Abstract

Eğitim sistemindeki müfredatların başarıya ulaşmasında en önemli rol öğretmenlere aittir. Öğretmenlerin sosyo-ekonomik koşulları bir taraftan mesleğin seçimini, diğer taraftan öğretmenlerin performanslarını etkilemektedir. Bu kapsamda, Denizli ilindeki meslek liseleri dışında kalan Anadolu ve Fen liselerindeki 270 öğretmenle yapılan anket sonuçları analiz edilmiştir. Çalışmada şu sonuçlara ulaşılmıştır: (1) Öğretmenlik mesleği özellikle gelir ve eğitim düzeyi düşük aile bireyleri tarafından daha çok tercih edilmektedir. (2) Ücret düzeyinin düşüklüğü ve ücretlerdeki artışın performansı arttıracağı konusunda genel bir fikir birliği bulunmaktadır. (3) Ücret düzeyinin düşüklüğü öğretmenlerin kişisel gelişimleri için gelirlerinden ayırdıkları payları olumsuz olarak etkilemektedir. (4) Ebeveynlerin gelir ve eğitim düzeylerindeki düşüklük öğrencilerin sorunlarının çözümünde ve öğrenci başarısının arttırılmasında öğrenci-öğretmen-veli ilişkilerini zayıflamaktadır. (5) Öğrencilerin üniversiteye girişteki başarıları üzerinde Anadolu veya Fen liselerine girişteki aldıkları başarı puanlarının, öğrenciöğretmen oranının ve öğretmenlerin mutluluk ve motivasyon düzeylerinin en etkili faktörler olarak öne çıktığı ifade edilebilir. 1. GİRİŞ

Keywords

• Öğretmen özellikleri,öğrenci başarısı,öğretmen işgücü piyasası,performans faktörleri,öğretmen etkinliliği

THE SOCIO-ECONOMIC POSITIONS OF TEACHERS AND THE EFFECTS OF TEACHER CHARACTERISTICS ON STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT

Abstract

The most important role in the success of the curriculum in the education system belongs to teachers. The socio-economic conditions of teachers affects on the one hand the choice of profession and on the other hand their performance. In this context, the survey results that conducted with 270 teachers in Anatolian and Science high schools in Denizli have been analyzed. The results obtained are as follows: (1) The teaching profession is mostly preferred by family members especially with low levels of income and education. (2) There is a general consensus about the level of wages are low and the rise in wages will increase the performance. (3) The low level of wages negatively affects teachers’ spending for their personal development. (4) The lowness in income and education levels of parents of students weakens the student- teacher-parent relationship in solving problems of students and increasing their achievements. (5) It can be expressed that the Anatolian high schools and science schools entrance scores, the student-teacher ratio and the happiness and motivation levels of teachers are the most important factors.

Keywords

• Teacher characteristics,student achievement,teacher labour market,performance factors,teacher effectiveness

References

1. Aaronson, D., Barrow, L., & Sander, W. (2007). Teachers and Student Achievement in the Chicago Public High
2. Schools, Journal of Labor Economics, 25(1), p.95-135. Acemoglu, Daron and Pischke, J.S. (2001) “Changes in the wage structure, family income, and children's education”, European Economic Review, 45, p.890-904.
3. Aksu, M., Engin-Demir, C., Daloğlu, A., Yıldırım, S., & Kiraz, E. (2010). Who are the future teachers in Turkey?
4. Characteristics of entering student Teachers, International Journal of Educational Development, 30, p.91-101. Atar, H. Y. (2014). Multilevel Effects of Teacher Characteristics on TIMSS 2011 Science Achievement, Education and Science, 39(172), p.121-137.
5. Barro, R. J. & Lee, Jong-Wha (2013). A new data set of educational attainment in the world, 1950–2010, Journal of Development Economics, 104 (2013) p.184–198.
6. Barro, R. J. (2013). Education and Economic Growth, Annals Of Economics and Finance, 14(2), p.277-304.
7. Başaran, S.T., (2004). Effectiveness of Anatolian Teacher High Schools in terms of serving their intended purpose.
8. Unpublished doctoral thesis, Middle East Technical University, Ankara, Turkey. Cemalcilar, Z., & Gökşen, F. (2012). Inequality in social capital: social capital, social risk and drop-out in the Turkish education system, British Journal of Sociology of Education, DOI:10.1080/01425692.2012.740807.

