Comparison of Different 18S rRNA Primers with Conventional PCR Methods in Determination of Plasmodium spp. and Evaluation of Nested PCR Method

Abstract

Purpose: In this study, our objective was to develop a conventional PCR method in our laboratory to support microscopy and rapid diagnostic tests in routine diagnosis of malaria. For this purpose, by comparing two different primer sets, it was aimed to determine which primer set gave better results in diagnosis and to use this primer set in future studies.Methods: Microscopic examination is the gold standard for diagnosis of Plasmodium infections. The sensitivity and specificity of conventional PCR method, which was based on two different primer sets with a common gene region, were calculated. Afterward, nested PCR were performed for species differentiation using PCR products obtained with both primer pairs.Results: 165 of 168 blood samples 98.21% , which were microscopically Plasmodium vivax positive, were also positive with rPLU1, rPLU5 primers. Furthermore, 163 of these samples 97.02% were also positive with rPLU5, rPLU6 primers.In addition, to evaluate whether the method detected all species, PCR was carried out with all species positive samples for both primer pairs. Comparison with microscopic examination showed that sensitivity and specificity of rPLU1 and rPLU5 primer pairs were 98.21% and 100%, respectively while sensitivity and specificity of rPLU5 and rPLU6 primer pairs were 97.02% and 100%, respectively. We found a perfect consistency between microscopy and PCR results with both primer sets.Conclusion: Although there was no significant difference between two primer pairs, which provided better results for cases required a conventional first step PCR method during routine laboratory practice, we decided to prefer rPLU1 and rPLU5 primer pair

Keywords

• Conventional PCR,nested PCR,Plasmodium spp.,18S rRNA primers

References

1. Li P, Zhao Z, Wang Y, et al. Nested PCR detection of malaria directly using blood filter paper samples from epidemiological surveys. Malar J 2014;13:1–6. [CrossRef]
2. Phuong M, Lau R, Ralevski F, Boggild AK. Sequence-based optimization of a quantitative real-time PCR assay for detection of Plasmodium ovale and Plasmodium malariae. J Clin Microbiol 2014;52:1068–1073. [CrossRef]
3. Alver O, Ener B. Bursa’da 2013–2014 yılları arasında sıtma epidemiyolojisi. Turk Hij Den Biyol Derg 2018;75:37–42. https://www. journalagent.com/turkhijyen/pdfs/THDBD_75_1_37_42.pdf
4. Perandin F, Manca N, Calderaro A, et al. Development of a real-time PCR assay for detection of Plasmodium falciparum, Plasmodium vivax, and Plasmodium ovale for routine clinical diagnosis. J Clin Microbiol 2004;42:1214–1219. [CrossRef]
5. Lau YL, Lai MY, Anthony CN, et al. Comparison of three molecular methods for the detection and speciation of five human Plasmodium species. Am J Trop Med Hyg 2015;92:28–33. [CrossRef]
6. Iqbal A, Mushtaq R, Hussain F, Saleem M, Naz M, Maqsood B. Comparison of conventional and PCR based detection of Plasmodium falciparum and Plasmodium vivax infections in human blood. J Adv Biol 2013;3:248–252. [CrossRef]
7. Singh B, Bobogare A, Cox-Singh J, Snounou G, Abdullah MS, Rahman HA. A genus- and species-specific nested polymerase chain reaction malaria detection assay for epidemiologic studies. Am J Trop Med Hyg 1999;60:687–692. [CrossRef]
8. GraphPad© Software, 2018. Quantify agreement with kappa. https:// www.graphpad.com/quickcalcs/kappa1/?K=12

