Romantik İlişkilerde Doyum ve Aşk Stilleri Arasındaki İlişki: Yakınlığın Aracı Rolü

Year 2025, Issue: 28, 15 - 30

Hulya Ercan , Ozan Korkmaz , Fuad Bakioğlu

https://doi.org/10.30786/jef.1480912

Abstract

Romantik ilişkiler, insan yaşamını zenginleştiren önemli unsurlar arasında yer alır. Bu ilişkiler ergenlik döneminde ortaya çıkmaya başlar ve genç yetişkinlik yıllarında önemli bir gelişimsel görevi yerine getirir. Romantik ilişkiler konusunda yapılan araştırmalarda daha çok aşk konusu ele alınır. Aşk konusundaki kuramlarda da farklı açıklamalar ileri sürülür ve farklı sınıflamalar yapılır. Sınıflamalardan biri, Lee’nin Aşkın Renkleri Kuramında geçer. Bu çalışmada, üniversite öğrencilerinin aşk stillerinin ilişki doyumunu yordamasında yakınlığın aracı rolü incelenmiştir. Çalışma grubunu 349 öğrenci oluşturmaktadır. Katılımcıların 267’si (%76.5) kadın, 82’si (%23.5) erkektir ve yaş ortalamaları 23.39’dur (SS=4.57). Verilerin toplanmasında Kişisel Bilgi Formu, Aşka İlişkin Tutumlar Ölçeği: Kısa Form, Romantik İlişkilerde Yakınlık ile İlişki Değerlendirme Ölçekleri kullanılmıştır. Araştırmanın hipotetik modelleri yapısal eşitlik modellemeleri ile test edilmiştir. Bulgulara göre tutkulu aşk ile arkadaşça aşk ilişki doyumu üzerinde pozitif etkiye sahipken sahiplenici aşk negatif etkiye sahiptir. Oyun gibi aşkta ve özgeci aşkta ilişki doyumunun tam aracısı olan yakınlık, arkadaşça aşkta kısmi aracıdır. Sonuç olarak mantıklı aşk dışındaki aşk stillerinin doğrudan ya da yakınlık aracılığı ile ilişki doyumunun önemli birer yordayıcısı olduğu söylenebilir.

Keywords

romantik ilişkiler, ilişki doyumu, aşk stilleri, yakınlık

The Relationships between Love Styles and Satisfaction in Romantic Relationships: The Mediating Role of Intimacy

Abstract

Romantic relationships are among the important elements that enrich human life. These relationships begin to be shaped during adolescence and serve an important developmental role in the young adulthood years. Love is a pervasive topic within the field of research on romantic relationships. Theories of love offer various explanations and classifications, one of which includes Lee's Colors of Love Theory. This study aims to examine the mediating role of intimacy in the relationship between love styles and relationship satisfaction in university students. The study group comprised 349 students, 267 (76.5%) women and 82 (23.5%) men. The participants’ average age was 23.39 years (SD=4.57). Data were collected through the Love Attitudes Scale: Short Form, the Intimacy Scale in Romantic Relationships, the Relationship Assessment Scale, and the Personal Information Form. The hypothetical models designed in the study were tested using structural equation modeling. The findings suggest that eros and storge have a positive direct effect on relationship satisfaction, while mania has a negative effect. Intimacy plays a crucial role in romantic relationships. It serves as a mediator in the relationship between relationship satisfaction and ludus, agape, and storge. In conclusion, love styles other than pragma are important predictors of relationship satisfaction directly and/or through intimacy.

