Conceptual Boundaries Between Safety and Security in Aviation

Seda Çeken; Arif Tuncal

doi:10.30518/jav.1860487

Conceptual Boundaries Between Safety and Security in Aviation

Abstract

Aviation is a critical global industry where the prevention of harm is paramount. Aviation safety and security are both essential for sustainable operations, yet they represent conceptually distinct domains. Safety traditionally refers to the prevention of accidents and unintentional harm in flight operations, while security addresses protection against intentional acts of interference. The conceptual complexity of distinguishing safety from security has motivated investigation into how aviation professionals interpret these terms in practice. This study employed qualitative research to examine aviation professionals’ understandings of “safety” versus “security”. 82 participants provided open-ended written definitions of safety and security in an aviation context. Qualitative content analysis was used to identify recurring themes in these definitions. Coding was conducted using analyst triangulation, with multiple researchers independently coding the responses and subsequently reaching consensus on the thematic categories. The analysis mapped how participants differentiate the two concepts and where overlaps in meaning occur. Safety was described mainly as preventing accidents and incidents through proactive management of operational hazards that arise without hostile intent, including human error, technical failure, and environmental variability, with an emphasis on keeping risk at acceptable levels. Security was defined as protection against intentional threats, including unlawful interference, terrorism, sabotage, and unauthorized access. Intentionality functioned as the primary boundary between the concepts. Metaphors portrayed safety as continuous system support and security as defensive protection against intrusion. Limited overlap indicates a need for clearer terminology and scenario-based training that reinforces correct classification and response, especially in multilingual contexts.

Keywords

Ethical Statement

This study was approved by Ethical Committee of International Science & Technology University (Decision No. 202505-01 dated May 14, 2025). All participants gave their informed consent before taking part in the study.

References

Ale, B. (2009). Risk: An introduction—The concepts of risk. Routledge.
Ateş, S. S., Uzgör, M., & Yüksek, K. (2022). UAV tracking module proposal based on a regulative comparison between manned and unmanned aviation. Journal of Airline and Airport Management, 12(1), 29-47.
Barbour, R. S. (2001). Checklists for improving rigour in qualitative research: a case of the tail wagging the dog?. Bmj, 322(7294), 1115-1117.
Bureau of Enquiry and Analysis for Civil Aviation Safety [BEA]. (2016). Final report: Accident on 24 March 2015 at Prads-Haute-Bléone (Alpes-de-Haute-Provence, France) to the Airbus A320-211 registered D-AIPX operated by Germanwings (Flight GWI18G) (Report No. BEA2015-0125.en).
Bieder, C., & Pettersen Gould, K. (2020). Exploring the Interrelations Between Safety and Security: Research and Management Challenges. In C. Bieder & K. Pettersen Gould (Eds.), The Coupling of Safety and Security: Exploring Interrelations in Theory and Practice (pp. 105–113). Springer.
Blokland, P. J., & Reniers, G. L. (2020). The Concepts of Risk, Safety, and Security: A Fundamental Exploration and Understanding of Similarities and Differences. In C. Bieder & K. Pettersen Gould (Eds.), The Coupling of Safety and Security: Exploring Interrelations in Theory and Practice (pp. 9–16). Springer.
Boholm, M., Möller, N., & Hansson, S. O. (2016). The concepts of risk, safety, and security: applications in everyday language. Risk analysis, 36(2), 320-338.
Bongiovanni, I. (2020). User Safety and Security Experience: Innovation Through Design-Inspired Methods in Airports. In C. Bieder & K. Pettersen Gould (Eds.), The Coupling of Safety and Security: Exploring Interrelations in Theory and Practice (pp. 53–61). Springer.

