Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

İstatistiksel ve Makine Öğrenmeye Dayalı Yaklaşımlarla Kobalt Katalizör Üzerinden Metan Kuru Reformundan Elde Edilen Sentez Gazının Tahmini Modellemesi

Year 2020, , 8 - 14, 31.03.2020
https://doi.org/10.7240/jeps.558373

Abstract

Metanın kuru reformlanması, CO2
emisyonunu azaltmak ve çeşitli Fischer-Tropsch sentezlerinde ve sentez
gazlarının üretiminde kullanmak için umut verici bir yöntemdir. İstenen
ürünleri verimli bir şekilde elde etmek için, reaktantların ürünler üzerindeki
etkisi kesin olarak bilinmelidir. Bu amaçla, yapay-zeka bazlı veri odaklı
tahmin modelleri ile metan kuru reformunun modellenmesi için çeşitli çalışmalar
yayınlanmıştır. Önerilen metotlar, aşırı uyum probleminin araştırılmamasından,
eksik ve/veya yanlı performans değerlendirmelerinden dolayı, sürecin belirli
çıktılarını tahmin etmek için yetersiz kalmıştır. Bu çalışmada 57 örnek içeren
bir veri seti kullanarak üç regresyon yöntemi kullandık ve tahmin modelleri
geliştirdik. Modellerin performans değerlendirmeleri, tarafsız sonuçlar elde
etmek için, 10 katlı çapraz doğrulama ile gerçekleştirilmiştir. Önerilen
yöntemlerin hem eğitim hem de test performansları ayrı ayrı incelenmiş ve pratikte
uygulanabilirliği tartışılmıştır.

References

  • Florides, G. A. and Christodoulides, P., “Global warming and carbon dioxide through sciences,” Environ. Int., vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 390–401, 2009.
  • Ayodele, B. V. and Cheng, C. K., “Modelling and optimization of syngas production from methane dry reforming over ceria-supported cobalt catalyst using artificial neural networks and Box-Behnken design,” J. Ind. Eng. Chem., vol. 32, pp. 246–258, 2015.
  • Yücel, Ö. and Hastaoglu, M. A., “Comprehensive Study of Steam Reforming of Methane in Membrane Reactors,” J. Energy Resour. Technol., vol. 138, no. 5, p. 052204, 2016.
  • Luisetto, I., Tuti, S., and Di Bartolomeo, E., “Co and Ni supported on CeO2 as selective bimetallic catalyst for dry reforming of methane,” Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, vol. 37, no. 21, pp. 15992–15999, 2012.
  • Guo, J., Lou, H., and Zheng, X., “The deposition of coke from methane on a Ni/MgAl2O4 catalyst,” Carbon N. Y., vol. 45, no. 6, pp. 1314–1321, 2007.
  • Maestri, M., Vlachos, D. G., Beretta, A., Groppi, G., and Tronconi, E., “Steam and dry reforming of methane on Rh: Microkinetic analysis and hierarchy of kinetic models,” J. Catal., vol. 259, no. 2, pp. 211–222, 2008.
  • Hossain, M. A., Ayodele, B. V., Cheng, C. K., and Khan, M. R., “Artificial neural network modeling of hydrogen-rich syngas production from methane dry reforming over novel Ni/CaFe2O4 catalysts,” Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, vol. 41, no. 26, pp. 11119–11130, 2016.
  • Saidina Amin, N. A., Mohd. Yusof, K., and Isha, R., “Carbon Dioxide Reforming of Methane to Syngas: Modeling Using Response Surface Methodology and Artificial Neural Network,” J. Teknol., vol. 43, no. 1, 2013.
  • Davidson, J. W., Savic, D. A., and Walters, G. A., “Symbolic and numerical regression: Experiments and applications,” Inf. Sci. (Ny)., vol. 150, no. 1–2, pp. 95–117, 2003.
  • Bottou, L., “Large-scale machine learning with stochastic gradient descent,” in Proceedings of COMPSTAT 2010 - 19th International Conference on Computational Statistics, Keynote, Invited and Contributed Papers, 2010, pp. 177–186.
  • Jain, A. K., Mao, J., and Mohiuddin, K. M., “Artificial neural networks: A tutorial,” Computer (Long. Beach. Calif)., vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 31–44, 1996.
  • Detection, T., “Neural Networks (and more!),” Sci. Eng. Guid. to Digit. Signal Process., vol. 171, no. 1, pp. 13–18, 1994.
  • Hecht-Nielsen, R., “Theory of the backpropagation neural network,” Neural Networks, vol. 1, no. 1, p. 445, 1988.
  • Smola, A. J. and Schölkopf, B., “A tutorial on support vector regression,” Stat. Comput., vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 199–222, 2004.
  • Evgeniou, T., Pontil, M., and Poggio, T., “Regularization Networks and Support Vector Machines,” Adv. Comput. Math., vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 1–50, 2000.
  • Elmaz, F., Yücel, Ö., and Mutlu, A. Y., “Evaluating the Effect of Blending Ratio on the Co-Gasification of High Ash Coal and Biomass in a Fluidized Bed Gasifier Using Machine Learning,” Mugla J. Sci. Technol., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 1–15, Jun. 2019.
  • Mutlu, A. Y. and Yucel, O., “An artificial intelligence based approach to predicting syngas composition for downdraft biomass gasification,” Energy, vol. 165, pp. 895–901, Dec. 2018.

