Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite
Year 2024, , 16 - 26, 02.06.2024
https://doi.org/10.17261/Pressacademia.2024.1893

Abstract

References

  • Acemoglu, D., Simon, J., & James, R. (2001). The colonial origins of comparative development. American Economic Review, 91(5), 1369–1401. https://www.nber.org/papers/w7771.pdf
  • Adelakun, O. (2011). Human capital development and economic growth in Nigeria. European Journal of Business and Management, 3(9), 29–38.
  • Bartlett, S. (2011). Poverty reduction strategy papers and their contribution to health: an analysis of three countries. McGill Journal of Medicine, 13(2), 22-28.
  • Benjamin, A. (2008). Fundamental Principles of the Occupational Health and Safety. Second Edition. International Labour Organization.
  • Booth, D., & Lucas, H. (2001). Desk study of good practice in the development of PRSP ındicators and monitoring systems. Overseas Development Institute, 172, 32-51.
  • Brautigam, D. (1996). State Capacity and Effective Governance. Agenda for Africa’s economic Renewal. Washington, DC: Transaction Publishing
  • Bretton Woods Project. (2003). Poverty Reduction strategies Papar(PRSP). Rough guide, Macdonald Road London. Macdonald Road London.
  • Chantal, C. (2007). Poverty Reduction Strategies in The United Kigdom and Ireland. Libraryb Parliament, November, PRB-28E.
  • Cheru, F. (2006). Building and supporting PRSPs in Africa: What has worked well so far? What Needs Changing? Third World Quarterly, 27(2), 355–376. https://doi.org/10.1080/01436590500432689
  • Craig, D., & Porter, D. (2003). Poverty reduction strategy papers: A new convergence. World Development, 31(1), 53–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-750X(02)00147-X
  • Dissanayake, D. M. N. S. W. (2013). Research, research gap and the research problem. Munich Personal RePEc Archive, 47519, 1–5. https://ideas.repec.org/p/pra/mprapa/47519.html
  • Driscoll, R., & Christiansen, K. (2004). The PRSP Approach: A basic guide for CARE International. Overseas Development Institute. London: ODI
  • Eberlei, W. (2001). Institutionalised Participation in Processes Beyond the PRSP. Institute for Development and Peace (INEF). Gerhard-Mercator-University, Duisburg
  • Francis, O. (2003). Pragmatism and the gradual shift from dependency to neoliberalism: the World Bank, African leaders and development policy in Africa. World Development, 31(10), 1655–1672.
  • Franz, H., Achi, A., Martine, P., Gerard, G., & Jean, C. (2004). Development strategies and food and nutrition security in Africa: An assessment. Washington, DC: IFPRI (2020 Discussion Paper No. 38)
  • Harrison, M., Klugman, J., & Swanson, E. (2003). Are Poverty Reduction Strategies Undercutting the Millennium Development Goals? An Empirical Review. Washington: World Bank (September 17)., 1–18.
  • Healey, J., Foster, M., Norton, A., & Booth, D. (2000). Towards National Public Expenditure Strategies for Poverty Reduction. In London: Overseas Development Institute (Poverty Briefing).
  • Heidhues, F., & Obare, G. (2011). Lessons from structural adjustment programmes and their effects in Africa. Quarterly Journal of International Agriculture 50(1), 55–64.
  • Hughes, S., & Haworth, N. (2011). Decent work and poverty reduction strategies. Relations Industrielles, 66(1), 34–53.
  • Hunter, N., May, J., & Padayachee, V. (2003). Lessons for PRSP from Poverty Reduction Strategies in South Africa. University of KwaZulu-Natal, Centre for Social and Development Studies, ISBN No. 1-86840-498-6
  • Jim, L. (2002). The World Bank ’ s Poverty Reduction Strategy Paper Approach: Good Marketing or Good Policy Jim Levinsohn. World, November.
  • Khan, S. L. A. (2010). Poverty Reduction Strategy Papers : Failing Minorities and Indigenous Peoples. London ISBN 97-819045849-64
  • Koudougou, B. (2002). Critical Analysis of the PRSP e Experience in Burkina Faso. The UN Economic Commission for Africa, Brussels.
  • Levie, C. (2004). The Poverty Reduction Strategy Initiative-An Independent Evaluation of the World Bank’s Support Through 2003. Routledge. London and New York ISBN 97-813151282-52
  • Lucas, H., Evans, D., Pasteur, K., & Lloyd, R. (2004). Research on the Current State of PRS Monitoring Systems. Discussion Paper No. 382. Brighton: IDS
  • Marlier, E., Atkinson, T., Cantillon, B., & Nolan, B. (2005). Taking forward the EU Social Inclusion Process. The EU and Social Inclusion, July, 1–186. https://doi.org/10.56687/9781847421722-011
  • Mick, F., & Douglas, Z. (2002). How, When and Why Does Poverty Get Budget Priority? : Poverty Reduction Strategy and Public Expenditure in Ghana. Overseas Development Institute, Working Paper No. 164, London. ODI
  • Noël, A. (2006). The new global politics of poverty. Global Social Policy, 6(3), 304–333. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468018106069203
  • Rafael, G., & Lawson, M. (2005). Pro‐poor macroeconomic policies require poverty and social ımpact analysis. Development Policy Review, 23(3), 369–384.
  • Sanchez, D., & Cash, K. (2003). Reducing Poverty or Repeating Mistakes? A Civil Society Critique of Poverty Reduction Strategy Papers. Stockholm: Church of Sweden Aid, Diakonia, Save the Children Sweden and The Swedish Jubilee Network. (Brussels: Eurodad)
  • Segura, U., Lago, M., Chelsky, M., Mugerwa, S., Sembene, D., Goldsbrough, J., & Tsikata, T. (2004). Evaluation of the IMF’s Role in Poverty Reduction Strategy Papers and the Poverty Reduction and Growth Facility IMF Publication Services. Washington, D.C. ISBN 1-58906-367-8
  • Stewart, F., & Wang, M. (2003). Do PRSPs Empower poor Countries and Disempower the World Bank, or is it the Other Way Round? Globalization and the Nation State: The Impact of the IMF and the World Bank, 108, 310–340. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203323441
  • UNCTAD. (2002). The least developed countries report 2002: escaping the poverty trap. Geneva: UNCTAD, 2002. Journal of African Economics 12 (4), 672-678. https://doi.org/10.1093/jae/12.4.672
  • UNECA. (2002). Re-thinking the Brain Drain in Africa in Light of Recent Events and Findings. Conference of the Minister of Education of African Mamber States. Dar-es-salaam, Tanzania, 2-6 December 2002). Addis Ababa, UN. ECA
  • UNSCAP (2015) .TheLinkage Between the MDGS and the PRSPs. Https://www.unescap.org/sites/site/default/files/PRSP%20MDGs.PDF.
  • Whaites, A. (Ed. ). (2002). Masters of Their Own Development?: PRSPs and the Prospects for the Poor. Monrovia, CA: World Vision International
  • Whitehead, A. (2003). Failing women , Sustaining Poverty: Report for the UK Gender and Development Network. Gender in Poverty Reduction Strategy Papers, 5(1), 123–135.
  • Woodbridge, M. (2015). From MDGs to SDGs: What are the Sustainable Development Goals? ICLEI Briefing Sheet - Urban Issues, 1(1), 1-4. https://www.local2030.org/library/251/From-MDGs-to-SDGs-What-are-the-Sustainable-Development-Goals.pdf
  • World Bank. (2000). Partners in Transforming Development: New Approaches to Developing Country-Owned Poverty Reduction Strategies. IMF. http://www.worldbank.org/poverty/strategies/
  • World Bank. (2001). Comprehensive Development Framework: Meeting the Promise? Early Experience and Emerging Issues, draft policy note presented at the CIDA seminar, CDF Secretariat, 27 August.
  • World Health Organization. (2004). Reduction strategy Paper - PRSPs. Their Significance for Health:PRSPs: Second Synthesis Report (No. WHO/HDP/PRSP/04.1). World Health Organization.
  • Zuckerman, E., Garrett, A., & Gender Action. (2003). Do Poverty Reduction Strategy Papers ( PRSPs ) Address Gender ? A Gender Audit of 2002 PRSPs. Washington, DC: Gender Action

