Research Article

COMPARATIVE PREDICTIVE MODELLING OF TECHNOLOGY-INDUCED LABOUR MARKET DYNAMICS USING XGBOOST AND LIGHTGBM MODELS

Volume: 15 Number: 1 June 30, 2026

COMPARATIVE PREDICTIVE MODELLING OF TECHNOLOGY-INDUCED LABOUR MARKET DYNAMICS USING XGBOOST AND LIGHTGBM MODELS

Abstract

Purpose- Rapid advances in industrial automation, artificial intelligence, and digital production technologies are transforming labour market structures worldwide, intensifying concerns related to job displacement, occupational vulnerability, and regional inequality. This study aims to forecast technology-induced labour market dynamics using an interpretable and policy-relevant machine-learning framework. Methodology- The study develops an interpretable predictive modelling framework based on a large-scale, harmonized panel dataset comprising 68,882 occupation–region–year observations spanning the period 2010–2023. The dataset integrates labour-force microdata, task-based automation risk indicators, occupational characteristics, and macroeconomic control variables across multiple economies. Two state-of-the-art gradient-boosting algorithms—XGBoost and LightGBM—are trained and evaluated using temporally consistent cross- validation. Model performance is assessed using Root Mean Squared Error (RMSE) and the coefficient of determination (R²), while model interpretability is achieved through SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP). Findings- Empirical results indicate that XGBoost substantially outperforms LightGBM, achieving a lower RMSE (2,304.76) and a higher R² (0.9325), compared to LightGBM’s RMSE of 6,017.03 and R² of 0.5398. These results demonstrate XGBoost’s superior ability to capture nonlinear relationships and heterogeneous automation effects across occupations and regions. Conclusion- SHAP-based interpretability analysis identifies task repetitiveness, physical proximity, and cognitive complexity as the most influential drivers of automation-related labour market vulnerability. Scenario-based simulations further reveal that targeted policy interventions—such as reskilling programmes and workforce transition support—can significantly reduce projected job displacement, particularly among mid-risk occupations. Overall, the findings confirm that interpretable gradient-boosting models provide a robust and policy-relevant tool for forecasting automation-driven labour market dynamics and supporting evidence-based workforce planning in economies undergoing rapid technological transformation.

Keywords

References

  1. Acemoglu, D., & Restrepo, P. (2020). Robots and jobs: Evidence from U.S. labor markets. Journal of Political Economy, 128(6), 2188–2244. https://doi.org/10.1086/705716
  2. Acemoglu, D., & Restrepo, P. (2022). Tasks, automation, and the rise in U.S. wage inequality. Econometrica, 90(5), 1973–2016. https://doi.org/10.3982/ECTA19815
  3. Arik, S. Ö., & Pfister, T. (2021). TabNet: Attentive interpretable tabular learning. Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 35(8), 6679–6687. https://doi.org/10.1609/aaai.v35i8.16826
  4. Athey, S., & Imbens, G. W. (2019). Machine learning methods that economists should know about. Annual Review of Economics, 11, 685– 725. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-economics-080217-053433
  5. Autor, D. H. (2015). Why are there still so many jobs? The history and future of workplace automation. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 29(3), 3–30. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.29.3.3
  6. Autor, D. H., Levy, F., & Murnane, R. J. (2003). The skill content of recent technological change: An empirical exploration. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 118(4), 1279–1333. https://doi.org/10.1162/003355303322552801
  7. Autor, D. H., Mindell, D. A., & Reynolds, E. (2023). The work of the future: Building better jobs in an age of intelligent machines. MIT Press.
  8. Autor, D. H., & Salomons, A. (2018). Is automation labor-displacing? Productivity growth, employment, and the labor share. In D. H. Autor (Ed.), Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, Spring 2018 (pp. 1–87). Brookings Institution. https://www.brookings.edu/wp- content/uploads/2018/03/1_autorsalomons.pdf

