Purpose- This paper compares the performance of DIA, trailing optimal portfolio and forward-looking optimal portfolio constructed from a pool of DOW stocks, applying a modified contrarian portfolio construction to the forward-looking optimization. The modified contrarian optimization of this study is based on the premise that loser stocks, in the short run, would have reversal performance and become winner stocks in the short-run future. The investigative question is: Do forward-looking optimal portfolios of DOW stocks perform better than trailing optimal portfolios of DOW stocks in the short run after DJIA hit the year's lowest point in 2022?
Methodology- To answer the investigative question, this study compares the short-run performance of forward-looking optimal portfolios with the performance of trailing optimal portfolios. Elton, Gruber, and Padberg (1987) originally introduced the optimal portfolio technique.
Findings- The primary focus was on the case related to September 30, 2022, when DJIA hit the lowest level in 2022. To get the trend analysis of the cases of DJIA hitting the lowest level of the year, this study examined two comparable findings, having examined the performance properties of trailing vs. forward-looking optimal portfolios using the same method. One examined the case related to March 23, 2020, and another examined the case related to December 24, 2018. It finds a robust performance of DIA compared to the performance of two forms of optimal portfolios. It also finds that forward-looking optimal portfolios performed better than trailing optimal portfolios regarding the average performance of three cases.
Conclusion- It concludes the potential usefulness of DIA as evidence of the market efficiency of DOW stocks. At the same time, forward-looking optimal portfolios for short-run investment in DOW stocks are a viable alternative to investing in the DIA.
Primary Language | English |
---|---|
Subjects | Finance, Finance and Investment (Other), Business Administration, Business Systems in Context (Other) |
Journal Section | Articles |
Authors | |
Publication Date | June 2, 2024 |
Submission Date | January 28, 2024 |
Acceptance Date | May 28, 2024 |
Published in Issue | Year 2024 |
Journal of Economics, Finance and Accounting (JEFA) is a scientific, academic, double blind peer-reviewed, quarterly and open-access online journal. The journal publishes four issues a year. The issuing months are March, June, September and December. The publication languages of the Journal are English and Turkish. JEFA aims to provide a research source for all practitioners, policy makers, professionals and researchers working in the area of economics, finance, accounting and auditing. The editor in chief of JEFA invites all manuscripts that cover theoretical and/or applied researches on topics related to the interest areas of the Journal. JEFA publishes academic research studies only. JEFA charges no submission or publication fee.
Ethics Policy - JEFA applies the standards of Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE). JEFA is committed to the academic community ensuring ethics and quality of manuscripts in publications. Plagiarism is strictly forbidden and the manuscripts found to be plagiarized will not be accepted or if published will be removed from the publication. Authors must certify that their manuscripts are their original work. Plagiarism, duplicate, data fabrication and redundant publications are forbidden. The manuscripts are subject to plagiarism check by iThenticate or similar. All manuscript submissions must provide a similarity report (up to 15% excluding quotes, bibliography, abstract and method).
Open Access - All research articles published in PressAcademia Journals are fully open access; immediately freely available to read, download and share. Articles are published under the terms of a Creative Commons license which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Open access is a property of individual works, not necessarily journals or publishers. Community standards, rather than copyright law, will continue to provide the mechanism for enforcement of proper attribution and responsible use of the published work, as they do now.