INTRODUCTION TO THE POVERTY REDUCTION STRATEGY PLANS (PRSP): PROCESS AND EFFECTIVENESS REVIEW

Year 2024, , 16 - 26, 02.06.2024
https://doi.org/10.17261/Pressacademia.2024.1893

Abstract

Purpose- This study tries to describe a comprehensive overview of the Poverty Reduction Strategy Plan papers. This is a crucial document that any current economist should understand. Currently, the globe is implementing seventeen development goals listed on the Sustainable Development Goals Agenda.
Methodology- The empirical review through several reports and works that addresses several themes that are pertinent to the Poverty Reduction Strategy Plans document, including the Interim Poverty Reduction Strategy Plan (IPRSP) and the Complete Poverty Reduction Strategy Plans (PRSP) was done. The work also describes how historically the concept of poverty reduction strategy plans (PRSP) came to exist. It covers the time from when the PRSP method was presented in 1999 up to date. Also, the work explains the main principles that must be included in preparing the Poverty Reduction Strategy Plans (PRSP) documents and challenges that face poor countries in the implementation of their corresponding poverty reduction strategy plans (PRSP) is discussed.
Findings- The paper finalize by looking at different discussions and views on whether these plans really help the poor countries, or they are just another mode of empowering the poor countries and international finance institutions will be given. By the end of this review a reader should be able to grasp and overview of overall concept of the poverty reduction strategy plans.
Conclusion- The study concluded that the plans help developing countries due to noticeable development progress in developing countries