9. Gözükara Bağ HG, Karabulut E, Alpar CR. 2X2 gözlü tablolarda gözlemciler/gözlemler arası uyumun değerlendirilmesi. Hacettepe Diş Hek Fak Derg 2010;34:46–52. http://www.dishekdergi.hacettepe. edu.tr/htdergi/makaleler/20101-2makale-06.pdf
10. Landis JR, Koch GG, The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 1977;33:159–174. [CrossRef]
11. Shahwani Z, Aleem A, Ahmed N, Mushtaq M, Afridi S. A PCR method based on 18S rRNA gene for detection of malaria parasite in Balochistan. J Pak Med Assoc 2016;66:1587–1591. https://jpma.org. pk/article-details/8008?article_id=8008
12. Chew CH, Lim YAL, Lee PC, Mahmud R, Chu KH. Hexaplex PCR detection system for identification of five human Plasmodium species with an internal control. J Clin Microbiol 2012;50:4012–4019. [CrossRef]
13. Pakalapati D, Garg S, Middha S, et al. Comparative evaluation of microscopy, OptiMAL and 18S rRNA gene based multiplex PCR for detection of Plasmodium falciparum and Plasmodium vivax from field isolates of Bikaner, India. Asian Pac J Trop Med 2013;6:346–351. [CrossRef]
14. Genc A, Eroglu F, Koltas IS. Detection of Plasmodium vivax by nested PCR and real-time PCR. Korean J Parasitol 2010;48:99–103. [CrossRef]
15. Yentur Doni N, Yildiz Zeyrek F, Seyrek A. Detection of Plasmodium using filter paper and nested PCR for patients with malaria in Sanliurfa, in Turkey. Malar J 2016;15:1–8. [CrossRef]
16. Rodulfo H, De Donato M, Mora R, González L, Contreras CE. Comparison of the diagnosis of malaria by microscopy, ımmunochromatography and PCR in endemic areas of Venezuela. Braz J Med Biol Res 2007;40:535–543. [CrossRef]
17. Han TZ, Han KT, Aye KH, Hlaing T, Thant KZ, Vythilingam I. Comparison of microscopy and PCR for the detection of human Plasmodium species and Plasmodium knowlesi in Southern Myanmar. Asian Pac J Trop Biomed 2017;7:680–685. [CrossRef]
18. Richardson DC, Ciach M, Zhong KJY, Crandall I, Kain KC. Evaluation of the Makromed dipstick assay versus PCR for diagnosis of Plasmodium falciparum malaria in returned travelers. J Clin Microbiol 2002;40:4528–4530. [CrossRef]
19. Puri B, Mehta P, Ingole N, Prasad P, Mathure T. Laboratory tests for malaria: a diagnostic conundrum? S Afr Med J 2013;103:625–627. [CrossRef]
20. Boonma P, Christensen PR, Suwanarusk R, Price RN, Russel B, Lek- Uthai U. Comparison of three molecular methods for the detection and speciation of Plasmodium vivax and Plasmodium falciparum. Malar J 2007;6:124. [CrossRef]
21. Al-Harthi SA. Comparison of a genus-specific conventional PCR and a species-specific nested-PCR for malaria diagnosis using FTA collected samples from Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. J Egypt Soc Parasitol 2015;45:457–466. [CrossRef]
22. MCM Couto, AP Sudre, MF Lima, TCB Bomfim. Comparison of techniques for DNA extraction and agarose gel staining of DNA fragments using samples of Cryptosporidium. Vet Med-Czech 2013;58:535–542. [CrossRef]
23. Echeverry DF, Deason NA, Davidson J, et al. Human malaria diagnosis using a single-step direct-PCR based on the Plasmodium cytochrome oxidase IIII gene. Malar J 2016;15:128. [CrossRef]
24. Anthony C, Mahmud R, Lau YL, Syedomar SF, Sri La Sri Ponnampalavanar S. Comparison of two nested PCR methods for the detection of human malaria. Trop Biomed 2013;30:459–466. http:// www.msptm.org/files/459_-_466_Lau_YL.pdf
25. Vincent OO, Ikeh E, Obisakin F. Comparison of nested PCR and conventional analysis of Plasmodium parasites in Kano, Nigeria. Eur J Clin Biomed Sci 2017;3:85–90. [CrossRef]