DIGITAL AGRICULTURE PRACTICES IN THE CONTEXT OF AGRICULTURE 4.0
Abstract
Purpose- Agricultural production is under heavy pressure based upon increasing world population and significant changes in the climate. In this study, the concept of digital agriculture practices and their effects on agricultural productivity is discussed. An evaluation of current circumstance is made through the cases of Doktar Inc. and Tarla.io which are digital agriculture companies located in Turkey.
Methodology- This study has utilized case method to evaluate the current circumstance of digital agriculture applications in Turkey. Since digital agriculture is an area that is still in early development stage in Turkey, case method is one of the most suitable methods. 11 open-ended questions and subsequent interviews sent to Doktor Inc and Tarla.io General Managers via e-mail and answers are evaluated with other collected data.
Findings- Digital agriculture applications are in the early development stage in Turkey. The companies that are discussed in the paper have made meaningful progress regarding raising awareness of farmers and other involved parts of agriculture sector in Turkey. While the penetration of the two companies is currently not enough both as volume and quantity, the applications used for digital agriculture by them are parallel with the applications in developed countries.
Conclusion- Digital agriculture practices in Turkey have yet to be implemented in very limited, but there are steps to be taken to acceleration. To develop digital farming in Turkey, supports of government have strategic priorities. In this context, the development of a digital agriculture action plan and supporting of this strategy with related policies and implementations, like in the EU countries and USA, will enable the expansion of agricultural production vision in Turkey. Technopolis and incubation centers of universities will be able to transform the accumulated scientific knowledge into initiatives and create a digital agriculture-focused ecosystem.
Keywords
References
- Andrade-Sanchez, P., & Heun, J. T. (2010), Understanding Technical Terms and Acronyms Used in Precision Agriculture, The University of Arizona, Arizona Cooperative Extension Bulletin AZ1534.
- Ault, A., Krogmeier, J., & Buckmaster, D. (2013, July), Mobile, Cloud-Based Farm Management: A Case Study with Trello on My Farm, In 2013 ASABE Annual International Meeting, https://elibrary.asabe.org/abstract.asp?aid=43733&t=2&redir=&redirType=, Accessed: 11.02.2017.
- Avşar, D. & Avşar, G. (2014), Yeni Tarım Düzeninin Tarımsal Üretim Üzerindeki Etkileri ve Türkiye’deki Uygulamalar, Akademik Platform, 379-385.
- Balamurugan S., Divyabharathi, N., Jayashruthi, K., Bowiya, M., Shermy, R. P. &Shanker, R., (2016), Internet of Agriculture: Applying IoT to Improve Food and Farming Technology, International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET), 3(10), 713-719.
- Byerlee, D., de Janvry, A. ve Sadoulet, E. (2009), Agriculture for Development: Toward a New Paradigm, Annual Review of Resource Economics, 1, 15-31.
- Chavali, L. N. (2014), Cloud Computing in Agriculture. In Agricultural Bioinformatics, 189-213, Springer India.
- Deichmann, U., Goyal, A., & Mishra, D. (2016), Will Digital Technologies Transform Agriculture in Developing Countries?, Agricultural Economics, 47(S1), 21-33.
- Devlin, B. (2013), Business UnIntelligence: Insight and Innovation Beyond Analytics and Big Data, Technics Publications, New Jersey, p.151.
Details
Primary Language
English
Subjects
-
Journal Section
Research Article
Publication Date
June 30, 2017
Submission Date
March 28, 2017
Acceptance Date
-
Published in Issue
Year 2017 Volume: 4 Number: 2