Research Article

DID WALGREENS AND RITE AID BENEFIT FROM THEIR 2017 DEAL?

Volume: 11 Number: 4 December 31, 2022
  • Khamis M. Bılbeısı *
  • C. R. Narayanaswamy

DID WALGREENS AND RITE AID BENEFIT FROM THEIR 2017 DEAL?

Abstract

Purpose- After several attempts that extended over two years, in 2017 the U.S. Federal Trade Commission approved Walgreens’ proposal to buy nearly half of Rite Aid stores. The two companies were in the same line of business making the merger fall in the category of horizontal mergers. The main benefits of horizontal mergers are cost savings from improved operational efficiency and superior bargaining power with respect to suppliers. Using annual financial statements, we examined the performance of Walgreens and Rite Aid over the four-year period since the acquisition of Rite Aid stores by Walgreens. The examination is useful because the Federal Trade Commission was not in favor of Walgreens’ earlier proposal to merge completely with Rite Aid, but later allowed it to buy almost half of Rite Aid stores. The present study examines whether the revised proposal benefitted both Walgreens and Rite Aid. Methodology- We collected annual financial statement data of the two companies from Mergent database and analyzed the common size statements and the relevant financial ratios. Findings- Analysis of profitability ratios indicate profit margins (gross as well as net) continued to decrease for both companies even after the acquisition. Both companies showed improved operational effeciency as reflected in Inventory turnover and employee productivity, but Walgreens had a superior performance. Conclusion- Only four years have passed since Walgreens acquired Rite Aid stores. Our analysis of the limited data indicates that Walgreen seems to have benefitted more from the deal. Rite Aid, by selling about 46% of its stores to Walgreens in 2017, became a much smaller company. The smaller size did not affect the cost of inventory or financing, but its profitability did not improve.

Keywords

References

  1. Agarwal, P., Mittal, R. (2014). MERGERS AND ACQUISITIONS ANALYSIS WITH THE CASE STUDY METHOD. International Journal of Management and Commerce Innovations. ISSN 2348-7875 (Online). Vol. 2 Issue 1 236-244. April 2104 Available at www.researchpublish.com
  2. Avkiran, A. K. (1999). The evidence of efficiency gains: The role of mergers and benefits to the public. Journal of Banking & Finance (1999), 23, 991-1013.
  3. Bilbeisi, K. M., Narayanaswamy, C. R., Dinh, C. (2018). WAS THE DOLLAR TREE – FAMILY DOLLAR MERGER SYNERGIC?: FINANCIAL STATEMENTS ANALYSIS . Journal of Business Economics and Finance, 7 (2) , 148-155 . DOI: 10.17261/Pressacademia.2018.837
  4. Cabanda, E., Pajara-Pascual, M. (2007). Mergers in the Philippines: Evidence in the Corporate Performance of William, Gothong, and Aboitiz (WG&A) Shipping Companies. Journal of Business Case Studies, 3 (4), 266-278.
  5. CVS. (2022). Our history https://www.cvshealth.com/about-cvs-health/our-purpose/our-history
  6. Fraser, L.M., Ormiston, A. (2001). Understanding financial statements, Sixth Edition, Pearson Education, Prentice Hall.
  7. Gottfried, M., Grant, C. (2017). Rite Aid Stock Crashes into the Drugstore Bargain Bin. The Wall Street Journal, New York, N.Y., 30 June 2017.
  8. Harrison Jr. W. T., Horngren, C. T. (2008). Financial Accounting seventh edition, Pearson / Prentice Hall © 2008.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Economics, Finance, Business Administration

