Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

UNDERPRICING OF IPOS (INITIAL PUBLIC OFFERING) IN BORSA ISTANBUL: THE EFFECT OF COVID-19 PANDEMIC PERIOD

Year 2024, , 37 - 54, 03.06.2024

Alper Ataker Oktay Taş

https://doi.org/10.17261/Pressacademia.2024.1900

Abstract

Purpose- The research investigates the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on Initial Public Offering (IPO) mispricing in the Turkish IPO market from 2010 to 2022. The study aims to offer valuable insights into the behavior of IPOs during this period, aiding investors and issuers in understanding the effects of the pandemic on IPO pricing. The findings may empower stakeholders, including investors, regulators, and market participants, to make more informed decisions in times of market volatility and uncertainty.
Methodology- The study utilizes two methods, ordinary least squares (OLS) and quantile regression (QR), to analyze the impact of independent variables on IPO mispricing. OLS focuses on average effects, overlooking nuances in mispricing distribution. In contrast, QR allows the exploration of variable effects at different mispricing levels, accommodating the asymmetric distribution of returns. Employing QR helps identify specific impacts of variables on IPOs within distinct mispricing levels, addressing distribution heterogeneity observed in the sample. This robust approach enhances the study's ability to capture a more comprehensive understanding of the relationship between independent variables and IPO mispricing.
Findings- The study reveals a substantial increase in IPO mispricing during the COVID-19 period, attributed to factors like heightened asymmetric information, reduced IPO volume, and decreased demand. Notably, the impact extends beyond the pandemic period, indicating a lasting effect on IPO mispricing. Sector-specific effects are observed, with all sectors, except Consumer Non-Cyclicals, showing significance in first-day returns. However, for 1-year returns, only the Finance and Energy sectors exhibit significance, with the latter slightly exceeding the 10% limit.
Conclusion- The study provides robust evidence of increased IPO mispricing during the COVID-19 pandemic, highlighting the persistent impact of the crisis on financial markets, as well as sector-specific nuances influencing mispricing levels

