The Impact Of CEO Stock Option Expensing As Per SFAS 123 (R) On Earnings Quality

Volume: 3 Number: 2 June 1, 2014
  • Veronica Paz
  • Syed Zaidi
EN

The Impact Of CEO Stock Option Expensing As Per SFAS 123 (R) On Earnings Quality

Abstract

This paper examines the relationship between stock option expensing as per SFAS 123 (R) as a part of CEO compensation and earnings quality. We hypothesize the expensing of CEO stock options as per SFAS 123 (R) positively influences earnings quality. This study contributes to literature by further enhancing our knowledge of CEO compensation and the bonding effect of stock options awarded to CEOs. The ExecuComp database provides the sample for CEO compensation from 2000 to 2009. Estimating earnings quality using multiple regressions, we find empirical support for our hypotheses.

References

  1.  Aboody, D., M. E. Barth, and R. Kasznik. 2004. SFAS No. 123 Stock‐Based Compensation Expense and Equity Market Values. The Accounting Review 79 (2):251-275.
  2.  Agarwal, N. C. 1981. Determinants of Executive Compensation. In Industrial Relations: Wiley-Blackwell, 36-46. Ashley, A. S., and S. S. M. Yang. 2004. Executive Compensation and Earnings Persistence. Journal of Business Ethics 50 (4):369-382. Attaway, M. C. 1997. A study of the relationship between firm performance and CEO compensation. Doctoral Dissertation. ———. 2000. A study of the relationship between company performance and CEO compensation. In American Business Review, 77-85. Baber, W. R., S. N. Janakiraman, and S. H. Kang. 1996. Investment opportunities and the structure of executive compensation. Journal of Accounting and Economics 21 (3):297-318. Baber, W. R., S.-H. Kang, and K. R. Kumar. 1998. Accounting earnings and executive compensation: The role of earnings persistence. Journal of Accounting and Economics 25 (2):169-193. Baber, W. R., S. H. Kang, and K. R. Kumar. 1999. The explanatory power of earnings levels vs. earnings changes in the context of executive compensation. The Accounting Review 74 (4):459-472.
  3.  Benston, G. J. 1985. The Self-Serving Management Hypothesis: Some Evidence. Journal of Accounting & Economics 7 (1-3):67-84.
  4.  Boyd, B. K. 1994. Board control and CEO compensation. Strategic Management Journal 15 (5):335-344. Butler, S., and N. Newman. 1989. Agency control mechanisms, effectiveness and decision making in an executive's final year with a firm. Journal of Institutional and Theoritical Economics 145:451-464. Cheng, Q., and D. B. Farber. 2008. Earnings Restatements, Changes in CEO Compensation, and Firm Performance. Accounting Review 83 (5):1217-1250.
  5.  Cheng, Q., and T. D. Warfield. 2005. Equity Incentives and Earnings Management. In Accounting Review: American Accounting Association, 441-476.
  6. Comiskey, E., and C. W. Mulford. 2000. Guide to Financial Reporting and Analysis New York, New York: John Wiley & Sons.
  7. Core, J. E., W. R. Guay, and R. E. Verrecchia. 2003. Price versus non-price performance measures in optimal CEO compensation contracts. Accounting Review 78 (4):957-981.
  8. Core, J. E., R. W. Holthausen, and D. F. Larcker. 1999. Corporate governance, chief executive officer compensation, and firm performance. Journal of Financial Economics 51 (3):371-406.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

-

Journal Section

-

Authors

Veronica Paz This is me

Syed Zaidi This is me

Publication Date

June 1, 2014

Submission Date

November 4, 2014

Acceptance Date

-

Published in Issue

Year 2014 Volume: 3 Number: 2

APA
Paz, V., & Zaidi, S. (2014). The Impact Of CEO Stock Option Expensing As Per SFAS 123 (R) On Earnings Quality. Journal of Business Economics and Finance, 3(2), 153-170. https://izlik.org/JA39DN77UJ
AMA
1.Paz V, Zaidi S. The Impact Of CEO Stock Option Expensing As Per SFAS 123 (R) On Earnings Quality. JBEF. 2014;3(2):153-170. https://izlik.org/JA39DN77UJ
Chicago
Paz, Veronica, and Syed Zaidi. 2014. “The Impact Of CEO Stock Option Expensing As Per SFAS 123 (R) On Earnings Quality”. Journal of Business Economics and Finance 3 (2): 153-70. https://izlik.org/JA39DN77UJ.
EndNote
Paz V, Zaidi S (June 1, 2014) The Impact Of CEO Stock Option Expensing As Per SFAS 123 (R) On Earnings Quality. Journal of Business Economics and Finance 3 2 153–170.
IEEE
[1]V. Paz and S. Zaidi, “The Impact Of CEO Stock Option Expensing As Per SFAS 123 (R) On Earnings Quality”, JBEF, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 153–170, June 2014, [Online]. Available: https://izlik.org/JA39DN77UJ
ISNAD
Paz, Veronica - Zaidi, Syed. “The Impact Of CEO Stock Option Expensing As Per SFAS 123 (R) On Earnings Quality”. Journal of Business Economics and Finance 3/2 (June 1, 2014): 153-170. https://izlik.org/JA39DN77UJ.
JAMA
1.Paz V, Zaidi S. The Impact Of CEO Stock Option Expensing As Per SFAS 123 (R) On Earnings Quality. JBEF. 2014;3:153–170.
MLA
Paz, Veronica, and Syed Zaidi. “The Impact Of CEO Stock Option Expensing As Per SFAS 123 (R) On Earnings Quality”. Journal of Business Economics and Finance, vol. 3, no. 2, June 2014, pp. 153-70, https://izlik.org/JA39DN77UJ.
Vancouver
1.Veronica Paz, Syed Zaidi. The Impact Of CEO Stock Option Expensing As Per SFAS 123 (R) On Earnings Quality. JBEF [Internet]. 2014 Jun. 1;3(2):153-70. Available from: https://izlik.org/JA39DN77UJ

Journal of Business, Economics and Finance (JBEF) is a scientific, academic, double blind peer-reviewed, semi-annual and open-access journal. The publication language is English. The journal publishes 2 issues a year. The issuing months are June and December. The journal aims to provide a research source for all practitioners, policy makers and researchers working in the areas of business, economics and finance. The Editor of JBEF invites all manuscripts that that cover theoretical and/or applied researches on topics related to the interest areas of the Journal. JBEF charges no submission or publication fee.



Ethics Policy - JBEF applies the standards of Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE). JBEF is committed to the academic community ensuring ethics and quality of manuscripts in publications. Plagiarism is strictly forbidden and the manuscripts found to be plagiarized will not be accepted or if published will be removed from the publication. Authors must certify that their manuscripts are their original work. Plagiarism, duplicate, data fabrication and redundant publications are forbidden. The manuscripts are subject to plagiarism check by iThenticate or similar. All manuscript submissions must provide a similarity report (up to 15% excluding quotes, bibliography, abstract, method).


Open Access - All research articles published in PressAcademia Journals are fully open access; immediately freely available to read, download and share. Articles are published under the terms of a Creative Commons license which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Open access is a property of individual works, not necessarily journals or publishers. Community standards, rather than copyright law, will continue to provide the mechanism for enforcement of proper attribution and responsible use of the published work, as they do now.