ECONOMIC FACTORS INFLUENCING THE DYNAMICS OF UNEMPLOYMENT IN THE G10 COUNTRIES: EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE FROM PANEL DATA MODELING

Year 2017, , 17 - 30, 30.03.2017

Oguzhan Ozcelebi , Seval Ozkan

https://doi.org/10.17261/Pressacademia.2017.382

Abstract

Purpose- The purpose of the study is to
determine which macroeconomic factors and economic policy changes may affect
unemployment in the G10 countries.

Methodology-  Panel least squares approach is employed to
estimate the role of economic factors inflencing unemployment in the G10
countries.

Findings-  Our findings are in line with the Phillips
curve approach, exposing the importance of expansionary macroeconomic policies
triggering the aggregate demand along with maintaining economic and financial
stability to reduce unemployment. Expansionary economic policies play a major
role in providing an improvement in the labor market in the long run. An
increase in the level of financial and economic integration and development may
decrease unemployment in the G10 countries. An increase in the total
value-added industry and education expenditures may lead to a decrease in the
unemployment rates in these countries.

Conclusion- We suggest that these countries should focus on
sustaining their financial stability and development to improve the conditions
of the labor market permanently. Liberalization of foreign trade, financial
flows and market capitalization are crucial factors for the development of
productivity of production factors, technology and organizational capacity in
the G10 countries. Policy makers in the G10 countries should identify the
channels through which technology, human capital, government spending, investment-specific,
foreign and other shocks and taxes affect unemployment. 

Keywords

Unemployment, G10 Countries, economic factors, panel data, panel data least squares estimation

