Research Article

SYSTEMATIC LITERATURE REVIEW ON BLOCKCHAIN ADOPTION IN BANKING

Volume: 8 Number: 3 September 30, 2021
  • Arun Khatri *
  • Anjali Kaushik
EN

SYSTEMATIC LITERATURE REVIEW ON BLOCKCHAIN ADOPTION IN BANKING

Abstract

Purpose- Blockchain has emerged as high impact disruptive technology and surpassed most of the aggressive predictions in banking and finance domain. The changing landscape in digital banking has forced the entire banking sector to look at blockchain technology as future of transactions. Blockchain is disrupting the banking industry and contributing to the increased efficiency and speed in banking. However, there exists a gap in research and development into block-chained processes in banking from an academic perspective, and this paper ia an attempt to put together the research work done in the field of blockchain adoption in banking. Methodology- This paper’s literature review process follows common and established guidelines (Levy and Ellis, 2006; Okoli, 2015; von Brocke et al., 2009; Webster and Watson, 2002) and is summarized thoroughly. We considered the IS literature in both the blockchain and the banking context. In the first step, we conduct a separate review on both streams of literature to derive a general understanding of their current state of development. In the second step, we then conflate the relevant literature and discuss it within a joint analytical framework. In doing so, we identify paths for future research and discuss the potential of blockchain technology for banking and finance sector. Findings- In this paper we discuss the impact that blockchain will have on banking in future and show the increasing importance of distributed ledger based transactions for the banking industry. Finally, this paper brings together the research work published in several reputed databases, in hope of motivating more active engagement by academics, researchers and bankers alike. A comprehensive review of the blockchain adoption in banking to date and across the geographic areas is presented as a result of comprehensive review of literature. Conclusion- The collaboration of blockchain and banking is not very old, comparatively novice and we have tried to include all the significant studies till date across various databases of research.

Keywords

References

  1. Abramova, O., Krasnova, H., Shavanova, T., Fuhrer, A., Buxmann, P., (2016). Impression management in the sharing economy: understanding the effect of response strategy to. Die Unternehmung – Swiss Journal of Business Research Practice, 70, 58–73. https://doi. org/10.5771/0042-059X- 2016-1-58.
  2. Abramova, O., Shanvanova, T., Fuhrer, A., Krasnova, H., Buxmann, P., (2015). Understanding the sharing economy: the role of response to negative reviews in the peer-to-peer accommodation sharing network. In: ECIS 2015 Proceedings.
  3. Ahangama, S., Poo, D.C.C., (2016). Credibility of algorithm based decentralized computer networks governing personal finances: the case of cryptocurrency. In: HCIBGO 2016 Proceedings. 165–176. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-39396-4
  4. Al Khalil, F., Butler, T., O’Brien, L., Ceci, M., (2017). Trust in smart contracts is a process, as well. In: Brenner, M., Rohloff, K., Bonneau, J., Miller,
  5. A., Ryan, P.Y.A., Teague, V., Bracciali, A., Sala, M., Pintore, F., Jakobsson, M. (Eds.), Financial Cryptography and Data Security. Springer International Publishing, Cham, 510–519.
  6. Albinsson, P.A., Perera, Y., (2012). Alternative marketplaces in the 21st century: building community through sharing events. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 11, 303–315. https://doi.org/10.1002/cb.1389.
  7. Albiston, G., Osman, T., Peytchev, E., (2014). Modelling trust in semantic web applications. In: UKSim 2014 Proceedings. 440–445. doi:10.1109/ UKSim.2014.62 Umarovich, A.A., Natalia, V. (2017). Blockchain and financial controlling in the system of technological provision of large corporations’ economic security. European Research Studies Journal, 265-288.
  8. Alexopoulos, N., Daubert, J., Muhlhauser, M., Habib, S.M., (2017). Beyond the hype: On using blockchains in trust management for authentication. In: Proceedings – 16th IEEE International Conference on Trust, Security and Privacy in Computing and Communications, 11th IEEE International Conference on Big Data Science and Engineering and 14th IEEE International Conference on Embedded Software and Systems. 546–553. doi:10.1109/Trustcom/BigDataSE/ICESS.2017.283

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Finance, Business Administration

