Political Legitimacy in Crisis: A Weberian Reading of W. B. Yeats's “The Second Coming"

Year 2025, Volume: 7 Issue: 1, 13 - 21, 30.06.2025

Yakut Akbay

Abstract

W. B. Yeats’s “The Second Coming” (1919) has long been regarded as a prophetic reflection on political and social unrest. This article examines Yeats’s poem within the framework of Max Weber’s theory of political authority. Weber categorises legitimacy into three forms: traditional, legal-rational, and charismatic. Yeats’s evocative image, “Things are falling apart; the centre cannot hold”, conveys the fragmentation of both traditional and legal-rational structures and thus corresponds to Weber’s notion of legitimacy in crisis. In “The Second Coming”, the haunting vision of a “rough beast” approaching Bethlehem implies the emergence of a new charismatic force that is unpredictable, radical, and potentially destructive. However, while charismatic authority can serve as a means of renewal, Yeats’s apocalyptic tone in the poem suggests scepticism about whether such figures restore order or merely accelerate disintegration. By portraying the transition from a crumbling system to an uncertain future, the poem raises a critical question: Does the collapse of legitimacy inherently invite the rise of tyranny rather than transformation? Combining Yeats’s apocalyptic vision with Weber’s socio-political concepts, this study explores how “The Second Coming” anticipates the conditions under which charismatic leaders rise in times of upheaval. It also considers Yeats’s own ambivalence towards this transformation and asks whether charismatic authority in the poem represents a necessary renewal or a descent into deeper disorder. The Weberian reading of “The Second Coming” emphasises the continuing importance of understanding the fragile and cyclical nature of political legitimacy in moments of unprecedented crisis.

Keywords

Charisma , Legitimacy , The Second Coming , Weber , Yeats

Ethical Statement

It is not necessary.

Supporting Institution

None

Thanks

Thank you

References

• Allison, J. (2006). Yeats and politics. In M. Howes & J. Kelly (Eds.), The Cambridge companion to W. B. Yeats (pp. 185-205). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Bloom, H. (1972). Yeats. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Greenblatt S. (2006). The Norton Anthology of English Literature: Vol. 2 (pp. 2019-2053). New York & London: WW Norton &Company.
• Jeffares, A. N. (2001). W. B. Yeats: A new biography. London: Continuum.
• Izzo, D. G. (2009). The influence of mysticism on 20th century British and American literature. McFarland City: McFarland.
• Kendall, T. (Ed.). (2013). Poetry of the First World War: An anthology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Preston, C. J. (2020). Teaching “Problematic” Yeats: Relevance Without Recuperation. International Yeats Studies, 4(1), 2. https://doi.org/10.34068/IYS.04.01.01
• Ross, D. A. (2009). Critical companion to WB Yeats: A literary reference to his life and work. New York: Facts on File.
• Surette, L. (1994). The birth of modernism: Ezra Pound, TS Eliot, WB Yeats, and the occult. McGill-Queen's Press-MQUP.
• Tratner, M. (2015). Politics and modernist poetry. In A. Davis & L. M. Jenkins (Eds.), A history of modernist poetry (pp. 68-80). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Weber, M. (2019). Economy and society: A New Translation (K. Tribe, Ed & Trans.). Harvard: Harvard University Press. (Original work published 1921)
• Weeks, D. (1948). Image and Idea in Yeats’ The Second Coming. PMLA, 63(1), 281-292. https://doi.org/10.1632/459419
• Yeats, W.B. (2012). Complete poetry and plays. East Sussex, United Kingdom: Delphi Classics.