References

  • Acemoglu, D., Simon, J., & James, R. (2001). The colonial origins of comparative development. American Economic Review, 91(5), 1369–1401. https://www.nber.org/papers/w7771.pdf
  • Adelakun, O. (2011). Human capital development and economic growth in Nigeria. European Journal of Business and Management, 3(9), 29–38.
  • Bartlett, S. (2011). Poverty reduction strategy papers and their contribution to health: an analysis of three countries. McGill Journal of Medicine, 13(2), 22-28.
  • Benjamin, A. (2008). Fundamental Principles of the Occupational Health and Safety. Second Edition. International Labour Organization.
  • Booth, D., & Lucas, H. (2001). Desk study of good practice in the development of PRSP ındicators and monitoring systems. Overseas Development Institute, 172, 32-51.
  • Brautigam, D. (1996). State Capacity and Effective Governance. Agenda for Africa’s economic Renewal. Washington, DC: Transaction Publishing
  • Bretton Woods Project. (2003). Poverty Reduction strategies Papar(PRSP). Rough guide, Macdonald Road London. Macdonald Road London.
  • Chantal, C. (2007). Poverty Reduction Strategies in The United Kigdom and Ireland. Libraryb Parliament, November, PRB-28E.
  • Cheru, F. (2006). Building and supporting PRSPs in Africa: What has worked well so far? What Needs Changing? Third World Quarterly, 27(2), 355–376. https://doi.org/10.1080/01436590500432689
  • Craig, D., & Porter, D. (2003). Poverty reduction strategy papers: A new convergence. World Development, 31(1), 53–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-750X(02)00147-X
  • Dissanayake, D. M. N. S. W. (2013). Research, research gap and the research problem. Munich Personal RePEc Archive, 47519, 1–5. https://ideas.repec.org/p/pra/mprapa/47519.html
  • Driscoll, R., & Christiansen, K. (2004). The PRSP Approach: A basic guide for CARE International. Overseas Development Institute. London: ODI
  • Eberlei, W. (2001). Institutionalised Participation in Processes Beyond the PRSP. Institute for Development and Peace (INEF). Gerhard-Mercator-University, Duisburg
  • Francis, O. (2003). Pragmatism and the gradual shift from dependency to neoliberalism: the World Bank, African leaders and development policy in Africa. World Development, 31(10), 1655–1672.
  • Franz, H., Achi, A., Martine, P., Gerard, G., & Jean, C. (2004). Development strategies and food and nutrition security in Africa: An assessment. Washington, DC: IFPRI (2020 Discussion Paper No. 38)
  • Harrison, M., Klugman, J., & Swanson, E. (2003). Are Poverty Reduction Strategies Undercutting the Millennium Development Goals? An Empirical Review. Washington: World Bank (September 17)., 1–18.
  • Healey, J., Foster, M., Norton, A., & Booth, D. (2000). Towards National Public Expenditure Strategies for Poverty Reduction. In London: Overseas Development Institute (Poverty Briefing).
  • Heidhues, F., & Obare, G. (2011). Lessons from structural adjustment programmes and their effects in Africa. Quarterly Journal of International Agriculture 50(1), 55–64.
  • Hughes, S., & Haworth, N. (2011). Decent work and poverty reduction strategies. Relations Industrielles, 66(1), 34–53.
  • Hunter, N., May, J., & Padayachee, V. (2003). Lessons for PRSP from Poverty Reduction Strategies in South Africa. University of KwaZulu-Natal, Centre for Social and Development Studies, ISBN No. 1-86840-498-6
  • Jim, L. (2002). The World Bank ’ s Poverty Reduction Strategy Paper Approach: Good Marketing or Good Policy Jim Levinsohn. World, November.
  • Khan, S. L. A. (2010). Poverty Reduction Strategy Papers : Failing Minorities and Indigenous Peoples. London ISBN 97-819045849-64
  • Koudougou, B. (2002). Critical Analysis of the PRSP e Experience in Burkina Faso. The UN Economic Commission for Africa, Brussels.