Brooks, D. J., & Coole, M. (2020). Divergence of Safety and Security. In C. Bieder & K. Pettersen Gould (Eds.), The Coupling of Safety and Security: Exploring Interrelations in Theory and Practice (pp. 63–73). Springer.
Costa, C. E. P. (2016). Estudo de termos simples e expressões fixas baseado em um corpus de segurança da aviação. Aviation in Focus-Journal of Aeronautical Sciences, 7(1), 4-12.
Eleimat, M., & Őszi, A. (2025). Cybersecurity in Aviation: Exploring the Significance, Applications, and Challenges of Cybersecurity in the Aviation Sector. Periodica Polytechnica Transportation Engineering, 53(2), 169-183.
Ge, J., Zhang, Y., Xu, K., Li, J., Yao, X., Wu, C., ... & Xu, Q. (2022). A new accident causation theory based on systems thinking and its systemic accident analysis method of work systems. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 158, 644-660.
Gerede, E. (2006). Havacılık Emniyeti ve Havacılık Güvenliği Kavramları Arasındaki İlişki ve Farkların Belirlenmesine Yönelik Bir Araştırma [A Survey to Determine the Relationship and Differences Between the Aviation Safety and Aviation Security Concepts]. Yönetim, 17(54), 26–37.
Halpin, S. N. (2024). Inter-coder agreement in qualitative coding: Considerations for its use. American Journal of Qualitative Research, 8(3), 23-43.
Hill, C. E., Knox, S., Thompson, B. J., Williams, E. N., Hess, S. A., & Ladany, N. (2005). Consensual qualitative research: An update. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 52(2), 196–205.
International Civil Aviation Organization [ICAO]. (2016). Annex 19 to the Convention on International Civil Aviation, Safety Management, Second Edition. Montréal, Quebec, Canada.
International Civil Aviation Organization [ICAO]. (2018). Doc 9859, Safety Management Manual (SMM), Fourth Edition, Montréal, Quebec, Canada.
International Civil Aviation Organization [ICAO]. (2022). Annex 17 to the Convention on International Civil Aviation, Aviation Security, Safeguarding International Civil Aviation against Acts of Unlawful Interference, Twelfth Edition. Montréal, Quebec, Canada.
International Civil Aviation Organization [ICAO]. (2025a). Doc 10004, Global Aviation Safety Plan, 2026-2028 Edition, Montréal, Quebec, Canada.
International Civil Aviation Organization [ICAO]. (2025b). Doc 10159, Safety Intelligence Manual, First Edition, Montréal, Quebec, Canada.
Jore, S. H. (2020). Security and Safety Culture—Dual or Distinct Phenomena? In C. Bieder & K. Pettersen Gould (Eds.), The Coupling of Safety and Security: Exploring Interrelations in Theory and Practice (pp. 43–51). Springer.
Klenka, M. (2019). Major incidents that shaped aviation security. Journal of Transportation Security, 12, 39–56.
Kriaa, S., Pietre-Cambacedes, L., Bouissou, M., & Halgand, Y. (2015). A survey of approaches combining safety and security for industrial control systems. Reliability engineering & system safety, 139, 156-178.
La Porte, T. R. (2020). Doing Safety … and then Security: Mixing Operational Challenges—Preparing to Be Surprised. In C. Bieder & K. Pettersen Gould (Eds.), The Coupling of Safety and Security: Exploring Interrelations in Theory and Practice (pp. 75–85). Springer.
Leveson, N. (2020). Safety and Security Are Two Sides of the Same Coin. In C. Bieder & K. Pettersen Gould (Eds.), The Coupling of Safety and Security: Exploring Interrelations in Theory and Practice (pp. 17–27). Springer.
Line, M. B., Nordland, O., Rostad, L., & Tondel, I. A. (2006). Safety vs. security? In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Probabilistic Safety Assessment & Management (PSAM). ASME Press.
Lykou, G., Anagnostopoulou, A., & Gritzalis, D. (2018). Smart airport cybersecurity: Threat mitigation and cyber resilience controls. Sensors, 19(1), 19.
Mayring, P. (2015). Qualitative Content Analysis: Theoretical Background and Procedures. In: Bikner-Ahsbahs, A., Knipping, C., Presmeg, N. (eds) Approaches to Qualitative Research in Mathematics Education. Advances in Mathematics Education. Springer, Dordrecht.
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.
National Transportation Safety Board [NTSB]. (2000). In-flight Breakup Over the Atlantic Ocean: Trans World Airlines Flight 800 Boeing 747-131, N93119 Near East Moriches, New York July 17, 1996, (Aircraft Accident Report No. NTSB/AAR-00/03).
Patton, M. Q. (2014). Qualitative research & evaluation methods: Integrating theory and practice. Sage publications.
Pettersen Gould, K., & Bieder, C., (2020). Safety and Security: The Challenges of Bringing Them Together. In C. Bieder & K. Pettersen Gould (Eds.), The Coupling of Safety and Security: Exploring Interrelations in Theory and Practice (pp. 1-8). Springer.
Pettersen, K. A., & Bjørnskau, T. (2015). Organizational contradictions between safety and security–Perceived challenges and ways of integrating critical infrastructure protection in civil aviation. Safety science, 71, 167- 177.
Pidgeon, N., & O'Leary, M. (2000). Man-made disasters: Why technology and organizations (sometimes) fail. Safety Science, 34(1-3), 15–30.
Piètre-Cambacédès, L., & Bouissou, M. (2013). Cross-fertilization between safety and security engineering. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 110, 110-126.
Piètre-Cambacédès, L., & Chaudet, C. (2010). The SEMA referential framework: Avoiding ambiguities in the terms “security” and “safety”. International Journal of Critical Infrastructure Protection, 3(2), 55–66.
Raj, P., & Raman, A. C. (2017). The Internet of Things: Enabling technologies, platforms, and use cases. Auerbach Publications.
Reason, J. (2016). Managing the risks of organizational accidents. Routledge.
Sampigethaya, K., Poovendran, R., Shetty, S., Davis, T., & Royalty, C. (2011). Future e-enabled aircraft communications and security: The next 20 years and beyond. Proceedings of the IEEE, 99(11), 2040-2055.
Schreier, M. (2012). Qualitative content analysis in practice. SAGE Publications.
Schulman, P. R. (2020). Safety and Security: Managerial Tensions and Synergies. In C. Bieder & K. Pettersen Gould (Eds.), The Coupling of Safety and Security: Exploring Interrelations in Theory and Practice (pp. 87–95). Springer.
Shah, I. A., Jhanjhi, N. Z., & Brohi, S. (2024). Cybersecurity issues and challenges in civil aviation security. Cybersecurity in the Transportation Industry, 1-23.
Smith, C., & Brooks, D. J. (2012). Security science: The theory and practice of security. Butterworth-Heinemann.
Stolzer, A. J., Sumwalt, R. L., & Goglia, J. J. (2023). Safety management systems in aviation. CRC Press.
Stonkus, S. (2024). The Uncertainty of Aviation Safety and Aviation Security in Relation to Human Rights: Philosophical Aspects of Legal Definitions. Filosofija. Sociologija, 35(2), 73–84.
Stroeve, S., Smeltink, J., & Kirwan, B. (2022). Assessing and advancing safety management in aviation. Safety, 8(2), 20.
Strohmeier, M., Schäfer, M., Smith, M., Lenders, V., & Martinovic, I. (2016, May). Assessing the impact of aviation security on cyber power. In 2016 8th International Conference on Cyber Conflict (CyCon) (pp. 223-241). IEEE.
Tutkun, A. (2023). Havalimanlarının kara tarafında güvenlik (pp. 111–128). In M. M. Başdemir & C. M. Bükeç (Eds.), Küresel havacılık güvenliğine stratejik bakış. Nobel Bilimsel Eserler.
Uzgör, M., Semercioglu, H., & Aydoğan, K. (2024). An Assessment of Factors Influencing Airline Disruption Management Decisions Through R-SWARA Method. Uluslararası Beşeri ve Sosyal Bilimler İnceleme Dergisi, 8(2), 108-117.
Virissimo, M. C. G., & Vaz-Ferreira, L. V. (2023). Synergies and Tensions Between Safety and Security in Civil Aviation. Campos Neutrais: Revista Latino-Americana de Relações Internacionais, 5(3), 76–88.
Wilson, V. (2014). Research methods: Triangulation. Evidence Based Library and Information Practice, 9(1), 74– 75.
Wipf, H. (2020). Safety Versus Security in Aviation. In C. Bieder & K. Pettersen Gould (Eds.), The Coupling of Safety and Security: Exploring Interrelations in Theory and Practice (pp. 29–41). Springer.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Public Transport