Predictive Modeling of the Syngas Production from Methane Dry Reforming over Cobalt Catalyst with Statistical and Machine Learning Based Approaches

Year 2020, , 8 - 14, 31.03.2020
https://doi.org/10.7240/jeps.558373

Abstract

Dry reforming of methane is a promising method
to reduce the emission of CO2 and to use it in various type of
Fischer–Tropsch synthesis and production of syngas. In order to obtain
desirable products efficiently, the effect of reactants on the products must be
known precisely. For this purpose, several studies have published for modeling
the dry reforming of methane process with artificial intelligence-based
data-driven prediction models. Due to lack of investigating overfitting problem
and deficient and/or biased performance evaluations, actual potential of
proposed methods have not been revealed for predicting certain outputs of the
process. In this paper, we employed three regression methods and developed
prediction models using a dataset with 57 observations. Performance evaluations
of the models are performed with 10-fold cross-validation to ensure unbiased
results. Proposed methods’ both training and testing performances are
separately investigated, further applicability is discussed.

References

  • Florides, G. A. and Christodoulides, P., “Global warming and carbon dioxide through sciences,” Environ. Int., vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 390–401, 2009.
  • Ayodele, B. V. and Cheng, C. K., “Modelling and optimization of syngas production from methane dry reforming over ceria-supported cobalt catalyst using artificial neural networks and Box-Behnken design,” J. Ind. Eng. Chem., vol. 32, pp. 246–258, 2015.
  • Yücel, Ö. and Hastaoglu, M. A., “Comprehensive Study of Steam Reforming of Methane in Membrane Reactors,” J. Energy Resour. Technol., vol. 138, no. 5, p. 052204, 2016.
  • Luisetto, I., Tuti, S., and Di Bartolomeo, E., “Co and Ni supported on CeO2 as selective bimetallic catalyst for dry reforming of methane,” Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, vol. 37, no. 21, pp. 15992–15999, 2012.
  • Guo, J., Lou, H., and Zheng, X., “The deposition of coke from methane on a Ni/MgAl2O4 catalyst,” Carbon N. Y., vol. 45, no. 6, pp. 1314–1321, 2007.
  • Maestri, M., Vlachos, D. G., Beretta, A., Groppi, G., and Tronconi, E., “Steam and dry reforming of methane on Rh: Microkinetic analysis and hierarchy of kinetic models,” J. Catal., vol. 259, no. 2, pp. 211–222, 2008.
  • Hossain, M. A., Ayodele, B. V., Cheng, C. K., and Khan, M. R., “Artificial neural network modeling of hydrogen-rich syngas production from methane dry reforming over novel Ni/CaFe2O4 catalysts,” Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, vol. 41, no. 26, pp. 11119–11130, 2016.
  • Saidina Amin, N. A., Mohd. Yusof, K., and Isha, R., “Carbon Dioxide Reforming of Methane to Syngas: Modeling Using Response Surface Methodology and Artificial Neural Network,” J. Teknol., vol. 43, no. 1, 2013.
  • Davidson, J. W., Savic, D. A., and Walters, G. A., “Symbolic and numerical regression: Experiments and applications,” Inf. Sci. (Ny)., vol. 150, no. 1–2, pp. 95–117, 2003.
  • Bottou, L., “Large-scale machine learning with stochastic gradient descent,” in Proceedings of COMPSTAT 2010 - 19th International Conference on Computational Statistics, Keynote, Invited and Contributed Papers, 2010, pp. 177–186.
  • Jain, A. K., Mao, J., and Mohiuddin, K. M., “Artificial neural networks: A tutorial,” Computer (Long. Beach. Calif)., vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 31–44, 1996.
  • Detection, T., “Neural Networks (and more!),” Sci. Eng. Guid. to Digit. Signal Process., vol. 171, no. 1, pp. 13–18, 1994.
  • Hecht-Nielsen, R., “Theory of the backpropagation neural network,” Neural Networks, vol. 1, no. 1, p. 445, 1988.
  • Smola, A. J. and Schölkopf, B., “A tutorial on support vector regression,” Stat. Comput., vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 199–222, 2004.
  • Evgeniou, T., Pontil, M., and Poggio, T., “Regularization Networks and Support Vector Machines,” Adv. Comput. Math., vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 1–50, 2000.
  • Elmaz, F., Yücel, Ö., and Mutlu, A. Y., “Evaluating the Effect of Blending Ratio on the Co-Gasification of High Ash Coal and Biomass in a Fluidized Bed Gasifier Using Machine Learning,” Mugla J. Sci. Technol., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 1–15, Jun. 2019.
  • Mutlu, A. Y. and Yucel, O., “An artificial intelligence based approach to predicting syngas composition for downdraft biomass gasification,” Energy, vol. 165, pp. 895–901, Dec. 2018.
There are 17 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Subjects Engineering
Journal Section Research Articles
Authors

