Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

DO BOARD GOVERNANCE MECHANISMS INFLUENCE THE INTELLECTUAL CAPITAL–PERFORMANCE RELATIONSHIP? EVIDENCE FROM AN EMERGING ECONOMY

Year 2025, Volume: 14 Issue: 2 , 177 - 189 , 31.12.2025
https://izlik.org/JA49JM27EX

Abstract

Purpose- This study examines the influence of intellectual capital (IC) on firm performance and the moderating role of board governance
mechanisms in the context of Bangladesh, an emerging economy.
Methodology- Using panel data from 100 non-financial firms listed on the Dhaka Stock Exchange over 2018–2023, IC efficiency is measured
through the Modified Value-Added Intellectual Capital (MVAIC) model, while firm performance is assessed using return on assets and Tobin’s
Q.
Findings- The findings demonstrate that IC efficiency positively and significantly enhances firm performance, with human capital, structural
capital, and capital employed efficiency being key drivers. Moreover, board characteristics, particularly board size, independence, and
meeting frequency, significantly strengthen the IC–performance relationship. Earnings per share (EPS) and the price–earnings (P/E) ratio are
additionally employed as alternative measures of firm performance to verify the robustness of the observed relationship.
Conclusion- The results highlight the importance of effective board governance in maximizing the benefits of IC. For managers and
policymakers in emerging economies, strengthening board mechanisms and governance practices can enhance firm performance by ensuring
better utilization of intangible assets. This is one of the pioneer studies to investigate the moderating role of board governance mechanisms
in the IC–performance nexus within an emerging economy like Bangladesh. By employing the MVAIC model, it offers novel evidence on how
board attributes shape the effectiveness of IC in an emerging economy context.