Journal Section

Research Article

Authors

Publication Date

September 30, 2021

Submission Date

June 6, 2021

Acceptance Date

September 2, 2021

Published in Issue

Year 2021 Volume: 8 Number: 3

APA
Khatri, A., & Kaushik, A. (2021). SYSTEMATIC LITERATURE REVIEW ON BLOCKCHAIN ADOPTION IN BANKING. Journal of Economics Finance and Accounting, 8(3), 126-146. https://doi.org/10.17261/Pressacademia.2021.1458
AMA
1.Khatri A, Kaushik A. SYSTEMATIC LITERATURE REVIEW ON BLOCKCHAIN ADOPTION IN BANKING. JEFA. 2021;8(3):126-146. doi:10.17261/Pressacademia.2021.1458
Chicago
Khatri, Arun, and Anjali Kaushik. 2021. “SYSTEMATIC LITERATURE REVIEW ON BLOCKCHAIN ADOPTION IN BANKING”. Journal of Economics Finance and Accounting 8 (3): 126-46. https://doi.org/10.17261/Pressacademia.2021.1458.
EndNote
Khatri A, Kaushik A (September 1, 2021) SYSTEMATIC LITERATURE REVIEW ON BLOCKCHAIN ADOPTION IN BANKING. Journal of Economics Finance and Accounting 8 3 126–146.
IEEE
[1]A. Khatri and A. Kaushik, “SYSTEMATIC LITERATURE REVIEW ON BLOCKCHAIN ADOPTION IN BANKING”, JEFA, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 126–146, Sept. 2021, doi: 10.17261/Pressacademia.2021.1458.
ISNAD
Khatri, Arun - Kaushik, Anjali. “SYSTEMATIC LITERATURE REVIEW ON BLOCKCHAIN ADOPTION IN BANKING”. Journal of Economics Finance and Accounting 8/3 (September 1, 2021): 126-146. https://doi.org/10.17261/Pressacademia.2021.1458.
JAMA
1.Khatri A, Kaushik A. SYSTEMATIC LITERATURE REVIEW ON BLOCKCHAIN ADOPTION IN BANKING. JEFA. 2021;8:126–146.
MLA
Khatri, Arun, and Anjali Kaushik. “SYSTEMATIC LITERATURE REVIEW ON BLOCKCHAIN ADOPTION IN BANKING”. Journal of Economics Finance and Accounting, vol. 8, no. 3, Sept. 2021, pp. 126-4, doi:10.17261/Pressacademia.2021.1458.
Vancouver
1.Arun Khatri, Anjali Kaushik. SYSTEMATIC LITERATURE REVIEW ON BLOCKCHAIN ADOPTION IN BANKING. JEFA. 2021 Sep. 1;8(3):126-4. doi:10.17261/Pressacademia.2021.1458

Journal of Economics, Finance and Accounting (JEFA) is a scientific, academic, double blind peer-reviewed, semiannual and open-access online journal. The journal publishes 2 issues a year. The issuing months are June and December. The publication language of the Journal is English. JEFA aims to provide a research source for all practitioners, policy makers, professionals and researchers working in the area of economics, finance, accounting and auditing. The editor in chief of JEFA invites all manuscripts that cover theoretical and/or applied researches on topics related to the interest areas of the Journal. JEFA publishes academic research studies only. JEFA charges no submission or publication fee.

Ethics Policy - JEFA applies the standards of Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE). JEFA is committed to the academic community ensuring ethics and quality of manuscripts in publications. Plagiarism is strictly forbidden and the manuscripts found to be plagiarized will not be accepted or if published will be removed from the publication. Authors must certify that their manuscripts are their original work. Plagiarism, duplicate, data fabrication and redundant publications are forbidden. The manuscripts are subject to plagiarism check by iThenticate or similar. All manuscript submissions must provide a similarity report (up to 15% excluding quotes, bibliography, abstract).

Open Access - All research articles published in PressAcademia Journals are fully open access; immediately freely available to read, download and share. Articles are published under the terms of a Creative Commons license which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Open access is a property of individual works, not necessarily journals or publishers. Community standards, rather than copyright law, will continue to provide the mechanism for enforcement of proper attribution and responsible use of the published work, as they do now.