References

• Abbas, S.K. & Sgro, P.M. 2011, “New keynesian phillips curve and inflation dynamics in Australia”, Economic Modelling, vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 2022–2033.
• Agnello, L. Castro, V., Jalles, J.T. & Sousa, R.M. (2014), “Fiscal adjustments, labour market flexibility and unemployment”, Economics Letters, vol. 124, no. 2, pp. 231–235.
• Akeju, K.F. & Olanipekun, D.B. 2014, “Unemployment and economic growth in Nigeria”, Journal of Economics and Sustainable Development, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 138–144.
• Akram, M., Hussain, S., Raza, S.H. & Masood, S., 2014, “An empirical estimation of Okun’s law in context of Pakistan”, Journal of Finance and Economics, vol. 2, no. 5, pp. 173–177.
• Altig, D., Christiano, J., Eichenbaum, M. & Linde, J. 2011, “Firm-specific capital, nominal rigidities and the business cycle”, Review of Economic Dynamics, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 225–247.
• Ang, S.H. & Loganathan, N. 2013, “Interactions between economic growth and unemployment condition in Asian region”, International Journal of Economics and Empirical Research, vol. 1, no. 12, pp. 135–146.
• Aoki, M. 2001, Toward a comparative economic analysis, MIT Press, Cambridge.
• Arestis, P. 2015, “Coordination of fiscal with monetary and financial stability policies can better cure unemployment”, Review of Keynesian Economics, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 233–247.
• Attanasio, O., Goldberg, P.K. & Pavcnik, N. 2004, “Trade reforms and wage inequality in Columbia”, Journal of Development Economics, vol. 74, no. 2, pp. 331–366.
• Autiero, G. 2008, “Labor market coordination systems and unemployment performance in some OECD countries”, Journal of SocioEconomics, vol. 37, no. 5, pp. 1846–1855.
• Bande, R. & Riveiro, D. 2012, “The consumption–investment–unemployment relationship in Spain: An analysis with regional data”, MPRA Working Paper, No. 42681.
• Bankole, A.S. & Fatai, B.O. 2013, “Empirical test of okun’s law in Nigeria”, International Journal of Economic Practices and Theories, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 227–231.
• Barigozzi, M., Conti, A.M. & Luciani, M. 2014, “Do Euro area countries respond asymmetrically to the common monetary policy?”, Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, vol. 76, no. 5, pp. 693–714.
• Basarac, M., Škrabić, B. & Sorić, P. 2011, “The hybrid Phillips curve: Empirical evidence from transition economies”, Finance a úvěr – Czech Journal of Economics and Finance, vol. 61, no. 4, pp. 367–383.
• Bassanini, A. & Duval, R. (2006), “The determinants of unemployment across OECD countries: Reassessing the role of policies and institutions”, OECD Economic Studies, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 7–86.
• Belot, M. & van Ours, J.C. 2001, “Unemployment and labour market institutions: An empirical analysis”, Journal of the Japanese and International Economies, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 403–418.
• Berger, T. & Everaert, G. 2013, “Is the impact of labor taxes on unemployment asymmetric?”, Macroeconomic Dynamics, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 143–154.
• Blanchard, O. & Wolfers, J. 2000, “The role of shocks and institutions in the rise of European unemployment: The aggregate evidence”, Economic Journal, vol. 110, no. 462, pp. C1–C33.
• Bowdler, C. 2009, “Openness, exchange rate regimes and the Phillips curve”, Journal of International Money and Finance, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 148–160.
• Canale, R.R. & Liotti, G. 2015, “Structural adjustment and unemployment in selected Eurozone countries”, Australian Economic Review, vol. 48, no. 2, pp. 113–121.
• Canova, F., Lopez-Salido, D. & Michelacci, C. 2007, “Schumpeterian technology shocks”, Universitat Pompeu Fabra Working Paper, No. 1012.
• Carruth, A.A., Hooker, M.A. & Oswald, A.J. 1998, “Unemployment equilibria and input prices: Theory and evidence from the United States”, Review of Economics and Statistics, vol. 80, no. 4, pp. 621–628.
• Cheng, C.H.J. 2014, “Exchange rate pass-through, unemployment and optimal implementable monetary policy rule for emerging economies”, Global Economic Review: Perspectives on East Asian Economies and Industries, vol. 43, no. 3, pp. 221–243.
• Choi, I. 2001, “Unit root tests for panel data”, Journal of International Money and Finance, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 249–272.
• Ciccarone, G., Giuli, F. & Liberati, D. 2014, “Incomplete interest rate pass-through under credit and labor market frictions”, Economic Modelling, vol. 36, pp. 645–657.
• Cooke, D. 2010, “Openness and inflation”, Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, vol. 42, no. 2–3, pp. 267–287.
• Correa-Lopez, M., Garcia-Serrador, A. & Mingorance-Arnaiz, C. 2014, “Product market competition, monetary policy regimes and inflation dynamics: Evidence from a panel of OECD countries”, Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, vol. 76, no. 4, pp. 484–509.
• Cuestas, J.C., Gil-Alana, L.A. & Staehr, K. 2011, “A further investigation of unemployment persistence in European transition economies”, Journal of Comparative Economics, vol. 39, no. 4, pp. 514–532.
• Daveri, F. & Tabellini, G. 1997, “Unemployment, growth and taxation in industrial countries”, IGIER Working Paper, No. 122.
• Dogru, B. 2013, “The link between unemployment rate and real output in Eurozone: A panel error correction approach”, Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, vol. 99, pp. 94–103.
