Abstract
Purpose- In so far as financial development that supports the supply-side view as well as the country’s competitiveness, a rapid increase in import price index in comparison to the export price index brings forth the deterioration regarding trade. A similar case also exists in Turkey. The aim of the study is to test the relationship between foreign trade balance and terms of trade in Turkey.
Methodology- In this study, the monthly data of terms of trade and foreign trade balance for the period 2005: M1 - 2017: M4 are analyzed for Turkey, and the validity of Harberger-Laursen-Metzler Hypothesis is tested.
Findings- The deviations in the short run converge to the long-term equilibrium in approximately 6 months period. In addition, considering the normalized long-term relationship, the 1-unit increase in the terms of trade would cause an average increase of $ 321,335 in the estimated dependent variable, namely, the foreign trade balance.
Conclusion- There exists a long-term relationship between the variables, namely, terms of trade and foreign trade balance. Moreover, there is a short-term unilateral causality from foreign trade balance to terms of trade.
References
- Aslan N. and Yörük, D. (2008). Teori ve Uygulamada Dış Ticaret Hadleri ve Kalkınma İlişkisi. Marmara Üniversitesi İİBF Dergisi. 25(2): 33-69.
- Bekar, S. Akbulut and Terzi, H. (2016). Dış Ticaret Haddi’nin Dış Ticaret Dengesine Etkisi: Türkiye’deki Endüstriler İçin “S Eğrisi Yaklaşımı”nın Geçerliliği. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 31(2): 95-114.
- Bouakez, H. (2008). Terms of Trade and Current Account Fluctuations: The HArberger- Laursen Metzler Effect Revisited. Journal of Macroeconomics. 30(1): 260-281.
- Brueckner, M. Carneiro, F. (2017). Terms of trade volatility, government spending cyclicality, and economic growth. Review of International Economics. 25(5): 975-989.
- Choi, J., Hur. J. and Kang. M. (2017). Dissecting the Effects of Terms of Trade Shocks on the Korean Economy, Emerging Markets and Finance & Trade. 53: 1199-1216.
- Dikmen, N. (2012). Ekonometri Temel Kavramlar ve Uygulamalar (2 Ed.). Bursa: Dora Basım Yayın Dağıtım.
- Ergin, A. and Yetiz, F. (2017). The Relationship among Gross Barter Terms of Trade, Exchange Rates, and Economic Growth: A Case in Turkey. IJEFI. 7(3): 738-745.
- Esen, Ö. (2012). Türkiye’de Döviz Kuru Belirsizliğinin İhracat Üzerine Etkisi. Finans Politik ve Ekonomik Yorumlar. 49(568): 87-97.
- Granger, C. (1988). Causality, Cointegration and Control. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control. 12: 551-559.
- Harberger, A. C. (1950). Currency depreciation, income, and the balance of trade. Journal of Political Economy 58:47–60.
- Hepaktan, C.E. and Karakayalı H. (2009). 1980-2008 Döneminde Türkiye’nin Dış Ticaret Hadlerinin Analizi. Celal Bayar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi. 7(2): 181-210.
- Szomolányi. K. Lukáčik. M. and Lukáčiková A. (2017). Impact of Terms-of-Trade on Slovakia, the Czech Republic, and Croatia in the Short Run Our Economy (Nase Gospodarstvo). 63(1): 3-13.
- Küçükaksoy İ. and Çiftçi, İ. (2014). Dış Ticaret Hadlerinin Dış Ticaret Dengesine Etkisi: Harberger-Laursen-Metzler Hipotezinin Türkiye Uygulaması. Optimum Ekonomi ve Yönetim Bilimleri Dergisi.1(2): 103-129.
- Lars, E., Svensson, O. and Razin, A. (1983). The Terms of Trade and the Current Account: The Harberger- Laursen- Metzler Effect. Journal of Political Economy.91(1).
- Laursen, S. and Metzler, L.A. (1950). Flexible Exchange Rate and The Theory Of Employment. The Review of Economics and Statistics. 32(4), 281-299.
- Mansoorian, A. (1993). Habit Persistence and The Harberger-Laursen-Metzler Effect in an Infinite Horizon Model. Journal of International Economics. 34(1-2): 153-166.
- Misztal, P. (2009). The Harberger-Laursen-Metzler Effect: Theory and Practice in Poland. The Romanian Economic Journal. 38: 129-146.
- Oktar, S. and Dalyancı, L. (2012). Dış Ticaret Hadlerinin Cari İşlemler Dengesi Üzerindeki Etkisi: Türkiye Örneği. Marmara Üniversitesi İ.İ.B Dergisi. 33(2): 1-18.
- Otto, G. (2003). Terms of trade shocks and the balance of trade: there is a Harberger-Laursen-Metzler effect. Journal of International Money and Finance. 22(2): 155-184.
- Parasız, İ. ve Ekren, N. (2013). Uluslararası İktisat. Bursa: Ezgi Kitabevi.
- Seyidoğlu, H.( 2007). Uluslararası İktisat(16. Baskı). İstanbul: Güzem Can Yayınları.
- Uçan, O. (2013). Döviz Kuru Dinamikleri(1. Baskı). Ankara: Seçkin Yayınları.
- Yamak, R. and Korkmaz, A. (2006). Harberger-Laursen-Metzler Etkisi: Literatür ve Türkiye Örneği. Atatürk Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi. 20(1): 57-69.
Abstract
References
- Aslan N. and Yörük, D. (2008). Teori ve Uygulamada Dış Ticaret Hadleri ve Kalkınma İlişkisi. Marmara Üniversitesi İİBF Dergisi. 25(2): 33-69.