Journal Section

Research Article

Authors

Khamis M. Bılbeısı * This is me
0000-0002-0907-9582
United States

C. R. Narayanaswamy This is me
0000-0003-2877-0333
United States

Publication Date

December 31, 2022

Submission Date

September 24, 2022

Acceptance Date

November 29, 2022

Published in Issue

Year 2022 Volume: 11 Number: 4

APA
Bılbeısı, K. M., & Narayanaswamy, C. R. (2022). DID WALGREENS AND RITE AID BENEFIT FROM THEIR 2017 DEAL? Journal of Business Economics and Finance, 11(4), 185-194. https://izlik.org/JA29LT97ZD
AMA
1.Bılbeısı KM, Narayanaswamy CR. DID WALGREENS AND RITE AID BENEFIT FROM THEIR 2017 DEAL? JBEF. 2022;11(4):185-194. https://izlik.org/JA29LT97ZD
Chicago
Bılbeısı, Khamis M., and C. R. Narayanaswamy. 2022. “DID WALGREENS AND RITE AID BENEFIT FROM THEIR 2017 DEAL?”. Journal of Business Economics and Finance 11 (4): 185-94. https://izlik.org/JA29LT97ZD.
EndNote
Bılbeısı KM, Narayanaswamy CR (December 1, 2022) DID WALGREENS AND RITE AID BENEFIT FROM THEIR 2017 DEAL? Journal of Business Economics and Finance 11 4 185–194.
IEEE
[1]K. M. Bılbeısı and C. R. Narayanaswamy, “DID WALGREENS AND RITE AID BENEFIT FROM THEIR 2017 DEAL?”, JBEF, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 185–194, Dec. 2022, [Online]. Available: https://izlik.org/JA29LT97ZD
ISNAD
Bılbeısı, Khamis M. - Narayanaswamy, C. R. “DID WALGREENS AND RITE AID BENEFIT FROM THEIR 2017 DEAL?”. Journal of Business Economics and Finance 11/4 (December 1, 2022): 185-194. https://izlik.org/JA29LT97ZD.
JAMA
1.Bılbeısı KM, Narayanaswamy CR. DID WALGREENS AND RITE AID BENEFIT FROM THEIR 2017 DEAL? JBEF. 2022;11:185–194.
MLA
Bılbeısı, Khamis M., and C. R. Narayanaswamy. “DID WALGREENS AND RITE AID BENEFIT FROM THEIR 2017 DEAL?”. Journal of Business Economics and Finance, vol. 11, no. 4, Dec. 2022, pp. 185-94, https://izlik.org/JA29LT97ZD.
Vancouver
1.Khamis M. Bılbeısı, C. R. Narayanaswamy. DID WALGREENS AND RITE AID BENEFIT FROM THEIR 2017 DEAL? JBEF [Internet]. 2022 Dec. 1;11(4):185-94. Available from: https://izlik.org/JA29LT97ZD

Journal of Business, Economics and Finance (JBEF) is a scientific, academic, double blind peer-reviewed, semi-annual and open-access journal. The publication language is English. The journal publishes 2 issues a year. The issuing months are June and December. The journal aims to provide a research source for all practitioners, policy makers and researchers working in the areas of business, economics and finance. The Editor of JBEF invites all manuscripts that that cover theoretical and/or applied researches on topics related to the interest areas of the Journal. JBEF charges no submission or publication fee.



Ethics Policy - JBEF applies the standards of Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE). JBEF is committed to the academic community ensuring ethics and quality of manuscripts in publications. Plagiarism is strictly forbidden and the manuscripts found to be plagiarized will not be accepted or if published will be removed from the publication. Authors must certify that their manuscripts are their original work. Plagiarism, duplicate, data fabrication and redundant publications are forbidden. The manuscripts are subject to plagiarism check by iThenticate or similar. All manuscript submissions must provide a similarity report (up to 15% excluding quotes, bibliography, abstract, method).


Open Access - All research articles published in PressAcademia Journals are fully open access; immediately freely available to read, download and share. Articles are published under the terms of a Creative Commons license which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Open access is a property of individual works, not necessarily journals or publishers. Community standards, rather than copyright law, will continue to provide the mechanism for enforcement of proper attribution and responsible use of the published work, as they do now.