• Dogrul, H.G. & Soytas, U. 2010, “Relationship between oil prices, interest rate, and unemployment: Evidence from an emerging market”, Energy Economics, vol. 32, no. 6, pp. 1523–1528.
• Dutt, P., Mitra, D. & Ranjan, P. 2009, “International trade and unemployment: Theory and cross-national evidence”, Journal of International Economics, vol. 78, no. 1, pp. 32–44.
• Elshamy, H. 2013, “Okun’s law and its validity in Egypt”, Journal of Emerging Issues in Economics, Finance and Banking, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 67– 74.
• Ernst, C. 2005, “Trade liberalization, export orientation and employment in Argentina, Brazil and Mexico”, Employment Strategy Papers, No. 15.
• Faia, E., Lechthaler, W. & Merkl, C. 2013, “Fiscal stimulus and labor market policies in Europe”, Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, vol. 37, no. 3, pp. 483–499.
• Felbermayr, G., Prat, J. & Schmerer, H.J. 2011a, “Trade and unemployment: What do the data say?” European Economic Review, vol. 55, no. 6, pp. 741–758.
• Felbermayr, G., Prat, J. & Schmerer, H.J. 2011b, “Globalization and labor market outcomes: Wage bargaining, search frictions, and firm heterogeneity”, Journal of Economic Theory, vol. 146, no. 1, pp. 39–73.
• Feldmann, H. 2012, “Real interest rate and labor market performance in developing countries”, Economic Letters, vol. 117, no. 1, pp. 200– 203.
• Fisher, J. 2006, “The dynamic effects of neutral and investment-specific technology shocks”, Journal of Political Economy, vol. 114, no. 3, pp. 413–451.
• Gamberoni, E., Von Uexkull, E. & Weber, S. 2010, “The role of openness and labour market institutions for employment dynamics during economic crises”, ILO Employment Working Paper, No. 68.
• Gaston, N. & Rajaguru, G. 2013, “How an export boom affects unemployment”, Economic Modelling, vol. 30, no. 2013, pp. 343–355.
• Gozgor, G. 2014, “The impact of trade openness on the unemployment rate in G7 countries”, Journal of International Trade and Economic Development: An International and Comparative Review, vol. 23, no. 7, pp. 1018–1037.
• Hadri, K. 2000, “Testing for stationarity in heterogeneous panel data”, Econometrics Journal, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 148–161.
• Hahn J. & Kuersteiner, G. 2002, “Asymptotically unbiased inference for a dynamic panel model with fixed effects when both n and T are large”, Econometrica, vol. 70, no. 4, pp. 1639–1657.
• Hasan, R. Devashish Mitra, D., Ranjan, P. & Ahsan, R.N. 2012, “Trade liberalization and unemployment: Theory and evidence from India”, Journal of Development Economics, vol. 97, no. 2, pp. 269–280.
• Henzel, S. & Wollmershäuser, T. 2008, “The new keynesian Phillips curve and the role of expectations: Evidence from the CESifo world economic survey”, Economic Modelling, vol. 25, no. 5, pp. 811–832.
• Hong, I. 2014, “Italian welfare in the aftermath of the economic crisis: Neoliberal reforms and limits to the path dependency approach”, Journal of Sociology and Social Welfare, vol. XLI, no. 2, pp. 73–91.
• Hove, S., Mama, A.T. & Tchana Tchana, F. 2015, “Monetary policy and commodity terms of trade shocks in emerging market economies”, Economic Modelling, Vol. 49, pp. 53–71.
• Iacovoiu, V.B. 2012, “Impact of capital investments on unemployment in the context of economic crisis: The case of Romania”, Economic Insights – Trends and Challenges, vol. 1 (LXIV), no. 4/2012, pp. 36–47.
• Im, K.S., Pesaran, M.H. & Shin, Y. 2003, “Testing for unit roots in heterogeneous panels”, Journal of Econometrics, vol. 115 no. 1, pp. 53–74.
• Jovanovic, B. & Petreski, M. 2014, “Monetary policy, exchange rates and labor unions in SEE and the CIS during the financial crisis”, Economic Systems, vol. 38, no. 3, pp. 309–332.
• Karanassou, M., Sala, H. & Snower, D.J. 2008, “Long run inflation–unemployment dynamics: The Spanish Phillips curve and economic policy”, Journal of Policy Modeling, Vol. 30, No. 2, pp. 279–300.
• Kim, B. G. & Ahn, B.K. 2008, “An assessment of the new keynesian Phillips curve in the Korean economy”, Economic Analysis, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 85–131.
• Krause, M.U. & Uhlig, H. 2012, “Transition in the German labor market: Structure and crisis”, Journal of Monetary Economics, vol. 59, no. 1, pp. 64–79.
• Kreishan, F.M. 2011, “Economic growth and unemployment: An empirical analysis”, Journal of Social Sciences, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 228–231.
• Lal, I., Sulaiman D. Jalil, M.A., Hussain, A. 2010, “Test of Okun’s law in some Asian countries cointegration approach”, European Journal of Scientific Research, vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 73–80.
• Levin, A., Lin, C.-F. & Chu, C.-S. J. 2002, “Unit root tests in panel data: Asymptotic and finite-sample properties”, Journal of Econometrics, vol. 108, pp. 1–24.
• Loganathan, N., Sukemi, M.N. & Kogid, M. 2011, “Dynamic causal relationship between trade balance and unemployment scenario in Malaysia: Granger non-causality analysis”, Economics and Finance Review, vol. 1, No. 3, pp. 13–20.
• Maddala, G.S. & Wu, S. 1999, “A comparative study of unit root tests with panel data and a new simple test”, Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, vol. 61 no. S1, pp. 631–652.
• Malikane, C. & Mokoka, T. 2014, “The new keynesian Phillips curve: Endogeneity and misspecification”, Applied Economics, vol. 46, no. 25, pp. 3082–3089.
• Mandelman, F.S. & Zanetti, F. 2014, “Flexible prices, labor market frictions and the response of employment to technology shocks”, Labour Economics, vol. 26, pp. 94–102.
