AN ANALYSIS OF WORKING CAPITAL EFFICIENCY OF COMPANIES LISTED ON SUSTAINABILITY INDEX BY INDEX METHOD

Year 2020, , 94 - 102, 30.06.2020

Ilkut Elif Kandil Goker

https://doi.org/10.17261/Pressacademia.2020.1206

Abstract

Purpose - In the 21st century, social and environmental risks have been increasing in global economies day by day. Since companies focus on profit and value maximization primarily, they ignore care for main production factors i.e. labor and natural resources. However, in recent years, production, management, and financing policies, in which social and environmental issues are taken into consideration, have started to be developed in this context. Sustainable development has a policy feature that the effects of the investments will be seen in the long term. Therefore, efficient working capital management is important in these companies, as companies that start to act by adopting the sustainability approach will not be able to benefit from the added value created in the short term. In this context this study aims to reveal the working capital management efficiency performance of sustainable companies.
Methodology - his study aims to calculate the working capital management efficiency of 19 companies, which are listed on the BIST Sustainability Index (XUSRD), created in 2014, between 2015 and 2018, by using the Index method developed by Bhattacharya (1997). Besides, the Wilcoxon Signed Ranks Test is used to see whether there is a significant difference between the working capital efficiency values of the companies listed on the sustainability index before and after their inclusion.
Findings- The companies' working capital management index values decrease after being included in the sustainability index. Additionally, the difference between the working capital management index values before and after being included in the corporate governance index is found to be significant.
Conclusion- The findings show that companies aiming to contribute to the world in terms of sustainability with a long-term social and environmental dimension should focus more on short-term assets and liabilities management.

Keywords

BIST Sustainability Index, Working Capital Management, Index Method

References

• Adams, M., Thornton, B., & Sepehri, M. (2012). The impact of the pursuit of sustainability on the financial performance of the firm. Journal of Sustainability and Green Business, 1, 1-14.
• Ameer R. & Othman R. (2012). Sustainability Practices and Corporate Financial Performance: A Study Based on the Top Global Corporations, Journal of Business Ethics, 108, 61-79.
• Bhattacharya H. (2014). Working Capital Management Strategies and Techniques. PHI Learning Private Limited, Third Edition.
• Burhan, A. H., & Rahmanti, W. (2012).The Impact of Sustainability Reporting on Company Performance. Journal of Economics, Business, and Accountancy Ventura, 15(2), 257-272.
• Buys, P., Oberholzer, M., & Andrikopoulos, P. (2011). An investigation of the economic performance of sustainability reporting companies versus non-reporting companies: A South African perspective. Journal of Social Sciences, 29(2), 151-158.
• Detre, J. D., & Gunderson, M. A. (2011). The Triple Bottom Line: What is the Impact on the Returns to Agribusiness?. International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, 14(4), 165-178.
• Düzer M., Önce S. (2017). Kurumsal Sürdürülebilirlik Raporlaması ve Finansal Performans: BİST’te İşlem Gören Şirketler İçin Karşılaştırmalı Bir Analiz, Bilecik Şeyh Edebali Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 2(2), 637-648.
• Fettahoğlu S. (2014). İşletmelerde Sosyal Sorumluluk İle Finansal Performans Arasındaki İlişki: İmkb’ye Yönelik Bir Uygulama, Sosyal ve Beşeri Bilimler Dergisi, 6(1), 11-20.
• Guidry, R. P., & Patten, D. M. (2010). Market reactions to the first-time issuance of corporate sustainability reports: Evidence that quality matters. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 1(1), 33-50.
• Gürünlü M. (2019). Sürdürülebilirlik ve finansal performans arasındaki ilişki: BİST şirketleri üzerine bir araştırma, Muhasebe ve Finansman Dergisi (84), 177-190.
• Kaur H. V., Singh S. (2013). Managing working capital efficiency in capital goods sector in India, Global Business Review, 14(2), 343–355.
• Laskar, N., Chakraborty T. K. & Maji S. G. (2017). Corporate sustainability performance and financial performance: empirical evidence from Japan and India, Management and Labour Studies, 42(2), 88-106.
• Lo, S., & Sheu, H. (2007). Is corporate sustainability a value-increasing strategy for business? Journal Compilation, 15(2), 345–358.
• Lopez, M. V., Garcia, A., & Rodriguez, L. (2007). Sustainable development and corporate performance: A study based on the Dow Jones Sustainability Index. Journal of Business Ethics, 75(3), 285-300.
• Mallouh A. A: & Tahtamouni A. (2018). The impact of social responsibility disclosure on the liquidity of the Jordanian industrial corporation, International Journal of Managerial and Financial Accounting, 10(3), 273-300.
• Ngwakwe, C. C. (2009). Environmental responsibility and firm performance: evidence from Nigeria. International Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 3(2), 97-103.
• Ortas, E. Moneva J. M. (2014). Sustainability stock exchange indexes and investor expectations: Multivariate evidence from DJSI-Stoxx, Spanish Journal of Finance and Accounting, 40(151), 395- 416.
• Önder Ş. (2018). Impact of sustainability performance of company on its fınancial performance: an empirical study on Borsa Istanbul (BIST), Dumlupınar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 56 Nisan, 115-127.
• Pérez R. (2003). About ‘global responsibility’ in management. Corporate Governance 3(3), 78–89.
• Santis P., Albuquerque A., Lizarelli F. (2016). Do sustainable companies have a better financial performance? A study on Brazilian public companies, Journal of Cleaner Production, 133, 735-745.
• Schadewitz, H., & Niskala, M. (2010). Communication via responsibility reporting and its effect on firm value in Finland. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 17(2), 96-106.
• Subramaniam, R. & Samuel, S. (2015). Liquidity implication of corporate social responsibility disclosures: Malaysian capital market evidence, Journal of International Accounting Research, 15(1), 133–155.
• Venanzi, D. (2012). Social Ratings and Financial Performance: An Instrumental Approach, SSRN 2188859.
• Yıldırım G., Uzun Kocamış T. & Tuncer Tokur E. (2018). Sürdürülebilirlik ve firma performansı: BİST sürdürülebilirlik endeksi şirketleri üzerine bir uygulama, Akademik Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 5(15), 90-96.
• Ziegler, A., Rennings, K., & Schroder, M. (2007). The effect of environmental and social performance on the shareholder value of European stock corporations, Environ Resources Econ, 37, 661-680