Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite
Year 2019, Volume: 8 Issue: 4, 209 - 214, 30.12.2019

Abstract

References

  • Alles, M., & Gray, G. L. (2015). The Pros and Cons of Using Big Data in Auditing: a Synthesis of the Literature and a Research Agenda. Awaiting Approval, 1–37.
  • Aslan, Ü., & Özerhan, Y. (2017). Big Data, Muhasebe Ve Muhasebe Mesleği, Muhasebe Bilim Dünyası Dergisi, 19(4); 862-883
  • Connolly, S. (2012). 7 Key Drivers for the Big Data Market. Blog posting, http://hortonworks.com/blog/7-key-drivers-for-the-big-data-market
  • Deloitte (2017). Blockchain Technology and Its Potential Impact on the Audit and Assurance Profession, https://www. aicpa.org
  • E&Y. 2018 https://www.ey.com/en_us/assurance/why-ai-is-both-a-risk-and-a-way-to-manage-risk
  • Fanning, K., & Centers, D. P. (2016). Blockchain and Its Coming Impact on Financial Services. Journal of Corporate Accounting & Finance, 27(5), 53–57.doi:10.1002/jcaf.22179
  • FAR. (2016). Nyckeln till framtiden. FAR. Retrieved from https://www.far.se/globalassets/trycksaker-pdf/nyckeln-till-framtiden_uppslag.pdf
  • Flint, D. (1988). Philosophy and principles of auditing: An introduction. Macmillan Education LTD.
  • IIA. (2016). Global Perspectives and Insights: Emerging Trends, Issue 5.
  • Issa, H., Sun, T., & Vasarhelyi, M. A. (2016). Research Ideas for Artificial Intelligence in Auditing: The Formalization of Audit and Workforce Supplementation. Journal of Emerging Technologies in Accounting, 13(2), 1–20.doi:10.2308/jeta-10511
  • Karlsen A. & Wallberg M. The effects of digitalization on auditors’ tools and working methods: A study of the audit profession. http://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:1115922/FULLTEXT01.pdf.
  • Kiesow, A., Zarvic, N., & Thomas, O. (2014). Continuous Auditing in Big Data Computing Environments: Towards an Integrated Audit Approach by Using CAATTs. In GI-Jahrestagung pp. 901-912.
  • McKinsey, (2011). Big data: The next frontier for innovation, competition, and productivity. McKinsey Global Institute, June. http://www.mckinsey.com/insights/business_technology/big_data_the_next_frontier_for_ innovation
  • Ovenden, J. (2017). Will Render Accountants Irrelevant?, https://channels.theinnovationenterprise.com/articles/will-blockchain-renderaccountants-irrelevant
  • Öz, Y. (2016) Bulut Bilişim (Cloud Computing) ve Muhasebe Bartın Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi 7 (13), 63-79.
  • Qian, L., Luo, Z., Du, Y., and Guo, L. (2009). Cloud computing: An overview. Berlin, Germany: Springer, pp. 626–631.
  • Sabillon, R., Serra-Ruiz, J., Cavaller, V., & Cano, J. (2017). A Comprehensive Cybersecurity Audit Model to Improve Cybersecurity Assurance: The CyberSecurity Audit Model (CSAM). In 2017 International Conference on Information Systems and Computer Science (INCISCOS) (pp. 253-259). IEEE.
  • Türker, M. (2018). Dijitalleşme Sürecinde Küresel Muhasebe Mesleğinin Yeniden Şekillenmesine Bakış. World of Accounting Science, 20(1).
  • Uçma T., & Kurt G., (2018). Blockchain Technology in Accounting and Auditing, Suleyman Demirel University The Journal of Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, Vol.23, No.2, pp.467-481

THE IMPACT OF DIGITALIZATION ON THE AUDIT PROFESSION: A REVIEW OF TURKISH INDEPENDENT AUDIT FIRMS

Year 2019, Volume: 8 Issue: 4, 209 - 214, 30.12.2019

Abstract

Purpose - The aim of exploratory study is to increase the understanding of the effects digitalization has on the tools and working methods of the audit profession.
Methodology - Websites of 235 audit firms authorized by POA (Public Oversight, Accounting and Auditing Standards Authority) were examined. In addition, transparency reports of 64 companies authorized for Public Interest Entity (PIE) Audit were investigated as well. The status of the services provided by the audit companies after the technological developments were analyzed. In addition, infrastructure and continuous education investments of audit firms related to digitalization have been determined.
Findings- It has been found that almost all audit companies provide services for independent audit and tax audit. (Respectively 95% and 85%). These are followed by financial services and internal audit issues. (Respectively 61% and 45%). Only Big Four invest the necessary infrastructure and human resources in addition to providing services in these matters. In spite of all these technological developments, only 24 companies provide education to their employees for IT / IT audits. Only Big Four provide education for digital technologies to their employees.
Conclusion- As a result, with the effect of digitalization, Information technologies have gained importance. But the audit firms have not yet made the necessary investment in these areas. 90% of audit firms do not provide services in these areas and do not make infrastructure and human resources investments.

