Research Article

THE ABILENE PARADOX AND COLLECTIVE IRRATIONALITY IN CRYPTOCURRENCY MARKETS: A SOCIAL MEDIA SENTIMENT ANALYSIS

Volume: 12 Number: 2 December 31, 2025

THE ABILENE PARADOX AND COLLECTIVE IRRATIONALITY IN CRYPTOCURRENCY MARKETS: A SOCIAL MEDIA SENTIMENT ANALYSIS

Abstract

Purpose- This study investigates the manifestation of the Abilene Paradox within the context of collective irrational behavior in cryptocurrency markets, utilizing social media data for sentiment analysis. The Abilene Paradox describes a phenomenon where a group collectively decides on a course of action that is contrary to the preferences of most or all individuals, as each mistakenly believes it aligns with the desires of others. In the highly community-driven cryptocurrency market, this paradox can exacerbate herd behavior and the Fear of Missing Out (FOMO), leading to significant market volatility. Methodology- Through sentiment analysis of discussions on social media platforms (e.g., Twitter, Reddit) concerning specific cryptocurrencies (e.g., Meme Coins), this research explores how community sentiment influences market behavior and price movements. Findings- The study considers the impact of community variables (e.g., community size, opinion leader influence), sentiment variables (e.g., positive/negative sentiment indices, sentiment polarization), and market variables (e.g., trading volume, price volatility) on collective irrational behavior. Conclusion- It aims to establish a generalized model explaining the relationship between social media sentiment and market behavior. The findings will contribute to understanding the behavioral economics characteristics of cryptocurrency markets and offer new perspectives for investors and regulators.

Keywords

References

  1. Anaza, N. A., Upadhyaya, B., Bennett, D. H. S., & Ruvalcaba, C. (2024). Is it FOMO or is it ME? The influence of personality traits on cryptocurrency consumption. Psychology & Marketing, 41(1), 184–202. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.21919
  2. Antweiler, W., & Frank, M. Z. (2004). Is all that talk just noise? The information content of Internet stock message boards. The Journal of Finance, 59(3), 1259–1294. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2004.00662.x
  3. Banerjee, A. V. (1992). A simple model of herd behavior. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 107(3), 797–817. https://doi.org/10.2307/2118364
  4. Barber, B. M., & Odean, T. (2001). Boys will be boys: Gender, overconfidence, and common stock investment. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 116(1), 261–292. https://doi.org/10.1162/003355301556400
  5. Baur, D. G., Hong, K., & Lee, A. D. (2018). Bitcoin: Medium of exchange or speculative assets? Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, 54, 177–189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intfin.2017.12.004
  6. Blei, D. M., Ng, A. Y., & Jordan, M. I. (2003). Latent Dirichlet allocation. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 3, 993–1022.
  7. Bollen, J., Mao, H., & Zeng, X. (2011). Twitter mood predicts the stock market. Journal of Computational Science, 2(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocs.2010.12.007
  8. Bollerslev, T. (1986). Generalized autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity. Journal of Econometrics, 31(3), 307–327. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4076(86)90063-1

