Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite
Year 2018, Volume: 5 Issue: 1, 137 - 143, 30.03.2018
https://doi.org/10.17261/Pressacademia.2018.811

Abstract

References

  • Anitha, J. (2014). Determinants of Employee Engagement and their Impact on Employee Performance. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, Vol. 63, no. 3, pp. 308-323.
  • Bailey, C., Madden, A., Alfes, K. and Fletcher, L. (2017). The Meaning, Antecedents and Outcomnes of Employee Engagement: A Narrative Synthesis. International Journal of Management Reviews, Vol. 19, no. 1, 31-53.
  • Ellinger, A. D., Ellinger, A. E. and Keller, S. B. (2003). Supervisory Coaching Behaviour, Employee Satisfaction and Warehouse Employee Performance: A Dyadic Perspective in the Distribution Industry. Human Resource Development Quarterly, Vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 435-458.
  • Flammer, C. And Luo, J. (2017). Corporate Social Responsibility as an Employee Governance Tool: Evidence from a Quasi-Experimant. Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 38, no. 2, 163-183.
  • Gitongu, M. K., Kingi, W. and Uzel, J. M. M. (2016). Determinants of Employees’ Performance of State Parastatals in Kenya: Kenya Ports Authority. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, vol. 6, no. 10, pp. 197-204.
  • Liao, H. and Chang, A. (2004). A Multilevel Investigation of Factors Influencing Employee Service Performance and Customer Outcomes. Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 47, no. 1, pp. 41-58.
  • Gruman, J. A. and Saks, A. M. (2011). Performance Management and Employee Engagement. Human Resource Management Review, Vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 123-136.
  • Harter, J. K., Schmidt, F. L. and Hayes, T. L. (2002). Business Unit Level Relationship between Employee Satisfaction, Employee Engagement, and Business Outcomes: A Meta-Analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 87, no. 2, pp. 268-279.
  • Mackay, C. J., Cousins, R., Kelly, P. J., Lee, S. and McCaig, R. H. (2004). Management Standards and Work-Related Stress in the UK: Policy Background and Science. International Journal of Work, Health and Organizations, Vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 91-112.
  • Markos, S. and Sridevi, M. S. (2010). Employee Engagement: The Key to Improving Performance. International Journal of Business and Management, Vol. 5, no. 12, pp. 89-96.
  • Mehrzi, N. and Singh, S. K. (2016). Competing through Employee Engagement: A Proposed Framework. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, Vol. 65, no. 6, pp. 831-843.
  • Mokaya, S. O. and Kipyegon, M. J. (2014). Determinants of Employee Engagement in the Banking Industry in Kenya; Case of Cooperative Bank. Journal of Human Resource Management and Labour Studies, Vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 187-200.
  • Rich, B. L., Lepine, J. A. and Crawford, E. R. (2010). Job Engagement: Antecedents and Effects on Job Performance. Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 53, no. 3, pp. 617-635.
  • Saks, A. M. (2006). Antecedents and Consequences of Employee Engagement. Journal of Managerial Psychology, Vol. 21, no. 7, pp. 600619.
  • Saks, A. M. and Gruman, J. A. (2014). What do We Really Know About Employee Engagement?. Human Resource Development Quarterly, Vol. 25, no. 2, 155-182.
  • Sharma, B. R., and Anupama, R. (2010). Determinants of Employee Engagement in a Private Organization: An Exploratory Study. Advances in Management, vol. 3, no. 10.

THE DETERMINANTS OF EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE IN JORDANIAN ORGANIZATIONS

Year 2018, Volume: 5 Issue: 1, 137 - 143, 30.03.2018
https://doi.org/10.17261/Pressacademia.2018.811

Abstract

Purpose- The study aims to explore the determinants of employees’ performance in
Jordanian industrial sector, which is traded on the Jordanian stock markets.
Specifically, the study looks to explore the impact of employees’ satisfaction,
management standards and trainings on employee’s performance, while employee
engagement mediates the relationship between three independant and the
depandant variable.

Methodology- A sample of 100
administrative and executive managers is selected from industrial sector of
Jordan through convenient sampling. Primary data is collected, distributing 2
questionnaires to each organization; one for the administrative manager and one
for the executive manager individually. Structural equation modeling is
implemented for quantitative data analysis. 

Findings- The study found that employees satisfaction, management standards and
trainings are significant factors for employees’ performance, having
significant impact on employee engagement that ultimately leads towards
employees’ performance.  

Conclusion- Organizations should focus on
employee satisfaction, management standards and trainings to enhance their
engagement towards work, hence improving their performance.  

