Basel Accords: Lessons For Turkey

Volume: 2 Number: 4 December 1, 2013
  • Müge Karacal
  • Emre Can
  • İlker Arslan
EN

Basel Accords: Lessons For Turkey

Abstract

In the last two decades, the world economies have experienced severe financial crises. After every crisis “new” financial regulations were offered to prevent an upcoming one. Basel Criteria have become the milestone of these regulations regarding the banking sectors where the problems and the solutions of the financial crises have emanated. However, it is observed that the Basel Accords have not met the required measures in preventing the world economy from entering a global financial crisis in 2008. Turkish banking sector has been implementing its ownmeasures which are tighter than the Basel criteria since the financial crisis it went through in 2001 and has been growing in spite of the last financial turmoil unlike its developed country counterparts. Thus our aim is to compare the banking sectors of Turkey and 10 other OECD countries for the period 2000-2008, and try to answer whether Turkey performs better regarding risk management and whether she should adopt the Basel criteria or not. To this end, we perform a panel data estimation making use of measures such as capital adequacy ratio, liquid reserves, and non-performing loans. The results indicate that in time Turkish banking sectorgot better in handlingrisk management, but that it is more prone to risk compared to OECD countries.

Keywords

References

  1. Ali, A. and Daly, K. (2010), Macroeconomic Determinants of Credit Risk: Recent Evidence from a Cross Country Study,International Review of Financial Analysis, Vol. 19, pp. 165-171.
  2. Barth, J. R, Caprio, G. Jr. and Levine, R. (2008), Bank Regulations are Changing: For Better or Worse?,Comparative Economic Studies, Vol. 50, pp. 537–563.
  3. Benink, H., Danielsson, J. and Jonsson, A. (2008), On the Role of Regulatory Banking Capital,Financial Markets, Institutions & Instruments, Vol. 17, No. 1, pp. 85-96.
  4. Blundell-Wignall, A. and Atkinson, P. (2010), Thinking Beyond Basel III: Necessary Solutions For Capital And Liquidity, OECD Journal: Financial Market Trends, Vol. 1, pp. 1-23.
  5. Chamia R.andCosimanob T. F. (2010). Monetary Policy with a Touch of Basel. Journal of Economics and Business, 62, 161–175.
  6. Chang, Y. T., (2006), Role of Non-Performing Loans and Capital Adequacy in Banking Structure and Competition. University of Bath School of Management Working Paper Series, 2006.16.
  7. Danielsson, J., Embrechts, P., Goodhart, C., Keating, C., Muennich, F. and Renault, O. (2001),An Academic Response to Basel II,Financial Markets Group, London School of Economics, Special Paper, No. 130.
  8. Demirgüç-Kunt, A., Detragiache E. andTressel T. (2006). Banking on the Principles: Compliance with Basel Core Principles and Bank Soundness, IMF Working Paper, WP/06/242.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

-

Journal Section

-

Authors

Müge Karacal This is me

Emre Can This is me

İlker Arslan This is me

Publication Date

December 1, 2013

Submission Date

November 4, 2014

Acceptance Date

-

Published in Issue

Year 2013 Volume: 2 Number: 4

APA
Karacal, M., Can, E., & Arslan, İ. (2013). Basel Accords: Lessons For Turkey. Journal of Business Economics and Finance, 2(4), 19-32. https://izlik.org/JA72DY85ZS
AMA
1.Karacal M, Can E, Arslan İ. Basel Accords: Lessons For Turkey. JBEF. 2013;2(4):19-32. https://izlik.org/JA72DY85ZS
Chicago
Karacal, Müge, Emre Can, and İlker Arslan. 2013. “Basel Accords: Lessons For Turkey”. Journal of Business Economics and Finance 2 (4): 19-32. https://izlik.org/JA72DY85ZS.
EndNote
Karacal M, Can E, Arslan İ (December 1, 2013) Basel Accords: Lessons For Turkey. Journal of Business Economics and Finance 2 4 19–32.
IEEE
[1]M. Karacal, E. Can, and İ. Arslan, “Basel Accords: Lessons For Turkey”, JBEF, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 19–32, Dec. 2013, [Online]. Available: https://izlik.org/JA72DY85ZS
ISNAD
Karacal, Müge - Can, Emre - Arslan, İlker. “Basel Accords: Lessons For Turkey”. Journal of Business Economics and Finance 2/4 (December 1, 2013): 19-32. https://izlik.org/JA72DY85ZS.
JAMA
1.Karacal M, Can E, Arslan İ. Basel Accords: Lessons For Turkey. JBEF. 2013;2:19–32.
MLA
Karacal, Müge, et al. “Basel Accords: Lessons For Turkey”. Journal of Business Economics and Finance, vol. 2, no. 4, Dec. 2013, pp. 19-32, https://izlik.org/JA72DY85ZS.
Vancouver
1.Müge Karacal, Emre Can, İlker Arslan. Basel Accords: Lessons For Turkey. JBEF [Internet]. 2013 Dec. 1;2(4):19-32. Available from: https://izlik.org/JA72DY85ZS

Journal of Business, Economics and Finance (JBEF) is a scientific, academic, double blind peer-reviewed, semi-annual and open-access journal. The publication language is English. The journal publishes 2 issues a year. The issuing months are June and December. The journal aims to provide a research source for all practitioners, policy makers and researchers working in the areas of business, economics and finance. The Editor of JBEF invites all manuscripts that that cover theoretical and/or applied researches on topics related to the interest areas of the Journal. JBEF charges no submission or publication fee.



Ethics Policy - JBEF applies the standards of Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE). JBEF is committed to the academic community ensuring ethics and quality of manuscripts in publications. Plagiarism is strictly forbidden and the manuscripts found to be plagiarized will not be accepted or if published will be removed from the publication. Authors must certify that their manuscripts are their original work. Plagiarism, duplicate, data fabrication and redundant publications are forbidden. The manuscripts are subject to plagiarism check by iThenticate or similar. All manuscript submissions must provide a similarity report (up to 15% excluding quotes, bibliography, abstract, method).


Open Access - All research articles published in PressAcademia Journals are fully open access; immediately freely available to read, download and share. Articles are published under the terms of a Creative Commons license which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Open access is a property of individual works, not necessarily journals or publishers. Community standards, rather than copyright law, will continue to provide the mechanism for enforcement of proper attribution and responsible use of the published work, as they do now.