Purpose-The UN environment challenge 2030 was set to develop and enhance approaches to sustainable development. The study was carried
out to investigate the impact of environmental accounting on market reactions in Africa and more so the moderating impact of the board of
directors on the said relationship.
Methodology- The study used 119 listed firms on the Johannesburg stock exchange with the period spanning 2008-2019. We used Investment
variable regression model for the study using share price and adjusted market returns as proxy for market reactions and environment accounting
as reported in annual integrated reports as a proxy for environmental accounting
Findings- Results obtained show that environmental accounting has a positive and statistical relationship with market reactions and the board of
directors does moderate the relationship between market reactions and environmental accounting. The study shows that firms in South Africa
are taking sustainability accounting correctly by accounting for the environment. This supports the legitimacy theory and also supports the notion
that firms are taking the lead in climate change consideration. We are the first to make such a study in an African setting and thus we hope that
regulators will pay more attention to the reports and workings of firms and their contribution to the environment.
Conclusion- The study supports stakeholder and legitimacy theories as it shows that directors carry out decisions for the benefit of all stakeholders,
and firms carry out decisions to prove their legitimacy in fulfilling their societal obligations which include taking care of the environment as any
responsible citizen would. In order to achieve the UN environmental goals of 2030 of a cleaner environment, we need everyone on board including
firms, investors and the public. Investors can help push firms be more sustainable and take care of the environment in which they operate by
refusing to buy the assets of firms engaging in pollution or purchasing assets for firms that are environmentally compliant.
Primary Language | English |
---|---|
Subjects | Finance, Business Administration |
Journal Section | Articles |
Authors | |
Publication Date | June 30, 2022 |
Published in Issue | Year 2022 Volume: 9 Issue: 2 |
Journal of Economics, Finance and Accounting (JEFA) is a scientific, academic, double blind peer-reviewed, quarterly and open-access online journal. The journal publishes four issues a year. The issuing months are March, June, September and December. The publication languages of the Journal are English and Turkish. JEFA aims to provide a research source for all practitioners, policy makers, professionals and researchers working in the area of economics, finance, accounting and auditing. The editor in chief of JEFA invites all manuscripts that cover theoretical and/or applied researches on topics related to the interest areas of the Journal. JEFA publishes academic research studies only. JEFA charges no submission or publication fee.
Ethics Policy - JEFA applies the standards of Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE). JEFA is committed to the academic community ensuring ethics and quality of manuscripts in publications. Plagiarism is strictly forbidden and the manuscripts found to be plagiarized will not be accepted or if published will be removed from the publication. Authors must certify that their manuscripts are their original work. Plagiarism, duplicate, data fabrication and redundant publications are forbidden. The manuscripts are subject to plagiarism check by iThenticate or similar. All manuscript submissions must provide a similarity report (up to 15% excluding quotes, bibliography, abstract and method).
Open Access - All research articles published in PressAcademia Journals are fully open access; immediately freely available to read, download and share. Articles are published under the terms of a Creative Commons license which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Open access is a property of individual works, not necessarily journals or publishers. Community standards, rather than copyright law, will continue to provide the mechanism for enforcement of proper attribution and responsible use of the published work, as they do now.