BibTex RIS Cite
Year 2014, Volume: 3 Issue: 3, 328 - 340, 01.09.2014

Abstract

References

  •  Abbott, L.J., Parker S, Peters, G.F. and Raghunandan, K.(2003). The Association between Audit Committee Characteristics and Audit Fees. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory,Vol.22 (2): 17-32
  •  Bell, T.B., Landsman, W. and Shackelford, D.A.(2001). Auditors’ Perceived Business Risk and Audit Fees: analysis and Evidence. Journal of Accounting Research,Vol.39(1):35–43.
  •  DeAngelo, L. (1981). Auditor Size and Auditor Quality. Journal of Accounting and Economics, Vol. 3(3): 183–99.
  •  DeFond, M. (1992). The Association between Changes in Client Firm Agency Costs and AuditorSwitching. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, Vol.11 (1): 16–
  •  Fields, L.P., Fraser, D.R. and Wilkins M.(2004). An Investigation of the Pricing of Audit Services for Financial Institutions. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, Vol.23(1):53-77
  •  Francis, J., Maydew, E. and Sparks, H.C. (1999). The Role of Big 6 Auditors in the Credible Reporting of Accruals. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, Vol.18 (2): 17–34.
  •  Francis, J., and Wilson, E.(1988). Auditor Changes: A Joint Test of Theories Relating to AgencyCosts and Auditor Differentiation. The Accounting Review, Vol.63 (4): 663–82.
  •  Frankel, R. and Li, X.(2004). Characteristic of a Firm’s Information Environment and the Information Asymmetry between Insiders and Outsiders, Journal of Accounting and Economics, Vol.37, 229-259.
  • Froot, K.A., David, S.S. and Jeremy, C. S., (1993). Risk Management: Coordinating Corporate Investment and Financing Policies, Journal of Finance, Vol.48, 162919
  •  Gow, I.D., Ormazabal, G. and Taylor, D.J. (2010). Correcting for Cross-Sectional and Time-Series Dependence in Accounting Research. The Accounting Review, Vol. 85 (2):483-512
  •  Godfrey, J.M. and J. Hamilton. (2005). The Impact of R&D Intensity on Demand for Specialist Auditor Services. Contemporary Accounting Research, Vol. 22 (1), pp. 55-93.
  •  Hay, D., Knechel, W.R. and Wong N. (2006). Audit Fees: A Meta-analysis of the Effect of Supply and Demand Attributes. Contemporary Accounting Research, Vol. 23 (1), pp. 141-191.
  •  Himmelberg, C. P. and Petersen, B.C. (1994). R&D and Internal Finance: a Panel Study of Small Firms in High-tech Industries. Review of Economics and Statistics, Vol.76: 38-51.
  •  Holmstrom, B. (1989). Agency Costs and Innovation. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, Vol.12, 305-327.
  •  Johnson, W.B. and Lys, T. (1990). The Market for Audit Services: Evidence from VoluntaryAuditor Changes. Journal of Accounting and Economics, Vol.12 (1–3): 281–308.
  •  Kothari S.P.,Leone A.J. and Wasley, C.E. (2005). Performance Matched Discretionary Accrual Measures. Journal of Accounting and Economics, Vol 39: 163-197
  •  Krishnan, G.V., Sun, L., Wang, Q. and Yang, R. (2013). Client Risk Management: A Pecking Order Analysis of Auditor Response to Upward Earnings Management Risk. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, Vol. 32 (2):147-169
  •  Mayhew, B.W. and Wilkins, M.S. (2004). Audit Firm Industry Specialization as a Differentiation Strategy: Evidence from Fees Charged to Firms Going Public. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, Vol. 22 (2):33-52
  •  Petersen, M.A. (2009). Estimating Standard Errors in Finance Panel Data Sets: Comparing Approaches. Review of Financial Studies. Vol. 22(1): 435-480
  •  Reichelt, K.J. and Wang, D. (2009). National and Office-Specific Measures of Auditor Industry Expertise and  Effects on Audit Quality, Journal of Accounting Research, Vol.48(3):647-686
  •  Shi, C. (2003). On the Trade-off between the Future Benefits and Riskiness of R&D: A Bondholders’ Perspective.
  •  Journal of Accounting and Economics, Vol. 35, 227-254.  Simunic, D. (1980). The pricing of audit services: theory and evidence. Journal of Accounting Research, Vol.18(1):161–190.
  • Tsui, J., Jaggi, B., and Gul, F. (2001). CEO domination, growth opportunities, and their impact on audit fees.Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Finance, Vol.16(3):189–203.

Research and Development Intensity and Audit Fees

Year 2014, Volume: 3 Issue: 3, 328 - 340, 01.09.2014

Abstract

This study provides evidence on whether audit fees vary in response to the intensity of research and development (R&D) expenditure and whether some other factors, such as expert auditor, may moderate the relationship between R&D intensity and audit fees. Our evidence indicates that there is a positive relationship between R&D intensity and audit fees and hiring an industry specialist auditor may attenuate the relationship. Our findings sugge*st that auditors charge a premium for heightened audit risk and increased audit efforts related to R&D intensity.

