Review Article
BibTex RIS Cite

AN ANALYSIS OF THE WORK “THE MONK” THROUGH TZVETAN TODOROV’S AND ANN RADCLIFFE’S DEFINITON OF “FANTASTIC”

Year 2020, Volume: 2 Issue: 2, 152 - 158, 25.12.2020

Abstract

The Monk by Matthew G. Lewis epitomizes a true fantastic novel of the Gothic Era. The fantastic elements within the novel concord with Tzvetan Todorov’s definition of Fantastic. The balance between the “uncanny” and “marvelous” is prolonged, which evokes the sensations of the readers more as they confront with the events. Hence, the purpose of fantastic of Todorov is accomplished. Also, this study will analyze The Monk according to Ann Radcliffe’s assertations about the horror and terror in literature of fantasy. The explicit depictions of Ghosts and bewitchery elements drag The Monk to horror side rather than terror. Subsequently, it causes a moral deterioration on the readers’ minds according to the definition of Radcliffe. Because horror repels fostering ideas from the events within the work, which creates an opposite effect. Instead of taking lessons from the event, the readers indulge in the horror of the events. All in all, this study will shed light on the gothic features of The Monk by comparing Tzvetan Todorov’s and Ann Radcliffe’s ideas over the Fantastic literature.

Supporting Institution

Istanbul Aydın University

Thanks

I am deeply grateful to editorial commitee for their labourious work

References

  • Botting, F. (1996) Gothic Taylor & Francis e-Library, 2005 ISBN 0-203-99376-4
  • Brooks, P. (1973). Virtue and Terror: The Monk. ELH, 40(2), 249-263. doi:10.2307/2872659
  • Philmus, R. (1980). Todorov's Theory of "The Fantastic": The Pitfalls of Genre Criticism. Mosaic: A Journal for the Interdisciplinary Study of Literature, 13(3/4), 71-82. Retrieved May 5, 2020, from www.jstor.org/stable/24780263
  • Sandner, D. (2006). Theorizing the Fantastic: Editing Fantastic Literature: A Critical Reader and the Six Stages of Fantasy Criticism. Journal of the Fantastic in the Arts, 16(4 (64)), 277-301. Retrieved May 5, 2020, from www.jstor.org/stable/43310263)
  • Todorov T. (1975) The Fantastic: A Structural Approach to a Literary Genre Cornell University Press ISBN10: 0801491460
  • Watkins, D. (1986). SOCIAL HIERARCHY IN MATTHEW LEWIS'S "THE MONK". Studies in the Novel, 18(2), 115-124. Retrieved May 3, 2020, from www.jstor.org/stable/29532407
Year 2020, Volume: 2 Issue: 2, 152 - 158, 25.12.2020

Abstract

References

  • Botting, F. (1996) Gothic Taylor & Francis e-Library, 2005 ISBN 0-203-99376-4
  • Brooks, P. (1973). Virtue and Terror: The Monk. ELH, 40(2), 249-263. doi:10.2307/2872659
  • Philmus, R. (1980). Todorov's Theory of "The Fantastic": The Pitfalls of Genre Criticism. Mosaic: A Journal for the Interdisciplinary Study of Literature, 13(3/4), 71-82. Retrieved May 5, 2020, from www.jstor.org/stable/24780263
  • Sandner, D. (2006). Theorizing the Fantastic: Editing Fantastic Literature: A Critical Reader and the Six Stages of Fantasy Criticism. Journal of the Fantastic in the Arts, 16(4 (64)), 277-301. Retrieved May 5, 2020, from www.jstor.org/stable/43310263)
  • Todorov T. (1975) The Fantastic: A Structural Approach to a Literary Genre Cornell University Press ISBN10: 0801491460
  • Watkins, D. (1986). SOCIAL HIERARCHY IN MATTHEW LEWIS'S "THE MONK". Studies in the Novel, 18(2), 115-124. Retrieved May 3, 2020, from www.jstor.org/stable/29532407
There are 6 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Subjects Creative Arts and Writing
Journal Section Articles
Authors

Halilcan Koçak

Publication Date December 25, 2020
Published in Issue Year 2020 Volume: 2 Issue: 2

Cite

APA Koçak, H. (2020). AN ANALYSIS OF THE WORK “THE MONK” THROUGH TZVETAN TODOROV’S AND ANN RADCLIFFE’S DEFINITON OF “FANTASTIC”. Eurasian Journal of English Language and Literature, 2(2), 152-158.