The efficient market hypothesis assumes that investors behave
rationally, by using all relevant information, and analyse it in the most
effective way to achieve the best possible outcome. However, many investors
appear to behave in irrational ways. For example, irrelevant information, such
as rumour, is used and the analysis may be subject to misinterpretation,
emotion and other psychological bias. Investors may not base decisions on their
own views about investments, but upon what they see as the majority view. The
majority being followed are not necessarily well-informed rational investors.
The investors that are followed may be uninformed and subject to psychological
biases that render their behaviour irrational (from the perspective of
economists). Rational investors may even focus on predicting the behaviour of
irrational investors rather than trying to ascertain fundamental value. This
may explain the popularity of technical analysis amongst market professionals.
This paper compares and evaluates the existing literature of psychological bias,
based on the critical analysis of uneconomic variables, such as weather and
biorhythmic variables, on investors’ mood that are found in the literature.
This paper argues for the need to develop a new methodology to examine the
efficient market hypothesis by reflecting psychological bias as a main driver
of financial market assessment.
Journal Section | Articles |
---|---|
Authors | |
Publication Date | September 30, 2016 |
Published in Issue | Year 2016 Volume: 3 Issue: 3 |
Journal of Economics, Finance and Accounting (JEFA) is a scientific, academic, double blind peer-reviewed, quarterly and open-access online journal. The journal publishes four issues a year. The issuing months are March, June, September and December. The publication languages of the Journal are English and Turkish. JEFA aims to provide a research source for all practitioners, policy makers, professionals and researchers working in the area of economics, finance, accounting and auditing. The editor in chief of JEFA invites all manuscripts that cover theoretical and/or applied researches on topics related to the interest areas of the Journal. JEFA publishes academic research studies only. JEFA charges no submission or publication fee.
Ethics Policy - JEFA applies the standards of Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE). JEFA is committed to the academic community ensuring ethics and quality of manuscripts in publications. Plagiarism is strictly forbidden and the manuscripts found to be plagiarized will not be accepted or if published will be removed from the publication. Authors must certify that their manuscripts are their original work. Plagiarism, duplicate, data fabrication and redundant publications are forbidden. The manuscripts are subject to plagiarism check by iThenticate or similar. All manuscript submissions must provide a similarity report (up to 15% excluding quotes, bibliography, abstract and method).
Open Access - All research articles published in PressAcademia Journals are fully open access; immediately freely available to read, download and share. Articles are published under the terms of a Creative Commons license which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Open access is a property of individual works, not necessarily journals or publishers. Community standards, rather than copyright law, will continue to provide the mechanism for enforcement of proper attribution and responsible use of the published work, as they do now.