References

  • Anitha, J. (2014). Determinants of Employee Engagement and their Impact on Employee Performance. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, Vol. 63, no. 3, pp. 308-323.
  • Bailey, C., Madden, A., Alfes, K. and Fletcher, L. (2017). The Meaning, Antecedents and Outcomnes of Employee Engagement: A Narrative Synthesis. International Journal of Management Reviews, Vol. 19, no. 1, 31-53.
  • Ellinger, A. D., Ellinger, A. E. and Keller, S. B. (2003). Supervisory Coaching Behaviour, Employee Satisfaction and Warehouse Employee Performance: A Dyadic Perspective in the Distribution Industry. Human Resource Development Quarterly, Vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 435-458.
  • Flammer, C. And Luo, J. (2017). Corporate Social Responsibility as an Employee Governance Tool: Evidence from a Quasi-Experimant. Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 38, no. 2, 163-183.
  • Gitongu, M. K., Kingi, W. and Uzel, J. M. M. (2016). Determinants of Employees’ Performance of State Parastatals in Kenya: Kenya Ports Authority. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, vol. 6, no. 10, pp. 197-204.
  • Liao, H. and Chang, A. (2004). A Multilevel Investigation of Factors Influencing Employee Service Performance and Customer Outcomes. Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 47, no. 1, pp. 41-58.
  • Gruman, J. A. and Saks, A. M. (2011). Performance Management and Employee Engagement. Human Resource Management Review, Vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 123-136.
  • Harter, J. K., Schmidt, F. L. and Hayes, T. L. (2002). Business Unit Level Relationship between Employee Satisfaction, Employee Engagement, and Business Outcomes: A Meta-Analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 87, no. 2, pp. 268-279.
  • Mackay, C. J., Cousins, R., Kelly, P. J., Lee, S. and McCaig, R. H. (2004). Management Standards and Work-Related Stress in the UK: Policy Background and Science. International Journal of Work, Health and Organizations, Vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 91-112.
  • Markos, S. and Sridevi, M. S. (2010). Employee Engagement: The Key to Improving Performance. International Journal of Business and Management, Vol. 5, no. 12, pp. 89-96.
  • Mehrzi, N. and Singh, S. K. (2016). Competing through Employee Engagement: A Proposed Framework. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, Vol. 65, no. 6, pp. 831-843.
  • Mokaya, S. O. and Kipyegon, M. J. (2014). Determinants of Employee Engagement in the Banking Industry in Kenya; Case of Cooperative Bank. Journal of Human Resource Management and Labour Studies, Vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 187-200.
  • Rich, B. L., Lepine, J. A. and Crawford, E. R. (2010). Job Engagement: Antecedents and Effects on Job Performance. Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 53, no. 3, pp. 617-635.
  • Saks, A. M. (2006). Antecedents and Consequences of Employee Engagement. Journal of Managerial Psychology, Vol. 21, no. 7, pp. 600619.
  • Saks, A. M. and Gruman, J. A. (2014). What do We Really Know About Employee Engagement?. Human Resource Development Quarterly, Vol. 25, no. 2, 155-182.
  • Sharma, B. R., and Anupama, R. (2010). Determinants of Employee Engagement in a Private Organization: An Exploratory Study. Advances in Management, vol. 3, no. 10.
There are 16 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Journal Section Articles
Authors

Zuheir Mohamed Dakhoul This is me 0000-0002-7671-8364

Publication Date March 30, 2018
Published in Issue Year 2018 Volume: 5 Issue: 1

Cite

APA Dakhoul, Z. M. (2018). THE DETERMINANTS OF EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE IN JORDANIAN ORGANIZATIONS. Journal of Economics Finance and Accounting, 5(1), 137-143. https://doi.org/10.17261/Pressacademia.2018.811

Journal of Economics, Finance and Accounting (JEFA) is a scientific, academic, double blind peer-reviewed, quarterly and open-access online journal. The journal publishes four issues a year. The issuing months are March, June, September and December. The publication languages of the Journal are English and Turkish. JEFA aims to provide a research source for all practitioners, policy makers, professionals and researchers working in the area of economics, finance, accounting and auditing. The editor in chief of JEFA invites all manuscripts that cover theoretical and/or applied researches on topics related to the interest areas of the Journal. JEFA publishes academic research studies only. JEFA charges no submission or publication fee.

Ethics Policy - JEFA applies the standards of Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE). JEFA is committed to the academic community ensuring ethics and quality of manuscripts in publications. Plagiarism is strictly forbidden and the manuscripts found to be plagiarized will not be accepted or if published will be removed from the publication. Authors must certify that their manuscripts are their original work. Plagiarism, duplicate, data fabrication and redundant publications are forbidden. The manuscripts are subject to plagiarism check by iThenticate or similar. All manuscript submissions must provide a similarity report (up to 15% excluding quotes, bibliography, abstract and method).

Open Access - All research articles published in PressAcademia Journals are fully open access; immediately freely available to read, download and share. Articles are published under the terms of a Creative Commons license which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Open access is a property of individual works, not necessarily journals or publishers. Community standards, rather than copyright law, will continue to provide the mechanism for enforcement of proper attribution and responsible use of the published work, as they do now.