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Industrial Marketing

Journal Section

Research Article

Authors

Lawrence Farinola
0009-0004-5480-2137
Kuzey Kıbrıs Türk Cumhuriyeti

Publication Date

June 30, 2026

Submission Date

June 11, 2026

Acceptance Date

June 30, 2026

Published in Issue

Year 2026 Volume: 15 Number: 1

APA
Farinola, L. (2026). COMPARATIVE PREDICTIVE MODELLING OF TECHNOLOGY-INDUCED LABOUR MARKET DYNAMICS USING XGBOOST AND LIGHTGBM MODELS. Journal of Business Economics and Finance, 15(1), 16-25. https://doi.org/10.17261/Pressacademia.2026.2030
AMA
1.Farinola L. COMPARATIVE PREDICTIVE MODELLING OF TECHNOLOGY-INDUCED LABOUR MARKET DYNAMICS USING XGBOOST AND LIGHTGBM MODELS. JBEF. 2026;15(1):16-25. doi:10.17261/Pressacademia.2026.2030
Chicago
Farinola, Lawrence. 2026. “COMPARATIVE PREDICTIVE MODELLING OF TECHNOLOGY-INDUCED LABOUR MARKET DYNAMICS USING XGBOOST AND LIGHTGBM MODELS”. Journal of Business Economics and Finance 15 (1): 16-25. https://doi.org/10.17261/Pressacademia.2026.2030.
EndNote
Farinola L (June 1, 2026) COMPARATIVE PREDICTIVE MODELLING OF TECHNOLOGY-INDUCED LABOUR MARKET DYNAMICS USING XGBOOST AND LIGHTGBM MODELS. Journal of Business Economics and Finance 15 1 16–25.
IEEE
[1]L. Farinola, “COMPARATIVE PREDICTIVE MODELLING OF TECHNOLOGY-INDUCED LABOUR MARKET DYNAMICS USING XGBOOST AND LIGHTGBM MODELS”, JBEF, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 16–25, June 2026, doi: 10.17261/Pressacademia.2026.2030.
ISNAD
Farinola, Lawrence. “COMPARATIVE PREDICTIVE MODELLING OF TECHNOLOGY-INDUCED LABOUR MARKET DYNAMICS USING XGBOOST AND LIGHTGBM MODELS”. Journal of Business Economics and Finance 15/1 (June 1, 2026): 16-25. https://doi.org/10.17261/Pressacademia.2026.2030.
JAMA
1.Farinola L. COMPARATIVE PREDICTIVE MODELLING OF TECHNOLOGY-INDUCED LABOUR MARKET DYNAMICS USING XGBOOST AND LIGHTGBM MODELS. JBEF. 2026;15:16–25.
MLA
Farinola, Lawrence. “COMPARATIVE PREDICTIVE MODELLING OF TECHNOLOGY-INDUCED LABOUR MARKET DYNAMICS USING XGBOOST AND LIGHTGBM MODELS”. Journal of Business Economics and Finance, vol. 15, no. 1, June 2026, pp. 16-25, doi:10.17261/Pressacademia.2026.2030.
Vancouver
1.Lawrence Farinola. COMPARATIVE PREDICTIVE MODELLING OF TECHNOLOGY-INDUCED LABOUR MARKET DYNAMICS USING XGBOOST AND LIGHTGBM MODELS. JBEF. 2026 Jun. 1;15(1):16-25. doi:10.17261/Pressacademia.2026.2030

Journal of Business, Economics and Finance (JBEF) is a scientific, academic, double blind peer-reviewed, semi-annual and open-access journal. The publication language is English. The journal publishes 2 issues a year. The issuing months are June and December. The journal aims to provide a research source for all practitioners, policy makers and researchers working in the areas of business, economics and finance. The Editor of JBEF invites all manuscripts that that cover theoretical and/or applied researches on topics related to the interest areas of the Journal. JBEF charges no submission or publication fee.



Ethics Policy - JBEF applies the standards of Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE). JBEF is committed to the academic community ensuring ethics and quality of manuscripts in publications. Plagiarism is strictly forbidden and the manuscripts found to be plagiarized will not be accepted or if published will be removed from the publication. Authors must certify that their manuscripts are their original work. Plagiarism, duplicate, data fabrication and redundant publications are forbidden. The manuscripts are subject to plagiarism check by iThenticate or similar. All manuscript submissions must provide a similarity report (up to 15% excluding quotes, bibliography, abstract, method).


Open Access - All research articles published in PressAcademia Journals are fully open access; immediately freely available to read, download and share. Articles are published under the terms of a Creative Commons license which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Open access is a property of individual works, not necessarily journals or publishers. Community standards, rather than copyright law, will continue to provide the mechanism for enforcement of proper attribution and responsible use of the published work, as they do now.