Keywords

Romantic relationships, relationship satisfaction, love styles, intimacy

References

• Antonucci, T. C., Lansford, J. E., & Akiyama, H. (2001). Impact of positive and negative aspects of marital relationships and friendships on well-being of older adults. Applied Developmental Science, 5(2), 68-75. https://doi.org/10.1207/S1532480XADS0502_2
• Axinn, W. G., & Thornton, A. (1993). Mothers, children, and cohabitation: The intergenerational effects of attitudes and behavior. American Sociological Review, 233246.
• Beştav, F. G. (2007). Romantik ilişki doyumu ile cinsiyet, bağlanma stilleri, rasyonel olmayan inançlar ve aşka ilişkin tutumlar arasındaki ilişkilerin incelenmesi [The association of romantic relationship satisfaction with gender, attachment styles, irrational beliefs, and love attitudes]. (Unpublished Master Thesis), Hacettepe University, Institute of Social Sciences, Psychology, Social Psychology, Ankara.
• Bookwala, J. (2005). The role of marital quality in physical health during the mature years. Journal of aging and health, 17(1), 85-104. https://doi.org/10.1177/0898264304272794
• Budak, B. (2011). Üniversite öğrencilerinin aşka ilişkin tutumları ve ilişki doyumlarının kişilik özellikleri ile ilişkisi [Attitudes of university students towards love and the relationship of relation satisfaction with personality traits]. (Unpublished Master Thesis), Gazi University, Institute of Educational Sciences, Education Sciences, Psychological Counseling and Guidance, Ankara.
• Buss, D. M. (1989). Sex differences in human mate preferences: Evolutionary hypotheses tested in 37 cultures. Behavioral and Brain, 12(1), 1-49.
• Buss, D. M. (1995). Psychological sex differences: Origins through sexual selection. American Psychologist, 50 (3), 164-168
• Buss, D. M. (2023). The Oxford handbook of human mating. New York: Oxford University Press.
• Bühler, J. L., Krauss, S., & Orth, U. (2021). Development of relationship satisfaction across the life span: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 147(10), 1012–1053. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000342
• Büyüköztürk, Ş., Kılıç Çakmak, E., Akgün, Ö. Karadeniz, Ş. & Demirel, F. (2019). Eğitimde bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri (Scientific research methods in education). Ankara: Pegem Academy Publishing.
• Büyükşahin, A., & Hovardaoğlu, S. (2004). Çiftlerin aşka ilişkin tutumlarının Lee’nin Çok Boyutlu Aşk Biçimleri kapsamında incelenmesi (A study of couples’ love attitudes within Lee’s multidimensional love styles framework). Turkish Journal of Psychology, 19(54), 59-75.
• Cahill, V. A., Malouff, J. M., Little, C. W., & Schutte, N. S. (2020). Trait perspective taking and romantic relationship satisfaction: A meta-analysis. Journal of Family Psychology, 34(8), 1025–1035. https://doi.org/10.1037/fam0000661
• Candel, O. S., & Turliuc, M. N. (2019). Insecure attachment and relationship satisfaction: A meta-analysis of actor and partner associations. Personality and Individual Differences, 147, 190-199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2019.04.037
• Collins, N. L., & Read, S. J. (1990). Adult attachment, working models, and relationship quality in dating couples. Journal of personality and social psychology, 58(4), 644.
• Curun, F. (2001). The effects of sexism and sex role orientation on relationship satisfaction. (Unpublished Master Thesis), Middle East Technical University, Institute of Social Sciences, Psychology, Ankara.
• Das, N., & Bapu, K. V. (2024). Psychological Well-being, Relationship Satisfaction and Adjustment among Partners Involved in Inter-religious Romantic Relationship. Indian Journal of Health and Wellbeing, 15(1), 62-68.
• Demirtas, S. C., & Tezer, E. (2012). Romantic relationship satisfaction, commitment to career choices and subjective well-being. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 46, 2542-2549.
• Ercan, H. (2019). Romantik İlişkilerde Yakınlık Ölçeği geliştirme çalışması (A study on developing Intimacy Scale in Romantic Relationships). OPUS International Journal of Society Research, 11(18), 205-231.
• Erikson, E. H. (1963). Childhood and society. New York: Norton & Company.
• Erikson, E. H. (1968). Identity: Youth and crisis. New York: Norton & Company.
• Fisher, H. (2006). The drive to love: The neural mechanism for mate selection. In. R. J. Sternberg & K. Weis (Eds.), The new psychology of love (pp.87-115). New Haven: Yale University Press.
• Fisher, H. (2009). Why him? Why her? New York: Henry Hold and Company.
• Fisher, H. (2016). Anatomy of love: a natural history of mating marriage and why we stray. New York: Norton & Company.
• Fricker, J., & Moore, S. (2002). Relationship satisfaction: The role of love styles and attachment styles. Current Research in Social Psychology, 7(11), 182-204.
• Gana, K., Saada, Y., & Untas, A. (2013). Effects of love styles on marital satisfaction in heterosexual couples: A dyadic approach. Marriage & Family Review, 49 (8), 754-772.
• Goodboy, A. K., & Booth-Butterfield, M. (2009). Love styles and desire for closeness in romantic relationships. Psychological Reports, 105(1), 191-197.
• Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process and analysis: A regression-based approach. New York: Guilford Press.
• Hazan, C. & Shaver, P. R. (1987). Romantic love conceptualized as an attachment process. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52(3), 511-524.
• Hazan, C. & Shaver, P. R. (1994). Attachment as an organizational framework for research on close relationships. Psychological Inquiry, 5(1), 1-22.