  • Levie, C. (2004). The Poverty Reduction Strategy Initiative-An Independent Evaluation of the World Bank’s Support Through 2003. Routledge. London and New York ISBN 97-813151282-52
  • Lucas, H., Evans, D., Pasteur, K., & Lloyd, R. (2004). Research on the Current State of PRS Monitoring Systems. Discussion Paper No. 382. Brighton: IDS
  • Marlier, E., Atkinson, T., Cantillon, B., & Nolan, B. (2005). Taking forward the EU Social Inclusion Process. The EU and Social Inclusion, July, 1–186. https://doi.org/10.56687/9781847421722-011
  • Mick, F., & Douglas, Z. (2002). How, When and Why Does Poverty Get Budget Priority? : Poverty Reduction Strategy and Public Expenditure in Ghana. Overseas Development Institute, Working Paper No. 164, London. ODI
  • Noël, A. (2006). The new global politics of poverty. Global Social Policy, 6(3), 304–333. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468018106069203
  • Rafael, G., & Lawson, M. (2005). Pro‐poor macroeconomic policies require poverty and social ımpact analysis. Development Policy Review, 23(3), 369–384.
  • Sanchez, D., & Cash, K. (2003). Reducing Poverty or Repeating Mistakes? A Civil Society Critique of Poverty Reduction Strategy Papers. Stockholm: Church of Sweden Aid, Diakonia, Save the Children Sweden and The Swedish Jubilee Network. (Brussels: Eurodad)
  • Segura, U., Lago, M., Chelsky, M., Mugerwa, S., Sembene, D., Goldsbrough, J., & Tsikata, T. (2004). Evaluation of the IMF’s Role in Poverty Reduction Strategy Papers and the Poverty Reduction and Growth Facility IMF Publication Services. Washington, D.C. ISBN 1-58906-367-8
  • Stewart, F., & Wang, M. (2003). Do PRSPs Empower poor Countries and Disempower the World Bank, or is it the Other Way Round? Globalization and the Nation State: The Impact of the IMF and the World Bank, 108, 310–340. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203323441
  • UNCTAD. (2002). The least developed countries report 2002: escaping the poverty trap. Geneva: UNCTAD, 2002. Journal of African Economics 12 (4), 672-678. https://doi.org/10.1093/jae/12.4.672
  • UNECA. (2002). Re-thinking the Brain Drain in Africa in Light of Recent Events and Findings. Conference of the Minister of Education of African Mamber States. Dar-es-salaam, Tanzania, 2-6 December 2002). Addis Ababa, UN. ECA
  • UNSCAP (2015) .TheLinkage Between the MDGS and the PRSPs. Https://www.unescap.org/sites/site/default/files/PRSP%20MDGs.PDF.
  • Whaites, A. (Ed. ). (2002). Masters of Their Own Development?: PRSPs and the Prospects for the Poor. Monrovia, CA: World Vision International
  • Whitehead, A. (2003). Failing women , Sustaining Poverty: Report for the UK Gender and Development Network. Gender in Poverty Reduction Strategy Papers, 5(1), 123–135.
  • Woodbridge, M. (2015). From MDGs to SDGs: What are the Sustainable Development Goals? ICLEI Briefing Sheet - Urban Issues, 1(1), 1-4. https://www.local2030.org/library/251/From-MDGs-to-SDGs-What-are-the-Sustainable-Development-Goals.pdf
  • World Bank. (2000). Partners in Transforming Development: New Approaches to Developing Country-Owned Poverty Reduction Strategies. IMF. http://www.worldbank.org/poverty/strategies/
  • World Bank. (2001). Comprehensive Development Framework: Meeting the Promise? Early Experience and Emerging Issues, draft policy note presented at the CIDA seminar, CDF Secretariat, 27 August.
  • World Health Organization. (2004). Reduction strategy Paper - PRSPs. Their Significance for Health:PRSPs: Second Synthesis Report (No. WHO/HDP/PRSP/04.1). World Health Organization.
  • Zuckerman, E., Garrett, A., & Gender Action. (2003). Do Poverty Reduction Strategy Papers ( PRSPs ) Address Gender ? A Gender Audit of 2002 PRSPs. Washington, DC: Gender Action
There are 42 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Subjects Finance, Finance and Investment (Other), Business Administration, Business Systems in Context (Other)
Journal Section Articles
Authors

