An Analysis of Commercial Aircraft Accidents Using the Human Factors Analysis and Classification System (HFACS): The Case of The United States

Year 2025, Volume: 9 Issue: 3, 703 - 713, 19.10.2025

Münevver Aycel Kaya , Didem Göçmen

https://doi.org/10.30518/jav.1729542

Abstract

A significant portion of aviation accidents is attributed to human factors, highlighting the need for comprehensive and systematic analyses in this field. This study examines 57 scheduled commercial aircraft accidents that occurred in the United States between 2020 and 2024 using the Human Factors Analysis and Classification System (HFACS) framework, with the aim of evaluating the contributing human factors in a multi-layered manner. The research demonstrates that human errors are not solely the result of individual performance deficiencies but also stem from systemic, managerial, and organizational shortcomings. The study utilizes official accident reports from the United States National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB), analysed through content and descriptive analysis techniques. Only accidents involving turbofan-powered fixed-wing aircraft engaged in scheduled passenger transportation were included. NTSB reports are considered highly reliable primary sources due to their comprehensive analysis of technical, operational, and human factors related to aviation incidents. Based on 207 coding conducted according to the HFACS model, human errors were analysed across four levels: unsafe acts, preconditions for unsafe acts, supervisory factors, and organizational influences. The analysis revealed that the most frequently observed human errors were related to decision-making and perception, primarily resulting from cognitive limitations, information deficiencies, and inadequate situational awareness. Environmental factors such as turbulence and technological shortcomings were also identified as direct threats to operational safety. Furthermore, operational planning errors, the neglect of safety priorities, dysfunctional procedures, and insufficient resource management were highlighted as indirect contributors stemming from managerial and organizational deficiencies. The findings emphasize the necessity of developing accident prevention strategies not only at the individual level but also across organizational and systemic levels.