Journal Section

Research Article

Authors

Seda Çeken ^*
0000-0002-5870-2246
Türkiye

Arif Tuncal
0000-0003-4343-6261
Türkiye

Early Pub Date

February 27, 2026

Publication Date

February 27, 2026

Submission Date

January 10, 2026

Acceptance Date

February 17, 2026

Published in Issue

Year 2026 Volume: 10 Number: 1

DOI

https://doi.org/10.30518/jav.1860487

IZ

https://izlik.org/JA39ZW59YA

Cite

RIS / Bibtex

APA

Çeken, S., & Tuncal, A. (2026). Conceptual Boundaries Between Safety and Security in Aviation. Journal of Aviation, 10(1), 166-175. https://doi.org/10.30518/jav.1860487

AMA

1.Çeken S, Tuncal A. Conceptual Boundaries Between Safety and Security in Aviation. JAV. 2026;10(1):166-175. doi:10.30518/jav.1860487

Chicago

Çeken, Seda, and Arif Tuncal. 2026. “Conceptual Boundaries Between Safety and Security in Aviation”. Journal of Aviation 10 (1): 166-75. https://doi.org/10.30518/jav.1860487.

EndNote

Çeken S, Tuncal A (February 1, 2026) Conceptual Boundaries Between Safety and Security in Aviation. Journal of Aviation 10 1 166–175.

IEEE

[1]S. Çeken and A. Tuncal, “Conceptual Boundaries Between Safety and Security in Aviation”, JAV, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 166–175, Feb. 2026, doi: 10.30518/jav.1860487.

ISNAD

Çeken, Seda - Tuncal, Arif. “Conceptual Boundaries Between Safety and Security in Aviation”. Journal of Aviation 10/1 (February 1, 2026): 166-175. https://doi.org/10.30518/jav.1860487.

JAMA

1.Çeken S, Tuncal A. Conceptual Boundaries Between Safety and Security in Aviation. JAV. 2026;10:166–175.

MLA

Çeken, Seda, and Arif Tuncal. “Conceptual Boundaries Between Safety and Security in Aviation”. Journal of Aviation, vol. 10, no. 1, Feb. 2026, pp. 166-75, doi:10.30518/jav.1860487.

Vancouver

1.Seda Çeken, Arif Tuncal. Conceptual Boundaries Between Safety and Security in Aviation. JAV. 2026 Feb. 1;10(1):166-75. doi:10.30518/jav.1860487