GHOSTIP: A Model for a Secure and Anonymous Corporate Feedback Mechanism Using Blockchain Technology

Year 2025, Issue: 4, 68 - 80, 09.01.2026

Büşra Günaydın , Emre Akadal

https://doi.org/10.26650/JODA.1790610

Abstract

Effective internal communication and feedback mechanisms are critical for organizational development, enhancing employee engagement, and fostering a healthy corporate culture. However, traditional feedback systems often fail to provide genuine anonymity, which can lead to employees withholding honest opinions due to fear of negative judgment or retaliation. This apprehension stifles candid communication, preventing critical issues from being addressed and hindering organizational growth. To overcome these challenges, ensuring user anonymity is paramount. This study posits that blockchain technology, with its inherent features of decentralization, immutability, and transparency, provides a robust framework for creating secure and trust-based communication systems.

This paper introduces Ghostip, a novel model for a blockchain-based anonymous feedback and communication system designed for internal use within organizations. The proposed model leverages pseudonymous wallets to protect user identities and employs asymmetric encryption to ensure that messages can only be decrypted by the intended recipient. The system supports both direct private messaging and categorized community feedback, with all interactions immutably recorded on the blockchain to guarantee data integrity. By facilitating a secure and truly anonymous channel for expression, this model aims to cultivate a more democratic, transparent, and effective communication environment, ultimately contributing to greater employee satisfaction and organizational health.

Keywords

Blockchain , Anonymous Feedback , Internal Communication , Organizational Development

References

• Bruschi, F., Paulon, T., Rana, V., & Sciuto, D. (2021). A privacy preserving identification protocol for smart contracts. 2021 IEEE Symposium on Computers and Communications (ISCC), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1109/iscc53001.2021.9631501 google scholar
• Burris E., Thomas B., Sodhi K. & Klinghoffer D. (2024). Turn Employee Feedback Into Action. Harvard Business Review. https://hbr.org/2024/11/turn-employee-feedback-into-action google scholar
• Gallup. (2024, January 13). U.S. Employee Engagement Sinks to 10-Year Low. https://www.gallup.com/workplace/654911/employee-engagement-sinks-year-low.aspx google scholar
• Gudumian, S., Lizy, A., Jagadeeswari, S., Chinnadurai, S., Thiruppathy Kesavan, V., & Gopi, R. (2024). Enhancing Safety Solutions through Blockchain Technology and Digital Signatures. International Journal of Experimental Research and Review, 46, 127–138. https://doi.org/10.52756/ijerr.2024.v46.010 google scholar
• Hadziahmetovic, N., & Salihovic, N. (2022). The Role of Transparent Communication and Leadership in Employee Engagement. International Journal of Academic Research in Economics and Management Sciences, 11(2). https://doi.org/10.6007/ijarems/v11-i2/14067 google scholar
• Hannan, R. L., Rankin, F. W., & Towry, K. L. (2003). Managing Impressions: The Effect of Non-Contractible Information on Honesty in Managerial Reporting. SSRN Electronic Journal, https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.420541 google scholar
• Jiang, H., & Luo, Y. (2018). Crafting employee trust: from authenticity, transparency to engagement. Journal of Communication Management, 22(2), 138–160. https://doi.org/10.1108/jcom-07-2016-0055 google scholar
• Jiang, H., & Shen, H. (2020). Toward a Relational Theory of Employee Engagement: Understanding Authenticity, Transparency, and Employee Behaviors. International Journal of Business Communication, 60(3), 948–975. https://doi.org/10.1177/2329488420954236 google scholar
• Kim, H., & Scott, C. (2019). Change communication and the use of anonymous social media at work. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 24(3), 410–424. https://doi.org/10.1108/ccij-07-2018-0076 google scholar
• Kudisch, J. D., Fortunato, V. J., & Smith, A. F. R. (2006). Contextual and Individual Difference Factors Predicting Individuals’ Desire to Provide Upward Feedback. Group & Organization Management, 31(4), 503–529. https://doi.org/10.1177/1059601106286888 google scholar
• Lee, J. S. Y., & Akhtar, S. (1996). Determinants of employee willingness to use feedback for performance improvement: cultural and organizational interpretations. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 7(4), 878–890. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585199600000161 google scholar
• Lehnhardt, J., & Spalka, A. (2011). Decentralized Generation of Multiple, Uncorrelatable Pseudonyms without Trusted Third Parties. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (pp. 113–124). Springer Berlin Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-22890-2_10 google scholar
• Mao, C. M., & DeAndrea, D. C. (2018). How Anonymity and Visibility Affordances Influence Employees’ Decisions About Voicing Workplace Concerns. Management Communication Quarterly, 33(2), 160–188. https://doi.org/10.1177/0893318918813202 google scholar
• Mathwale, R., & Sawarkar, A. D. (2024). BSHILD Blockchain Based Security for Instant Live Discussion. 2024 International Conference on IoT Based Control Networks and Intelligent Systems (ICICNIS), 132–137. https://doi.org/10.1109/icicnis64247.2024.10823335 google scholar
• Men, L. (2015). Employee Engagement in Relation to Employee–Organization Relationships and Internal Reputation: Effects of Leadership Communication. google scholar
• Men, L. R., & Hung-Baesecke, C. F. (2015). Engaging employees in China. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 20(4), 448–467. https://doi.org/10.1108/ccij-11-2014-0079 google scholar
• Nalini, N., Kumar, A., Sharma, M., Sil, A., & Khan, W. (2023). Pseudonymous Decentralised Reputation System. 2023 9th International Conference on Smart Computing and Communications (ICSCC), 682–687. https://doi.org/10.1109/icscc59169.2023.10335003 google scholar
• Nassar Kyriakidou, C. D., Papathanasiou, A. M., & Polyzos, G. C. (2023). Decentralized Identity With Applications to Security and Privacy for the Internet of Things. Computer Networks and Communications. https://doi.org/10.37256/cnc.1220233048 google scholar
• Opeyemi, E. A., Nweze, M., & Avickson, E. K. (2024). Blockchain technology as a tool for corporate governance and transparency. International Journal of Science and Research Archive, 13(1), 2479–2493. https://doi.org/10.30574/ijsra.2024.13.1.1971 google scholar
• Folorunsho, S. O., Adenekan, O. A., Ezeigweneme, C., Somadina, I. C., & Okeleke, P. A. (2024). Enhancing security and transparency in telecommunications through blockchain technology implementation. Engineering Science Technology Journal, 5(8), 2520–2547. https://doi.org/10.51594/estj.v5i8.1442 google scholar
• Verma, A., Bhardwaj, A., Shraddha, & Kumar, A. (2025). Enhancing Security and Transparency in Video Conferencing Systems through Blockchain Integration. 2025 2nd International Conference on Computational Intelligence, Communication Technology and Networking (CICTN), 282–287. https://doi.org/10.1109/cictn64563.2025.10932424 google scholar
• Wang, L. (2024). Research on the Impact and Solution Strategies of Blockchain Technology on Data Security and Transparency in Enterprise Digital Transformation. Advances in Economics, Management and Political Sciences, 103(1), 157–165. https://doi.org/10.54254/2754-1169/103/20242418 google scholar