Kassim Tafana Kassim 0000-0002-0962-5985

Ertan Beceren 0000-0003-1314-5607

Publication Date June 2, 2024
Submission Date January 11, 2024
Acceptance Date April 29, 2024
Published in Issue Year 2024

Cite

APA Kassim, K. T., & Beceren, E. (2024). INTRODUCTION TO THE POVERTY REDUCTION STRATEGY PLANS (PRSP): PROCESS AND EFFECTIVENESS REVIEW. Journal of Economics Finance and Accounting, 11(1), 16-26. https://doi.org/10.17261/Pressacademia.2024.1893

Journal of Economics, Finance and Accounting (JEFA) is a scientific, academic, double blind peer-reviewed, quarterly and open-access online journal. The journal publishes four issues a year. The issuing months are March, June, September and December. The publication languages of the Journal are English and Turkish. JEFA aims to provide a research source for all practitioners, policy makers, professionals and researchers working in the area of economics, finance, accounting and auditing. The editor in chief of JEFA invites all manuscripts that cover theoretical and/or applied researches on topics related to the interest areas of the Journal. JEFA publishes academic research studies only. JEFA charges no submission or publication fee.

Ethics Policy - JEFA applies the standards of Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE). JEFA is committed to the academic community ensuring ethics and quality of manuscripts in publications. Plagiarism is strictly forbidden and the manuscripts found to be plagiarized will not be accepted or if published will be removed from the publication. Authors must certify that their manuscripts are their original work. Plagiarism, duplicate, data fabrication and redundant publications are forbidden. The manuscripts are subject to plagiarism check by iThenticate or similar. All manuscript submissions must provide a similarity report (up to 15% excluding quotes, bibliography, abstract and method).

Open Access - All research articles published in PressAcademia Journals are fully open access; immediately freely available to read, download and share. Articles are published under the terms of a Creative Commons license which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Open access is a property of individual works, not necessarily journals or publishers. Community standards, rather than copyright law, will continue to provide the mechanism for enforcement of proper attribution and responsible use of the published work, as they do now.