Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

WHICH EPU HAS BETTER PREDICTIVE POWER IN FORECASTING THE RETURN AND VOLATILITY OF STOCK INDICES?

Year 2024, Volume: 11 Issue: 2, 60 - 75, 31.12.2024

Abstract

Purpose- This study examines the predictive power of domestic and foreign Economic Policy Uncertainty (EPU) indices-specifically from the US, China, Europe, and globally-on the return and realized volatility (RV) of 20 global stock indices using monthly data spanning over 25 years.
Methodology- The dynamic connectedness method is applied to analyze the spillover effects of EPUs across stock markets.
Findings- The empirical results reveal that EPU impacts RV more significantly than returns, with Global and US EPUs emerging as primary drivers across most regions and periods. Notably, Chinese EPU consistently exhibits minimal influence, while local EPUs have pronounced effects in economies with heightened political, economic, and financial uncertainties. Contrary to expectations, EPUs from major trade partners and regional EPUs do not exhibit superior predictive power compared to Global and US EPUs. These insights are critical for investors, risk managers, and policymakers in optimizing strategies amidst evolving economic uncertainties.
Conclusion- The findings indicate that Economic Policy Uncertainty (EPU) has a stronger influence on realized volatility (RV) than on stock returns, with Global and US EPUs serving as the dominant predictors across most regions and periods. In contrast, Chinese EPU consistently has minimal impact, while local EPUs play a significant role in countries with pronounced political and economic instability. Surprisingly, EPUs from major trade partners and regional EPUs do not outperform Global and US EPUs in predictive power. These insights underscore the importance of focusing on global and US-driven uncertainties for strategic decision-making by investors, risk managers, and policymakers.

