The Mediating Role of Occupational Stress in the Impact of Digital Leadership on Open Innovation Capability in the Aviation Sector

Year 2025, Volume: 9 Issue: 3, 658 - 668

Ethem Topçuoğlu , Onur Oktaysoy , Yaşar Şahin

https://doi.org/10.30518/jav.1717814

Abstract

In today's business world, where digitalization has become a strategic necessity, the impact of leadership styles on innovation capacity is becoming increasingly important. In particular, in the aviation industry, a sector characterized by low error tolerance and high information intensity, digital leaders must not only possess the ability to implement technology but also the competence to steer organizational innovation processes and manage employees' stress levels. In this context, the primary objective of this study is to empirically investigate how digital leadership influences open innovation capability and to examine the potential mediating role of occupational stress experienced by employees in this relationship. The study sample, which employs quantitative research methods, consists of 407 participants working in the aviation sector in Türkiye. The data obtained through the survey method were analyzed using structural equation modeling with the Smart-PLS 4.1.1 program. The findings indicate that digital leadership has a direct positive effect on open innovation capability and that occupational stress plays a partial mediating role in this relationship. These findings indicate that digital transformation processes should focus not only on technology but also on human resource strategies. The study presents a unique conceptual framework within the triangle of digital leadership, open innovation, and occupational stress, highlighting the impact of leadership on innovative and psychological outcomes in high-risk sectors such as aviation.

Keywords

Digital leadership , Open innovation capability , Occupational stress , Aviation sector

Ethical Statement

To document the scientific and ethical principles of the study, approval was obtained from the Giresun University Social Sciences Ethics Committee on May 28, 2025, with the reference number 06/336.