References

  • Adebayo, A. O., Oyewole, O. M., & Lamidi, W. A. (2021). Corporate governance characteristics and intellectual capital of listed non-financial firms in Nigeria. Horn of Africa Journal of Business and Economics (HAJBE), 4(1), 44–55.
  • Al-Musalli, M. A. K., & Ismail, K. N. I. K. (2012). Intellectual capital performance and board characteristics of GCC banks. Procedia Economics and Finance, 2(Af), 219–226. https://doi.org/10.1016/s2212-5671(12)00082-2
  • Andriessen, D. (2004). Making sense of intellectual capital: Designing a method for the valuation of intangibles. Elsevier Butterworth-Heinemann
  • Bala, A. J., Hassan, A., & Muhammad, M. L. (2024). Do board characteristics matter in the relationship between intellectual capital efficiency and firm value? Evidence from the Nigerian oil and gas downstream sector. Future Business Journal, 10(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43093-024-00351-3
  • Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99–120. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639101700108
  • Bharathi Kamath, G. (2019). Board Characteristics and Intellectual Capital Performance: A Comparison of Service vs. Manufacturing Firms in India. Scholedge International Journal of Business Policy & Governance, 6(1), 1-21. https://doi.org/10.19085/sijbpg060101
  • Demartini, M. C., & Beretta, V. (2020). Intellectual capital and SMEs’ performance: A structured literature review. Journal of Small Business Management, 58(2), 288–332. https://doi.org/10.1080/00472778.2019.1659680
  • Ebrahim, S. A. H., Ali, B. J. A., & Oudat, M. S. (2021). The effect of board characteristics on intellectual capital in the commercial banks sector listed on the Bahrain bourse: An empirical study. Information Sciences Letters, 10(1), 91–109. https://doi.org/10.18576/isl/10S106
  • Farooq, M., & Ahmad, N. (2023). Nexus between board characteristics, firm performance and intellectual capital: an emerging market evidence. Corporate Governance, 23(6), 1269–1297. https://doi.org/10.1108/CG-08-2022-0355
  • Faruq, M. O., Akter, T., & Mizanur Rahman, M. (2023). Does intellectual capital drive bank’s performance in Bangladesh? Evidence from static and dynamic approach. Heliyon, 9(7), e17656. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e17656
  • Gujarati, D. (2003). Basic Econometrics. McGraw-Hill Education.
  • Kamath, B. (2019). Impact of corporate governance characteristics on intellectual capital performance of firms in India. International Journal of Disclosure and Governance, 16(1), 20–36. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41310-019-00054-0
  • Kanakriyah, R. (2021). The impact of board of directors’ characteristics on firm performance: a case study in Jordan. Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 8(3), 341–350. https://doi.org/10.13106/jafeb.2021.vol8.no3.0341
  • Li, J., Mangena, M., & Pike, R. (2012). The effect of audit committee characteristics on intellectual capital disclosure. The British Accounting Review, 44(2), 98–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.BAR.2012.03.003
  • Majumder, M. T. H., Ruma, I. J., & Akter, A. (2023). Does intellectual capital affect bank performance? Evidence from Bangladesh. LBS Journal of Management & Research, 21(2), 171–185. https://doi.org/10.1108/lbsjmr-05-2022-0016
  • Mollah, M. A. S., & Rouf, M. A. (2022). The impact of intellectual capital on commercial banks’ performance: evidence from Bangladesh. Journal of Money and Business, 2(1), 82–93. https://doi.org/10.1108/jmb-07-2021-0024
  • Mondal, A., & Ghosh, S. K. (2012). Intellectual capital and financial performance of Indian banks. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 13(4), 515– 530. https://doi.org/10.1108/14691931211276115
  • Mubaraq, S., & Ahmed Haji, A. (2014). The impact of corporate governance attributes on intellectual capital disclosure: A longitudinal investigation of Nigerian banking sector. Journal of Banking Regulation, 15(2), 144–163. https://doi.org/10.1057/jbr.2013.15
  • Nabi, M. N., Gao, Q., Rahman, M. T., Britton, S. O., & Islam, M. M. (2020). Intellectual Capital and Corporate Performance: Evidence From Banking Industry of Bangladesh. International Journal of Human Resource Studies, 10(1), 234-251. https://doi.org/10.5296/ijhrs.v10i1.16146
  • Nadeem, M., Gan, C., & Nguyen, C. (2017). Does intellectual capital efficiency improve firm performance in BRICS economies? A dynamic panel estimation. Measuring Business Excellence, 21(1), 65–85. https://doi.org/10.1108/MBE-12-2015-0055
  • Okon Akpan, E. (2014). Board Characteristics and Company Performance: Evidence from Nigeria. Journal of Finance and Accounting, 2(3), 81- 99. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jfa.20140203.17
  • Ozkan, N., Cakan, S., & Kayacan, M. (2017). Intellectual capital and financial performance: A study of the Turkish Banking Sector. Borsa Istanbul Review, 17(3), 190–198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bir.2016.03.001
  • Pavić Kramarić, T., Aleksic, A., & Pejic-Bach, M. (2018). Measuring the impact of board characteristics on the performance of Croatian insurance companies. International Journal of Engineering Business Management, 10, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/1847979018765864
  • Rositha, A. H., Firdausi, N., & Darmawan, A. (2019). Board of director’s characteristics, intellectual capital, and bank performance. The International Journal of Accounting and Business Society, 27(2), 1–26.
  • Ruta, C. D. (2009). HR portal alignment for the creation and development of intellectual capital. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 20(3), 562–577. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585190802707318
  • Scafarto, V., Ricci, F., Magnaghi, E., & Ferri, S. (2021). Board structure and intellectual capital efficiency: does the family firm status matter? In Journal of Management and Governance, 25(3), 221-234. Springer US. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10997-020-09533-x
  • Shah, S. Q. A., Lai, F. W., Tahir, M., Shad, M. K., Hamad, S., & Ali, S. E. A. (2024). Intellectual capital and financial performance: does board size and independent directors matter? An empirical enquiry. Journal of Islamic Accounting and Business Research. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIABR-02-2023-0043
  • Shahzad, K., Shah, S. Q. A., Lai, F. W., Jan, A. A., Shah, S. A. A., & Shad, M. K. (2023). Exploring the nexus of corporate governance and intellectual capital efficiency: from the lens of profitability. Quality and Quantity, 57(3), 2447–2468. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-022- 01472-z
  • Smriti, N., & Das, N. (2018). The impact of intellectual capital on firm performance: a study of Indian firms listed in COSPI. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 19(5), 935–964. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIC-11-2017-0156
  • Soewarno, N., & Tjahjadi, B. (2020). Measures that matter: an empirical investigation of intellectual capital and financial performance of banking firms in Indonesia. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 21(6), 1085–1106. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIC-09-2019-0225
  • Stewart, T. A. (1997). Intellectual capital : the new wealth of organizations. Doubleday.
  • Sveiby, K. E. (1997). The New Organizational Wealth: Managing and Measuring Knowledge-Based Assets. Berrett-Koehler Publishers.
  • Tan, H. P., Plowman, D., & Hancock, P. (2008). The evolving research on intellectual capital. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 9(4), 585–608. https://doi.org/10.1108/14691930810913177
  • Ting, I. W. K., Ren, C., Chen, F. C., & Kweh, Q. L. (2020). Interpreting the dynamic performance effect of intellectual capital through a value- added-based perspective. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 21(3), 381–401. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIC-05-2019-0098
  • Vo, D. H., & Tran, N. P. (2021). Intellectual capital and bank performance in Vietnam. Managerial Finance, 47(8), 1094–1106. https://doi.org/10.1108/MF-03-2020-0143
  • Wang, Z., Cai, S., Liang, H., Wang, N., & Xiang, E. (2021). Intellectual capital and firm performance: the mediating role of innovation speed and quality. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 32(6), 1222–1250. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2018.1511611
  • Wernerfelt, B. (1984). A resource‐based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 5(2), 171–180. https://doi.org/10.1002/SMJ.4250050207;CTYPE:STRING:JOURNAL
  • Wooldridge, J. M. (2016). Introductory Econometrics (6th ed.). Cengage Learning.
  • Xu, J., & Li, J. (2022). The interrelationship between intellectual capital and firm performance: evidence from China’s manufacturing sector. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 23(2), 313–341. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIC-08-2019-0189
  • Xu, J., & Liu, F. (2020). The impact of intellectual capital on firm performance: A modified and extended vaic model. Journal of Competitiveness, 12(1), 161–176. https://doi.org/10.7441/joc.2020.01.10
  • Zheng, C., Islam, M. N., Hasan, N., & Halim, M. A. (2022). Does intellectual capital efficiency matter for banks’ performance and risk-taking behavior? Cogent Economics and Finance, 10(1), 22-35. https://doi.org/10.1080/23322039.2022.2127484
There are 41 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Subjects Finance
Journal Section Research Article
Authors

