Purpose- Cryptocurrency, which is one of the first products of blockchain technology, is preferred by more and more actors in addition to
traditional investment tools. One of the factors over demographic and psychological factors that affect the financial investment decisions
of individuals is gender. Although there are many studies in the academic literature on gender-related financial investment decisions, there
is no research and data on cryptocurrencies. In this study, the factors affecting cryptocurrency investments are examined within the
context of gender.
Methodology- Survey model was used as a quantitative research method. With the computer aided survey research conductd in Turkey,
gender-related behavioral and psychological differences in cryptocurrency investments were revealed and the survey findings were
discussed over the information obtained from the literature review.
Findings- With this research, it was seen that the gender factor was associated with both psychological and demographic factors.
Cryptocurrencies are in the top 5 in men's financial investment instruments portfolio while 32.6 percent of women invest in
cryptocurrencies. The level of knowledge about cryptocurrencies, which is effective in investment preferences, is at medium and high level
at the rate of 64 percent for men however 60 percent of women have very limited or no knowledge about this investment tool. The first
two of the factors that affect cryptocurrency investment decisions which are confidence and volatility also differ in terms of rank and
proportion. Age-related cryptocurrency investment preferences do not differ by gender. This study shows that men follow their
investments more frequently than women and do not avoid taking risks.
Conclusion- With this research, gender-based main preference differences in cryptocurrency investments are revealed and an important
resource is provided in this field, which has limited research, and contributes to the literature. It has been observed that women prefer
different investment tools primarily due to lower income and lower level of knowledge about cryptocurrencies. Factors showing similarity
based on gender were also found by this research.
Primary Language | English |
---|---|
Subjects | Economics, Finance, Business Administration |
Journal Section | Articles |
Authors | |
Publication Date | December 31, 2021 |
Published in Issue | Year 2021 |
Journal of Business, Economics and Finance (JBEF) is a scientific, academic, double blind peer-reviewed, quarterly and open-access journal. The publication language is English. The journal publishes four issues a year. The issuing months are March, June, September and December. The journal aims to provide a research source for all practitioners, policy makers and researchers working in the areas of business, economics and finance. The Editor of JBEF invites all manuscripts that that cover theoretical and/or applied researches on topics related to the interest areas of the Journal. JBEF charges no submission or publication fee.
Ethics
Policy - JBEF applies the standards of
Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE). JBEF is committed to the academic
community ensuring ethics and quality of manuscripts in publications.
Plagiarism is strictly forbidden and the manuscripts found to be plagiarized
will not be accepted or if published will be removed from the publication. Authors
must certify that their manuscripts are their original work. Plagiarism,
duplicate, data fabrication and redundant publications are forbidden. The
manuscripts are subject to plagiarism check by iThenticate or similar. All manuscript submissions must provide a similarity report (up to 15% excluding quotes, bibliography, abstract, method).
Open Access - All research articles published in PressAcademia Journals are fully open access; immediately freely available to read, download and share. Articles are published under the terms of a Creative Commons license which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Open access is a property of individual works, not necessarily journals or publishers. Community standards, rather than copyright law, will continue to provide the mechanism for enforcement of proper attribution and responsible use of the published work, as they do now.