Keywords

Aviation Safety , Human Factors , HFACS , Aircraft Accident , NTSB Reports

References

• Avcı, F., & Ercan, S. (2022). Türk Sivil Havacılık Kazalarının HFACS Modeliyle Değerlendirilmesi (2003–2017). Hava cılık Emniyeti ve İnsan Faktörleri Dergisi, 7(1), 58–75.
• Baber, E. (2007). İnsan faktörü analizi ve sınıflandırma sistemi (HFACS) ve kara havacılık kazalarına uygulanabilirliği (Yüksek Lisans Tezi). Gazi Üniversitesi, Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü
• Bilbro, J. (2013). An inter-rater comparison of DOD human factors analysis and classification system (HFACS) and human factors analysis and classification system maritime (HFACS-M) (Doctoral dissertation, Monterey, California: Naval Postgraduate School).
• CASA. (2014c). SMS 6 – SMS for aviation – A practical guide: Safety policy and objectives (2nd ed.). CASA. https://www.casa.gov.au/sites/default/files/2021-06/safety-management-systems-book-6-human- factors.pdf
• de Hoyos, J. U. (2019). Human Factor in Military Aviation Accidents: A Resume of 31 USAF accidents extracted from Accident Investigation Board public reports https://openlibrary.org/books/OL33881833M/Human_Factor_in_Military_Aviation_Accidents
• Deaton, J. E., & Morrison, J. G. (2010). Aviation research and development: A framework for the effective practice of human factors, or “What your mentor never told you about a career in human factors…”. In J. A. Wise, V. D. Hopkin & D. J. Garland (Eds.), Handbook of Aviation Human Factors (2nd ed.,]). Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
• Demirhan, Y. (2024). Ticari uçak kazalarının HFACS modeli ile incelenmesi ve EYS açısından değerlendirilmesi (Yüksek Lisans Tezi). Türk Hava Kurumu Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü.
• Dönmez, K. (2018). 21. yüzyıl havacılık olaylarında operasyon organizasyon ilişkisi: İnsan faktörleri analiz ve sınıflandırma sistemi uygulaması (Yüksek Lisans Tezi). Anadolu Üniversitesi, Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü.
• Dönmez, K., & Uslu, S. (2018). İnsan faktörleri analiz ve sınıflandırma sistemi’nin (HFACS) literatürde yaygın kullanımının değerlendirilmesi. Journal of Aviation, 2(2), 156–176.
• Endsley, M. R. (1995). Toward a theory of situation awareness in dynamic systems. Human Factors, 37(1), 32– 64.
• Ergai, A. (2013). Assessment of the Human Factors Analysis and Classification System (HFACS): Intrarater and inter-rater reliability, Clemson University.
• Griffin, T., Young, M., & Stanton, N. (2015). Human factors models for aviation accident analysis and prevention. Ashgate Publishing Limited.
• Heinrich, H. (1931). Industrial accident prevention: A scientific approach. McGraw Hill.
• Hollnagel, E. (2012). FRAM: The functional resonance analysis method: Modelling complex socio-technical systems. Ashgate.
• ICAO. (1993). Investigation of human factors in accidents and incidents (Human Factors Digest No. 7; Circular 240-AN/144). Montreal, Canada: International Civil Aviation Organization.
• ICAO. (2010). Manual of Aircraft Accident and Incident Investigation (Doc 9756). Montreal, Canada: International Civil Aviation Organization.
• ICAO. (2014). Human factors training manual (3rd ed., Doc 9683). Montreal, Canada: ICAO.
• ICAO. (2018). Safety management manual (SMM) (4th ed., Doc 9859). Montreal, Canada: ICAO.
• Işıldak, B., Keleş, M. K., & Özdağoğlu, A. (2021). Sivil havacılıkta uçak kazalarının analizi: Türkiye örneği. 14. Uluslararası Güncel Araştırmalarla Sosyal Bilimler Kongresi Tam Metin Kitabı (ss. 1430-1444)
• Karataş, Z. (2015). Sosyal bilimlerde araştırma yöntemleri. Manevi Temelli Sosyal Hizmet Araştırmaları Dergisi, 1(1), 63–64, 72–73.
• Kılıc, B., & Gümüş, E. (2020). Application of HFACS to the nighttime aviation accidents and incidents. Journal of Aviation, 4(2), 10-16.
• Kılıc, B., & Gundogdu, S. (2020). Human factors in air cargo operations: An analysis using HFACS. Journal of Aviation Research, 2(2), 101-114.
• Kızıltepe, N. (2021). Analysis of human factors in aircraft accidents: The case of the USA (Master’s thesis). İbn Haldun University, İstanbul.
• Kharoufah, H., Murray, J., Baxter, G., & Wild, G. (2018). A review of human factors causations in commercial air transport accidents and incidents: From to 2000–2016. Progress in Aerospace Sciences, 99, 1-13. :
• Leveson, N. G. (2003). A new accident model for engineering safer systems. Safety Science. Elsevier.
• Li, W.-C., Harris, D., & Yu, C.-S. (2008). Routes to failure: Analysis of 41 civil aviation accidents from the Republic of China using the Human Factors Analysis and Classification System. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 40(2), 426–434.
