Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

Year 2017, , 216 - 223, 30.09.2017

Ertan Gunduz

https://doi.org/10.17261/Pressacademia.2017.681

Abstract

References

  • Abraham, R. (2000). Organizational cynicism: Bases and consequences, Genetic, Social and General Psychology Monographs, 126, 269–292.
  • Allen, N. J. and Meyer, J. P. (1990). The measurement and antecedents of affective, continuance and normative commitment to the organization, Journal of Occupational Psychology, 63(1), 1-18.
  • Andersson, L. M. and Bateman, T. S. (1997). Cynicism in the workplace: Some causes and effects. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 18, 449–469.
  • Barton, L. C., , & Ambrosini, V. (2013). The moderating effect of organizational change cynicism on middle manager strategy commitment, The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 24 (4), 721-746.
  • Battistelli, A., Montani, F., Odoardi, C., Vandenberghe, C., & Picci, P. (2014). Employees' concerns about change and commitment to change among Italian organizations: the moderating role of innovative work behavior, The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 25 (7), 951-978.
  • Bommer, W. H., Rich, G. A., & Rubin, R. S. (2005). Changing attitudes about change: Longitudinal effects of transformational leader behavior on employee cynicism about organizational change, Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26 (97), 733-753.
  • Brown, M. E., Treviño, L. K., & Harrison, D. A. (2005). Ethical Leadership: A Social Learning Perspective for Construct Development and Testing, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 97, 117-134.
  • Brown, M., & Cregan, C. (2008). Organizational change cynicism: The role of employee involvement, Human Resource Management, 47 (4), 667-686.
  • Buchanan, B. (1974). Building organizational commitment: The socialization of managers in work organizations, Administrative science quarterly, 19 (4), 533-546.
  • Chiaburu, D. S., Peng, A. C., Oh, I. S., Banks, G. C., & Lomeli, L. C. (2013). Antecedents and consequences of employee organizational cynicism: A meta-analysis, Journal of Vocational Behavior, 83 (2), 181-197.
  • Dean, J. W., Brandes, P., & Dharwadkar, R. (1998). Organizational cynicism. Academy of Management Review, 23, 341–352.
  • Gini, A. R. (1975). Philosopher as model. The Journal of Pre-College Philosophy, 1 (4), 55-59.
  • Gini, A. R. (2013). My job, my self: Work and the creation of the modern individual, Routledge.
  • Green, P. E., Tull, D. S., & Albaum, G. (1988). Research for marketing decisions, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
  • Gündüz, E. (2013). The Competitive Tension as a Moderator for Strategic Innovation, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences Elsevier, 99 (6), 553-561.
  • Harari, Y. N. (2016). Homo Deus: A brief history of tomorrow, Random House.
  • Işık, Ö. G. (2014). Organizational Cynicism: A Study among Advertising Agencies, Akdeniz İletişim, 22, 130-151.
  • Johnson, J. L., & O’Leary-Kelly, A. (2003). The effect of psychological contract breach and organizational cynicism: Not all social exchange violations are created equal, Journal of Organizational Behavior, 24, 627–647.
  • Kouzes, J., & Posner, B. (2012). The Leadership Challenge: How to Make Extraordinary Things Happen in Organizations, John Wiley & Sons.
  • Levine, J.M., & Moreland, R.L. (2006). Small Groups, Psychology Press, New York and Hove.
  • Meindl, J. R., Ehrlich, S. B., & Dukerich, J. M. (1985). The romance of leadership, Administrative science quarterly, 30 (1), 78-102.
  • Randall, D. M. (1987). Commitment and the Organization: The Organization Man Revisited, Academy of Management Review, 12 (3), 460471.
  • Reichers, A. E., Wanous, J. P., & Austin, J. T. (1997). Understanding and managing cynicism about organizational change, The Academy of Management Executive, 11 (1), 48-59.
  • Scott, W. G., & Hart, D. K. (1979) Organizational America, Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
  • Song, G., Min, S., Lee, S., & Seo, Y. (2017). The effects of network reliance on opportunity recognition: A moderated mediation model of knowledge acquisition and entrepreneurial orientation, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 117, 98–107.
  • Sullivan, J. (1988). Three roles of language in motivation theory, Academy of Management Review, 13, 104-115.
  • Tolay, E., Dalkılıç, O. S., & Sezgin, O. B. (2017). Örgütsel Değişim Sinizmi: Ölçek Geliştirme, Güvenilirlik ve Geçerlilik Çalişmasi, Atatürk Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 31, 1.
  • Wanous, J. P., Reichers, A. E., & Austin, J. T. (1994). Organizational Cynicism: An Initial Study, in Academy of Management Proceedings, 1994 (1), 269-273.
  • Wanous, J. P., Reichers, A. E., & Austin, J. T. (2000). Cynicism about organizational change, Group and Organization Management, 25 (2) 132–153.
  • Zhu, W., Heb, H., Treviño, L. K., Chaod, M. M., & Wang, W. (2015). Ethical leadership and follower voice and performance: The role of follower identifications and entity morality beliefs, The Leadership Quarterly, 26, 702-718.

