Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

EXAMINING THE NEXUS BETWEEN CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY DISCLOSURE AND EARNINGS MANAGEMENT: EVIDENCE FROM THE STATE-OWNED ENTERPRISES OF BANGLADESH

Year 2024, Volume: 13 Issue: 1, 24 - 36, 03.06.2024
https://doi.org/10.17261/Pressacademia.2024.1899

Abstract

Purpose- The purpose of the study is to examine the association between corporate social responsibility (CSR) disclosure and the practice of earnings management in the listed state-owned enterprises (SOEs) of Bangladesh.
Methodology- All the listed SOEs (17 firms) of Dhaka Stock Exchange (DSE) for the years 2017-2022 were considered in the study, resulting in observations of 102 firm-years. Content analysis was used to assess the level of CSR disclosure in the annual reports. For measuring earnings management, Beneish M-score model was used as the proxy variable. To investigate the association between CSR disclosure and earnings management, multivariate regression analysis was conducted using pooled OLS model, random effects model and lag model.
Findings- The regression outcomes of the study found a positive and significant association between CSR disclosure and earnings management. This study shows how managers can use CSR disclosures as a competitive advantage by manipulating earnings while also fostering positive relationships with stakeholders.
Conclusion- Investors and governments alike are increasingly demanding ethical business practices and full disclosure from corporations. The study concludes that managers' opportunistic behavior is a primary motivation for using CSRD to cover their tracks. This study will provide valuable insights to the policy-makers, regulators, investors and other stakeholders on how CSR reporting can be used as a medium to hide management’s manipulative practices and, why it is important to implement a more comprehensive guideline on CSR reporting and effective governance to eliminate such practices.

