Corruption and Innovation: The Case of EECA Countries

Volume: 6 Number: 2 December 1, 2017
  • Fatma Nur Karaman Kabadurmuş
EN TR

Corruption and Innovation: The Case of EECA Countries

Abstract

Although the effect of corruption on country-level investment is studied widely in literature, only a limited number of research has sought to understand how corruption affects firm-level innovation. Using firm-level data for twenty seven Eastern European and Central Asian countries, we empirically investigate how corruption affects innovation. We find that corruption has a positive effect on the rate of innovation. This finding is robust to alternative measurement proxies.

Keywords

References

  1. Ahn, Sanghoon, (2002), Competition, Innovation and Productivity Growth: A Review of Theory and Evidence, OECD Economics Department Working Papers 317.
  2. Anokhin, S., and William S. Schulze, (2009), Entrepreneurship, innovation, and corruption. Journal of business venturing, 24(5), 465-476.
  3. Asiedu, E., & James Freeman, (2009), The effect of corruption on investment growth: Evidence from firms in Latin America, Sub‐Saharan Africa, and transition countries. Review of Development Economics, 13(2), 200-214.
  4. Ayyagari, M., Asli Demirgüç-Kunt, Vojislav Maksimovic, (2014), Bribe Payments and Innovation in Developing Countries: Are Innovating Firms Disproportionately Affected?, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 49(1), 51-75.
  5. Azfar, O., and Peter Murrell, (2009), Identifying reticent respondents: assessing the quality of survey data on corruption and values, Economic Development and Cultural Change, 57(2), 387-411.
  6. Bassetti, T., Lorenzo Dal Maso, & Nicola Lattanzi, (2015), Family businesses in Eastern European countries: How informal payments affect exports, Journal of Family Business Strategy, 6(4), 219-233.
  7. Beck, T., Asli Demirguc-Kunt, and Vojislav Maksimovic (2005), Financial and Legal Constraints to Firm Growth: Does Firm Size Matter? Journal of Finance, 60(1), 137-177.
  8. Blackburn, K., & Forgues-Puccio, G. F. (2009), Why is corruption less harmful in some countries than in others?. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 72(3), 797-810.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

-

Journal Section

-

Authors

Fatma Nur Karaman Kabadurmuş This is me

Publication Date

December 1, 2017

Submission Date

-

Acceptance Date

-

Published in Issue

Year 2017 Volume: 6 Number: 2

APA
Karaman Kabadurmuş, F. N. (2017). Corruption and Innovation: The Case of EECA Countries. Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation Management, 6(2), 51-71. https://izlik.org/JA83JL36SH
AMA
1.Karaman Kabadurmuş FN. Corruption and Innovation: The Case of EECA Countries. JEIM. 2017;6(2):51-71. https://izlik.org/JA83JL36SH
Chicago
Karaman Kabadurmuş, Fatma Nur. 2017. “Corruption and Innovation: The Case of EECA Countries”. Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation Management 6 (2): 51-71. https://izlik.org/JA83JL36SH.
EndNote
Karaman Kabadurmuş FN (December 1, 2017) Corruption and Innovation: The Case of EECA Countries. Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation Management 6 2 51–71.
IEEE
[1]F. N. Karaman Kabadurmuş, “Corruption and Innovation: The Case of EECA Countries”, JEIM, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 51–71, Dec. 2017, [Online]. Available: https://izlik.org/JA83JL36SH
ISNAD
Karaman Kabadurmuş, Fatma Nur. “Corruption and Innovation: The Case of EECA Countries”. Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation Management 6/2 (December 1, 2017): 51-71. https://izlik.org/JA83JL36SH.
JAMA
1.Karaman Kabadurmuş FN. Corruption and Innovation: The Case of EECA Countries. JEIM. 2017;6:51–71.
MLA
Karaman Kabadurmuş, Fatma Nur. “Corruption and Innovation: The Case of EECA Countries”. Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation Management, vol. 6, no. 2, Dec. 2017, pp. 51-71, https://izlik.org/JA83JL36SH.
Vancouver
1.Fatma Nur Karaman Kabadurmuş. Corruption and Innovation: The Case of EECA Countries. JEIM [Internet]. 2017 Dec. 1;6(2):51-7. Available from: https://izlik.org/JA83JL36SH