Research Article

INNOVATIVE ENTREPRENUERSHIP UNDER UNCERTAINTY

Volume: 6 Number: 2 June 30, 2017
EN

INNOVATIVE ENTREPRENUERSHIP UNDER UNCERTAINTY

Abstract

Purpose- This paper analyzes the economic activity of innovative entrepreneurship under uncertainty. We examine the profit maximization model of innovative firm under two kinds of uncertainties. The first kind of uncertainty pertains to market conditions. Erratic behavior of future prices creates market uncertainty.

Methodology- This uncertainty is at least partly resolved by rational expectations hypothesis. But repercussions of market imperfections still loom large in the background of theoretical framework. The second kind of uncertainty is caused by technological changes and the patterns of innovations. We use the black-box approach methodology to production function and then improve it with a learning model. Findings- The pace and space of innovation adoption is retarded and narrowed by technological uncertainties. This problem is tackled by neoclassical innovation models to some extent. In particular, endogenous growth models and the industrial dynamics model attempt to endogenize the innovation and technology under rational expectations.


Conclusion- But these models provide incomplete insights for they do not deal with learning behavior of innovative entrepreneurs. We propose an alternative learning model which takes into account the adaptive and imitative behavior of individual innovators whose economic actions matter in the general framework of real life economics.

Keywords

References

  1. Aghion, P. and Howitt, P. (1992). “A Model of Growth Through Creative Destruction,” Econometrica, Vol. 60, pp. 323-351.
  2. Assous, M. and Lampa, R. (2014). “Lange’s 1938 Model: ‘Dynamics and the Optimum Propensity to Consume,’” GREDEG Working Paper No. 2014-2.
  3. Dennett, D. C. (1998). Brainchildren. Essays on Designing Minds. London, Penguin Books.
  4. Ericsson, R. and Pakes, A. (1995). “Markov-Perfect Industry Dynamics: A Framework for Empirical Work,” Review of Economic Studies, Vol. 62, 53-82.
  5. Hacıoğlu, V. (2015). “Bayesian Expectations and Strategic Complementarity: Implications for Macroeconomic Stability,” Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, Elsevier, Vol. 195, pp. 580-591.
  6. Keuzenkamp, H. A. (1991). A Precursor to Muth: Tinbergen’s 1932 Model of Rational Expectations,” The Economic Journal, Vol. 101, No. 408, pp. 1245-1253.
  7. Keynes, J. M. (1936). The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money. London: Macmillan.
  8. Kirzner, I. (1997) “Entrepreneurial Discovery and the Competitive Market Process: An Austrian Approach,” Journal of Economic Literature, 35, Vol. 1, pp. 60-85.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

-

Journal Section

Research Article

Publication Date

June 30, 2017

Submission Date

February 5, 2017

Acceptance Date

-

Published in Issue

Year 2017 Volume: 6 Number: 2

APA
Sener, S., & Hacioglu, V. (2017). INNOVATIVE ENTREPRENUERSHIP UNDER UNCERTAINTY. Journal of Business Economics and Finance, 6(2), 168-176. https://doi.org/10.17261/Pressacademia.2017.506
AMA
1.Sener S, Hacioglu V. INNOVATIVE ENTREPRENUERSHIP UNDER UNCERTAINTY. JBEF. 2017;6(2):168-176. doi:10.17261/Pressacademia.2017.506
Chicago
Sener, Sefer, and Volkan Hacioglu. 2017. “INNOVATIVE ENTREPRENUERSHIP UNDER UNCERTAINTY”. Journal of Business Economics and Finance 6 (2): 168-76. https://doi.org/10.17261/Pressacademia.2017.506.
EndNote
Sener S, Hacioglu V (June 1, 2017) INNOVATIVE ENTREPRENUERSHIP UNDER UNCERTAINTY. Journal of Business Economics and Finance 6 2 168–176.
IEEE
[1]S. Sener and V. Hacioglu, “INNOVATIVE ENTREPRENUERSHIP UNDER UNCERTAINTY”, JBEF, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 168–176, June 2017, doi: 10.17261/Pressacademia.2017.506.
ISNAD
Sener, Sefer - Hacioglu, Volkan. “INNOVATIVE ENTREPRENUERSHIP UNDER UNCERTAINTY”. Journal of Business Economics and Finance 6/2 (June 1, 2017): 168-176. https://doi.org/10.17261/Pressacademia.2017.506.
JAMA
1.Sener S, Hacioglu V. INNOVATIVE ENTREPRENUERSHIP UNDER UNCERTAINTY. JBEF. 2017;6:168–176.
MLA
Sener, Sefer, and Volkan Hacioglu. “INNOVATIVE ENTREPRENUERSHIP UNDER UNCERTAINTY”. Journal of Business Economics and Finance, vol. 6, no. 2, June 2017, pp. 168-76, doi:10.17261/Pressacademia.2017.506.
Vancouver
1.Sefer Sener, Volkan Hacioglu. INNOVATIVE ENTREPRENUERSHIP UNDER UNCERTAINTY. JBEF. 2017 Jun. 1;6(2):168-76. doi:10.17261/Pressacademia.2017.506

Journal of Business, Economics and Finance (JBEF) is a scientific, academic, double blind peer-reviewed, semi-annual and open-access journal. The publication language is English. The journal publishes 2 issues a year. The issuing months are June and December. The journal aims to provide a research source for all practitioners, policy makers and researchers working in the areas of business, economics and finance. The Editor of JBEF invites all manuscripts that that cover theoretical and/or applied researches on topics related to the interest areas of the Journal. JBEF charges no submission or publication fee.



Ethics Policy - JBEF applies the standards of Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE). JBEF is committed to the academic community ensuring ethics and quality of manuscripts in publications. Plagiarism is strictly forbidden and the manuscripts found to be plagiarized will not be accepted or if published will be removed from the publication. Authors must certify that their manuscripts are their original work. Plagiarism, duplicate, data fabrication and redundant publications are forbidden. The manuscripts are subject to plagiarism check by iThenticate or similar. All manuscript submissions must provide a similarity report (up to 15% excluding quotes, bibliography, abstract, method).


Open Access - All research articles published in PressAcademia Journals are fully open access; immediately freely available to read, download and share. Articles are published under the terms of a Creative Commons license which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Open access is a property of individual works, not necessarily journals or publishers. Community standards, rather than copyright law, will continue to provide the mechanism for enforcement of proper attribution and responsible use of the published work, as they do now.