References

  •  Abbott, L.J., Parker S, Peters, G.F. and Raghunandan, K.(2003). The Association between Audit Committee Characteristics and Audit Fees. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory,Vol.22 (2): 17-32
  •  Bell, T.B., Landsman, W. and Shackelford, D.A.(2001). Auditors’ Perceived Business Risk and Audit Fees: analysis and Evidence. Journal of Accounting Research,Vol.39(1):35–43.
  •  DeAngelo, L. (1981). Auditor Size and Auditor Quality. Journal of Accounting and Economics, Vol. 3(3): 183–99.
  •  DeFond, M. (1992). The Association between Changes in Client Firm Agency Costs and AuditorSwitching. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, Vol.11 (1): 16–
  •  Fields, L.P., Fraser, D.R. and Wilkins M.(2004). An Investigation of the Pricing of Audit Services for Financial Institutions. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, Vol.23(1):53-77
  •  Francis, J., Maydew, E. and Sparks, H.C. (1999). The Role of Big 6 Auditors in the Credible Reporting of Accruals. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, Vol.18 (2): 17–34.
  •  Francis, J., and Wilson, E.(1988). Auditor Changes: A Joint Test of Theories Relating to AgencyCosts and Auditor Differentiation. The Accounting Review, Vol.63 (4): 663–82.
  •  Frankel, R. and Li, X.(2004). Characteristic of a Firm’s Information Environment and the Information Asymmetry between Insiders and Outsiders, Journal of Accounting and Economics, Vol.37, 229-259.
  • Froot, K.A., David, S.S. and Jeremy, C. S., (1993). Risk Management: Coordinating Corporate Investment and Financing Policies, Journal of Finance, Vol.48, 162919
  •  Gow, I.D., Ormazabal, G. and Taylor, D.J. (2010). Correcting for Cross-Sectional and Time-Series Dependence in Accounting Research. The Accounting Review, Vol. 85 (2):483-512
  •  Godfrey, J.M. and J. Hamilton. (2005). The Impact of R&D Intensity on Demand for Specialist Auditor Services. Contemporary Accounting Research, Vol. 22 (1), pp. 55-93.
  •  Hay, D., Knechel, W.R. and Wong N. (2006). Audit Fees: A Meta-analysis of the Effect of Supply and Demand Attributes. Contemporary Accounting Research, Vol. 23 (1), pp. 141-191.
  •  Himmelberg, C. P. and Petersen, B.C. (1994). R&D and Internal Finance: a Panel Study of Small Firms in High-tech Industries. Review of Economics and Statistics, Vol.76: 38-51.
  •  Holmstrom, B. (1989). Agency Costs and Innovation. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, Vol.12, 305-327.
  •  Johnson, W.B. and Lys, T. (1990). The Market for Audit Services: Evidence from VoluntaryAuditor Changes. Journal of Accounting and Economics, Vol.12 (1–3): 281–308.
  •  Kothari S.P.,Leone A.J. and Wasley, C.E. (2005). Performance Matched Discretionary Accrual Measures. Journal of Accounting and Economics, Vol 39: 163-197
  •  Krishnan, G.V., Sun, L., Wang, Q. and Yang, R. (2013). Client Risk Management: A Pecking Order Analysis of Auditor Response to Upward Earnings Management Risk. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, Vol. 32 (2):147-169
  •  Mayhew, B.W. and Wilkins, M.S. (2004). Audit Firm Industry Specialization as a Differentiation Strategy: Evidence from Fees Charged to Firms Going Public. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, Vol. 22 (2):33-52
  •  Petersen, M.A. (2009). Estimating Standard Errors in Finance Panel Data Sets: Comparing Approaches. Review of Financial Studies. Vol. 22(1): 435-480
  •  Reichelt, K.J. and Wang, D. (2009). National and Office-Specific Measures of Auditor Industry Expertise and  Effects on Audit Quality, Journal of Accounting Research, Vol.48(3):647-686
  •  Shi, C. (2003). On the Trade-off between the Future Benefits and Riskiness of R&D: A Bondholders’ Perspective.
  •  Journal of Accounting and Economics, Vol. 35, 227-254.  Simunic, D. (1980). The pricing of audit services: theory and evidence. Journal of Accounting Research, Vol.18(1):161–190.
  • Tsui, J., Jaggi, B., and Gul, F. (2001). CEO domination, growth opportunities, and their impact on audit fees.Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Finance, Vol.16(3):189–203.
There are 23 citations in total.

Details

Journal Section Articles
Authors

Zenghui Liu This is me

Bo Ouyang This is me

Publication Date September 1, 2014
Published in Issue Year 2014 Volume: 3 Issue: 3

Cite

APA Liu, Z., & Ouyang, B. (2014). Research and Development Intensity and Audit Fees. Journal of Business Economics and Finance, 3(3), 328-340.

Journal of Business, Economics and Finance (JBEF) is a scientific, academic, double blind peer-reviewed, quarterly and open-access journal. The publication language is English. The journal publishes four issues a year. The issuing months are March, June, September and December. The journal aims to provide a research source for all practitioners, policy makers and researchers working in the areas of business, economics and finance. The Editor of JBEF invites all manuscripts that that cover theoretical and/or applied researches on topics related to the interest areas of the Journal. JBEF charges no submission or publication fee.



Ethics Policy - JBEF applies the standards of Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE). JBEF is committed to the academic community ensuring ethics and quality of manuscripts in publications. Plagiarism is strictly forbidden and the manuscripts found to be plagiarized will not be accepted or if published will be removed from the publication. Authors must certify that their manuscripts are their original work. Plagiarism, duplicate, data fabrication and redundant publications are forbidden. The manuscripts are subject to plagiarism check by iThenticate or similar. All manuscript submissions must provide a similarity report (up to 15% excluding quotes, bibliography, abstract, method).


Open Access - All research articles published in PressAcademia Journals are fully open access; immediately freely available to read, download and share. Articles are published under the terms of a Creative Commons license which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Open access is a property of individual works, not necessarily journals or publishers. Community standards, rather than copyright law, will continue to provide the mechanism for enforcement of proper attribution and responsible use of the published work, as they do now.