Furkan Elmaz This is me 0000-0002-7030-0784

Özgün Yücel 0000-0001-8916-2628

Ali Yener Mutlu This is me 0000-0002-2221-8698

Publication Date March 31, 2020
Published in Issue Year 2020

Cite

APA Elmaz, F., Yücel, Ö., & Mutlu, A. Y. (2020). Predictive Modeling of the Syngas Production from Methane Dry Reforming over Cobalt Catalyst with Statistical and Machine Learning Based Approaches. International Journal of Advances in Engineering and Pure Sciences, 32(1), 8-14. https://doi.org/10.7240/jeps.558373
AMA Elmaz F, Yücel Ö, Mutlu AY. Predictive Modeling of the Syngas Production from Methane Dry Reforming over Cobalt Catalyst with Statistical and Machine Learning Based Approaches. JEPS. March 2020;32(1):8-14. doi:10.7240/jeps.558373
Chicago Elmaz, Furkan, Özgün Yücel, and Ali Yener Mutlu. “Predictive Modeling of the Syngas Production from Methane Dry Reforming over Cobalt Catalyst With Statistical and Machine Learning Based Approaches”. International Journal of Advances in Engineering and Pure Sciences 32, no. 1 (March 2020): 8-14. https://doi.org/10.7240/jeps.558373.
EndNote Elmaz F, Yücel Ö, Mutlu AY (March 1, 2020) Predictive Modeling of the Syngas Production from Methane Dry Reforming over Cobalt Catalyst with Statistical and Machine Learning Based Approaches. International Journal of Advances in Engineering and Pure Sciences 32 1 8–14.
IEEE F. Elmaz, Ö. Yücel, and A. Y. Mutlu, “Predictive Modeling of the Syngas Production from Methane Dry Reforming over Cobalt Catalyst with Statistical and Machine Learning Based Approaches”, JEPS, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 8–14, 2020, doi: 10.7240/jeps.558373.
ISNAD Elmaz, Furkan et al. “Predictive Modeling of the Syngas Production from Methane Dry Reforming over Cobalt Catalyst With Statistical and Machine Learning Based Approaches”. International Journal of Advances in Engineering and Pure Sciences 32/1 (March 2020), 8-14. https://doi.org/10.7240/jeps.558373.
JAMA Elmaz F, Yücel Ö, Mutlu AY. Predictive Modeling of the Syngas Production from Methane Dry Reforming over Cobalt Catalyst with Statistical and Machine Learning Based Approaches. JEPS. 2020;32:8–14.
MLA Elmaz, Furkan et al. “Predictive Modeling of the Syngas Production from Methane Dry Reforming over Cobalt Catalyst With Statistical and Machine Learning Based Approaches”. International Journal of Advances in Engineering and Pure Sciences, vol. 32, no. 1, 2020, pp. 8-14, doi:10.7240/jeps.558373.
Vancouver Elmaz F, Yücel Ö, Mutlu AY. Predictive Modeling of the Syngas Production from Methane Dry Reforming over Cobalt Catalyst with Statistical and Machine Learning Based Approaches. JEPS. 2020;32(1):8-14.