MEASURING ORGANIZATIONAL RESILIENCE: A SCALE DEVELOPMENT

Volume: 4 Number: 3 September 29, 2015
EN

MEASURING ORGANIZATIONAL RESILIENCE: A SCALE DEVELOPMENT

Abstract

Today’s business context is characterized by hyper competition, uncertainty, and ambiguity. Added to this is the unfortunate increase in the occurrence and the intensity of the natural disasters and crises situations including economic, political and social events. Accordingly, all the changes in the external environment amplified the significance of ‘resilience’ for all organizations. Resilient individuals and organizations positively adapt to changing conditions without showing any stress (Mallak, 1998), and thus today organizations desire to be resilient to easily adapt to changing circumstances and move forward. Organizational resilience term is highly adopted in organizational theory field and specifically in crisis management and disaster management literatures, and recently in strategic management literature. Yet, there is not an agreed upon and commonly accepted scale of organizational resilience. Accordingly, the organizational resilience literature is yet to develop regarding quantitative studies. This study attempts to fill this gap by developing a reliable and valid scale of organizational resilience construct through adopting both qualitative and quantitative methods.

Keywords

References

  1. • Aleksic, A, Stefanovic, M., Arsovski, A. and Tadic, D, 2013, “As Assessment of Organizational resilience potential in SMEs of the process industry, a fuzzy approach,”Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process of Industries, 26, 1238-1245.
  2. • Bryman, A, 1988, Quantity and Quality in Social Research, Contemporary Social Research Series No. 18, London: Unwin Hyman.
  3. • Campbell-Sills, L. and Stein, M., 2007, “Psychometric analysis and refinement of the Connor–Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC): validation of a 10-item measure of resilience,” Journal of Traumatic Stress 20, 1019–1028.
  4. • Campbell D. T. ve Fiske, D. W., 1959, “Covergent and Dicriminant Validation by the Multitrait-Multimethod Matrix,” Psychological Bulletin, 56, 2, 81-110.
  5. • Churchill, G.A., 1979, "A paradigm for developing better measures of marketing constructs," Journal of Marketing Research, 64-73.
  6. • Conner, D. R., 1993, “Managing at the speed of change”, Villard Books, New York.
  7. • Denzin N. K. and Lincoln Y., 2005, The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Research, Sage Publications.
  8. • Doe, P. J., 1994, “Creating a resilient organization”, Canadian Business Review, 21, 2, 22-25.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

-

Journal Section

-

Authors

Arzu Iseri Say This is me

Publication Date

September 29, 2015

Submission Date

November 8, 2015

Acceptance Date

-

Published in Issue

Year 2015 Volume: 4 Number: 3

APA
Kantur, D., & Say, A. I. (2015). MEASURING ORGANIZATIONAL RESILIENCE: A SCALE DEVELOPMENT. Journal of Business Economics and Finance, 4(3). https://doi.org/10.17261/Pressacademia.2015313066
AMA
1.Kantur D, Say AI. MEASURING ORGANIZATIONAL RESILIENCE: A SCALE DEVELOPMENT. JBEF. 2015;4(3). doi:10.17261/Pressacademia.2015313066
Chicago
Kantur, Deniz, and Arzu Iseri Say. 2015. “MEASURING ORGANIZATIONAL RESILIENCE: A SCALE DEVELOPMENT”. Journal of Business Economics and Finance 4 (3). https://doi.org/10.17261/Pressacademia.2015313066.
EndNote
Kantur D, Say AI (November 1, 2015) MEASURING ORGANIZATIONAL RESILIENCE: A SCALE DEVELOPMENT. Journal of Business Economics and Finance 4 3
IEEE
[1]D. Kantur and A. I. Say, “MEASURING ORGANIZATIONAL RESILIENCE: A SCALE DEVELOPMENT”, JBEF, vol. 4, no. 3, Nov. 2015, doi: 10.17261/Pressacademia.2015313066.
ISNAD
Kantur, Deniz - Say, Arzu Iseri. “MEASURING ORGANIZATIONAL RESILIENCE: A SCALE DEVELOPMENT”. Journal of Business Economics and Finance 4/3 (November 1, 2015). https://doi.org/10.17261/Pressacademia.2015313066.
JAMA
1.Kantur D, Say AI. MEASURING ORGANIZATIONAL RESILIENCE: A SCALE DEVELOPMENT. JBEF. 2015;4. doi:10.17261/Pressacademia.2015313066.
MLA
Kantur, Deniz, and Arzu Iseri Say. “MEASURING ORGANIZATIONAL RESILIENCE: A SCALE DEVELOPMENT”. Journal of Business Economics and Finance, vol. 4, no. 3, Nov. 2015, doi:10.17261/Pressacademia.2015313066.
Vancouver
1.Deniz Kantur, Arzu Iseri Say. MEASURING ORGANIZATIONAL RESILIENCE: A SCALE DEVELOPMENT. JBEF. 2015 Nov. 1;4(3). doi:10.17261/Pressacademia.2015313066

Journal of Business, Economics and Finance (JBEF) is a scientific, academic, double blind peer-reviewed, semi-annual and open-access journal. The publication language is English. The journal publishes 2 issues a year. The issuing months are June and December. The journal aims to provide a research source for all practitioners, policy makers and researchers working in the areas of business, economics and finance. The Editor of JBEF invites all manuscripts that that cover theoretical and/or applied researches on topics related to the interest areas of the Journal. JBEF charges no submission or publication fee.



Ethics Policy - JBEF applies the standards of Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE). JBEF is committed to the academic community ensuring ethics and quality of manuscripts in publications. Plagiarism is strictly forbidden and the manuscripts found to be plagiarized will not be accepted or if published will be removed from the publication. Authors must certify that their manuscripts are their original work. Plagiarism, duplicate, data fabrication and redundant publications are forbidden. The manuscripts are subject to plagiarism check by iThenticate or similar. All manuscript submissions must provide a similarity report (up to 15% excluding quotes, bibliography, abstract, method).


Open Access - All research articles published in PressAcademia Journals are fully open access; immediately freely available to read, download and share. Articles are published under the terms of a Creative Commons license which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Open access is a property of individual works, not necessarily journals or publishers. Community standards, rather than copyright law, will continue to provide the mechanism for enforcement of proper attribution and responsible use of the published work, as they do now.