9. Chingos, M. M., & Peterson, P. E. (2011). It’s Easier to Pick a Good Teacher than to Train One: Familiar and New
10. Results on the Correlates of Teacher Effectiveness, Economics of Education Review, 30(3), p.449-465. Clotfelter, C. T., Ladd, H. F. & Vigdor, J. L. (2006). Teacher-Student Matching and The Assessment Of Teacher
11. Effectiveness, NBER Working Paper Series, NBER Working Papers 11936, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
12. Clotfelter, C., Glennie, E., Ladd, H., & Vigdor, J. (2008) Would higher salaries keep teachers in high-poverty schools? Evidence from a policy intervention in North Carolina, Journal of Public Economics, 92, 1352–1370.
13. Cooper, S. T., & Cohn, E. (1997). Estimation of a Frontier Production Function for the South Carolina Educational
14. Process, Economics of Education Review, 16(3), p.313-327., Corcoran , S. P., Evans, W. N., & Schwab, R. M. (2004). Changing Labor-Market Opportunities for Women and the Quality of Teachers, 1957–2000, Papers and Proceedings of the American Economic Review, 94(2), p.230-235.
15. Corcoran, R. P., & Tormey, R. (2013). Does emotional intelligence predict student teachers’ performance?,
16. Teaching and Teacher Education, 35, p.34-42. Çakıroğlu, E. & Çakıroğlu, J. (2003). Reflections on Teacher Education in Turkey, European Journal of Teacher Education, 26(2), p.253-264.
17. Dolton, P., & Marcenaro-Gutierrez, O. D. (2011). If you pay peanuts do you get monkeys? A cross-country analysis of teacher pay and pupil performance, Economic Policy, 5–55.
18. Dustmann, C., Rajah, N., & van Soest, A. (2003). Class Size, Education, and Wages, The Economic Journal, 113(485), p.F99-F120.
19. Ehrenberg, R. G., & Brewer, D. J. (1996). Do School and Teacher Characteristics Matter? Evidence from High
20. School and Beyond, Economics of Education Review, 13(1), p.1-17. Ekinci, C. E. (2011). Impact of Some Socio-economic Factors on Higher Education Participation in Turkey,
21. Education and Science, 36(160), 281-297. Engin-Demir,C. (2009). Factors influencing the academic achievement of the Turkish urban poor, International
22. Journal of Educational Development, 29, 17-29. Fretwell, D. H. & Wheeler, A. (2001). Turkey: Secondary Education and Training, The World Bank, Washington, D.C.
23. Gelbal, S. and Duyan, V. (2010). Examination of Variables Affecting Primary School Teachers’ State of Liking of
24. Children, Hacettepe University Journal of Education, 38, p.127-137. Gilpin, G. A. (2012). Teacher salaries and teacher aptitude: An analysis using quantile regressions, Economics of Education Review, 31, p.15-29.
25. Glewwe, P. (2002) "Schools and Skills in Developing Countries: Education Policies and Socioeconomic Outcomes,"
26. Journal of Economic Literature, XL, p.436-482. Goldhaber, D. D. and Brewer, D. J. (1997). Why Don't Schools and Teachers Seem to Matter? Assessing the Impact of Unobservables onEducational Productivity, The Journal of Human Resources, 32(3), p.505-523.
27. Goldhaber, D. D. and Anthony. E. (2007). Can Teacher Quality Be Effectively Assessed? National Board
28. Certification as a Signal of Effective Teaching, The Review of Economics and Statistics, 89(1), p.134–150. Greenwald, R., Hedges, L. V., & Laine, R. D. (1996). The Effect of School Resources on Student Achievement,
29. Review of Educational Research, 66(3), p.361-396. Hanushek, E. A. (1986). The Economics of Schooling: Production and Efficiency in Public Schools, Journal of