Asia Khatun This is me 0000-0002-6055-0368

Raihan Sobhan This is me 0000-0003-2015-8035

Shafera Siddique Aapan This is me 0009-0000-3106-1234

Submission Date September 5, 2025
Acceptance Date December 2, 2025
Publication Date December 31, 2025
DOI https://doi.org/10.17261/Pressacademia.2025.2026
IZ https://izlik.org/JA49JM27EX
Published in Issue Year 2025 Volume: 14 Issue: 2

Cite

APA Khatun, A., Sobhan, R., & Aapan, S. S. (2025). DO BOARD GOVERNANCE MECHANISMS INFLUENCE THE INTELLECTUAL CAPITAL–PERFORMANCE RELATIONSHIP? EVIDENCE FROM AN EMERGING ECONOMY. Journal of Business Economics and Finance, 14(2), 177-189. https://doi.org/10.17261/Pressacademia.2025.2026

Journal of Business, Economics and Finance (JBEF) is a scientific, academic, double blind peer-reviewed, semi-annual and open-access journal. The publication language is English. The journal publishes 2 issues a year. The issuing months are June and December. The journal aims to provide a research source for all practitioners, policy makers and researchers working in the areas of business, economics and finance. The Editor of JBEF invites all manuscripts that that cover theoretical and/or applied researches on topics related to the interest areas of the Journal. JBEF charges no submission or publication fee.



Ethics Policy - JBEF applies the standards of Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE). JBEF is committed to the academic community ensuring ethics and quality of manuscripts in publications. Plagiarism is strictly forbidden and the manuscripts found to be plagiarized will not be accepted or if published will be removed from the publication. Authors must certify that their manuscripts are their original work. Plagiarism, duplicate, data fabrication and redundant publications are forbidden. The manuscripts are subject to plagiarism check by iThenticate or similar. All manuscript submissions must provide a similarity report (up to 15% excluding quotes, bibliography, abstract, method).


Open Access - All research articles published in PressAcademia Journals are fully open access; immediately freely available to read, download and share. Articles are published under the terms of a Creative Commons license which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Open access is a property of individual works, not necessarily journals or publishers. Community standards, rather than copyright law, will continue to provide the mechanism for enforcement of proper attribution and responsible use of the published work, as they do now.