References

  • Aimer N. M. (2021). Economic policy uncertainty and exchange rates before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Ekonomi, 06, 119–127.
  • Alqahtani A. & M. Martinez, (2020). US economic policy uncertainty and GCC stock market. Asia-Pacific financial markets. Japanese Association of Financial Economics and Engineering, 27(3), 415-425.
  • Al-Yahyaee, K. H., Shahzad, S. J. H., & Mensi, W. (2020). Tail dependence structures between economic policy uncertainty and foreign exchange markets: Nonparametric quantiles methods. International Economics, 161, 66-82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inteco.2019.11.004.
  • Antonakakis, N., Chatziantoniou, I., & Filis, G. (2013). Dynamic co-movements of stock market returns, implied volatility and policy uncertainty. Economics Letters, 120(1), 87-92.
  • Arouri, M., Estay, C., Rault, C., & Roubaud, D. (2016). Economic policy uncertainty and stock markets: Long-run evidence from the US. Finance Research Letters, 18, 136-141.
  • Asafo-Adjei E., Agyapong D., Kwaku Agyei S., Frimpong S., Djimatey R., & Adam A.M. (2020). Economic Policy Uncertainty and Stock Returns of Africa: A Wavelet Coherence Analysis. Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society, Vol. 2020, https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/8846507
  • Bahmani-Oskooee M. & Saha S. (2019). On the effects of policy uncertainty on stock prices. Journal of Economics and Finance, 43, 764–778.
  • Baker, S. R., Bloom, N., and Davis, & S. J. (2016). Measuring Economic Policy Uncertainty. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 131(4), 1593-1636.
  • Balcilar M., Gupta R., Kim W.J. & Kyei C. (2019). The role of economic policy uncertainties in predicting stock returns and their volatility for Hong Kong, Malaysia and South Korea. International Review of Economics & Finance, 59, 150–163.
  • Belke A. & Osowskit T. (2019). International effects of the Euro Area versus U.S. policy uncertainty: A FAVAR approach. Economic Inquiry 57(1), 453–481.
  • Bhagat S., Ghosh P. & Rangan S.P. (2013). Economic Policy Uncertainty and Economic Growth in India. IIM Bangalore Research Paper No. 407.
  • Brogaard J, & Detzel A (2015). The asset-pricing implications of government economic policy uncertainty. Management Science, 61(1), 3–18.
  • Chang, B.H., Derindag, O. F., Hacievliyagil, N., & Canakci, M. (2022). Exchange rate response to economic policy uncertainty: Evidence beyond asymmetry. Humanities & Social Sciences Communications, 9, 358. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-022-01372-5
  • Chiang, T.C., (2019). Economic policy uncertainty, risk and stock returns: Evidence from G7 stock markets. Finance Research Letters, 29(C), 41-49.
  • Colombo, V. (2013). Economic policy uncertainty in the US: Does it matter for the Euro area? Economics Letters, 121(1), 39-42.
  • Dakhlaoui, I., & Aloui, C. (2016). The interactive relationship between the US economic policy uncertainty and BRIC stock markets. International Economics, 146, 141-157.
  • Das, K., & Kumar, S. B. (2018). International economic policy uncertainty and stock prices revisited: Multiple and Partial wavelet approach. Economics Letters,164, 100–108.
  • Diebold F. & Yilmaz K. (2014). On the network topology of variance decompositions: Measuring the connectedness of financial firms. Journal of Econometrics, 182(1), 119-134.
  • Donadelli M. (2014). Asian stock markets, US economic policy uncertainty and US macro-shocks. New Zealand Economic Papers, 49(2), 103–133.
  • Erdoğan, L., Ceylan, R., 1 Abdul-Rahman, M. (2022). The impact of domestic and global risk factors on Turkish stock market: Evidence from the NARDL approach. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, 58(7), 1961–1974.
  • Ersin, O.O, Gul, M., & Asik B. (2022). Are the policy uncertainty and CLI ‘effective’ indicators of volatility? GARCH-MIDAS analysis of the G7 stock markets. Economic Computation and Economic Cybernetics Studies and Research, Issue 1/2022; Vol. 56.
  • Guo, P., Zhu, H., & You, W. (2018). Asymmetric dependence between economic policy uncertainty and stock market returns in G7 and BRIC: A quantile regression approach. Finance Research Letters, 25, 251–258.
  • Helseth M.A.E., Krakstad S. O., Molnar P. & Norlin K-M (2020). Can policy and financial risk predict stock markets? Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 176(2), 701-719
  • Kang W. & R.A. Ratti (2013). Oil shocks, policy uncertainty and stock market return. Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, (3), 305-318
  • Kido, Y. (2016). On the link between the US economic policy uncertainty and exchange rates. Economics Letters, 144, 49-52.
  • Ko, J. H., & Lee, C. M. (2015). International economic policy uncertainty and stock prices: Wavelet approach. Economics Letters, 134, 118-122.
  • Kundu, S., & Paul, A. (2022). Effect of economic policy uncertainty on stock market return and volatility under heterogeneous market characteristics. International Review of Economics & Finance, 80, 597-612.
  • Li, X. M., Zhang, B., & Gao, R. (2015). Economic policy uncertainty shocks and stock–bond correlations: Evidence from the US market. Economics Letters, 132, 91-96
  • Li, R., Li, S., Yuan, D., & Yu, K. (2020). Does economic policy uncertainty in the US influence stock markets in China and India? Time-frequency evidence. Applied Economics, 15, 1-17.
  • Liming C., Ziqing D., & Zhihao H. (2020). Impact of economic policy uncertainty on exchange rate volatility of China. Finance Research Letters, 32, 101266.
  • Liu, L., & Zhang, T. (2015). Economic policy uncertainty and stock market volatility. Finance Research Letters, 15, 99-105.
  • Liu, Z., Ye, Y., Ma, F., & Liu, J. (2017). Can economic policy uncertainty help to forecast the volatility: A multifractal perspective. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 482, 181-188.
  • Mei, D., Zeng, Q., Zhang, Y., & Hou, W. (2018). Does US economic policy uncertainty matter for European stock markets volatility? Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 512, 215-221. .005
  • Meinen P. & Roehe O (2017). On measuring uncertainty and its impact on investment: Cross-country evidence from the euro area. European Economic Review, 92(c), 161-179.
  • Ozoguz, A. (2009). Good Times or Bad Times? Investors’ Uncertainty and Stock Returns. The Review of Financial Studies, 22(11), 4377–4422.
  • Pastor, L., & Veronesi, P. (2013). Political uncertainty and risk premia. Journal of Financial Economics, 110(3), 520-545.
  • Phan, D. H. B., Sharma, S. S., & Tran, V. T. (2018). Can economic policy uncertainty predict stock returns? Global evidence. Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, 55, 134-150.
  • Sum, V. (2013). The ASEAN stock market performance and economic policy uncertainty in the United States. Asia & the Pacific Policy Studies, 32(4), 512-521.
  • Tiryaki, A. & Tiryaki, H. N. (2018). Determinants of Turkish stock returns under the impact of economic policy uncertainty. Uluslararası İktisadi Ve İdari İncelemeler Dergisi. https://doi.org/10.18092/ulikidince.424369
  • Uddin MA, Hoque M.E. & Ali M.H. (2020). International economic policy uncertainty and stock market returns of Bangladesh: evidence from linear and nonlinear model. Quantitative Finance and Economics, 4(2), 236–251
  • Veronesi, P. (1999). Stock Market Overreaction to Bad News in Good Times: A Rational Expectations Equilibrium Model. The Review of Financial Studies, 12(5), 975–1007.
  • Xiong X., Bian Y. & Shen D. (2018). The time-varying correlation between policy uncertainty and stock returns: evidence from China. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications, 499, 413–419.
  • Wu S., Tong M., Yang Z., & Derbali A. (2019). Does gold or Bitcoin hedge economic policy uncertainty? Finance Research Letters, 31, 171–178.
  • Yang, Lu (2019). Connectedness of economic policy uncertainty and oil price shocks in a time domain perspective. Energy Economics, 80(C), 219-233.
There are 44 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Subjects Finance, Finance and Investment (Other), Business Administration
Journal Section Articles
Authors