References

• Benitez, J., Arenas, A., Castillo, A., & Esteves, J. (2022). Impact of digital leadership capability on innovation performance: The role of platform digitization capability. Information & Management, 59(2), Article 2.
• Bogers, M., Chesbrough, H., Heaton, S., & Teece, D. J. (2019). Strategic Management of Open Innovation: A Dynamic Capabilities Perspective. California Management Review, 62(1), 77–94.
• Borah, P. S., Iqbal, S., & Akhtar, S. (2022). Linking social media usage and SME’s sustainable performance: The role of digital leadership and innovation capabilities. Technology in Society, 68, 101900.
• Bregenzer, A., & Jimenez, P. (2021). Risk Factors and Leadership in a Digitalized Working World and Their Effects on Employees’ Stress and Resources: Web-Based Questionnaire Study. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 23(3), e24906.
• Bunce, D., & and West, M. (1994). Changing work environments: Innovative coping responses to occupational stress. Work & Stress, 8(4), 319–331.
• Byrne, B. M. (2016). Structural Equation Modeling With AMOS: Basic Concepts, Applications, and Programming (3rd ed.). Routledge.
• Cepeda, J., & Arias-Pérez, J. (2018). Information technology capabilities and organizational agility: The mediating effects of open innovation capabilities. Multinational Business Review, 27(2), 198–216. Chen, P. Y. (2023). Occupational Stress. Hogrefe Publishing.
• Cochran, W. G. (1977). Sampling Techniques (3rd ed.). John Wiley & Sons.
• Cui, F., & Song, J. (2022). Impact of Entrepreneurship on Innovation Performance of Chinese SMEs: Focusing on the Mediating Effect of Enterprise Dynamic Capability and Organizational Innovation Environment. Sustainability, 14(19), Article 19.
• Ertiö, T., Eriksson, T., Rowan, W., & McCarthy, S. (2024). The role of digital leaders’ emotional intelligence in mitigating employee technostress. Business Horizons, 67(4), 399–409.
• Fatima, T., Masood, A., Majeed, M., & Ali, M. U. (2021). Impact Of Digital Leadership On Open Innovation: A Moderating Serial Mediation Model. Academy of Management Proceedings, 2021(1), 13398.
• Finkel, A., Fougea, G., & Roux, S. (2025). An Automata-Based Method to Formalize Psychological Theories: The Case Study of Lazarus and Folkman’s Stress Theory. 204–215. https://www.scitepress.org/Link.aspx? doi=10.5220/0013175400003896
• Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50.
• Habicht, H., Möslein, K. M., & Reichwald, R. (2012). Open Innovation Maturity. International Journal of Knowledge-Based Organizations (IJKBO), 2(1), 92–111.
• Hadi, N. U., & Ali, I. (2025). Exploring the unknowns of international open innovation and international dynamic capabilities on the speed of innovation and firm international performance: A strategic view. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 10(2), 100683.
• Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2017). A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (2.Ed.). SAGE Publications.
• Han, S., Lyu, Y., Ji, R., Zhu, Y., Su, J., & Bao, L. (2020). Open innovation, network embeddedness and incremental innovation capability. Management Decision, 58(12), 2655–2680.
• Haq, I., Haque, A., Kaur, H., & a Rahim, N. (2024). Occupational Stress affecting Innovative Capabilities and Innovative Work Behavior of Migrant Entrepreneurs. Polish Journal of Management Studies, 29, 238–253.
• Haque, A. ul, & Yamoah, F. A. (2021). The Role of Ethical Leadership in Managing Occupational Stress to Promote Innovative Work Behaviour: A Cross-Cultural Management Perspective. Sustainability, 13(17), Article 17.
• Hart, P. M., & Cooper, C. L. (2002). Occupational stress: Toward a more integrated framework. In Handbook of industrial, work and organizational psychology, Volume 2: Organizational psychology (pp. 93–114). Sage Publications, Inc.
• Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance- based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1), 115–135.
• ICAO. (2024). Digitalization in aviation: Tackling the challenges. https://www.icao.int/Meetings/InnovationFair2024/Documents/Presentations/Session-3-Digitalization-in- aviation-tackling-the-challenges.pdf
• Jovanović, J., Lazaridis, K., & Stefanović, V. (2006). Theoretical approaches to problem of occupational stress. Acta Facultatis Medicae Naissensis, 23(3), 163–169.
• Karasek, R. A. (1979). Job Demands, Job Decision Latitude, and Mental Strain: Implications for Job Redesign. Administrative Science Quarterly, 24(2), 285–308.
• Kaygin, E., Kavak, O., & Topcuoglu, E. (2023). Heavy work investment and its premises. International Journal of Management Studies, 30(1), 63–92.
• Kinnunen-Amoroso, M., & Liira, J. (2013). Management of work-related stress by Finnish occupational physicians. Occupational Medicine, 63(5), 361–364.
• Lazarenko, Y., Garafonova, O., Marhasova, V., Tkalenko, N., & Grigashkina, S. (2019). Managing Organizational Open Innovation Capability in a Knowledge-Intensive Business Environment. MATEC Web of Conferences, 297, 07002.
• Luis, D. J., Ruth, C.-J., & Zhuofan, Z. (2020). Does Stress Lead to Creativity? The Relationship Between Occupational Stress and Individual Innovative Behavior. Studies in Business and Economics, 15(1), 21–30.
• Ly, B. (2024). The Interplay of Digital Transformational Leadership, Organizational Agility, and Digital Transformation. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 15(1), 4408–4427.
• Majumdarr, S., Dasgupta, S. A., Hassan, Y., Behl, A., & Pereira, V. (2024). Linking digital transformational leadership, symmetrical internal communication with innovation capability: A moderated mediation model. Journal of Knowledge Management, ahead-of-print(ahead-of-print).
• Malik, U. M., Ullah*, D. J., Gul, D. S., Bangash, S. A., Khan, Z. A., & Ikram, M. (2025). Occupational Stress, Mental Health and Employee Performances in Small Medium Enterprises. Social Science Review Archives, 3(1), Article 1.
• Marcatto, F., Blas, L. D., & Ferrante, D. (2023). Diagnostic Utility of the Perceived Occupational Stress Scale. European Journal of Psychological Assessment.