CREDENCE TO LEADER AFFECTING DESIRED LEVEL OF COMMITMENT: THE MODERATING EFFECT OF EMPLOYEE’S CYNICISM ABOUT ORGANIZATIONAL CHANGE

Year 2017, , 216 - 223, 30.09.2017

Ertan Gunduz

https://doi.org/10.17261/Pressacademia.2017.681

Abstract

Purpose- Credence to truthful leader increases employee’s commitment
level to organization. The over committed members of organizations might cause
to performance loss. Natural attitudes such as employee’s cynicism about
organizational change could be used to moderate organizational commitment. As
credence to the leader reduces the cynicism level it would be possible to
control the effectiveness of cynicism to change and use it. 

Methodology- To test the propositions, a case study has been
arranged on an industry leading dressing retail company located in Turkey in
2016. After the validation of measures a series of regression analysis was
conducted to test the hypotheses and to define the direction of relations. 

Findings- The obtained data from the questionnaires were confirmed the
predicted relationships from credence to leader to organizational commitment
level, and employee’s cynicism about organizational change moderated this
relation. 



Conclusion- The study was one of the first attempts to propose
managers to use cynicism which lose strength by experience of employees and
credence to leader for organizational performance.



  

Keywords

Cynicism organizational change credence to leader desired commitment level

References

  • Abraham, R. (2000). Organizational cynicism: Bases and consequences, Genetic, Social and General Psychology Monographs, 126, 269–292.
  • Allen, N. J. and Meyer, J. P. (1990). The measurement and antecedents of affective, continuance and normative commitment to the organization, Journal of Occupational Psychology, 63(1), 1-18.
  • Andersson, L. M. and Bateman, T. S. (1997). Cynicism in the workplace: Some causes and effects. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 18, 449–469.
  • Barton, L. C., , & Ambrosini, V. (2013). The moderating effect of organizational change cynicism on middle manager strategy commitment, The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 24 (4), 721-746.
  • Battistelli, A., Montani, F., Odoardi, C., Vandenberghe, C., & Picci, P. (2014). Employees' concerns about change and commitment to change among Italian organizations: the moderating role of innovative work behavior, The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 25 (7), 951-978.
  • Bommer, W. H., Rich, G. A., & Rubin, R. S. (2005). Changing attitudes about change: Longitudinal effects of transformational leader behavior on employee cynicism about organizational change, Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26 (97), 733-753.
  • Brown, M. E., Treviño, L. K., & Harrison, D. A. (2005). Ethical Leadership: A Social Learning Perspective for Construct Development and Testing, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 97, 117-134.
  • Brown, M., & Cregan, C. (2008). Organizational change cynicism: The role of employee involvement, Human Resource Management, 47 (4), 667-686.
  • Buchanan, B. (1974). Building organizational commitment: The socialization of managers in work organizations, Administrative science quarterly, 19 (4), 533-546.
  • Chiaburu, D. S., Peng, A. C., Oh, I. S., Banks, G. C., & Lomeli, L. C. (2013). Antecedents and consequences of employee organizational cynicism: A meta-analysis, Journal of Vocational Behavior, 83 (2), 181-197.
  • Dean, J. W., Brandes, P., & Dharwadkar, R. (1998). Organizational cynicism. Academy of Management Review, 23, 341–352.
  • Gini, A. R. (1975). Philosopher as model. The Journal of Pre-College Philosophy, 1 (4), 55-59.
  • Gini, A. R. (2013). My job, my self: Work and the creation of the modern individual, Routledge.
  • Green, P. E., Tull, D. S., & Albaum, G. (1988). Research for marketing decisions, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
  • Gündüz, E. (2013). The Competitive Tension as a Moderator for Strategic Innovation, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences Elsevier, 99 (6), 553-561.
  • Harari, Y. N. (2016). Homo Deus: A brief history of tomorrow, Random House.
  • Işık, Ö. G. (2014). Organizational Cynicism: A Study among Advertising Agencies, Akdeniz İletişim, 22, 130-151.