References

  • Akra, R. M., & Chaya, J. K. (2020). Testing the effectiveness of Altman and Beneish models in detecting financial fraud and financial manipulation: Case study Kuwaiti stock market. International Journal of Business and Management, 15(10), 70–81. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijbm.v15n10p70
  • Almahrog, Y., Ali Aribi, Z. & Arun, T. (2018). Earnings management and corporate social responsibility: UK evidence. Journal of Financial Reporting and Accounting, 16(2), 311-332. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFRA-11-2016-0092
  • Alsaadi, A., M. S. Ebrahim, & A. Jaafar. (2017). Corporate Social Responsibility, Shariah- Compliance, and Earnings Quality. Journal of Financial Services Research, 51(2), 169-194. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10693-016-0263-0
  • Arman, M., & Sharmin, S. (2019). Likelihood of a company’s manipulation of its financial statement: An empirical analysis using Beneish M-score model. International Conference on Management and Information Systems September (Vol. 29, pp. 30).
  • Becker, C. L., DeFond, M. L., Jiambalvo, J., & Subramanyam, K. (1998). The effect of audit quality on earnings management. Contemporary Accounting Research, 15(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1911-3846.1998.tb00547.x
  • Beneish, M. (1999). The detection of earning manipulation. Financial Analyst Journal, 55(5), 24–36. https://doi.org/10.2469/faj.v55.n5.2296
  • Brown, N. & Deegan, C. (1998). The public disclosure of environmental performance information: a dual test of media agenda setting theory and legitimacy theory. Accounting and Business Research, 2(1), 21-41. https://doi.org/10.1080/00014788.1998.9729564
  • Carroll, A. B. (1999). Corporate social responsibility evolution of a definitional construct. Business & Society, 38(3), 268–295. https://doi.org/10.1177/000765039903800303
  • Chih, H., Shen, C., & Kang, F. (2008). Corporate social responsibility, investor protection, and earnings management: Some international evidence. Journal of Business Ethics, 79(1-2), 179–198. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-007-9383-7
  • Cho, E., & S. Chun. 2016. Corporate social responsibility, real activities earnings management, and corporate governance: evidence from Korea. Asia-Pacific Journal of Accounting & Economics, 23(4), 400-431. https://doi.org/10.1080/16081625.2015.1047005
  • Choi, B. B., D. Lee, & Y. Park. (2013). Corporate Social Responsibility, Corporate Governance and Earnings Quality: Evidence from Korea. Corporate Governance: An International Review. 21(5), 447-467. https://doi.org/10.1111/corg.12033
  • Choi, T.H., & Pae, J. (2011). Business ethics and financial reporting quality: evidence from Korea. Journal of Business Ethics, 103(3), 403–427. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-0871-4
  • Dechow, P. M., & Skinner, D. J. (2000). Earnings management: Reconciling the views of accounting academics, practitioners, and regulators. Accounting Horizons, 14(2), 235–250. https://doi.org/10.2308/acch.2000.14.2.235
  • Dechow, P., Sloan, R., & Sweeney, A. (1995). Detecting earnings management. Accounting Review, 70(2), 193–225.
  • Ding, Y., Zhang, H., & Zhang, J. (2007). Private vs. state ownership and earnings management: evidence from Chinese listed companies. Corporate governance: an international review, 15(2), 223–38. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8683.2007.00556.x
  • Elsayed, M.O. and Hoque, Z. (2010). Perceived international environmental factors and corporate voluntary disclosure practices: An empirical study. The British Accounting Review, 42(1), 17–35. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/J.BAR.2010.01.001
  • Farooque, O.A., Zijl, T.V., Dunstan, K. & Karim, A.K.M.W. (2007). Corporate governance in Bangladesh: link between ownership concentration and financial performance. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 15(6), 1453-1468. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8683.2007.00657.x
  • Fayad, A.A.S., Binti Mohd Ariff, A.H. & Ooi, S.C. (2022). Dose board characteristics influence integrated reporting quality? Empirical evidence from an emerging market. Cogent Economics & Finance, 10(1). Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/23322039.2022.2140907
  • García-Sánchez, I.-M., & E. García-Meca. (2017). CSR Engagement and Earnings Quality in Banks. The Moderating Role of Institutional Factors. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 24(2), 145-158. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1405
  • Gargouri, R. M., C. Francoeur, & R. Shabou. (2010). The Relationship between Corporate Social Performance and Earnings Management. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences, 27(4), 320-334. https://doi.org/10.1002/cjas.178
  • Goel, A.M. & Thakor, A.V. (2003). Why do firms smooth earnings? The Journal of Business, 76(1), pp. 151-192. https://doi.org/10.1086/344117
  • Gujarati, D. N. (2003). Basic Econometrics (4th ed.). New York: McGraw-HiII.
  • Habbash, M. & Haddad, L. (2020). The impact of corporate social responsibility on earnings management practices: evidence from Saudi Arabia. Social Responsibility Journal, 16(8), 1073-1085. https://doi.org/10.1108/SRJ-09-2018-0232
  • Healy, P. M., & Wahlen, J. M. (1999). A review of the earnings management literature and its implications for standard setting. Accounting Horizons, 13(4), 365–383. https://doi.org/10.2308/acch.1999.13.4.365
  • Hoang, T. C., Abeysekera, I. A., & Ma, S. (2014). State ownership and earnings management: Empirical evidence from Vietnamese listed firms. Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Finance and Economics, Ho Chi Minh City, Việt Nam, 2–3 June.
  • Hong, Y. & Andersen, M.L. (2011). The relationship between corporate social responsibility and earnings management: an explanatory study. Journal of Business Ethics, 104, 461–471. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-0921-y
  • Jensen, M.C., & Meckling, W.H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305-360. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(76)90026-X
  • Kamal, M. E. M., Salleh, M. F. M., & Ahmad, A. (2016). Detecting financial statement fraud by Malaysian public listed companies: The reliability of the Beneish M-Score model. Jurnal Pengurusan, 46, 23–32.
  • Kim, Y., Park, M. S., & Wier, B. (2012). Is earnings quality associated with corporate social responsibility? The Accounting Review, 87(3), 761–796. http://dx.doi.org/10.2308/accr-10209
  • Kowalski, P., Büge, M., Egeland, M., & Sztajerowska, M. (2013). State-Owned Enterprises: Trade Effects and Policy Implications. OECD Trade Policy Papers n. 147, Paris: OECD Publishing.
  • Kumala, R. & Siregar, S.V. (2021). Corporate social responsibility, family ownership and earnings management: the case of Indonesia. Social Responsibility Journal, 17(1), 69-86. https://doi.org/10.1108/SRJ-09-2016-0156
  • Laksmana, I. & Yang, Y. (2009). Corporate citizenship and earnings attributes. Advances in Accounting, 25(1), 40-48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adiac.2009.02.001
  • Lee, B. B., & Choi, B. (2002). Company size, auditor type, and earnings management. Journal of Forensic Accounting, 3, 27–50.
  • Mamo, J., & Shehu, I. (2017). An estimating model for accounting manipulation phenomena. Case of Albania. Interdisciplinary Journal of Research and Development, 4(2), 130–44.
  • Moratis, L., & van Egmond, M. (2018). Concealing social responsibility? Investigating the relationship between CSR, earnings management and the effect of industry through quantitative analysis. International Journal of Corporate Social Responsibility, 3(8). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40991-018-0030-7
  • Muttakin, M. B., A. Khan, & M. I. Azim. (2015). Corporate social responsibility disclosures and earnings quality: Are they a reflection of managers’ opportunistic behavior? Managerial Auditing Journal, 30(3), 277-298. https://doi.org/10.1108/MAJ-02-2014-0997
  • OECD, (2014). The size and sectoral distribution of SOEs in OECD and partner countries.
  • Omran, M. et al. (2021). Integrated reporting and board characteristics: evidence from top Australian listed companies. Journal of Applied Accounting Research, 22(4), 732–758. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1108/JAAR-04-2020-0077/FULL/XML
  • Özcan, A. (2018). The use of Beneish model in forensic accounting: Evidence from Turkey. Journal of Applied Economics and Business Research, 8(1), 57–67.
  • Prior, D., Surroca, J., & Tribó, J. A. (2008). Are socially responsible managers really ethical? Exploring the relationship between earnings management and corporate social responsibility. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 16(3), 160–177. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8683.2008.00678.x
  • Pyo, G., & Lee, H.-Y. (2013). The Association Between Corporate Social Responsibility Activities and Earnings Quality: Evidence from Donations and Voluntary Issuance Of CSR Reports. Journal of Applied Business Research (JABR), 29(3), 945–962. https://doi.org/10.19030/jabr.v29i3.7793
  • Qaderi, S.A. et al. (2022). Board Characteristics and Integrated Reporting Strategy: Does Sustainability Committee Matter? Sustainability, 14(10), 6092. https://doi.org/10.3390/SU14106092
  • Repousis, S. (2016). Using Beneish model to detect corporate financial statement fraud in Greece. Journal of Financial Crime, 23(4), 1063–1073. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFC-11-2014-0055
  • Richardson, S. A., Tuna, A., & Wu, M. (2002). Predicting earnings management: The case of earnings restatements. In Min, predicting earnings management: the case of earnings restatements (October 2002).
  • Salewski, M., & Zülch, H. (2014). The association between corporate social responsibility and earnings quality – Evidence from European blue chips. Leipzig: HHL Working Paper Series No. 112, HHL.
  • Scholtens, B. & Kang, F. (2013). Corporate social responsibility and earnings management: evidence from Asian economics. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 20(2), 95-112. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1286
  • Scholtens, B. & Kang, F.C. (2013). Corporate social responsibility and earnings management: evidence from Asian economies. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 20(2), 95-112. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1286
  • Sun, N., Salama, A., Hussainey, K., & Habbash, M. (2010). Corporate environmental disclosure, corporate governance and earnings management. Managerial Auditing Journal, 25(7), 679–700. https://doi.org/10.1108/02686901011061351
  • Suteja, J., Gunardi, A., & Mirawati, A. (2016). Moderating effect of earnings management on the relationship between corporate social responsibility disclosure and profitability of banks in Indonesia. International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, 6(4), 1360-1365.
  • Sweeney, A. P. (1994). Debt-covenant violations and managers’ accounting responses. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 17(3), 281–308. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-4101(94)90030-2
  • Uyagu, B. & Dabor, A.O. (2017). Earnings management and corporate social responsibility, Romanian Economic Journal, 20(65), 70-87
  • Velayutham, E. (2018). Sustainability disclosure and earnings management. In Boubaker, S., Cumming, D., & Nguyen, D. K. (Eds.), Research handbook of finance and sustainability. Cheltenham, the UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.
  • Wang, l., & Yung, K. (2011). Do state enterprises manage earnings more than privately owned firms? The case of China. Journal of business finance & accounting, 38(7-8), 794-812. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5957.2011.02254.x
  • Yip, E., Staden, C.V. & Cahan, S. (2011). Corporate social responsibility reporting and earnings management: the role of political costs. Australasian Accounting Business and Finance, 5(3), 17-33.
  • Yunietha, & Palupi, A. 2017. Pengaruh Corporate Governance dan Faktor LainnyaTerhadap Manajemen Laba Perusahaan Publik Non Keuangan. Jurnal Bisnis DanAkuntansi, 19(4), 292–303. http://jurnaltsm.id/index.php/JBA
There are 55 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Subjects Finance, Business Administration
Journal Section Articles
Authors

