Adolescent Food Parenting Questionnaire: Evaluation Of Turkish Psychometric Properties of Parent And Adolescent Versions

Year 2024, Volume: 8 Issue: 3, 550 - 561, 30.09.2024

Dilek Demir Kösem , Şenay Demir , Murat Bektaş , İlknur Bektaş , Çiğdem Müge Haylı , Neşe Ataman Bor , Maaike Koning

https://doi.org/10.30621/jbachs.1378019

Abstract

Purpose: This study aimed to adapt the "Adolescent Food Parenting Questionnaire: Parent and Adolescent Version" into Turkish and conduct validity and reliability studies.
Material and Methods: The research was carried out in methodological type and was carried out with 337 adolescents aged 12-16 years and their parents between June to September 2022. Data were collected with the Child and Parent Information Form and Adolescent Food Parent Questionnaire. Content validity, construct validity, internal consistency reliability, and item analysis were used to determine the questionnaire’s psychometric properties.
Results: Both parent and adolescent versions of the Adolescent Food Parenting Questionnaire contain 16 items. The results of the exploratory factor analysis determined that the five-factor structure explained 50.45% of the total Variance for the parent version and 63.31% of the total Variance for the adolescent version. In addition, item factor loads for the parent version ranged from 0.32 to 0.71, while item factor loads for the adolescent version ranged from 0.37 to 0.75. As a result of confirmatory factor analysis, the goodness of fit values of the parent version were χ2/sd=2.030, RMSEA=0.055, GFI=0.94, CFI=0.95, IFI=0.95, RFI=0.87, NFI=0.90, TLI =0.93, and the adolescent version were χ2/sd=1.672, RMSEA = 0.045, GFI = 0.95, CFI = 0.96, IFI = 0.96, RFI = 0.88, NFI = 0.91, and TLI = 0.95. The Cronbach alpha value for the entire parent version was 0.86, and the Cronbach alpha values for all sub-dimensions were determined to vary between 0.60 and 0.84. The adolescent version’s overall cronbach alpha was determined to be 0.88, and the adolescent version’s sub-dimension Cronbach alpha values were discovered to vary between 0.63 and 0.841.
Conclusion: As a result of the research, it was determined that the "Adolescent Food Parenting Questionnaire: Parent and Adolescent Version" is a valid and reliable measurement tool to be used specifically for Turkish society.

Keywords

Adolescent, food parenting practices, nutrition, validity, reliability

Ethical Statement

Ethical approval was obtained from Hakkari University Scientific Research and Publication Ethics Committee (Date no: 02/06/2022, Decision No:2022/58-1) before starting the research practice.