• Nagano, H. (2020). The growth of knowledge through the resource-based view. Management Decision, 58, 98–111.
• Newton, C. J., & Bish, A. (2013). Proximal and Distal Levels of Leader Vision: A Stress Buffering Perspective. Academy of Management Proceedings, 2013(1), 11780.
• Oktaysoy, O., Topcuoglu, E., & Kaygin, E. (2022). A Study on Digital Leadership Scale Adaptation. International Journal of Organizational Leadership, 11(4), 407–425.
• Ordu, A., & Nayır, F. (2021). Dijital Liderlik Nedir? Bir Tanım Önerisi. e-Uluslararası Eğitim Araştırmaları Dergisi, 12(3), 68–81.
• Ramakrishnan, S., Mutum, D. S., Chit, M. M., & Wong, M. S. (2024). Occupational stress as a mediator between organisational intelligence traits and digital government service quality: A triangulation design approach. Journal of Service Theory and Practice, 34(6), 787–821.
• Rich, S. (2016). A brief examination of the effects of occupational stress on creativity and innovation. The Psychologist-Manager Journal, 19(2), 107–121.
• Ringle, C. M., Silva, D. da, & Bido, D. de S. (2014). Modelagem de Equações Estruturais com Utilização do Smartpls. ReMark - Revista Brasileira de Marketing, 13(2), Article 2.
• Sağbaş, M., & Erdoğan, F. A. (2022). Digital Leadership: A Systematic Conceptual Literature Review. İstanbul Kent Üniversitesi İnsan ve Toplum Bilimleri Dergisi, 3(1), Article 1.
• Sagbas, M., Oktaysoy, O., Topcuoglu, E., Kaygin, E., & Erdogan, F. A. (2023). The Mediating Role of Innovative Behavior on the Effect of Digital Leadership on Intrapreneurship Intention and Job Performance. Behavioral Sciences, 13(10), Article 10.
• Sarstedt, M., Hair, J. F., Pick, M., Liengaard, B. D., Radomir, L., & Ringle, C. M. (2022). Progress in partial least squares structural equation modeling use in marketing research in the last decade. Psychology & Marketing, 39(5), 1035–1064.
• Shi, X., & Zhang, Q. (2018). Inbound open innovation and radical innovation capability: The moderating role of organizational inertia. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 31(3), 581–597.
• Siegrist, J. (1996). Adverse health effects of high-effort/low-reward conditions. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 1(1), 27–41.
• Thakre, N., & Barua, P. (2015). Occupational Stress, Job Satisfaction and Job Involvement Amongst Organizational Employees. Indian Journal of Mental Health (IJMH), 3, 79.
• Topcuoglu, E., Kobanoglu, M. S., Kaygın, E., Karafakıoglu, E., Erdogan, S. U., Torun, B. T., & Oktaysoy, O. (2023). The improving role of digital leadership in the impact of social loafing on job performance. International Journal of Organizational Leadership, 12(1), Article 1.
• Topçuoğlu, E., Oktaysoy, O., Erdoğan, S. U., & Karatepe, S. G. (2023). İşsizlik ve Girişimcilik Kavramlarına Bibliyometrik Bakış. İşletme Araştırmaları Dergisi, 15(2), Article 2.
• Tran, Q. H. N. (2024). Investigate the relationship between leadership behaviours, organisational commitment, occupational stress and organisational citizenship behaviours in Vietnamese private business school libraries. Library Management, 45(1/2), 101–117.
• Tsai, F.-S., Cabrilo, S., Chou, H.-H., Hu, F., & Tang, A. D. (2022). Open innovation and SME performance: The roles of reverse knowledge sharing and stakeholder relationships. Journal of Business Research, 148, 433–443.
• Turan-Torun, B., Oktaysoy, O., Kobanoglu, M. S., Topcuoglu, E., Yenikaya, M. A., Topcuoglu, V., & Uygungil- Erdogan, S. (2025). Identification of heavy work investment antecedents: A research on digital leadership. Frontiers in Psychology, 16, 1588412.
• Uygungil-Erdogan, S., Şahin, Y., Sökmen-Alaca, A. İ., Oktaysoy, O., Altıntaş, M., & Topçuoğlu, V. (2025). Assessing the Effect of Artificial Intelligence Anxiety on Turnover Intention: The Mediating Role of Quiet Quitting in Turkish Small and Medium Enterprises. Behavioral Sciences, 15(3), Article 3.
• Vanni, K., Syvanen, A., & Viteli, J. (2024). Relationship between Digital Stress and Innovation Capacity. Human Factors, Business Management and Society, 135(135).
• Vasantha, S., & Santhi, R. (2020). Relationship between Occupational Stress and Resilience. Indian Journal of Public Health Research & Development, 11(3), 615–620.
• Wang, G., Mansor, Z. D., & Leong, Y. C. (2024). Linking digital leadership and employee digital performance in SMEs in China: The chain-mediating role of high-involvement human resource management practice and employee dynamic capability. Heliyon, 10(16), e36026.
• Xu, Y., Liao, C., Huang, L., Li, Z., Xiao, H., & Pan, Y. (2024). The positive side of stress: Investigating the impact of challenge stressors on innovative behavior in higher education. Acta Psychologica, 246, 104255.
• Yao, J., Crupi, A., Minin, A. D., & Zhang, X. (2020). Knowledge sharing and technological innovation capabilities of Chinese software SMEs. Journal of Knowledge Management, 24(3), 607–634.
• Yavan, Ö., & Pekkaya, M. (2017). Mesleki streste etkili ana faktörlerin önem derecelerinin belirlenmesi: Bir üniversitede uygulama. Uluslararası Yönetim İktisat ve İşletme Dergisi, 13(13), Article 13.
• Yazıcıoğlu, Y., & Erdoğan, S. (2014). SPSS uygulamalı bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri (4th ed.). Detay Yayıncılık.
• Yelkencıoglu, I., & Yuksel, A. H. (2022). Occupational stress and mindfulness: An empirical study. Journal of Business Economics and Finance, 11(2), Article 2.
• Yordam Dağıstan, S., Erol, G., & Düşmezkalender, E. (2024). Mesleki Damgalama, Öznel İyi Oluş ve Mesleki Stres Arasındaki İlişki: Otel Çalışanları Üzerine Araştırma. Journal of Tourism and Gastronomy Studies, 12, 2817–2835.
• Zeike, S., Bradbury, K., Lindert, L., & Pfaff, H. (2019). Digital Leadership Skills and Associations with Psychological Well-Being. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16(14), Article 14.
• Zhu, J., Zhang, B., Xie, M., & Cao, Q. (2022). Digital leadership and employee creativity: The role of employee job crafting and person-organization fit. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 827057.