Research Article

MARKET INTEGRATION AND LIQUIDITY DYNAMICS: EVIDENCE FROM MULTINATIONAL STABLECOIN ADOPTION

Volume: 14 Number: 2 December 31, 2025

MARKET INTEGRATION AND LIQUIDITY DYNAMICS: EVIDENCE FROM MULTINATIONAL STABLECOIN ADOPTION

Abstract

Purpose- This study investigates how multinational stablecoin adoption reshapes market liquidity and cross-border financial integration across advanced and emerging economies, with particular attention to financially constrained and high-volatility jurisdictions. It examines whether stablecoins constitute a structural layer of global liquidity provision and market linkage or primarily reinforce speculative and cyclical dynamics in digital asset markets, and identifies regulatory and macro-financial conditions under which stablecoin-driven integration enhances resilience versus amplifying vulnerabilities. Methodology- The analysis uses a balanced monthly panel of 156 countries from January 2024 to July 2025, combining high-frequency on- chain transaction data for major stablecoins with market microstructure indicators and macroeconomic controls. Country- and time-fixed effects regressions and dynamic panel estimators are complemented by network analysis of cross-border flows and event studies around key regulatory and macroeconomic shocks. Liquidity is measured via bid-ask spreads, depth, turnover, and realized volatility, while financial integration is proxied by cross-border flow ratios and co-movement between local and global prices. Findings- Higher stablecoin usage—through greater transaction volumes and wallet adoption—is linked to narrower spreads, deeper order books, and higher turnover, signaling improved liquidity in emerging markets with currency or capital constraints. Network analysis highlights new digital liquidity hubs and denser cross-border ties, while event studies show regulatory or macro shocks cause brief fragmentation before flows re-route and partially reintegrate. Effects are strongest in open or moderately regulated economies with high demand for synthetic hard-currency assets. Conclusion- The evidence indicates that stablecoins have become a durable component of the global financial architecture, enhancing liquidity and integration while concentrating operational and regulatory risks in a limited set of platforms and jurisdictions. The paper highlights the need for coordinated supervisory frameworks, real-time digital monitoring infrastructures, and improved data transparency, and calls for further research on off-chain linkages, user heterogeneity, and systemic risk transmission in a stablecoin-centric environment.

Keywords

References

  1. Ante, L., Fiedler, I., Willruth, J.M., Steinmetz, F., (2023). A systematic literature review of empirical research on stablecoins. Financial Technologies, 2(1), 15-29.
  2. Beare, M., (2020). Transforming Traditional Finance with Stablecoins. Thesis (Master), Copenhagen Business School.
  3. Brown, Albert, (2025). Stablecoin Transactions Hit $15.6T in 2024, 119% of Visa’s Total Txns [online], The Crypto Basic, https://thecryptobasic.com/2025/02/05/stablecoin-transactions-hit-15-6t-in-2024-119-of-visas-total-txns/ [Date Accessed: November 17, 2025].
  4. Buckley, R.P., Arner, D.W., Zetzsche, D.A., (2023). FinTech: Finance, Technology and Regulation, ISBN: 9781009086943
  5. Cambridge Centre for Alternative Finance. (2024). 2nd Global Cryptoasset Regulatory Landscape Study [online], University of Cambridge Judge Business School. https://www.jbs.cam.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/2024-2nd-global-cryptoasset-regulatory-landscape- study.pdf [Date Accessed: November 19, 2025].
  6. Candrick, G., Jha, M., (2025). Stablecoins – Implications for EM [online]. Standard Chartered, https://www.sc.com/en/uploads/sites/66/content/docs/SC-CIB-Stablecoins-and-EM.pdf [Date Accessed: November 7, 2025].
  7. Catalini, Christian, (2025). How Will Stablecoins Integrate with the Financial System? [online], Centre for International Governance Innovation, https://www.cigionline.org/static/documents/no.331_Catalini.pdf [Date Accessed: November 5, 2025].
  8. Chainalysis, (2025). The 2025 Geography of Crypto Report (Research Report) [online], Chainalysis Inc., https://www.chainalysis.com/wp- content/uploads/2025/10/the-2025-geography-of-crypto-report-release.pdf [Date Accessed: November 18, 2025].

