Risk Assessment of Passenger Behaviour During the Taxiing Process

Year 2025, Volume: 9 Issue: 2, 428 - 435, 28.06.2025

Sevdiye Kemik , Kübra Nur Uzuntaş , Mesut Aydemir

https://doi.org/10.30518/jav.1652492

Abstract

In the aviation industry, flight safety is always a top priority and holds great significance not only during takeoff, landing, or flight but also during maneuvering on the ground. The mobility or unsafe actions of the passengers during this maneuver should be restricted in accordance with regulations, as they are critical in ensuring in-flight safety and reducing operational risks to acceptable levels. Even with these clear and frequently repeated rules, some of the passengers can still be seen moving around the cabin during taxiing, opening overhead bins, and trying to remove their belongings. All of these, especially during sudden braking or turns, may cause passengers to be injured.
This study aims to conduct a qualitative risk assessment on the possible risks associated with the mobility of the passengers during the aircraft maneuver on the ground. A total of 75 participants from the cockpit, cabin crew, and passengers took part in an online qualitative risk assessment, and the assessments were interpreted using the risk matrix defined by ICAO. Results have shown that, though all of the participants managed to assess the similar likelihood of risks, their perceived magnitude of impact varied depending on the group of participants and their level of experience.

Keywords

Aviation Safety , Taxiing Process , Passenger Behaviors , Risk Assessment , ICAO Risk Matrix

References

• Aven, T. (2012). Foundations of risk analysis. John Wiley & Sons. Retrieved from https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/9781119945482.fmatter
• Blom, H. A. P., Daams, J., Mulder, M., & Everdij, M. H. C. (2003). Human cognition performance models for ATM safety risk assessment. EUROCONTROL Experimental Centre Reports.
• Chang, Y. H., & Liao, M. Y. (2009). The effect of aviation safety education on passenger cabin safety awareness. Safety Science, 47(10), 1337–1345.
• Çoban, R., & İpek, S. (2020). Sivil havacılık sektöründe uçuş güvenlik görevlisi uygulamaları üzerine kavramsal bir araştırma. Journal of Aviation, 4(1), 89–102.
• Dekker, S. (2006). The field guide to understanding human error. CRC Press.
• Dekker, S. W. (2014). The bureaucratization of safety. Safety Science, 70, 348–357.
• Eurocontrol. (2013). European safety programme for ATM.
• Federal Aviation Administration (FAA). (2015). Cabin safety procedures for air operators. Retrieved December 21, 2024, from https://www.faa.gov/about/initiatives/cabin_safety
• Federal Aviation Administration (FAA). (2020). Advisory Circular AC 120-55B: Air carrier in-flight cabin procedures.
• Green, N., Gaydos, S., Ewan, H., & Nicol, E. (2019). The health of the cabin crew. In Handbook of aviation and space medicine (pp. 255–257). CRC Press.
• Guest, G., MacQueen, K. M., & Namey, E. E. (2012). Applied thematic analysis. Sage.
• Gupta, A., Singh, R. K., Kamble, S., & Mishra, R. (2022). Knowledge management in industry 4.0 environment for sustainable competitive advantage: A strategic framework. Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 20(6), 878–892.
• Hollnagel, E. (2008). Risk + barriers = safety? Safety Science, 46(2), 221–229.
• Hollnagel, E. (2018). Safety-I and safety-II: The past and future of safety management. CRC Press.
• Hsu, Y. L., Li, W. C., & Chen, K. W. (2010). Structuring critical success factors of airline safety management system using a hybrid model. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 46(2), 222–235.
• International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO). (2013). Safety management manual (SMM) (Doc 9859, 3rd ed.). Retrieved October 31, 2024, from https://www.icao.int/SAM/Documents/2017-SSP-GUY/Doc 9859 SMM Third edition en.pdf
• International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO). (2018). Aviation security manual (Doc 8973). Retrieved October 31, 2024, from https://www.icao.int/security/sfp/pages/securitymanual.aspx
• International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO). (2018). Safety management manual (SMM) (Doc 9859, 4th ed.).
• International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO). (2022). Annex 19: Safety management (4th ed.).
• Jiang, X., & Hao, P. (2024). Hub airport end-around taxiway construction planning development: A review. Applied Sciences, 14(8), 3500.
• Kanki, B. G., Helmreich, R. L., & Anca, J. (2019). Crew resource management. Academic Press.
• Krivonos, P. D. (2005). Communication in aircraft cabin safety: Lessons learned and lessons required. Presented at the 22nd Annual International Cabin Safety Symposium, Universal City, California. Retrieved October 31, 2024, from https://www.ukfsc.co.uk/files/Safety Briefings _ Presentations/Cabin - Comms in Aircraft Cabin Safety Oct 2011.pdf
• Liu, B., Xu, Q., Xin, X., Cui, X., Ji, M., & You, X. (2022). How can proactive personality affect cabin attendants’ safety behaviors? The moderating roles of social support and safety climate. International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics, 29(2), 243–253.
• Punch, K. F. (2013). Introduction to social research: Quantitative and qualitative approaches. Sage.
• Reason, J. (2016). Managing the risks of organizational accidents. Routledge.
• Simaiakis, I., Khadilkar, H., Balakrishnan, H., Reynolds, T. G., & Hansman, R. J. (2014). Demonstration of reduced airport congestion through push-back rate control. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 66, 251–267.
• SHGM [Sivil Havacılık Genel Müdürlüğü - Directorate General of Civil Aviation]. (2013, July 2). Kabin içi el bagajları direktifi. Retrieved December 8, 2024, from https://web.shgm.gov.tr/documents/sivilhavacilik/files/mevzuat/sektorel/direktifler/kabin_ici_el_bagajlari_ direktifi.pdf
• Skybrary. (2024). Emergency procedures during taxi operations. Retrieved December 29, 2024, from https://skybrary.aero/articles/taxiing
• Sun, J., Tang, X., & Shao, Q. (2024). A collision risk assessment method for aircraft on the apron based on Petri nets. Applied Sciences, 14(19), 9128.
• Taherdoost, H. (2021). A review on risk management in information systems: Risk policy, control and fraud detection. Electronics, 10(24), 3065.
• USAFacts Team. (2023, December 19). Is flying safer than driving? USAFacts. Retrieved October 31, 2024, from https://usafacts.org/articles/is-flying-safer-than-driving/
• Watnick, M., & Ianniello, J. W. (1992, October). Airport movement area safety system. In [1992] Proceedings IEEE/AIAA 11th Digital Avionics Systems Conference (pp. 549–552). IEEE.
• Wiegmann, D. A., & Shappell, S. A. (2001). Human error analysis of commercial aviation accidents using the human factors analysis and classification system (HFACS) (No. DOT/FAA/AM-01/3). United States. Office of Aviation Medicine.
• Wilke, S., Majumdar, A., & Ochieng, W. Y. (2014). Airport surface operations: A holistic framework for operations modeling and risk management. Safety Science, 63, 18–33.
• Zimmermann, N., & Duffy, V. G. (2023). Systematic literature review of safety management systems in aviation maintenance operations. In Human-automation interaction (pp. 311–328). Springer.