Sukriye Tuysuz 0000-0001-8391-6521

Publication Date December 31, 2024
Submission Date October 15, 2024
Acceptance Date December 11, 2024
Published in Issue Year 2024 Volume: 11 Issue: 2

Cite

APA Tuysuz, S. (2024). WHICH EPU HAS BETTER PREDICTIVE POWER IN FORECASTING THE RETURN AND VOLATILITY OF STOCK INDICES?. Journal of Economics Finance and Accounting, 11(2), 60-75. https://doi.org/10.17261/Pressacademia.2024.1954

Journal of Economics, Finance and Accounting (JEFA) is a scientific, academic, double blind peer-reviewed, semiannual and open-access online journal. The journal publishes 2 issues a year. The issuing months are June and December. The publication language of the Journal is English. JEFA aims to provide a research source for all practitioners, policy makers, professionals and researchers working in the area of economics, finance, accounting and auditing. The editor in chief of JEFA invites all manuscripts that cover theoretical and/or applied researches on topics related to the interest areas of the Journal. JEFA publishes academic research studies only. JEFA charges no submission or publication fee.

Ethics Policy - JEFA applies the standards of Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE). JEFA is committed to the academic community ensuring ethics and quality of manuscripts in publications. Plagiarism is strictly forbidden and the manuscripts found to be plagiarized will not be accepted or if published will be removed from the publication. Authors must certify that their manuscripts are their original work. Plagiarism, duplicate, data fabrication and redundant publications are forbidden. The manuscripts are subject to plagiarism check by iThenticate or similar. All manuscript submissions must provide a similarity report (up to 15% excluding quotes, bibliography, abstract).

Open Access - All research articles published in PressAcademia Journals are fully open access; immediately freely available to read, download and share. Articles are published under the terms of a Creative Commons license which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Open access is a property of individual works, not necessarily journals or publishers. Community standards, rather than copyright law, will continue to provide the mechanism for enforcement of proper attribution and responsible use of the published work, as they do now.