Purpose- While extending two extant studies, this paper pioneers a holistic test and critical examination of the usefulness of Basel II/III capital
modeling implementation in sixteen Zimbabwean banks.
Methodology- A mixed method approach was adopted where quantitative and qualitative research designs were concurrently combined
under equal status. Quantitative data was collected with self-administered structured questionnaires distributed to 120 Risk Managers and
manifest archival content analysis carried on 160 audited annual financial statements for 2011-2020. Qualitative data was collected with
latent archival content analysis from purposive samples of 35 audited annual financial statements and 20 previous survey reports both for
2011-2020. Data analysis was carried out with descriptive statitistics and interpretative methods.
Findings- This paper finds deep implementation of Basel II/III capital modeling methods, sufficient data and skills, violation of the
proportionality principle, existence of information asymmetries and low levels of market discipline and supervision in Zimbabwean banks.
The violation of proportionality principle is shown by the fact that local banks are implementing advanced capital modeling methods at the
same pace or even higher than internationally active banks. The existence of information asymmetries is shown by divergence of perspectives
between regulator and banks. While the regulator is enforcing proportionality, banks are adopting advanced methods for their internal
purposes regardless of size. The usefulness of Basel II/III capital modeling in Zimbabwean banks as a tool for managing risk based minimum
capital requirements is not clear given the violation of the proportionality principle by banks and existence of other parallel higher capital
requirements enforced by the regulator.
Conclusion-This paper makes two specific contributions to knowledge. First it adds empirical evidence to two previous studies thus
contributing to literature on proportionality and Basel II/III capital modeling practices in Zimbabwean banks. Second, it proposes policy
recommendations to improve capital management in Zimbabwean banks.
quantitative risk management capital modeling global capital regulation concurrent triangulation mixed methods financial engineering
Primary Language | English |
---|---|
Subjects | Finance, Business Administration |
Journal Section | Articles |
Authors | |
Publication Date | June 30, 2022 |
Published in Issue | Year 2022 |
Journal of Economics, Finance and Accounting (JEFA) is a scientific, academic, double blind peer-reviewed, quarterly and open-access online journal. The journal publishes four issues a year. The issuing months are March, June, September and December. The publication languages of the Journal are English and Turkish. JEFA aims to provide a research source for all practitioners, policy makers, professionals and researchers working in the area of economics, finance, accounting and auditing. The editor in chief of JEFA invites all manuscripts that cover theoretical and/or applied researches on topics related to the interest areas of the Journal. JEFA publishes academic research studies only. JEFA charges no submission or publication fee.
Ethics Policy - JEFA applies the standards of Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE). JEFA is committed to the academic community ensuring ethics and quality of manuscripts in publications. Plagiarism is strictly forbidden and the manuscripts found to be plagiarized will not be accepted or if published will be removed from the publication. Authors must certify that their manuscripts are their original work. Plagiarism, duplicate, data fabrication and redundant publications are forbidden. The manuscripts are subject to plagiarism check by iThenticate or similar. All manuscript submissions must provide a similarity report (up to 15% excluding quotes, bibliography, abstract and method).
Open Access - All research articles published in PressAcademia Journals are fully open access; immediately freely available to read, download and share. Articles are published under the terms of a Creative Commons license which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Open access is a property of individual works, not necessarily journals or publishers. Community standards, rather than copyright law, will continue to provide the mechanism for enforcement of proper attribution and responsible use of the published work, as they do now.