Biogas Potential in Görükle Campus of Uludağ University

Year 2016, Volume: 10 Issue: 29, 79 - 88, 20.10.2016

İlknur Alibaş , Hilal Erdoğan , Aslıhan Yılmaz Göymen , Kamil Alibaş

Abstract

In this study, the potential of animal manure of the Application Research Centres of the Faculty of Agriculture and the Ranch of Veterinary Medicine and located within the boundaries of Görükle Campus at Uludağ University, the waste of rapeseed, sunflower, and wheat production of the Agricultural Research and Application Centre at the Agricultural Faculty and food waste of all dining halls, restaurants and cafeterias, particularly the Central Dining Hall, situated on the campus was determined in order to determine the biogas potential of the campus. As the dry matter, based on the organic waste potential, the biogas potential relating of the campus was calculated to be 499962.91 m3. It was determined that 17.95% of this potential consisted of animal manure, 46.15% of it consisted of agricultural production waste and 35.90% of it consisted of food waste. It was calculated that the electric energy potential obtained by transforming the biogas potential into electric energy by means of a generator was 980.22 MWh.

Keywords

Animal manure , Biogas , Agricultural wastes , Electricity , Food wastes

References

• Aguilar-Virgen Q, Taboada-González P, Ojeda-Benítez S, Cruz-Sotelo S (2014). Power generation with biogas from municipal solid waste: Prediction of gas generation with in situ parameters. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 30: 412–419.
• Alibaş I, Ozsoy G, Elicin AK (2015). Determination of Agricultural Biogas Potential in Diyarbakir. Journal of Agricultural Machinery Science, 11:75-87 (in Turkish).
• Alibaş K (1996). The determination of biogas production at different digestion temperature with the thermophilic, mesophhyllic and psychrophilic digestion from the cow manure, poultry manure and barley straw: The determination of total energy losses from full mechanized biogas digesters at different ambient temperature and different digesters type. Uludağ University, Faculty of Agriculture, Search and Investigation Notes, no:13, Bursa (in Turkish)
• Amini HR, Reinhart DR, Mackie KR (2012). Determination of first-order landfill gas modelling parameters and uncertainties. Waste Management, 32: 305–316.
• Anonymous (2016). Enerji Atlası. www.enerjiatlası.com/biyogaz. Accessed on August 28th 2016.
• Barros RM, Filho GLT, Rodrigo da Silva T (2014). The electric energy potential of landfill biogas in Brazil. Energy Policy, 65: 150–164.
• Briassoulis D, Hiskakis M, Babou E, Antiohos SK, Papadi C (2012). Experimental investigation of the quality characteristics of agricultural plastic wastes regarding their recycling and energy recovery potential. Waste Management, 32: 1075-1090.
• Havukainen J, Uusitalo V, Niskanen A, Kapustina V, Horttanainen M (2014). Evaluation of methods for estimating energy performance of biogas production. Renewable Energy, 66: 232-240.
• He K, Zhang J, Zeng Y, Zhang L (2016). Households’ willingness to accept compensation for agricultural waste recycling: taking biogas production from livestock manure waste in Hubei, P. R. China as an example. Journal of Cleaner Production, 131: 410-420.
• Isoda N, Rodrigues R, Silva A, Gonçalves M, Mandelli D, Figueiredo FCA, Carvalho WA (2014). Optimization of preparation conditions of activated carbon from agriculture waste utilizing factorial design. Powder Technology, 256: 175-181.
• Kabir H, Yegbemey RN, Bauer S (2013). Factors determinant of biogas adoption in Bangladesh, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 28: 881-889.
• Karray R, Hamza M, Sayadi S (2016). Production and characterization of enzymatic cocktail produced by Aspergillus niger using green macroalgae as nitrogen source and its application in the pre-treatment for biogas production from Ulva rigida. Bioresource Technology, 216: 622-628.
• Konening A, Dehn F (2016). Biogenic acid attack on concretes in biogas plants. Biosystem Engineering, 147: 226-237.
• Lübbers WG, Bergman H, Theuvsen L (2016). Potential analysis of the biogas production-as measured by effects of added value and employment. Journal of Cleaner Production, 129: 556-564.
• Maghanaki MM, Ghobadian B, Najafi G, Galogah RJ (2013). Potential of biogas production in Iran, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 28: 702-714.
• Moreno VC, Papasidero S, Scorpani GE, Guglielmi D, Cozzani V (2016). Analysis of accidents in biogas production and upgrading. Renewable Energy, 96:1127-1134.
• Ozsoy G, Alibaş I (2015). GIS Mapping of biogas potential from animal wastes in Bursa, Turkey. International Journal of Agricultural and Biological Engineering, 8: 74-83.
• Pizzuti L, Martins CA, Lacava PT (2016). Laminar burning velocity and flammability limits in biogas: A literature review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 62: 856-865.
• Schneider DR, Kirac M, Hublin A (2012). Cost-effectiveness of GHG emission reduction measures and energy recovery from municipal waste in Croatia. Energy, 48: 203–211.
• Thöle AJ, Rudnicki R, Kluba M (2016). Development of energy crops cultivation for biomass production in Poland. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 62: 534-545.
• TUIK. 2016. Turkish Statical Institute. www.tuik.gov.tr. Accessed on August 28th 2016.
• Ulusoy Y, Arslan R, Ulukardeşler AH, Kaplan C, Kul B, Arslan R (2015). Biogas Potential of Agricultural Organic Waste in Bursa and Investigation of Use of Biogas as a Fuel in Diesel Engines. Journal of Agricultural Faculty of Uludağ University, 29(2):39-45 (in Turkish).
• Zhu LD, Hiltunen E (2016). Application of livestock waste compost to cultivate microalgae for bioproducts production: A feasible framework. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 54: 1285-1290.