Why Are Flight Psychologists Important to Flight Safety?

Year 2023, , 156 - 160, 17.03.2023

Selvi Vural

https://doi.org/10.30518/jav.1220425

Abstract

The developments in aircraft technologies both in our country and around the world cause a serious increase in both the aircraft fleets and ticket sales, as well as the number of airline companies, their employees and passengers. These developments in the aviation industry necessitate flight safety and highlight the importance of the human factor (flight crew) by reducing the causality of technical factors in ensuring safety. Studies within this scope show that the main causal factor (65-70%) in aircraft crashes is the flight crew. There are many factors such as physiological, psychological, personal and psychosocial at the basis of the unsuccessful performance of the flight crew. However, the number of studies in the literature that draw attention to the psychological elements of the flight crew is very few. In fact, it is known that the psychological well-being of the flight crew is important for the success of the flight operations, but the airline companies do not have any evaluation obligation regarding this. On the contrary, some negative consequences may be encountered due to the freedom in this matter. In particular, the fact that human factor causation is at a much higher level than previously thought in plane crashes increases the importance of flight psychologists for airline companies today. Therefore, in this study, it is aimed to reveal the importance of flight psychologists on flight safety in civil aviation. In this context, interviews were held with the flight crews of two airlines (private-public). The findings show that flight psychologists are important and necessary in airline companies in order to be able to perform safe flights with healthier flight crews.

Keywords

Flight Safety, Flight Psychologist, Aviation Psychology, Flight Crews

Why Are Flight Psychologists Important to Flight Safety?

Abstract

Keywords

Flight Safety Flight Psychologist Aviation Psychology Flight Crews, Flight Psychologist, Aviation Psychology, Aviation Psychology, Flight Crews

References

• Ata, N. (2021). Türkiye’de Havacılık Psikiyatrisi ve Psikolojisi, Lokman Hekim Dergisi, 11 (1): 160-172.
• Bureau d’Enquêtes et d’Analysespour la sécurité de l’aviation civile (BEA). (2016). Final Report -Accident on 24 March 2015 at Prads-Haute-Bléone (Alpes-de-Haute-Provence, France) to the Airbus A320-211 registered D- AIPX operated by Germanwings, (Accessible 10 December 2022 - https://www.bea.aero/uploads/tx_ elydbrapports/BEA2015-0125.en-LR.pdf)
• CAA, CAP 720. (2002). Flight Crew Training: Cockpit Resource Management (CRM) and Line-Oriented Flight Training (LOFT), ICAO, 217AN/132.
• CAA, CAP 737. (2006). Crew Resource Management (CRM) Training, Guidance for Flight Crew, CRM Instructors (CRMIS) and CRM Instructor-Examiners (CRMIES).
• Çetingüç M. (2018). Uçuş psikologları, Havacılık Tıbbı Bülteni 32:1022-3.
• Chute, R.D. and E.L. Wiener. (1996). Cockpit-Cabin Communication: II. Shall We Tell the Pilots? The International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 6(3), 211–231.
• Clark, G. I. and Rock, A. J. (2016). Processes contributing to the maintenance of flying phobia: A narrative review, Frontiers in Psychology, 7(754), 1-21.
• Cropley, A.J. (2021). Qualitative research methods: A practice-oriented introduction for students of psychology and education, 3 rd updated, revised, and enlarged edition.
• Foushee, H. C. (1984). Dyads and triads at 35,000 feet: Factors affecting group process and aircrew performance, American Psychologist, 39(8), 885.
• Helmreich, R.L. and Foushee, H.C. (1993). Why Crew Resource Management? Empirical and Theoretical Bases of Human Factors Training in Aviation, in E.L. Wiener, R.L. Helmreich, B.G. Kanki (Eds.), Cockpit Resource Management, AcademicPress, San Diego, 3-41.
• Hochschild, A.R. (1983). The Managed Heart: Commercialization of Human Feeling. London: University of California Press.
• Jausan, M. Silva, J. and Sabatini, R. (2017). A holistic approach to evaluating the effect of safety barriers on the performance of safety reporting systems in aviation organisations, Journal of Air Transport Management, 63, 95-107.
• Jensen, R.S. (1993). The Boundaries of Aviation Psychology, Human Factors, Aeronautical Decision Making, Situation Awareness, and Crew Resource Management, The International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 7, 4, 259-267.
• Lasi, H. Fettke, P. Kemper, H. G. Feld, T. and Hoffmann, M. (2014). Industry 4.0, Business & Information Systems Engineering, 6(4), 239-242.
• Martinussen, M. and Hunter, D.R. (2010). Aviation Psychology and Human Factors, CRC Press, Taylor and Francis Group, LLC.
• Murphy, A. (2001). The Flight Attendant Dilemma: An Analysis of Communication and Sensemaking During In- Flight Emergencies, Journal of Applied Communication Research, S.29(1), 30-53.
• Sias, P.M. (2005). Workplace relationship quality and employee information experiences, Communication Studies, 56(4), 375-395.
• Sivil Havacılık Genel Müdürlüğü(SHGM). (2020). Havacılık Sağlık Talimatı (SHT-MED), Ankara.
• Wilhelm, F.H. and Roth, W. T. (1997). Clinical characteristics of flight phobia, Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 11(3), 241-261.