References

  • Alles, M., & Gray, G. L. (2015). The Pros and Cons of Using Big Data in Auditing: a Synthesis of the Literature and a Research Agenda. Awaiting Approval, 1–37.
  • Aslan, Ü., & Özerhan, Y. (2017). Big Data, Muhasebe Ve Muhasebe Mesleği, Muhasebe Bilim Dünyası Dergisi, 19(4); 862-883
  • Connolly, S. (2012). 7 Key Drivers for the Big Data Market. Blog posting, http://hortonworks.com/blog/7-key-drivers-for-the-big-data-market
  • Deloitte (2017). Blockchain Technology and Its Potential Impact on the Audit and Assurance Profession, https://www. aicpa.org
  • E&Y. 2018 https://www.ey.com/en_us/assurance/why-ai-is-both-a-risk-and-a-way-to-manage-risk
  • Fanning, K., & Centers, D. P. (2016). Blockchain and Its Coming Impact on Financial Services. Journal of Corporate Accounting & Finance, 27(5), 53–57.doi:10.1002/jcaf.22179
  • FAR. (2016). Nyckeln till framtiden. FAR. Retrieved from https://www.far.se/globalassets/trycksaker-pdf/nyckeln-till-framtiden_uppslag.pdf
  • Flint, D. (1988). Philosophy and principles of auditing: An introduction. Macmillan Education LTD.
  • IIA. (2016). Global Perspectives and Insights: Emerging Trends, Issue 5.
  • Issa, H., Sun, T., & Vasarhelyi, M. A. (2016). Research Ideas for Artificial Intelligence in Auditing: The Formalization of Audit and Workforce Supplementation. Journal of Emerging Technologies in Accounting, 13(2), 1–20.doi:10.2308/jeta-10511
  • Karlsen A. & Wallberg M. The effects of digitalization on auditors’ tools and working methods: A study of the audit profession. http://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:1115922/FULLTEXT01.pdf.
  • Kiesow, A., Zarvic, N., & Thomas, O. (2014). Continuous Auditing in Big Data Computing Environments: Towards an Integrated Audit Approach by Using CAATTs. In GI-Jahrestagung pp. 901-912.
  • McKinsey, (2011). Big data: The next frontier for innovation, competition, and productivity. McKinsey Global Institute, June. http://www.mckinsey.com/insights/business_technology/big_data_the_next_frontier_for_ innovation
  • Ovenden, J. (2017). Will Render Accountants Irrelevant?, https://channels.theinnovationenterprise.com/articles/will-blockchain-renderaccountants-irrelevant
  • Öz, Y. (2016) Bulut Bilişim (Cloud Computing) ve Muhasebe Bartın Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi 7 (13), 63-79.
  • Qian, L., Luo, Z., Du, Y., and Guo, L. (2009). Cloud computing: An overview. Berlin, Germany: Springer, pp. 626–631.
  • Sabillon, R., Serra-Ruiz, J., Cavaller, V., & Cano, J. (2017). A Comprehensive Cybersecurity Audit Model to Improve Cybersecurity Assurance: The CyberSecurity Audit Model (CSAM). In 2017 International Conference on Information Systems and Computer Science (INCISCOS) (pp. 253-259). IEEE.
  • Türker, M. (2018). Dijitalleşme Sürecinde Küresel Muhasebe Mesleğinin Yeniden Şekillenmesine Bakış. World of Accounting Science, 20(1).
  • Uçma T., & Kurt G., (2018). Blockchain Technology in Accounting and Auditing, Suleyman Demirel University The Journal of Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, Vol.23, No.2, pp.467-481
There are 19 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Subjects Finance, Business Administration
Journal Section Articles
Authors

Burcu Adiloglu 0000-0001-9680-1408

Nevzat Gungor 0000-0001-9883-1985

Publication Date December 30, 2019
Published in Issue Year 2019 Volume: 8 Issue: 4

Cite

APA Adiloglu, B., & Gungor, N. (2019). THE IMPACT OF DIGITALIZATION ON THE AUDIT PROFESSION: A REVIEW OF TURKISH INDEPENDENT AUDIT FIRMS. Journal of Business Economics and Finance, 8(4), 209-214.

Journal of Business, Economics and Finance (JBEF) is a scientific, academic, double blind peer-reviewed, quarterly and open-access journal. The publication language is English. The journal publishes four issues a year. The issuing months are March, June, September and December. The journal aims to provide a research source for all practitioners, policy makers and researchers working in the areas of business, economics and finance. The Editor of JBEF invites all manuscripts that that cover theoretical and/or applied researches on topics related to the interest areas of the Journal. JBEF charges no submission or publication fee.



Ethics Policy - JBEF applies the standards of Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE). JBEF is committed to the academic community ensuring ethics and quality of manuscripts in publications. Plagiarism is strictly forbidden and the manuscripts found to be plagiarized will not be accepted or if published will be removed from the publication. Authors must certify that their manuscripts are their original work. Plagiarism, duplicate, data fabrication and redundant publications are forbidden. The manuscripts are subject to plagiarism check by iThenticate or similar. All manuscript submissions must provide a similarity report (up to 15% excluding quotes, bibliography, abstract, method).


Open Access - All research articles published in PressAcademia Journals are fully open access; immediately freely available to read, download and share. Articles are published under the terms of a Creative Commons license which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Open access is a property of individual works, not necessarily journals or publishers. Community standards, rather than copyright law, will continue to provide the mechanism for enforcement of proper attribution and responsible use of the published work, as they do now.