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Finance

Journal Section

Research Article

Publication Date

December 31, 2025

Submission Date

November 2, 2025

Acceptance Date

December 20, 2025

Published in Issue

Year 2025 Volume: 12 Number: 2

APA
Jia-Ying, L. (2025). THE ABILENE PARADOX AND COLLECTIVE IRRATIONALITY IN CRYPTOCURRENCY MARKETS: A SOCIAL MEDIA SENTIMENT ANALYSIS. Journal of Economics Finance and Accounting, 12(2), 162-176. https://doi.org/10.17261/Pressacademia.2025.2008
AMA
1.Jia-Ying L. THE ABILENE PARADOX AND COLLECTIVE IRRATIONALITY IN CRYPTOCURRENCY MARKETS: A SOCIAL MEDIA SENTIMENT ANALYSIS. JEFA. 2025;12(2):162-176. doi:10.17261/Pressacademia.2025.2008
Chicago
Jia-Ying, Lyu. 2025. “THE ABILENE PARADOX AND COLLECTIVE IRRATIONALITY IN CRYPTOCURRENCY MARKETS: A SOCIAL MEDIA SENTIMENT ANALYSIS”. Journal of Economics Finance and Accounting 12 (2): 162-76. https://doi.org/10.17261/Pressacademia.2025.2008.
EndNote
Jia-Ying L (December 1, 2025) THE ABILENE PARADOX AND COLLECTIVE IRRATIONALITY IN CRYPTOCURRENCY MARKETS: A SOCIAL MEDIA SENTIMENT ANALYSIS. Journal of Economics Finance and Accounting 12 2 162–176.
IEEE
[1]L. Jia-Ying, “THE ABILENE PARADOX AND COLLECTIVE IRRATIONALITY IN CRYPTOCURRENCY MARKETS: A SOCIAL MEDIA SENTIMENT ANALYSIS”, JEFA, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 162–176, Dec. 2025, doi: 10.17261/Pressacademia.2025.2008.
ISNAD
Jia-Ying, Lyu. “THE ABILENE PARADOX AND COLLECTIVE IRRATIONALITY IN CRYPTOCURRENCY MARKETS: A SOCIAL MEDIA SENTIMENT ANALYSIS”. Journal of Economics Finance and Accounting 12/2 (December 1, 2025): 162-176. https://doi.org/10.17261/Pressacademia.2025.2008.
JAMA
1.Jia-Ying L. THE ABILENE PARADOX AND COLLECTIVE IRRATIONALITY IN CRYPTOCURRENCY MARKETS: A SOCIAL MEDIA SENTIMENT ANALYSIS. JEFA. 2025;12:162–176.
MLA
Jia-Ying, Lyu. “THE ABILENE PARADOX AND COLLECTIVE IRRATIONALITY IN CRYPTOCURRENCY MARKETS: A SOCIAL MEDIA SENTIMENT ANALYSIS”. Journal of Economics Finance and Accounting, vol. 12, no. 2, Dec. 2025, pp. 162-76, doi:10.17261/Pressacademia.2025.2008.
Vancouver
1.Lyu Jia-Ying. THE ABILENE PARADOX AND COLLECTIVE IRRATIONALITY IN CRYPTOCURRENCY MARKETS: A SOCIAL MEDIA SENTIMENT ANALYSIS. JEFA. 2025 Dec. 1;12(2):162-76. doi:10.17261/Pressacademia.2025.2008

Journal of Economics, Finance and Accounting (JEFA) is a scientific, academic, double blind peer-reviewed, semiannual and open-access online journal. The journal publishes 2 issues a year. The issuing months are June and December. The publication language of the Journal is English. JEFA aims to provide a research source for all practitioners, policy makers, professionals and researchers working in the area of economics, finance, accounting and auditing. The editor in chief of JEFA invites all manuscripts that cover theoretical and/or applied researches on topics related to the interest areas of the Journal. JEFA publishes academic research studies only. JEFA charges no submission or publication fee.

Ethics Policy - JEFA applies the standards of Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE). JEFA is committed to the academic community ensuring ethics and quality of manuscripts in publications. Plagiarism is strictly forbidden and the manuscripts found to be plagiarized will not be accepted or if published will be removed from the publication. Authors must certify that their manuscripts are their original work. Plagiarism, duplicate, data fabrication and redundant publications are forbidden. The manuscripts are subject to plagiarism check by iThenticate or similar. All manuscript submissions must provide a similarity report (up to 15% excluding quotes, bibliography, abstract).

Open Access - All research articles published in PressAcademia Journals are fully open access; immediately freely available to read, download and share. Articles are published under the terms of a Creative Commons license which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Open access is a property of individual works, not necessarily journals or publishers. Community standards, rather than copyright law, will continue to provide the mechanism for enforcement of proper attribution and responsible use of the published work, as they do now.