Research Article

FISCAL POLICY AND GROWTH: COMPERATIVE ANALYSIS OF RUSSIA AND THE OTHER POST SOVIET UNION COUNTRIES

Volume: 5 Number: 1 March 30, 2016
EN

FISCAL POLICY AND GROWTH: COMPERATIVE ANALYSIS OF RUSSIA AND THE OTHER POST SOVIET UNION COUNTRIES

Abstract

After the seperation of the Soviet Union and  the transformation of the economic systems from socialism to capitalism, public policies of old Soviet Nations have also changed. Among these countries, Russia has a special importance due to its economic and fiscal potential and in terms of its inheritance of a strict centralist system.  On the other hand,  aftermath of the scatter of Soviet Union in 1991, Russia met two important economic crises. This study aims to investigate Russian economic and fiscal performance in 1992-2014 after the disintegration and also to compare Old Soviet Nations including 12 countries by using dynamic panel data analysis with the variables of GDP growth, inflation, unemployment, current account balance, public revenues, public expenditures, primary balance, budget balance and public debt. Finally, the study examines the effect of public policies during the transition period on economic growth. 

Keywords

References

  1. Acosta Ormaechea, S. L., & Yoo, J. (2012). “Tax Composition and Growth: A Broad Cross-Country Perspective.”
  2. Acosta-Ormaechea, M. S. , & Morozumi, A. (2013). “Can a government enhance long-run growth by changing the composition of public expenditure?” (No. 13-162). International Monetary Fund.
  3. Afonso, A., Jalles, J. (2014). “Causality for the government budget and economic growth”, Applied Economics Letters, 21 (17), 1198-1201.
  4. Arellano, M., & Bond, S. (1991). “Some tests of specification for panel data: Monte Carlo evidence and an application to employment equations”, The review of economic studies, 58(2), 277-297.
  5. Baum, A., Checherita-Westphal, C., & Rother, P. (2013). “Debt and growth: New evidence for the euro area”, Journal of International Money and Finance, 32, 809-821.
  6. Baltagi,B., (1996). Econometric Analysis of Panel Data, John Wiley.
  7. Barro, R. (1990). “Government Spending in a Simple Model of Endogenous Growth”, Journal of Political Economy. 98 (5), 103–S125.
  8. Benos,N., (2009). “Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth: EmpricalEvidende From EU Countries”, MPRA Paper.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

-

Journal Section

Research Article

Publication Date

March 30, 2016

Submission Date

December 20, 2015

Acceptance Date

-

Published in Issue

Year 2016 Volume: 5 Number: 1

APA
Balikcioglu, E. (2016). FISCAL POLICY AND GROWTH: COMPERATIVE ANALYSIS OF RUSSIA AND THE OTHER POST SOVIET UNION COUNTRIES. Journal of Business Economics and Finance, 5(1), 98-107. https://doi.org/10.17261/Pressacademia.2016116557
AMA
1.Balikcioglu E. FISCAL POLICY AND GROWTH: COMPERATIVE ANALYSIS OF RUSSIA AND THE OTHER POST SOVIET UNION COUNTRIES. JBEF. 2016;5(1):98-107. doi:10.17261/Pressacademia.2016116557
Chicago
Balikcioglu, Eda. 2016. “FISCAL POLICY AND GROWTH: COMPERATIVE ANALYSIS OF RUSSIA AND THE OTHER POST SOVIET UNION COUNTRIES”. Journal of Business Economics and Finance 5 (1): 98-107. https://doi.org/10.17261/Pressacademia.2016116557.
EndNote
Balikcioglu E (March 1, 2016) FISCAL POLICY AND GROWTH: COMPERATIVE ANALYSIS OF RUSSIA AND THE OTHER POST SOVIET UNION COUNTRIES. Journal of Business Economics and Finance 5 1 98–107.
IEEE
[1]E. Balikcioglu, “FISCAL POLICY AND GROWTH: COMPERATIVE ANALYSIS OF RUSSIA AND THE OTHER POST SOVIET UNION COUNTRIES”, JBEF, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 98–107, Mar. 2016, doi: 10.17261/Pressacademia.2016116557.
ISNAD
Balikcioglu, Eda. “FISCAL POLICY AND GROWTH: COMPERATIVE ANALYSIS OF RUSSIA AND THE OTHER POST SOVIET UNION COUNTRIES”. Journal of Business Economics and Finance 5/1 (March 1, 2016): 98-107. https://doi.org/10.17261/Pressacademia.2016116557.
JAMA
1.Balikcioglu E. FISCAL POLICY AND GROWTH: COMPERATIVE ANALYSIS OF RUSSIA AND THE OTHER POST SOVIET UNION COUNTRIES. JBEF. 2016;5:98–107.
MLA
Balikcioglu, Eda. “FISCAL POLICY AND GROWTH: COMPERATIVE ANALYSIS OF RUSSIA AND THE OTHER POST SOVIET UNION COUNTRIES”. Journal of Business Economics and Finance, vol. 5, no. 1, Mar. 2016, pp. 98-107, doi:10.17261/Pressacademia.2016116557.
Vancouver
1.Eda Balikcioglu. FISCAL POLICY AND GROWTH: COMPERATIVE ANALYSIS OF RUSSIA AND THE OTHER POST SOVIET UNION COUNTRIES. JBEF. 2016 Mar. 1;5(1):98-107. doi:10.17261/Pressacademia.2016116557

Journal of Business, Economics and Finance (JBEF) is a scientific, academic, double blind peer-reviewed, semi-annual and open-access journal. The publication language is English. The journal publishes 2 issues a year. The issuing months are June and December. The journal aims to provide a research source for all practitioners, policy makers and researchers working in the areas of business, economics and finance. The Editor of JBEF invites all manuscripts that that cover theoretical and/or applied researches on topics related to the interest areas of the Journal. JBEF charges no submission or publication fee.



Ethics Policy - JBEF applies the standards of Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE). JBEF is committed to the academic community ensuring ethics and quality of manuscripts in publications. Plagiarism is strictly forbidden and the manuscripts found to be plagiarized will not be accepted or if published will be removed from the publication. Authors must certify that their manuscripts are their original work. Plagiarism, duplicate, data fabrication and redundant publications are forbidden. The manuscripts are subject to plagiarism check by iThenticate or similar. All manuscript submissions must provide a similarity report (up to 15% excluding quotes, bibliography, abstract, method).


Open Access - All research articles published in PressAcademia Journals are fully open access; immediately freely available to read, download and share. Articles are published under the terms of a Creative Commons license which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Open access is a property of individual works, not necessarily journals or publishers. Community standards, rather than copyright law, will continue to provide the mechanism for enforcement of proper attribution and responsible use of the published work, as they do now.