Keywords

IPOs mispricing pandemic initial returns long-term returns

References

  • Autore, D. M., Boulton, T. J., Smart, S. B. & Zutter, C. J. (2014). The impact of institutional quality on initial public offerings. Journal of Economics and Business, 73(C), 65–96.
  • Baig, A. S., Butt, H. A., Haroon, O., & Rizvi, S. A. R. (2021). Deaths, panic, lockdowns, and US equity markets: The case of COVID-19 pandemic. Finance Research Letters, 38, 101701.
  • Baig, A. S., Butt, Mengxi, C. (2022). Did the COVID-19 pandemic (really) positively impact the IPO Market? An Analysis of information uncertainty. Finance Research Letters, 46, 102372.
  • Beatty, R. P., & Ritter, J. R. (1986). Investment banking, reputation, and the underpricing of initial public offerings. Journal of Financial Economics, 15(1–2), 213–232.
  • Bird, R. & Ajmal, H. (2016). Mispricing of Australian IPOs. JASSA: The Finsia Journal of Applied Finance, (1), 27-33.
  • Boulton, T. J., Smart, S. B. & Zutter, C. J. (2010). IPO underpricing and international corporate governance. Journal of International Business Studies, 41(2), 206–222.
  • Campbell, T. S. & Kracaw, W. A. (1980). Information production, market signaling, and the theory of financial intermediation. The Journal of Finance, 35(4), 863–882.
  • Chahine, S. and Filatotchev, I. (2008), The Effects of Information Disclosure and Board Independence on IPO Discount. Journal of Small Business Management, 46: 219-241.
  • Chang, H. H., Chen, A., Kao, L. & Wu, C. S. (2014). IPO price discovery efficiency under alternative regulatory constraints: Taiwan, Hong Kong, and the US. International Review of Economics & Finance, 29, 83–96.
  • Chao, Y., Jiaxin, W., Zhi, W., Kam, C. C. (2023), Do media connections help? Evidence from IPO pricing in China, Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 42(3), May-June 2023, 107075.
  • Chen, G., Firth, M. & Kim, J.-B. (2004). IPO underpricing in China’s new stock markets. Journal of Multinational Financial Management, 14(3), 283–302.
  • Durukan, M. B., (2006), 16 - IPO underpricing and ownership structure: Evidence from the Istanbul Stock Exchange, Editor(s): Greg N. Gregoriou, In Quantitative Finance, Initial Public Offerings, Butterworth-Heinemann.
  • Engelen, P. J. & van Essen, M. (2010). Underpricing of IPOs: Firm-, issue- and country-specific characteristics. Journal of Banking & Finance, 34(8), 1958–1969.
  • Esterling, E. (2022, January). Volatility in Perspective. Crestmont Research. https://www.crestmontresearch.com/docs/Stock-Volatility-Perspective.pdf [Date Accessed: August 4, 2023].
  • Gao, Y. (2010). What comprises IPO initial returns: Evidence from the Chinese market. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 18(1), 77–89.
  • Green, T.C., Jame, R. (2013), Company name fluency, investor recognition, and firm value. Journal of Financial Economics, 109 (2013), 813-834.
  • Grinblatt, M., & Hwang, C. Y. (1989). Signaling and the Pricing of New Issues. The Journal of Finance, 44(2), 393–420.
  • Guo, H. & Brooks, R. (2008). Underpricing of Chinese A-share IPOs and short-run underperformance under the approval system from 2001 to 2005. International Review of Financial Analysis, 17(5), 984–997.
  • Habib, M. A. & Ljungqvist, A. P. (2001). Underpricing and entrepreneurial wealth losses in IPOs: Theory and evidence. Review of Financial Studies, 14(2), 433–458.
  • Hamao, Y., Packer, F. & Ritter, J. R. (2000). Institutional affiliation and the role of venture capital: Evidence from initial public offerings in Japan. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 8(5), 529–558.
  • Hill, P. & Wilson, N. (2006). Value gains on flotation and IPO underpricing. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 33(9-10), 1435–1459.
  • Hopp, C. & Dreher, A. (2013). Do differences in institutional and legal environments explain cross-country variations in IPO underpricing? Applied Economics, 45(4), 435–454.
  • Husnan, S., Hanafi, M. M. & Munandar, M. (2014). Price stabilization and IPO underpricing: An empirical study in the Indonesian stock exchange. Journal of Indonesian Economy and Business, 29(2), 129.
  • Ibbotson, Roger G., (1975). Price performance of common stock new issues. Journal of Financial Economics. Volume:2 Issue:3, 235–272.
  • Naoshi, I. (2022), Optimism, divergence of investors’ opinions, and the long-run underperformance of IPOs, Journal of Financial Markets, Volume 64, 2023.
  • Ilbasmış, M. (2023), Underpricing and aftermarket performance of IPOs during the Covid-19 period: Evidence from Istanbul stock exchange, Borsa Istanbul Review, 23(3), 662-673.
  • Jamaani, F. & Abdullahi Dahir A. (2021), Modifier Effects of Country-level Transparency on Global Underpricing Difference: New Hierarchical Evidence, International Review of Financial Analysis, 74(C): 1016-1067.
  • Jelic, R., Saadouni, B. & Briston, R. (2001). Performance of Malaysian IPOs: Underwriters reputation and management earnings forecasts. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 9(5), 457–486.
  • Kiymaz, H., (2000), The initial and aftermarket performance of IPOs in an emerging market: evidence from Istanbul stock exchange, Journal of Multinational Financial Management, Volume 10, Issue 2, 213-227.
  • Kooli, M. & Suret, J. M. (2001). The underpricing of initial public offerings: Further Canadian Evidence. CIRANO Working Paper No. 2001-50. https://ideas.repec.org/p/cir/cirwor/2001s-50.html [Date Accessed: August 8, 2023].
  • Kucukkocaoglu, G., (2008), Underpricing in Turkiye: A Comparison of the IPO Methods, Money Macro and Finance (MMF) Research Group Conference 2006 8, Money Macro and Finance Research Group.
  • Lee, J. S. & Kuo, C. T. (2010). Determinants of high and low IPO initial returns: Evidence from Taiwan’s stock markets. Journal of Information and Optimization Sciences, 31(6), 1189–1207.
  • Lee, P. J., Taylor, S. L. & Walter, T. S. (1996). Australian IPO pricing in the short and long run. Journal of Banking & Finance, 20(7), 1189–1210.
  • Lin, H. L., Pukthuanthong, K. & Walker, T. J. (2013). An international look at the lawsuit avoidance hypothesis of IPO underpricing. Journal of Corporate Finance, 19, 56–77.
  • Ljungqvist, A. P. (1997). Pricing initial public offerings: Further evidence from Germany. European Economic Review, 41(7), 1309–1320.
  • Logue, D. E. (1973). On the Pricing of Unseasoned Equity Issues: 1965-1969. The Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 8(1), 91–103.
  • Loughran, T. & Ritter, J. R. (2002). Why don’t issuers get upset about leaving money on the table in IPOs? Review of Financial Studies, 15(2), 413–444.
  • McGuinness, P. (1992). An examination of the underpricing of initial public offerings in Hong Kong: 1980-90. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 19(2), 165–186.
  • Michaely, R. & Shaw, W. H. (1994). The pricing of initial public offerings: Tests of adverse-selection and signaling theories. Review of Financial Studies, 7(2), 279–319.
  • Miller, R. E. & Reilly, F. K. (1987). An examination of mispricing, returns, and uncertainty for initial public offerings, Financial Management, 16(2), 33–38.
  • Montone, M., van den Assem, M.J., Zwinkels, R.C.J. (2023), Company name fluency and stock returns. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, 39, 100819, September 2023.
  • Orhan, M., (2006), 4 - Short- and long-run performance of IPOs traded on the Istanbul Stock Exchange, Editor(s): Greg N. Gregoriou, In Quantitative Finance, Initial Public Offerings, Butterworth-Heinemann, 2006.
  • Ritter, J. R. (1984). The “Hot Issue” Market of 1980. The Journal of Business, 57(2), 215–240.
  • Rock, K., (1986). Why new issues are underpriced. Journal of Financial Economics Volume:15 Issues:1–2, 187–212.
  • Wang, C. (2005). Ownership and operating performance of Chinese IPOs. Journal of Banking & Finance, 29(7), 1835–1856.
  • Wang, S., Wang, P., Cebula, R.J., Foley, M. (2023), Board characteristics and IPO underpricing in China: The perspective of the moderating effect of venture capitalists, Finance Research Letters, 52, 103491.
  • Welch, I., (1996), Equity offerings following the IPO theory and evidence, Journal of Corporate Finance, Volume 2, Issue 3, 227-259.
  • Wu, S. (2023), Impact of serial entrepreneurs on IPO valuation: Evidence from U.S. IPOs, The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, 64, 101857.
  • Zaremba, A., Kizys, R., Aharon, D. Y., & Demir, E. (2020). Infected Markets: Novel Coronavirus, Government Interventions, and Stock Return Volatility around the Globe. Finance Research Letters, 35, 101597
There are 49 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Subjects Finance, Business Administration
Journal Section Articles
Authors

