingale. Political Behavior of the American Electorate. 8th ed. Washington, DC: CQ Press, 1994.
• Frankovic, Kathleen A. “Why the Gender Gap Became News in 1996.” PS 32.1 (March 1999): 20-22.
• Ginsberg, Benjamin and Martin Shefter. “A Critical Realignment? The New Politics, the Reconstituted Right, and the Election of 1984.” The Election of 1984. Ed. Michael Nelson. Washington, DC: CQ Press, 1985. 1-25.
• Goren, Paul. “Gut-Level Emotions and the Presidential Vote.” American Politics Quarterly 25.1 (April 1997): 203-229.
• Green, John C. and Daniel M. Shea, eds. The State of the Parties: The Changing Role of Contemporary American Parties. 3rd ed. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield, 1999.
• Hurley, Patricia A. “Partisan Representation and the Failure of Realignment in the 1980s.” American Journal of Political Science33.1 (February 1989): 240-261.
• Kefee, William J. Parties, Politics, and Public Policy in America. 8th ed. Washington, DC: CQ Press, 1998.
• Key, V.O., Jr. Politics, Parties, and Pressure Groups. New York: Thomas Y. Crowell, 1942.
• -----. “A Theory of Critical Elections.” Journal of Politics 17.1 (February 1955): 3- 18.
• ----- and Milton C. Cummings, Jr. The Responsible Electorate: Rationality in Presidential Voting, 1936-1960. Cambridge, MA: Harvard UP, 1966.
• Lacy, Dean and J. Tobin Grant. “The Impact of the Economy on the 1996 Election: The Invisible Foot.” In Weisberg and Box-Steffensmeier. 99-110.
• Ladd, Carll Everett. “The 1994 Congressional Elections: The Postindustrial Realignment Continues.” Political Science Quarterly110.1 (Spring 1995): 1-23.
• -----. “The Brittle Mandate: Electoral Dealignment and the 1980 Presidential Election.” Political Science Quarterly 96.1 (Spring 1981): 1-25.
• -----. “Like Waiting for Godot: The Uselessness of Realignment for Understanding Change in Contemporary American Politics.”Polity 22.3 (Spring 1990): 511-525.
• -----. “On Mandates, Realignments, and the 1984 Presidential Election.” Political Science Quarterly 100.1 (Spring 1985): 1-25.
• Lawrence, David G. The Collapse of the Democratic Presidential Majority: Realignment, Dealignment, and Electoral Change from Franklin Roosevelt to Bill Clinton, Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1996.
• Little, Thomas H. “An Experiment in Responsible Party Government: National Agenda Setting and State Replicas of the Contract with America.” American Review of Politics 18.1 (Fall-Winter 1997): 1-24.
• Miller, Warren E. “The Election of 1984 and the Future of American Politics.” Elections in America. Ed. Kay Lehman Schlozman. Boston: Allen and Unwin, 1987. 293-320.
• -----. “Party Identification, Realignment, and Party Voting: Back to the Basics.” American Political Science Review 85.2 (June 1991): 557-568.
• Mink, Gwendolyn. Welfare’s End. Ithaca: Cornell UP, 1998.
• Monardi, Fred M. “Primary Voters as Retrospective Voters.” American Politics Quarterly, 22.1 (January 1994): 88-103.
• Moon, David. “What You Use Still Depends on What You Have: Information Effects in Presidential Elections, 1972-1988.” American Politics Quarterly 20.4 (October 1992): 427-441.
• Nardulli, Peter F. “The Concept of a Critical Realignment, Electoral Behavior, and Political Change.” American Political Science Review 89.1 (March 1995): 10-22.
• -----. “A Normal Vote Approach to Electoral Change: Presidential Elections, 1828- 1984.” Political Behavior 16.4 (December 1994): 467-503.
• Nelson, Michael. “Conclusion: Some Things Old, Some Things New.” The Elections of 1992. Ed. Michael Nelson. Washington, DC: CQ Press, 1993. 183-192.
• Norquist, Grover. Rock the House. Fort Lauderdale, FL: Vytis Press, 1995.
• Phillips, Kevin. The Emerging Republican Majority. New Rochelle: Arlington House, 1969.
• Pomper, Gerald. “The Presidential Election.” The Election of 1992: Reports and Interpretations. Ed. Gerald Pomper. Chatham, NJ: Chatham House, 1993. 132-156.
• -----. “The Presidential Election.” The Election of 1996: Reports and Interpretations. Ed. Gerald Pomper. Chatham, NJ: Chatham House, 1997. 173-204.
• Reichley, James A. “The Future of the American Two-Party System after 1996.” In Green and Shea. 10-27.
• Rice, Tom W. and Tracey A. Hilton. “Partisanship over Time: A Comparison of United States Panel Data.” Political Research Quarterly 49.1 (March 1996): 191- 201.
• Shafer, Byron E. “The Partisan Legacy: Are There Any New Democrats? And by the Way, Was There a Republican Revolution?” The Clinton Legacy. Ed. Colin Campbell and Bert A. Rockman. Chatham, NJ: Chatham House, 2000. 1-32.
• Sinclair, Barbara D. “Party Realignment and the Transformation of the National Agenda: The House of Representatives, 1925-1938.” American Political Science Review 71.3 (September 1977): 940-953.
• Speel, Robert W. Changing Patterns of Voting in the Northern United States: Electoral Realignment, 1952-1996. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State UP, 1998.
• Stanley, Harold W. and Richard G. Niemi, “Party Coalitions in Transition: Partisanship and Group Support, 1952-1996.” In Weisberg and Box-Steffensmeier. 162-180.
• Sundquist, James L. Dynamics of the Party System: Alignment and Realignment of Political Parties in the United States. 2nd ed. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution, 1983.
• -----. “Needed: A Political Theory for the New Era of Coalition Government in the United States.” Political Science Quarterly 103.4 (Winter 1988): 613-635.
• Svoboda, Craig J. “Retrospective Voting in Gubernatorial Elections: 1982 and 1986.” Political Research Quarterly 48.1 (March 1995): 135-150.
• Tarrance, Lance, Jr. and Walter De Vires, Checked and Balanced: How TicketSplitters Are Shaping the New Balance of Power in American Politics. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdemans, 1998.
• Tuchfarber, Alfred J. et al. “Realignment from the 1996 Election and a Look Ahead to 1998.” Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Washington, DC, 28-31 August 1997.
• -----. “The Republican Tidal Wave of 1994: Testing Hypothesis About Realignment, Restructuring, and Rebellion.” PS 28.4 (December 1995): 689-696.
• Wattenberg, Martin P. The Rise of Candidate-Centered Politics: Presidential Elections of the 1980s. Cambridge, MA: Harvard UP, 1991.
• Weisberg, Herbert F. and Janet M. Box-Steffensmeier, eds. Reelection 1996: How America Voted. New York: Seven Bridges Press, 1999.
• Weisberg, Herbert F. and Stephen T. Mockabee. “Attitudinal Correlates of the 1996
• Presidential Vote: The People Reelect a President.” In Weisberg and BoxSteffensmeier. 45-69.
• Wilcox, Clyde. The Latest American Revolution: The 1994 Elections and Their Implications for Governance. New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1995.