• Martins, L.F., Gabriel, V.J. 2009, “New keynesian Phillips curves and potential identification failures: A generalized empirical likelihood analysis”, Journal of Macroeconomics, vol. 31, no. 4, pp. 561–571.
• Matsui, M. & Yoshimi, T. 2015, “Macroeconomic dynamics in a model with heterogeneous wage contracts”, Economic Modelling, vol. 49, pp. 72–80.
• Mavroeidis, S., Møller, M.P. & Stock J.H. 2014, “Empirical evidence on inflation expectations in the new keynesian Phillips curve”, Journal of Economic Literature, vol. 52, no. 1, pp. 124–188.
• Mazumder, S. 2011, “The empirical validity of the new keynesian Phillips curve using survey forecasts of inflation”, Economic Modelling, vol. 28, no. 6, pp. 2439–2450.
• Menezes-Filho, N.A. & Muendler, M.A. 2007, “Labor reallocation in response to trade reform”, CESifo Working Paper Series, No. 1936.
• Michaelis, J. & de Pinto, M. 2014, “International trade and unemployment –the worker-selection effect”, Review of International Economics, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 226–252.
• Michelacci, C. & Lopez-Salido, D. 2007, “Technology shocks and job flows”, Review of Economic Studies, vol. 74, no. 4, pp. 1195–1227.
• Mortensen, D.T. & Pissarides, C.A. 1999, “Unemployment responses to ‘skill-biased’ technology shocks: The role of labour market policy”, Economic Journal, vol. 109, no. 455, pp. 242–265.
• Mumtaz, H. & Zanetti, F. 2015, “Labor market dynamics: A time-varying analysis”, Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, vol. 77, no. 3, pp. 319–338.
• Nwaka, I.D., Uma, K.E. & Tuna, G. 2015, “Trade openness and unemployment: Empirical evidence for Nigeria”, Economic and Labour Relations, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 117–136.
• Okun, A.M. 1962, “Potential GNP: Its measurement and significance”, in Proceedings of the Business and Economic Statistics Section of the American Statistical Association, American Statistical Association, Alexandria, VA, pp. 89–104.
• Otoiu, A. & Titan, E. (2012), “Main drivers of structural unemployment in times of relative prosperity”, Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, vol. 62, pp. 109–113.
• Palley, T. 2012, “The economics of the Phillips curve: Formation of inflation expectations versus incorporation of inflation expectations”, Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 221–230.
• Pérez, E. & Yao, Y. 2015, “Can institutional reform reduce job destruction and unemployment duration? Yes it can”, Empirical Economics, vol. 49, no. 3, pp. 961–983.
• Perry, B., Phillips, K.L. & Spencer, D.E. 2015, “State-Level variation in the real wage response to monetary policy”, Annals of Economics and Finance, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 1–17.
• Pesaran, M.H. 2004, “General diagnostic tests for cross section dependence in panels”, IZA Discussion Paper Series, No. 1240.
• Pesaran, M.H. 2007, “A simple panel unit root test in the presence of cross–section dependence”, Journal of Applied Econometrics, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 265–312.
• Phillips, A.W. 1958, “The relationship between unemployment and the rate of change of money wage rates in the United Kingdom 1861– 1957”, Economica, vol. 25, no. 100, pp. 283–299.
• Rocheteau, G. & Rodriguez-Lopez, A. 2014, “Liquidity provision, interest rates, and unemployment”, Journal of Monetary Economics, vol. 65, pp. 80–101.
• Saha, B., Sen, S. & Maiti, D. 2013, “Trade openness, labour institutions and flexibilisation: Theory and evidence from India”, Labour Economics, vol. 24, pp. 180–195.
• Samuelson, P.A. & Solow, R.M. 1960, “Analytical aspects of anti-inflation policy.” American Economic Review Papers, vol. 50, no, 2, in Papers and Proceedings of the Seventy-Second Annual Meeting of the American Economic Association, pp. 177–194.
• Schubert, S.F. (2011), “The effects of total Factor productivity and export shocks on a small open economy with unemployment”, Journal of Economic Dynamics & Control, vol. 35, no. 9, pp. 1514–1530.
• Srinivasan, N. & Mitra, P. 2014, “The European unemployment problem: Its cause and cure”, Empirical Economics, vol. 47, no. 1, pp. 57–73.
• Sunakawa, T. 2015, “Optimal monetary policy with labor market frictions: The role of the wage channel”, Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, vol. 47, no. 6, pp. 1119–1147.
• Tagkalakis, A.O. 2013, “The unemployment effects of fiscal policy: Recent evidence from Greece”, IZA Journal of European Labor Studies, vol. 2, no. 11, pp. 1–32.
• Thomas, A. 1998, “The fffects of tax wedges on hours worked and unemployment in Sweden”, IMF Working Paper, No. 152.
• Topalova, P. 2010, “Factor immobility and regional impacts of trade liberalization: Evidence on poverty from India”, IMF Working Paper, No. 128.
• Wesselbaum, D. 2015, “Sectoral labor market effects of fiscal spending”, Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, vol. 34, pp. 19–35.
• Woodburne, P.R. 2012, “The dynamic Phillips curve revisited: An error correction model”, International Journal of Advances in Management and Economics, vol. 1, no. 5, pp. 1–4.
• Yanikkaya, H. 2013, “Is trade liberalization a solution to the unemployment problem?”, Portuguese Economic Journal, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 57– 85.
• Zhang, C.S., Clovis, J. (2010), “The new keynesian Phillips curve of rational expectations: A serial correlation extension”, Journal of Applied Economics, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 159–179.