30. Economic Literature, 24(3), p.1141-1177.
31. Hanushek, E. A. & Rivkin, S. G. (2006). Teacher Quality, Handbook of the Economics of Education, Edited by Eric
32. Hanushek and Finis Welch, Volume 2, Chapter 18. Heyneman, S. P., & Loxley, W. A. (1983). The Effect of Primary-School Quality on Academic Achievement Across
33. Twenty-nine High-and Low-Income Countries, American Journal of Sociolog, 88(6), p.1162-1194.
34. Jepsen, C. (2005). Teacher characteristics and student achievement: evidence from teacher surveys, Journal of Urban Economics, 57, p.302–319.
35. Jones, M. D. (2013). Teacher behavior under performance pay incentives, Economics of Education Review, 37, p.148–164.
36. Lee, Jong-Wha & Barro, R. J. (1997). Schooling Quality in A Cross Section of Countries, NBER Working Paper
37. Series, NBER Working Papers 6198, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
38. Leigh, A., & Ryan, C. (2008). How and Why Has Teacher Quality Changed in Australia?, The Australian Economic Review, 41(2), p.141–159.
39. Leigh, A. (2012). Teacher pay and teacher aptitude, Economics of Education Review, 31, p.41– 53.
40. Darling-Hammond, L. (2002). Access to Quality Teaching: An Analysis of Inequality in California’s Public Schools,
41. UCLA’s Institute for Democracy, Education, & Access, Document wws-rr002-1002.
42. Loeb, S., & Page, M. E. (2000). Examining the Link between Teacher Wages and Student Outcomes: The Importance of Alternative Labor Market Opportunities and Non-Pecuniary Variation, The Review of Economics and Statistics, 82(3), p.393-408.
43. OECD (2010) Overcoming School Failure: Policies That Work, OECD Project.
44. Ok, A. & Önkol, P. (2007). The Profile of Prospective Teachers in Teacher Education Programs, Education and Science, 32(143), p.13-25.
45. Loeb, S. & Page, M. E. (2000). Examining The Link Between Teacher Wages And Student Outcomes: The Importance Of Alternative Labor Market Opportunities And Non-Pecuniary Variation, The Review of Economics and Statistics, August, 82(3), p.393–408.
46. Martins, P. S. & Pereira, P. T. (2004) “Does education reduce wage inequality? Quantile regression evidence from 16 countries”, Labour Economics, 11, p.355– 371.
47. Rivkin, S. G., Hanushek, E. A., & Kain, J. F. (2005). Teachers, Schools, and Academic Achievement, Econometrica, 73(2), 417–458.
48. Rockoff, J. E. (2004). The Impact of Individual Teachers on Student Achievement: Evidence from Panel Data, The American Economic Review, 94(2), Papers and Proceedings of the OneHundred Sixteenth Annual Meeting of the American Economic Association San Diego, CA, January 3-5, p.247-252.
49. Skaalvik, E. M., & Skaalvik, S. (2011). Teacher job satisfaction and motivation to leave the teaching profession:
50. Relations with school context, feeling of belonging, and emotional exhaustion, Teaching and Teacher Education, 27, p.1029-1038.
51. Stiglitz, J. E. (1973) “Education and Inequality”, Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 409: 135-145.
52. Tansel, A. (2002). Determinants of schooling attainment for boys and girls in Turkey: Individual, household and community factors, Economics of Education Review, 21, p.455–470.
53. Zee, M., Koomen, H.M.Y. & Van der Veen, I. (2013). Student–teacher relationship quality and academic adjustment in upper elementary school: The role of student personality, Journal of School Psychology, 51, p.517– 5