The Effect of Crossfit Cindy Model on Anthropometric and Physiological Characteristics in Sedentary Women

Year 2022, Volume: 6 Issue: 2, 597 - 607, 31.05.2022

Mehmet Söyler , Raif Zileli

https://doi.org/10.30621/jbachs.1063232

Cited By: 1

Abstract

CrossFit training models considering sedentary women have not been sufficiently examined. This study aims to examine the effects of the 16-week CrossFit Cindy training model on some physical and physiological fitness parameters. Participants are chosen among sedentary women who are members of a sports center. Fifteen healthy, sedentary women (average of age 39.87±8.21 years, height average 164.07±9.16 cm, body weight average 87.40±12.05 kg, and BMI average 30.71±4.79 kg/m2) who are members of a sports center voluntarily participated in this study. Participants were given CrossFit training (Cindy Model) for 90 minutes a day, 4 days a week for 16 weeks. Participants' body composition, cardiovascular fitness and physical physiological fitness parameters were measured at the beginning and at the end of the exercise period. For the analysis of the data obtained, SPSS 23 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) was used. Paired Sample T Test was used in the analysis of all parameters. Statistical significance was accepted as p< 0.05. Positive changes were observed in long-term regular CrossFit Cindy model training among sedentary women in terms of body composition, resting heart rate, strength and flexibility values (p<0.05). It can be concluded that CrossFit Cindy model training for 90 minutes, 4 days a week for 16 weeks can be used as an alternative to the traditional training methods as it causes positive changes in the physical/physiological parameters of women.

Keywords

crossfit, cindy method, complex training, anaerobıc training

References

• 1. Flegal, K.M., Kruszon-Moran, D., Carroll, M.D., Fryar, C.D., & Ogden, C.L. (2016). Trends in obesity among adults in the United States, 2005 to 2014. JAMA, 315, 2284–2291. doi: https://doi.org/ 10.1001/jama.2016.6458.
• 2. Sobrero, G., Arnett, S., Schafer, M., Stone, W., Tolbert, T.A., Salyer-Funk, A., et al. (2017). A comparison of high intensity functional training and circuit training on health and performance variables in women: A pilot study. Women Sport Phys. Act. J. 25, 1–10. doi: https://doi.org/10.1123/wspaj.2015-0035
• 3. Kalapotharakos, V.I., Tokmakidis, S.P., Smilios, I., Michalopoulos, M., Gliatis, J. & Godolias, G. (2005). Resistance training in older women: effect on vertical jump and functional performance. J Sports Med Phys Fitness, 45(4), 570-575. PMID: 16446692.
• 4. Dönmez, G. & Aydos, L. (2000). The effect of calisthenic exercise on physical and physiological parameters middle aged sedantery women. Gazi journal of Physical Education and Sport Science, 5(2), 17-25. Available at: https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/gbesbd/issue/27964/299550
• 5. Cox, L.C., Burke, V., & Morton, A.R. (2001). Long-term effects of exercise on blood pressure and lipids in healthy woman aged 40-65 years: The sedentary women exercise adherence trial (Sweat). Journal of Hypertension, 19(10), pp. 1733-1743. doi: https://doi.org/ 10.1097/00004872-200110000-00006.
• 6. Guthold, R., Stevens, G.A., Riley, L.M., Bull, F.C. (2020). Global trends in insufficient physical activity among adolescents: a pooled analysis of 298 population-based surveys with 1•6 million participants. Lancet Child Adolesc Health. 4(1), 23-35. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S2352-4642(19)30323-2
• 7. Arcury, T.A., Snively, B.M., Bell, R.A., Smith, S. L., Stafford, J.M., Wetmore-Arkader, L.K. & Quandt, S.A. (2006). Physical activity among rural older adults with diabetes. The Journal of rural health: official journal of the American Rural Health Association and the National Rural Health Care Association. 22(2), 164–168. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-0361.2006.00026.x
• 8. Trilk, J.L, Singhal, A, Bigelman, K.A., & Cureton, K.J. (2011). Effect of sprint interval training on circulatory function during exercise in sedentary, overweight/obese women. Eur J Appl Physiol, 111: 1591–1597. doi: https://doi.org/ 10.1007/s00421-010-1777-z.
• 9. Gillen, J. B. and Gibala, M.J. (2014). Is high-intensity interval training a time efficient exercise strategy to improve health and fitness? Appl Physiol Nutr Metab, 39(3), 409-412. doi: https://doi.org/10.1139/apnm-2013-0187
• 10. Skelly, L.E., Andrews, P.C., Gillen, J.B., Martin, B.J., Percival, M.E. & Gibala, M.J. (2014). High-intensity interval exercise induces 24-h energy expenditure similar to traditional endurance exercise despite reduced time commitment. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab, 39(7), 845-848. doi: https://doi.org/ 10.1139/apnm-2013-0562