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Finance

Journal Section

Research Article

Publication Date

December 31, 2025

Submission Date

October 26, 2025

Acceptance Date

December 21, 2025

Published in Issue

Year 2025 Volume: 14 Number: 2

APA
Ünal, H. T., & Göksu, G. (2025). MARKET INTEGRATION AND LIQUIDITY DYNAMICS: EVIDENCE FROM MULTINATIONAL STABLECOIN ADOPTION. Journal of Business Economics and Finance, 14(2), 141-157. https://doi.org/10.17261/Pressacademia.2025.2024
AMA
1.Ünal HT, Göksu G. MARKET INTEGRATION AND LIQUIDITY DYNAMICS: EVIDENCE FROM MULTINATIONAL STABLECOIN ADOPTION. JBEF. 2025;14(2):141-157. doi:10.17261/Pressacademia.2025.2024
Chicago
Ünal, Hasan Tolga, and Gökhan Göksu. 2025. “MARKET INTEGRATION AND LIQUIDITY DYNAMICS: EVIDENCE FROM MULTINATIONAL STABLECOIN ADOPTION”. Journal of Business Economics and Finance 14 (2): 141-57. https://doi.org/10.17261/Pressacademia.2025.2024.
EndNote
Ünal HT, Göksu G (December 1, 2025) MARKET INTEGRATION AND LIQUIDITY DYNAMICS: EVIDENCE FROM MULTINATIONAL STABLECOIN ADOPTION. Journal of Business Economics and Finance 14 2 141–157.
IEEE
[1]H. T. Ünal and G. Göksu, “MARKET INTEGRATION AND LIQUIDITY DYNAMICS: EVIDENCE FROM MULTINATIONAL STABLECOIN ADOPTION”, JBEF, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 141–157, Dec. 2025, doi: 10.17261/Pressacademia.2025.2024.
ISNAD
Ünal, Hasan Tolga - Göksu, Gökhan. “MARKET INTEGRATION AND LIQUIDITY DYNAMICS: EVIDENCE FROM MULTINATIONAL STABLECOIN ADOPTION”. Journal of Business Economics and Finance 14/2 (December 1, 2025): 141-157. https://doi.org/10.17261/Pressacademia.2025.2024.
JAMA
1.Ünal HT, Göksu G. MARKET INTEGRATION AND LIQUIDITY DYNAMICS: EVIDENCE FROM MULTINATIONAL STABLECOIN ADOPTION. JBEF. 2025;14:141–157.
MLA
Ünal, Hasan Tolga, and Gökhan Göksu. “MARKET INTEGRATION AND LIQUIDITY DYNAMICS: EVIDENCE FROM MULTINATIONAL STABLECOIN ADOPTION”. Journal of Business Economics and Finance, vol. 14, no. 2, Dec. 2025, pp. 141-57, doi:10.17261/Pressacademia.2025.2024.
Vancouver
1.Hasan Tolga Ünal, Gökhan Göksu. MARKET INTEGRATION AND LIQUIDITY DYNAMICS: EVIDENCE FROM MULTINATIONAL STABLECOIN ADOPTION. JBEF. 2025 Dec. 1;14(2):141-57. doi:10.17261/Pressacademia.2025.2024

Journal of Business, Economics and Finance (JBEF) is a scientific, academic, double blind peer-reviewed, semi-annual and open-access journal. The publication language is English. The journal publishes 2 issues a year. The issuing months are June and December. The journal aims to provide a research source for all practitioners, policy makers and researchers working in the areas of business, economics and finance. The Editor of JBEF invites all manuscripts that that cover theoretical and/or applied researches on topics related to the interest areas of the Journal. JBEF charges no submission or publication fee.



Ethics Policy - JBEF applies the standards of Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE). JBEF is committed to the academic community ensuring ethics and quality of manuscripts in publications. Plagiarism is strictly forbidden and the manuscripts found to be plagiarized will not be accepted or if published will be removed from the publication. Authors must certify that their manuscripts are their original work. Plagiarism, duplicate, data fabrication and redundant publications are forbidden. The manuscripts are subject to plagiarism check by iThenticate or similar. All manuscript submissions must provide a similarity report (up to 15% excluding quotes, bibliography, abstract, method).


Open Access - All research articles published in PressAcademia Journals are fully open access; immediately freely available to read, download and share. Articles are published under the terms of a Creative Commons license which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Open access is a property of individual works, not necessarily journals or publishers. Community standards, rather than copyright law, will continue to provide the mechanism for enforcement of proper attribution and responsible use of the published work, as they do now.