  • Johnson, J. L., & O’Leary-Kelly, A. (2003). The effect of psychological contract breach and organizational cynicism: Not all social exchange violations are created equal, Journal of Organizational Behavior, 24, 627–647.
  • Kouzes, J., & Posner, B. (2012). The Leadership Challenge: How to Make Extraordinary Things Happen in Organizations, John Wiley & Sons.
  • Levine, J.M., & Moreland, R.L. (2006). Small Groups, Psychology Press, New York and Hove.
  • Meindl, J. R., Ehrlich, S. B., & Dukerich, J. M. (1985). The romance of leadership, Administrative science quarterly, 30 (1), 78-102.
  • Randall, D. M. (1987). Commitment and the Organization: The Organization Man Revisited, Academy of Management Review, 12 (3), 460471.
  • Reichers, A. E., Wanous, J. P., & Austin, J. T. (1997). Understanding and managing cynicism about organizational change, The Academy of Management Executive, 11 (1), 48-59.
  • Scott, W. G., & Hart, D. K. (1979) Organizational America, Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
  • Song, G., Min, S., Lee, S., & Seo, Y. (2017). The effects of network reliance on opportunity recognition: A moderated mediation model of knowledge acquisition and entrepreneurial orientation, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 117, 98–107.
  • Sullivan, J. (1988). Three roles of language in motivation theory, Academy of Management Review, 13, 104-115.
  • Tolay, E., Dalkılıç, O. S., & Sezgin, O. B. (2017). Örgütsel Değişim Sinizmi: Ölçek Geliştirme, Güvenilirlik ve Geçerlilik Çalişmasi, Atatürk Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 31, 1.
  • Wanous, J. P., Reichers, A. E., & Austin, J. T. (1994). Organizational Cynicism: An Initial Study, in Academy of Management Proceedings, 1994 (1), 269-273.
  • Wanous, J. P., Reichers, A. E., & Austin, J. T. (2000). Cynicism about organizational change, Group and Organization Management, 25 (2) 132–153.
  • Zhu, W., Heb, H., Treviño, L. K., Chaod, M. M., & Wang, W. (2015). Ethical leadership and follower voice and performance: The role of follower identifications and entity morality beliefs, The Leadership Quarterly, 26, 702-718.
There are 30 citations in total.

Details

Journal Section Articles
Authors

Ertan Gunduz

Publication Date September 30, 2017
Published in Issue Year 2017

Cite

APA Gunduz, E. (2017). CREDENCE TO LEADER AFFECTING DESIRED LEVEL OF COMMITMENT: THE MODERATING EFFECT OF EMPLOYEE’S CYNICISM ABOUT ORGANIZATIONAL CHANGE. Journal of Business Economics and Finance, 6(3), 216-223. https://doi.org/10.17261/Pressacademia.2017.681

Journal of Business, Economics and Finance (JBEF) is a scientific, academic, double blind peer-reviewed, quarterly and open-access journal. The publication language is English. The journal publishes four issues a year. The issuing months are March, June, September and December. The journal aims to provide a research source for all practitioners, policy makers and researchers working in the areas of business, economics and finance. The Editor of JBEF invites all manuscripts that that cover theoretical and/or applied researches on topics related to the interest areas of the Journal. JBEF charges no submission or publication fee.



Ethics Policy - JBEF applies the standards of Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE). JBEF is committed to the academic community ensuring ethics and quality of manuscripts in publications. Plagiarism is strictly forbidden and the manuscripts found to be plagiarized will not be accepted or if published will be removed from the publication. Authors must certify that their manuscripts are their original work. Plagiarism, duplicate, data fabrication and redundant publications are forbidden. The manuscripts are subject to plagiarism check by iThenticate or similar. All manuscript submissions must provide a similarity report (up to 15% excluding quotes, bibliography, abstract, method).


Open Access - All research articles published in PressAcademia Journals are fully open access; immediately freely available to read, download and share. Articles are published under the terms of a Creative Commons license which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Open access is a property of individual works, not necessarily journals or publishers. Community standards, rather than copyright law, will continue to provide the mechanism for enforcement of proper attribution and responsible use of the published work, as they do now.