Nurses’ Knowledge Levels About Port Catheter Care (POCATH Study): a study of the palliative care working committee of the Turkish Oncology Group (TOG)

Year 2017, , 75 - 79, 30.06.2017

Ali Alkan

https://doi.org/10.5799/jcei.333384

Abstract

Objective: The purpose of this study is to investigate nurses’ levels of knowledge about port
catheters (PCs), define factors effecting them and to define the subjects in which more education
strategies should be developed.
Patients and Methods: A descriptive, cross-sectional study was carried out in cancer centers in
Turkey. Participants were evaluated with structured questionnaires to assess the levels of
knowledge about PCs and management strategies of PC related complications. The questions
were designed to evaluate their knowledge in different subscales.
Results: 363 nurses in 7 cancer centers in 4 different cities in Turkey participated in the study.
While 147 (40.5%) nurses had a more than 10 years of experience, 13.8% of them had a less
than 1 year of job experience in oncology. Knowledge about “Port catheter usage and
complications” and “difficulties while using PC” was worse than other subscales. The effects of
the job experience on knowledge showed a negative correlation between them (r= -168, p=
0.001). In addition, participants with an experience of more than 10 years have worse scores
when compared with others ( 27.2±11.4 vs. 30.6±9.4, P=0.003). There was no significant
difference between nurses working in a university hospital and public hospital (28.5 ± 10.9 vs.
30.4±10.4, P= 0.086).
Conclusion: The study concluded that experience in the field is negatively correlated with
knowledge about PCs. Nurses actively caring PCs should be routinely updated, especially about
complications of PCs and management strategies of them.

Keywords

Nurse, knowledge level, port catheters, port catheter care

References

• 1. Verity R, Wiseman T, Ream E, Teasdale E, Richardson A. Exploring the work of nurses who administer chemotherapy. Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2008;12:244-52. 2. Ozden D, Caliskan N. Turkish nurses' level of knowledge regarding implantable port catheter care. Japan J Nurs Sci. 2012;9:1-8. 3. Camp-Sorrell D, editor State of the science of oncology vascular access devices. Seminars in oncology nursing; 2010: Elsevier. 4. Galloway M, editor; Insertion and placement of central catheters in the oncology patient. Seminars in Oncology Nursing; 2010: Elsevier. 5. Bakey SJ. Evaluation of nurses’ practices throughout hemodialysis treatment for patients in hemodialysis unit at Baghdad teaching hospitals. Kufa J Nurs Sci 2014;2:23-7. 6. Linnemann B. Management of complications related to central venous catheters in cancer patients: an update. Semin Thromb Hemost. 2014;40:382-94. 7. Schiffer CA, Mangu PB, Wade JC, et al. Central venous catheter care for the patient with cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guideline. J Clin Oncol. 2013;31:1357-70. 8. Luciani A, Clement O, Halimi P, et al. Catheter-related upper extremity deep venous thrombosis in cancer patients: a prospective study based on Doppler US. Radiology. 2001;220:655-60. 9. McIlfatrick S, Sullivan K, McKenna H. Nursing the clinic vs. nursing the patient: nurses' experience of a day hospital chemotherapy service. J Clin Nurs. 2006;15:1170-8. 10. Özden D, Çalışkan N Turkish nurses’ level of knowledge regarding implantable port catheter care. Japan J Nurs Sci. 2012;9:1-8. 11. Gosselin TK, Dalton KA, Penne K, editors. The Role of the Advanced Practice Nurse in the Academic Setting. Seminars in Oncology Nursing; Elsevier, 2015. 12. Deshmukh M, Shinde M. Impact of structured education on knowledge and practice regarding venous access device care among nurses. Int J Sci Res (IJSR). 2014;3:895-901. 13. Matsubara MdGS, De Domenico EBL. Virtual learning environment in continuing education for nursing in oncology: an experimental study. J Cancer Education. 2015:1-7. 14. Beck S, Brant J, Donohue R, et al., editors. Oncology nursing certification: relation to nurses' knowledge and attitudes about pain, patient-reported pain care quality, and pain outcomes. Oncology Nursing Forum; 2016. 15. Zheng R-S, Guo Q-H, Dong F-Q, Owens RG. Chinese oncology nurses’ experience on caring for dying patients who are on their final days: A qualitative study. Int J Nurse Studies. 2015;52:288-96. 16. Kreis H, Loehberg CR, Lux MP, et al. Patients' attitudes to totally implantable venous access port systems for gynecological or breast malignancies. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2007;33:39-43. 17. Yaakup H, Eng TC, Shah SA. Does clinical experience help oncology nursing staff to deal with patient pain better than nurses from other displines? knowledge and attitudes survey amongst nurses in a tertiary care in Malaysia. Asian Pacific J Cancer Prevention. 2014;15:4885-91. 18. Gibson F, Shipway L, Aldiss S, et al. Exploring the work of nurses who administer chemotherapy to children and young people. Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2013;17:59-69.