• Liu, Q., Li, F., Ng, K. K., Han, J., & Feng, S. (2025). Accident investigation via LLMs reasoning: HFACS-guided Chain-of-Thoughts enhance general aviation safety. Expert Systems with Applications, 269, 126422.
• Maurino, D. (2017). Why SMS: An introduction and overview of safety management systems. ITF Discussion Paper 2017.16. https://www.itf-oecd.org/sites/default/files/whysms.pdf
• Meng, B., & Lu, N. (2022). A Hybrid Model Integrating HFACS and BN for Analyzing Human Factors in CFIT Accidents. Aerospace, 9(11),711.
• Özdemir, M. (2010). Nitel veri analizi: Sosyal bilimlerde yöntembilim sorunsalı üzerine bir çalışma. Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 11(1), 327–336.
• Patriarca, R., Di Gravio, G., Woltjer, R., Costantino, F., Praetorius, G., Ferreira, P., & Hollnagel, E. (2020). Framing the FRAM: A literature review on the Functional Resonance Analysis Method. Safety Science, 129, 104827.
• Reason, J. (1997). Managing the risks of organizational accidents. Ashgate.
• Reason, J. T. (1990). Human error. Cambridge University Press.
• Safety Institute of Australia. (2012). Models of causation: Safety. Safety Institute of Australia Ltd.
• Tamer, Ş. (2021). Havacılıkta insan faktörünün uçak kazalarına etkisinin incelenmesi: Tenerife uçak kazası örneği (Yüksek lisans tezi, İstanbul Gelişim Üniversitesi, Lisansüstü Eğitim Enstitüsü,
• Terzioğlu, M. (2007). Uçak kazalarının nedeni olarak insan hatalarını azaltmada ekip kaynak yönetimi (Master's thesis, Dokuz Eylul Universitesi (Turkey):
• Shappell, S. A., & Wiegmann, D. A. (1997a). A human error approach to accident investigation: The taxonomy of unsafe operations. International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 7, 269–291.
• Shappell, S. A., & Wiegmann, D. A. (1997b). Why would an experienced aviator fly a perfectly good aircraft into the ground? In Proceedings of the Ninth International Symposium on Aviation Psychology (pp. 26–32). The Ohio State University.
• Shappell, S. A., & Wiegmann, D. A. (2000). The Human Factors Analysis and Classification System--HFACS. , (). Retrieved from https://commons.erau.edu/publication/737
• Shappell, S. A., & Wiegmann, D. A. (2001). Applying the human factors analysis and classification system (HFACS) to the analysis of commercial aviation accident data. In Proceedings of the 11th International Symposium on Aviation Psychology (pp. 679–684). Columbus, OH: The Ohio State University.
• Shappell, S., & Wiegmann, D. (2009). A methodology for assessing safety programs targeting human error in aviation. International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 19, 252–269.
• Shappell, S., Detwiler, C., Holcomb, K., Hackworth, C., Boquet, A., & Wiegmann, D. A. (2007). Human error and commercial aviation accidents: An analysis using the human factors analysis and classification system. Human Factors, 49(2), 227–242.
• Shappell, S., Wiegmann, D., Fraser, J., Gregory, G., Kinsey, P., & Squier, H. (1999b). Beyond mishap rates: A human factors analysis of U.S. Navy/Marine Corps TACAIR and rotary wing mishaps using HFACS. Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine, 70, 416–417.
• SIA. (2012).Safety Institute of Australia. Models of causation: Safety. In The core body of knowledge for generalist OHS professionals. Tullamarine, VIC, Australia.
• Stolzer, A. J., & Goglia, J. J. (2016). Safety management systems in aviation (2nd ed.). Ashgate.
• Tavşancıl, E., & Aslan, E. (2001). İçerik analizi ve uygulama örnekleri. İstanbul: Epsilon Yayıncılık.
• Von Thaden, T. L., Wiegmann, D. A., & Shappell, S. A. (2006). Organizational Factors in Commercial Aviation Accidents. The International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 16(3), 239–261.
• Wiegmann, D. A., & Shappell, S. A. (2001). A human error analysis of commercial aviation accidents using the Human Factors Analysis and Classification System (HFACS). International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 11(4), 357–370.
• Wiegmann, D. A., & Shappell, S. A. (2003). A human error approach to aviation accident analysis: The human factors analysis and classification system. Ashgate.
• Wiegmann, D. A., Faaborg, T., Boquet, A., & Detwiler, C. (2005). Human error and general aviation accidents: A comprehensive, fine-grained analysis using HFACS. FAA Civil Aerospace Medical Institute Report.
• Xiong, C., Beckmann, V., & Tan, R. (2018). Effects of infrastructure on land use and land cover change (LUCC): the case of Hangzhou International Airport, China. Sustainability, 10(6), 2013.
• Yeşilbaş, V., & Cotter, T. S. (2014). Structural analysis of HFACS in unmanned and manned air vehicles. In Proceedings of the International Annual Conference of the American Society for Engineering Management (ASEM) (pp. 1–10). American Society for Engineering Management.https://www.researchgate.net/publication/336851769