Pre-Radiology Dental Students' Ability to Recognize Anatomical Landmarks on Panoramic Radiography

Abstract

Pre-Radiology Dental Students' Ability to Recognize Anatomical Landmarks on Panoramic Radiography

Abstract

Purpose: In dentistry, panoramic radiography is frequently utilized as a primary diagnostic tool due to its ability to visualize the normal and abnormal anatomy of the jawbones. This study aims to evaluate whether the ability of first and second-year dental students, who have not received radiographic training, to identify anatomically significant points relevant to their profession changes when using illustrations versus panoramic radiographic images. Material and Methods: The study involved the participation of 127 students from the Faculty of Dentistry. Twenty-four different anatomical structures significant in dental practice were marked using different numbers on panoramic radiographs and atlas images. Students were first asked to write down the numbers they believed corresponded to the anatomical structures on the panoramic image, and then on the atlas image. Results: On average, 61.21% of the anatomical points on the atlas image were correctly identified. The most frequently misidentified structures were the articular tubercle, mastoid cellulae, and gnathion. The average accuracy rate for identifying anatomical points on the panoramic image was 48.13%. The molar III. tooth, dens canini, and pulp were the most accurately identified structures. Conclusion: Our study found that dental students correctly identified many significant anatomical structures and points in the oral and maxillofacial region. For anatomical points with lower accuracy rates, active learning methods should be developed in addition to traditional education.

Keywords

• Dentistry
• panoramic radiography
• anatomy
• education

References

1. Miller L, Tonascia J, Awan OA. Augmenting Medical Student Education: A Radiology Resident Perspective. Academic Radiology 2023;30(1):140-141.
2. Isaac O, Awan OA. Global Medical Education and Its Value to Radiology. Academic Radiology 2023; 30(10):2222-2224.
3. Farmakis SG, Chertoff JD, Straus CM, Barth RA. Perspective: mandatory radiology education for medical students. Academic Radiology 2023; 30(7):1500-1510.
4. Sivarajah RT, Curci NE, Johnson EM, Lam DL, Lee JT, Richardson ML. A review of innovative teaching methods. Academic Radiology 2019; 26(1):101-113.
5. Cheng FC, Tang LH, Lee KJ, Lin YT, Yang FH, Chen MH, Chiang CP. A survey of the dental radiology course designed for dentist continuing education in Taiwan. Journal of Dental Sciences 2023;18(3):1354-1360.
6. Yeung AWK, Tanaka R, Jacobs R, Bornstein MM. Awareness and practice of 2D and 3D diagnostic imaging among dentists in Hong Kong. British dental journal 2020;228(9):701-709.
7. Yeung AWK, Wong NS M. Reject rates of radiographic images in Dentomaxillofacial radiology: a literature review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 2021;18(15):8076.
8. Yeung AWK. Content analysis of YouTube videos on radiographic anatomy on dental panoramic images. Healthcare 2022;10(8):1382.

9. Suomalainen A, Pakbaznejad Esmaeili E, Robinson S. Dentomaxillofacial imaging with panoramic views and cone beam CT. Insights into imaging 2015;6:1-16.
10. Keskin A, Çiçekcibaşı AE, Açar G, Mağat G. Position of the mandibular foramen in relation to the occlusal plane in children with skeletal class malocclusion. Eur J Anat 2023;28:2.
11. Çulhaoğlu AK, Kılıçarslan MA, Denız KZ. Diş hekimliğinde uzmanlik sinavinin farkli eğitim seviyelerdeki algi ve tercih durumlarinin değerlendirilmesi. Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi 2021;31(3):420-426.
12. Field JC, Walmsley A, Paganelli C, McLoughlin J, Szep S, Kavadella A, Levy G. The graduating European dentist: contemporaneous methods of teaching, learning and assessment in dental undergraduate education. European journal of dental education 2017;21(Suppl 1):28-35.
13. Hassan N, Akhter R, Al‐Aubaidy H, Flatau A. Undergraduate dental students' perceptions of head and neck anatomy teaching in Australia. European journal of dental education 2018; 22(3): e337-e342.
14. İlgüy D, İlgüy M, Dölekoğlu ZS, Ersan APN, Fişekçioğlu E. Evaluation of radiological anatomy knowledge among dental students. Yeditepe Dental journal 2017;13(3):31-36.
15. Maeda N, Hosoki H, Yoshida M, Suito H, Honda E. Dental students' levels of understanding normal panoramic anatomy. Journal of Dental Sciences 2018;13(4):374-377.
16. Savoldi F, Yeung AW, Tanaka R, Mohammad Zadeh LS, Montalvao C, Bornstein MM, Tsoi JK. Dry skulls and cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) for teaching orofacial bone anatomy to undergraduate dental students. Anatomical Sciences Education 2021;14(1):62-70.
17. Razi T, Deljavan AS. The Comparison of learning radiographic extraoral landmarks through two methods. Advances in Bioscience and Clinical Medicine 2017;5(1):16-24.
18. Estai M, Bunt S. Best teaching practices in anatomy education: A critical review. Annals of Anatomy-Anatomischer Anzeiger 2016;208:151-157.
19. Garg A, Norman GR, Spero L, Maheshwari P. Do virtual computer models hinder anatomy learning? Academic Medicine 1999;74(10):S87-89.
20. Alsufyani N, Alnamlah S, Mutaieb S, Alageel R, AlQarni M, Bukhari A, Faden A. Virtual reality simulation of panoramic radiographic anatomy for dental students. Journal of Dental Education 2023;87(8):1200-1209.
21. Duyan Yüksel H. Diş Hekimliği Öğrencilerinin Radyolojik Anatomi Bilgi Düzeylerinin Konik Işınlı Bilgisayarlı Tomografi Kullanılarak Değerlendirilmesi, UDEG 2. Uluslararası Diş Hekimliği Eğitimi Kongresi, Ankara, Turkey 2024; pp.1
22. Ertuğrul ZM, Şendişçi R, Alkış HT. Diş Hekimlerinin Panoramik Radyografi Üzerinde Anatomik Noktaları Değerlendirmedeki Bilgi Düzeylerinin Araştırılması. Akdeniz Diş Hekimliği Dergisi 2023;2(1): 29-33.
23. Kaplan TT, Yıldız Y. Evaluation of Knowledge Levels of Undergraduate and Postgraduate Dentists Concerning Anatomical Landmarks on Panoramic Radiography. Unika Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi 2024;4(1):671-681.
24. Abdulrahman A, Abdulmajeed A. Evaluation of undergraduate dental student radiographic interpretation in Qassim University. Int J Dent Med Res 2014;1(4):1-5.