- Bekar, S. Akbulut and Terzi, H. (2016). Dış Ticaret Haddi’nin Dış Ticaret Dengesine Etkisi: Türkiye’deki Endüstriler İçin “S Eğrisi Yaklaşımı”nın Geçerliliği. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 31(2): 95-114.
- Bouakez, H. (2008). Terms of Trade and Current Account Fluctuations: The HArberger- Laursen Metzler Effect Revisited. Journal of Macroeconomics. 30(1): 260-281.
- Brueckner, M. Carneiro, F. (2017). Terms of trade volatility, government spending cyclicality, and economic growth. Review of International Economics. 25(5): 975-989.
- Choi, J., Hur. J. and Kang. M. (2017). Dissecting the Effects of Terms of Trade Shocks on the Korean Economy, Emerging Markets and Finance & Trade. 53: 1199-1216.
- Dikmen, N. (2012). Ekonometri Temel Kavramlar ve Uygulamalar (2 Ed.). Bursa: Dora Basım Yayın Dağıtım.
- Ergin, A. and Yetiz, F. (2017). The Relationship among Gross Barter Terms of Trade, Exchange Rates, and Economic Growth: A Case in Turkey. IJEFI. 7(3): 738-745.
- Esen, Ö. (2012). Türkiye’de Döviz Kuru Belirsizliğinin İhracat Üzerine Etkisi. Finans Politik ve Ekonomik Yorumlar. 49(568): 87-97.
- Granger, C. (1988). Causality, Cointegration and Control. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control. 12: 551-559.
- Harberger, A. C. (1950). Currency depreciation, income, and the balance of trade. Journal of Political Economy 58:47–60.
- Hepaktan, C.E. and Karakayalı H. (2009). 1980-2008 Döneminde Türkiye’nin Dış Ticaret Hadlerinin Analizi. Celal Bayar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi. 7(2): 181-210.
- Szomolányi. K. Lukáčik. M. and Lukáčiková A. (2017). Impact of Terms-of-Trade on Slovakia, the Czech Republic, and Croatia in the Short Run Our Economy (Nase Gospodarstvo). 63(1): 3-13.
- Küçükaksoy İ. and Çiftçi, İ. (2014). Dış Ticaret Hadlerinin Dış Ticaret Dengesine Etkisi: Harberger-Laursen-Metzler Hipotezinin Türkiye Uygulaması. Optimum Ekonomi ve Yönetim Bilimleri Dergisi.1(2): 103-129.
- Lars, E., Svensson, O. and Razin, A. (1983). The Terms of Trade and the Current Account: The Harberger- Laursen- Metzler Effect. Journal of Political Economy.91(1).
- Laursen, S. and Metzler, L.A. (1950). Flexible Exchange Rate and The Theory Of Employment. The Review of Economics and Statistics. 32(4), 281-299.
- Mansoorian, A. (1993). Habit Persistence and The Harberger-Laursen-Metzler Effect in an Infinite Horizon Model. Journal of International Economics. 34(1-2): 153-166.
- Misztal, P. (2009). The Harberger-Laursen-Metzler Effect: Theory and Practice in Poland. The Romanian Economic Journal. 38: 129-146.
- Oktar, S. and Dalyancı, L. (2012). Dış Ticaret Hadlerinin Cari İşlemler Dengesi Üzerindeki Etkisi: Türkiye Örneği. Marmara Üniversitesi İ.İ.B Dergisi. 33(2): 1-18.
- Otto, G. (2003). Terms of trade shocks and the balance of trade: there is a Harberger-Laursen-Metzler effect. Journal of International Money and Finance. 22(2): 155-184.
- Parasız, İ. ve Ekren, N. (2013). Uluslararası İktisat. Bursa: Ezgi Kitabevi.
- Seyidoğlu, H.( 2007). Uluslararası İktisat(16. Baskı). İstanbul: Güzem Can Yayınları.
- Uçan, O. (2013). Döviz Kuru Dinamikleri(1. Baskı). Ankara: Seçkin Yayınları.
- Yamak, R. and Korkmaz, A. (2006). Harberger-Laursen-Metzler Etkisi: Literatür ve Türkiye Örneği. Atatürk Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi. 20(1): 57-69.
Details
| Primary Language | English |
|---|---|
| Journal Section | Articles |
| Authors | |
| Publication Date | July 13, 2018 |
| Published in Issue | Year 2018 Volume: 5 Issue: 2 |
Journal of Economics, Finance and Accounting (JEFA) is a scientific, academic, double blind peer-reviewed, quarterly and open-access online journal. The journal publishes four issues a year. The issuing months are March, June, September and December. The publication languages of the Journal are English and Turkish. JEFA aims to provide a research source for all practitioners, policy makers, professionals and researchers working in the area of economics, finance, accounting and auditing. The editor in chief of JEFA invites all manuscripts that cover theoretical and/or applied researches on topics related to the interest areas of the Journal. JEFA publishes academic research studies only. JEFA charges no submission or publication fee.
Ethics Policy - JEFA applies the standards of Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE). JEFA is committed to the academic community ensuring ethics and quality of manuscripts in publications. Plagiarism is strictly forbidden and the manuscripts found to be plagiarized will not be accepted or if published will be removed from the publication. Authors must certify that their manuscripts are their original work. Plagiarism, duplicate, data fabrication and redundant publications are forbidden. The manuscripts are subject to plagiarism check by iThenticate or similar. All manuscript submissions must provide a similarity report (up to 15% excluding quotes, bibliography, abstract and method).
Open Access - All research articles published in PressAcademia Journals are fully open access; immediately freely available to read, download and share. Articles are published under the terms of a Creative Commons license which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Open access is a property of individual works, not necessarily journals or publishers. Community standards, rather than copyright law, will continue to provide the mechanism for enforcement of proper attribution and responsible use of the published work, as they do now.