UNRAVELING RISK AND RETURN IN ISLAMIC BANKING: DOES THE PERCEIVED HIGH RETURN EXIST?

Volume: 2 Number: 2 June 29, 2015
  • Abrar Fitwi
  • Laura Elder
EN

UNRAVELING RISK AND RETURN IN ISLAMIC BANKING: DOES THE PERCEIVED HIGH RETURN EXIST?

Abstract

Using mixed qualitative and quantitative methods, this study analyzes the risk and return results of Islamic banks versus their conventional counterparts in Malaysia in order to evaluate arguments that adherence to shariah based banking principles minimizes risk exposure. Using comparative data from eight Malaysian banks, our empirical investigation provides limited support to theoretical arguments that the Islamic banks minimize risk. Our results show that there is no statistically significant difference in returns and risk between Islamic and conventional banks.  We interpret these results as providing support for theories of convergence between conventional finance and Islamic finance.  Further, we argue that policy makers thus need to take into account conventional models of systemic and structural risk when regulating burgeoning Islamic financial markets.

References

  1. Akkizidis, I., and S.K. Khandelwal. 2008. Financial Risk Management for Islamic Banking and Finance. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
  2. Balz, K. 2008. “Sharia Risk? How Islamic Finance Has Transformed Islamic Contract Law.” Islamic Legal Studies Program.
  3. Bank Negara Malaysia. 2010. Shariah Resolutions Is Islamic Finance. 2nd ed. Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia: Bank Negara Malaysia.
  4. Bassens, David, Ewald Engelen, Ben Derudder, and Frank Witlox. 2013. “Securitization across Borders:
  5. Organizational Mimicry in Islamic Finance.” Journal of Economic Geography 13: 85–106. Beck, Thorsten, Asli Demirguc-Kunt, and Ouarda Merrouche. 2010. “Islamic vs. Conventional Banking: Business
  6. Model, Efficiency, and Stability”. WPS 5446. Development Research Group, Finance and Private Sector
  7. Development Team. World Bank. Chapra, M. Umer. 1985. “Money and Banking in an Islamic Economy.” In Monetary and Fiscal Economics of Islam, edited by Mohammad Ariff, 145–76. International Centre for Research in Islamic Economics. Jeddah: King
  8. Abdulaziz University Press. Charles Tilly. 1990. Coercion, Capital, and European States, AD 990-1990. Cambridge, Mass: Blackwell.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

-

Journal Section

-

Authors

Abrar Fitwi This is me

Laura Elder This is me

Publication Date

June 29, 2015

Submission Date

October 20, 2015

Acceptance Date

-

Published in Issue

Year 2015 Volume: 2 Number: 2

APA
Fitwi, A., & Elder, L. (2015). UNRAVELING RISK AND RETURN IN ISLAMIC BANKING: DOES THE PERCEIVED HIGH RETURN EXIST? Journal of Economics Finance and Accounting, 2(2). https://izlik.org/JA54KE32DH
AMA
1.Fitwi A, Elder L. UNRAVELING RISK AND RETURN IN ISLAMIC BANKING: DOES THE PERCEIVED HIGH RETURN EXIST? JEFA. 2015;2(2). https://izlik.org/JA54KE32DH
Chicago
Fitwi, Abrar, and Laura Elder. 2015. “UNRAVELING RISK AND RETURN IN ISLAMIC BANKING: DOES THE PERCEIVED HIGH RETURN EXIST?”. Journal of Economics Finance and Accounting 2 (2). https://izlik.org/JA54KE32DH.
EndNote
Fitwi A, Elder L (October 1, 2015) UNRAVELING RISK AND RETURN IN ISLAMIC BANKING: DOES THE PERCEIVED HIGH RETURN EXIST? Journal of Economics Finance and Accounting 2 2
IEEE
[1]A. Fitwi and L. Elder, “UNRAVELING RISK AND RETURN IN ISLAMIC BANKING: DOES THE PERCEIVED HIGH RETURN EXIST?”, JEFA, vol. 2, no. 2, Oct. 2015, [Online]. Available: https://izlik.org/JA54KE32DH
ISNAD
Fitwi, Abrar - Elder, Laura. “UNRAVELING RISK AND RETURN IN ISLAMIC BANKING: DOES THE PERCEIVED HIGH RETURN EXIST?”. Journal of Economics Finance and Accounting 2/2 (October 1, 2015). https://izlik.org/JA54KE32DH.
JAMA
1.Fitwi A, Elder L. UNRAVELING RISK AND RETURN IN ISLAMIC BANKING: DOES THE PERCEIVED HIGH RETURN EXIST? JEFA. 2015;2. Available at https://izlik.org/JA54KE32DH.
MLA
Fitwi, Abrar, and Laura Elder. “UNRAVELING RISK AND RETURN IN ISLAMIC BANKING: DOES THE PERCEIVED HIGH RETURN EXIST?”. Journal of Economics Finance and Accounting, vol. 2, no. 2, Oct. 2015, https://izlik.org/JA54KE32DH.
Vancouver
1.Abrar Fitwi, Laura Elder. UNRAVELING RISK AND RETURN IN ISLAMIC BANKING: DOES THE PERCEIVED HIGH RETURN EXIST? JEFA [Internet]. 2015 Oct. 1;2(2). Available from: https://izlik.org/JA54KE32DH

Journal of Economics, Finance and Accounting (JEFA) is a scientific, academic, double blind peer-reviewed, semiannual and open-access online journal. The journal publishes 2 issues a year. The issuing months are June and December. The publication language of the Journal is English. JEFA aims to provide a research source for all practitioners, policy makers, professionals and researchers working in the area of economics, finance, accounting and auditing. The editor in chief of JEFA invites all manuscripts that cover theoretical and/or applied researches on topics related to the interest areas of the Journal. JEFA publishes academic research studies only. JEFA charges no submission or publication fee.

Ethics Policy - JEFA applies the standards of Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE). JEFA is committed to the academic community ensuring ethics and quality of manuscripts in publications. Plagiarism is strictly forbidden and the manuscripts found to be plagiarized will not be accepted or if published will be removed from the publication. Authors must certify that their manuscripts are their original work. Plagiarism, duplicate, data fabrication and redundant publications are forbidden. The manuscripts are subject to plagiarism check by iThenticate or similar. All manuscript submissions must provide a similarity report (up to 15% excluding quotes, bibliography, abstract).

Open Access - All research articles published in PressAcademia Journals are fully open access; immediately freely available to read, download and share. Articles are published under the terms of a Creative Commons license which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Open access is a property of individual works, not necessarily journals or publishers. Community standards, rather than copyright law, will continue to provide the mechanism for enforcement of proper attribution and responsible use of the published work, as they do now.