Raihan Sobhan This is me 0000-0003-2015-8035

Touhida Sharmin This is me 0009-0003-3343-6273

Publication Date June 3, 2024
Submission Date January 26, 2024
Acceptance Date May 24, 2024
Published in Issue Year 2024 Volume: 13 Issue: 1

Cite

APA Sobhan, R., & Sharmin, T. (2024). EXAMINING THE NEXUS BETWEEN CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY DISCLOSURE AND EARNINGS MANAGEMENT: EVIDENCE FROM THE STATE-OWNED ENTERPRISES OF BANGLADESH. Journal of Business Economics and Finance, 13(1), 24-36. https://doi.org/10.17261/Pressacademia.2024.1899

Journal of Business, Economics and Finance (JBEF) is a scientific, academic, double blind peer-reviewed, quarterly and open-access journal. The publication language is English. The journal publishes four issues a year. The issuing months are March, June, September and December. The journal aims to provide a research source for all practitioners, policy makers and researchers working in the areas of business, economics and finance. The Editor of JBEF invites all manuscripts that that cover theoretical and/or applied researches on topics related to the interest areas of the Journal. JBEF charges no submission or publication fee.



Ethics Policy - JBEF applies the standards of Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE). JBEF is committed to the academic community ensuring ethics and quality of manuscripts in publications. Plagiarism is strictly forbidden and the manuscripts found to be plagiarized will not be accepted or if published will be removed from the publication. Authors must certify that their manuscripts are their original work. Plagiarism, duplicate, data fabrication and redundant publications are forbidden. The manuscripts are subject to plagiarism check by iThenticate or similar. All manuscript submissions must provide a similarity report (up to 15% excluding quotes, bibliography, abstract, method).


Open Access - All research articles published in PressAcademia Journals are fully open access; immediately freely available to read, download and share. Articles are published under the terms of a Creative Commons license which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Open access is a property of individual works, not necessarily journals or publishers. Community standards, rather than copyright law, will continue to provide the mechanism for enforcement of proper attribution and responsible use of the published work, as they do now.