Alper Ataker This is me 0009-0001-3049-203X

Oktay Taş This is me 0000-0002-7570-549X

Publication Date June 3, 2024
Submission Date January 21, 2024
Acceptance Date May 19, 2024
Published in Issue Year 2024

Cite

APA Ataker, A., & Taş, O. (2024). UNDERPRICING OF IPOS (INITIAL PUBLIC OFFERING) IN BORSA ISTANBUL: THE EFFECT OF COVID-19 PANDEMIC PERIOD. Journal of Business Economics and Finance, 13(1), 37-54. https://doi.org/10.17261/Pressacademia.2024.1900

Journal of Business, Economics and Finance (JBEF) is a scientific, academic, double blind peer-reviewed, quarterly and open-access journal. The publication language is English. The journal publishes four issues a year. The issuing months are March, June, September and December. The journal aims to provide a research source for all practitioners, policy makers and researchers working in the areas of business, economics and finance. The Editor of JBEF invites all manuscripts that that cover theoretical and/or applied researches on topics related to the interest areas of the Journal. JBEF charges no submission or publication fee.



Ethics Policy - JBEF applies the standards of Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE). JBEF is committed to the academic community ensuring ethics and quality of manuscripts in publications. Plagiarism is strictly forbidden and the manuscripts found to be plagiarized will not be accepted or if published will be removed from the publication. Authors must certify that their manuscripts are their original work. Plagiarism, duplicate, data fabrication and redundant publications are forbidden. The manuscripts are subject to plagiarism check by iThenticate or similar. All manuscript submissions must provide a similarity report (up to 15% excluding quotes, bibliography, abstract, method).


Open Access - All research articles published in PressAcademia Journals are fully open access; immediately freely available to read, download and share. Articles are published under the terms of a Creative Commons license which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Open access is a property of individual works, not necessarily journals or publishers. Community standards, rather than copyright law, will continue to provide the mechanism for enforcement of proper attribution and responsible use of the published work, as they do now.