References

• Norris SA, Frongillo EA, Black MM, et al. Nutrition in adolescent growth and development. Lancet 2022;399(10320):172-184.
• Dallacker M, Hertwig R, Mata J. The frequency of family meals and nutritional health in children: a meta-analysis. Obes Rev 2018;19(5):638-653.
• Gevers DW, Kremers SP, de Vries NK, van Assema P. Clarifying concepts of food parenting practices. A Delphi study with an application to snacking behavior. Appetite 2014;79:51-57.
• Ferris KA, Babskie E, Metzger A. Associations Between Food-Related Parenting Behaviors and Adolescents’ Engagement in Unhealthy Eating Behaviors. Int J Aging Hum Dev 2017;84(3):231-246.
• Vaughn AE, Ward DS, Fisher JO, et al. Fundamental constructs in food parenting practices: a content map to guide future research. Nutr Rev 2016;74(2):98-117.
• Yee AZ, Lwin MO, Ho SS. The influence of parental practices on child promotive and preventive food consumption behaviors: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 2017;14(1):47.
• Mann KD, Howe LD, Basterfield L, et al. Longitudinal study of the associations between change in sedentary behavior and change in adiposity during childhood and adolescence: Gateshead Millennium Study. Int J Obes (Lond) 2017;41(7):1042-1047.
• Ogden CL, Carroll MD, Lawman HG, et al. Trends in obesity prevalence among children and adolescents in the United States, 1988-1994 through 2013-2014. JAMA 2016;315(21):2292-2299.
• Mitchell GL, Farrow C, Haycraft E, Meyer C. Parental influences on children’s eating behaviour and characteristics of successful parent-focussed interventions. Appetite 2013;60(1):85-94.
• Larsen JK, Hermans RC, Sleddens EF, Engels RC, Fisher JO, Kremers SP. How parental dietary behavior and food parenting practices affect children’s dietary behavior. Interacting sources of influence? Appetite 2015;89:246-257.
• Daniels LA, Mallan KM, Battistutta D, et al. Child eating behavior outcomes of an early feeding intervention to reduce risk indicators for child obesity: the NOURISH RCT. Obesity (Silver Spring) 2014;22(5):E104-E111.
• Koning M, de Jong A, de Jong E, Visscher TLS, Seidell JC, Renders CM. Agreement between parent and child report of physical activity, sedentary and dietary behaviours in 9-12-year-old children and associations with children’s weight status. BMC Psychol 2018;6(1):14.
• Rollins BY, Loken E, Savage JS, Birch LL. Maternal controlling feeding practices and girls’ inhibitory control interact to predict changes in BMI and eating in the absence of hunger from 5 to 7 y. Am J Clin Nutr 2014;99(2):249-257.
• Reicks M, Banna J, Anderson AK, et al. Development of parent and adolescent questionnaires to assess food parenting practices that address adolescent consumption during ındependent eating occasions. J Nutr Educ Behav 2020;52(3):307-313.
• Patrick H, Hennessy E, McSpadden K, Oh A. Parenting styles and practices in children’s obesogenic behaviors: scientific gaps and future research directions. Child Obes 2013;9 Suppl(Suppl 1):S73-S86.
• Zhang Y, Reyes Peralta A, Arellano Roldan Brazys P, Hurtado GA, Larson N, Reicks M. Development of a survey to assess Latino fathers’ parenting practices regarding energy balance-related behaviors of early adolescents. Health Educ Behav 2020;47(1):123-133.
• Koning M, Vink J, Notten N, Gevers D, Eisinga R, Larsen J. Development and preliminary validation of the Adolescent Food Parenting Questionnaire: Parent and adolescent version. Appetite 2021;167:105618.
• DeVellis RF. Scale development, theory and Applications. 4th ed. India, SAGE Publication Inc 2016:31-59.
• Jonhson B, Christensen L. Educational research: quantitative, qualitative, and mixed approaches. 3rd ed. California: SAGE Publication Inc 2014;190-222.
• Tabachnick, B.G., & Fidell, L.S. (2015). Using multivariate statistics (M. Baloğlu, Trans.), Ankara: Nobel Academic Publishing, pp.612-760. Ozdamar K. Scale and test development structural equation modeling. Ankara: Nisan Bookstore Publishing 2016;6-286.
• Karagöz Y. SPSS 23 and AMOS 23 applied statistical analysis. Ankara: Nobel Akademi Publishing 2016;878-940.
• Kartal M, Bardakçı S. Reliability and validity analysis with SPSS and AMOS applied examples. Turkey: Akademisyen Publishing 2018;1-192.
• Seçer I. Psychological test development and adaptation process; Spss and Lisrel applications. 2 nd ed. Ankara: Anı Publishing 2018;10-168.
• L Deslippe A, M O’Connor T, Brussoni M, C Mâsse L. The association of food parenting practices with adolescents’ dietary behaviors differ by youth gender, but not by parent gender. Appetite 2022;169:105846.
• Liu KSN, Chen JY, Ng MYC, Yeung MHY, Bedford LE, Lam CLK. How does the family influence adolescent eating habits in terms of knowledge, attitudes and practices? A global systematic review of qualitative studies. Nutrients 2021;13(11):3717.
• Gunther C, Reicks M, Banna J, et al. Food parenting practices that influence early adolescents’ food choices during independent eating occasions. J Nutr Educ Behav 2019;51(8):993-1002.
• Daly AN, O'Sullivan EJ, Kearney JM. Considerations for health and food choice in adolescents. Proc Nutr Soc 2022;81(1):75-86.
• Scaglioni S, De Cosmi V, Ciappolino V, Parazzini F, Brambilla P, Agostoni C. Factors influencing children's eating behaviours. Nutrients 2018;10(6):706.