• Hendrick, S. S. (1988). A generic measure of relationship satisfaction. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 50(1), 93-98. https://doi.org/10.2307/352430
• Hendrick, S. S., & Hendrick, C. (2006). Measuring respect in close relationships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 23(6), 881-899.
• Hendrick, C., Hendrick, S.S., & Dicke, A. (1998). The Love Attitudes Scale: Short form. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 15(2), 147-159. https://doi.org/10.1177/026540759815
• Jardine, B. B., Vannier, S., & Voyer, D. (2022). Emotional intelligence and romantic relationship satisfaction: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Personality and individual differences, 196, 111713. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2022.111713
• Johnson, R. B. & Christensen, L. (2019). Educational research: quantitative, qualitative, and mixed approaches. Washington: Sage Pub.
• Karney, B. R., & Bradbury, T. N. (1995). The longitudinal course of marital quality and stability: A review of theory, methods, and research. Psychological Bulletin, 118(1), 3-34.
• Lee, J. A. (1973). The Colors of Love: An exploration of the ways of loving. Toronto: New Press.
• Lee. J. A. (1974). The styles of loving. Psychology Today, October, 44-51.
• Lee. J. A. (1988). Love styles. In R.J. Sternberg & M. L. Barnes (Eds.). The psychology of love (p.38-67). New Haven: Yale University.
• Malouff, J. M., Thorsteinsson, E. B., Schutte, N. S., Bhullar, N., & Rooke, S. E. (2010). The five-factor model of personality and relationship satisfaction of intimate partners: A meta-analysis. Journal of Research in Personality, 44(1), 124-127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2009.09.004
• Morrow, G. D., Clark, E. M., & Brock, K. F. (1995). Individual and partner love styles: Implications for the quality of romantic involvements. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 12(3), 363-387.
• Moss, B. F. & Schwebel, A. I. (1993). Defining intimacy in romantic relationships. Family Relations, 42(1), 31-37.
• Myers, J. E., & Shurts, W. M. (2002). Measuring positive emotionality: A review of instruments assessing love. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 34 (4), 238-254. https://doi.org/10.1080/07481756.2002.12069040
• Prager, K.J. (1995). The psychology of intimacy. New York: The Guilford Press.
• Proulx, C. M., Helms, H. M., & Buehler, C. (2007). Marital quality and personal well‐being: A meta‐analysis. Journal of Marriage and Family, 69(3), 576-593.
• Robles, T. F., Slatcher, R. B., Trombello, J. M., & McGinn, M. M. (2014). Marital quality and health: a meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 140(1), 140. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0031859.
• Rohmann, E., Führer, A., & Bierhoff, H. W. (2016). Relationship satisfaction across European cultures: The role of love styles. Cross-Cultural Research, 50(2), 178-211.
• Rubin. Z. (1970). Measurement of romantic love. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 16(2), 265-273.
• Sened, H., Lavidor, M., Lazarus, G., Bar-Kalifa, E., Rafaeli, E., & Ickes, W. (2017). Empathic accuracy and relationship satisfaction: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Family Psychology, 31(6), 742. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/fam0000320
• Sternberg. R. J. (1986). A Triangular Theory of Love. Psychological Review, 93(2), 119-135.
• Sullivan, H. S. (1953). Interpersonal theory of psychiatry. New York: Norton.
• Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2012). Using multivariate statistics. Boston: Pearson.
• Taghavi Dinani, P., Samkhaniyan, E., Hamidi, M., & Arkiyan, F. (2014). Study on the relationship between love attitudes and marital satisfaction among married women. European Online Journal of Natural and Social Sciences, 3(3), 468-474.
• Tepeli Temiz, Z., & Elsharnouby, E. (2022). Relationship satisfaction and well-being during the COVID-19 pandemic: Examining the associations with interpersonal emotion regulation strategies. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 46(5), 902-915. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10608-022-10317-w
• Türk, E. G., & Yıldız, A. D. (2017). Aşk biçemleri, ilişki doyumu ve yalnızlık: Üniversite öğrencileri üzerine bir çalışma (Love Styles, Relationship Satisfaction and Loneliness: A Study on University Students). Turkish Psychological Counseling and Guidance Journal, 7 (48), 97-109.
• Uysal, A. N. (2016). Predicting relationship satisfaction: Dark triad personality traits, love attitudes, attachment dimension. Doğuş University, Institute of Social Sciences (Unpublished Master Thesis), İstanbul.
• Vedes, A., Hilpert, P., Nussbeck, F. W., Randall, A. K., Bodenmann, G., & Lind, W. R. (2016). Love styles, coping, and relationship satisfaction: A dyadic approach. Personal Relationships, 23(1), 84-97.
• Yam, F. C. (2023). The relationship between partner phubbing and life satisfaction: The mediating role of relationship satisfaction and perceived romantic relationship quality. Psychological Reports, 126(1), 303-331. https://doi.org/10.1177/003329412211446
• Yancey, G., & Berglass, S. (1991). Love styles and life satisfaction. Psychological Reports, 68(3), 883-890. Neto, F., & Pinto, M. D. C. (2025). Correlates of the Short Form Love Attitudes Scale among Portuguese People. Sexuality & Culture, 29(1), 152-168. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12119-024-10270-8