Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

Mechanical and Impact Properties of Packaging-Waste/E-Glass/Epoxy Sandwich Composites for Construction Applications

Year 2019, Volume: 31 - Özel Sayı II:, 84 - 91, 20.12.2019
https://doi.org/10.7240/jeps.539136

Abstract

Using textile structural
composites improves day by day in various industries due to their high specific
strength and modulus, good fatigue and corrosion resistance. The most important
reasons for the increased use of textile structural composites are the increased
expectations for product performance and demand for lightweight materials in
global markets. Rapid economic growth, urbanization, rising in population and
welfare level lead to an increased amount of waste production. In Turkey, the
annual average of solid waste is 25 million tons and 20% of this waste consists
of packaging waste. In this study, a new sandwich material was developed for
construction applications with low cost and high performance by using box
wastes as core and E-Glass woven fabric as sheet materials. The mechanical
properties were investigated by 3-point bending test and their impact behavior
was compared after low-velocity impact tests in different energy levels. The
core material had a negligible bending strength. The bending load of sandwich
composites was dramatically higher than those of face material. Low-velocity
impact results showed that absorbed energy and damaged area increased with
increasing impact energy level. It could be concluded that the developed
sandwich composites absorb more energy with small damaged areas and therefore
can be considered as damage resistant materials for constructional applications
as door and siding. The thermal insulation properties of these new sandwich
composites will be also investigated in future researches.

References

  • Hoa, S.V. (2009). Principles of the manufacturing of composite materials (Second edition). DEStch Publications, USA, pp. 5-60.
  • Kaya A.İ. (2016). Kompozit malzemeler ve özellikleri. Putech. Compos., Temmuz-Ağustos-Eylül, 38-45.
  • Kaymakcı A., Ayrılmış N. and Akbulut T. (2014). Dış cephe kaplamalarina ekolojik bir yaklaşim: ahşap polimer kompozitler, 7. Ulusal Çatı & Cephe Sempozyum, Yıldız Teknik Üniversitesi, İstanbul, Türkiye, 3-4 Nisan.
  • Ratwani M.M. (2010). Composite materials and sandwich structures- A primer. Rto-En-Avt., 156, 1-16.
  • Yıldız F., Aydın F. and Meydan U., Honeycomb, http://muhendislik.istanbul.edu.tr/, (March, 2018).
  • Chandradass J., Ramesh Kumar M. and Velmurugan R. (2008). Effect of clay dispersion on mechanical, thermal and vibration properties of glass fiber-reinforced vinyl ester composites. J. Reinf. Plast. Compos., 27, 1585-1601.
  • Cabrera N.O., Alcock B. and Peijs, T. (2008). Design and manufacture of all-PP sandwich panels based on co-extruded polypropylene tapes. Composites Part B, 39, 1183-1195.
  • Xu G., Yang F., Zeng T., Cheng S. and Wang Z. (2016). Bending behavior of graded corrugated truss core composite sandwich beams. Compos. Struct., 138, 342-351.
  • Lascoup B., Aboura Z., Khellil K. and Benzeggagh M. (2006). On the mechanical effect of stitch addition in sandwich panel. Compos. Sci. Technol., 66, 1385-1398.
  • Brandt J., Drechslef K. and Arendtsb, F.J. (1996). Mechanical performance of composites based on various three-dimensional woven-fibre preforms. Compos. Sci. Technol., 56, 381-386.
  • Guan Z.W., Aktas A., Potluri P., Cantwell W.J., Langdon G. and Nurick G.N. (2014). The blast resistance of stitched sandwich panels. Int. J. Impact Eng., 65, 137-145.
  • Meo M., Vignjevic R. and Marengo G. (2005). The response of honeycomb sandwich panels under low-velocity impact loading. Int. J. Mech. Sci., 47, 1301-1325.
  • Yetim A., Geri dönüşüm sektörünün dünyadaki genel görünümü ve Türkiye’deki durumu, İzmir Ticaret Odası, Ar-Ge Bülten, http://www.izto.org.tr/, (March, 2018).
  • ASTM D792-2013 Standard Test Methods for Density and Specific Gravity (Relative Density) of Plastics by Displacement (2013). American Society for Testing and Materials, USA.
  • ASTM D3171-2015 Standard Test Methods for Constituent Content of Composite Materials (2015). American Society for Testing and Materials, USA.
  • ASTM C393-16 Standard Test Method for Core Shear Properties of Sandwich Constructions by Beam Flexure (2016). American Society for Testing and Materials, USA.
  • ASTM D7136-15 Standard Test Method for Measuring the Damage Resistance of a Fiber-Reinforced Polymer Matrix Composite to a Drop-Weight Impact Event (2015). American Society for Testing and Materials, USA.
  • ASTM D790-1990 Standard Test Methods for Flexural Properties of Unreinforced and Reinforced Plastics and Electrical Insulating Materials (1990). American Society for Testing and Materials, USA.
Year 2019, Volume: 31 - Özel Sayı II:, 84 - 91, 20.12.2019
https://doi.org/10.7240/jeps.539136

Abstract

References

  • Hoa, S.V. (2009). Principles of the manufacturing of composite materials (Second edition). DEStch Publications, USA, pp. 5-60.
  • Kaya A.İ. (2016). Kompozit malzemeler ve özellikleri. Putech. Compos., Temmuz-Ağustos-Eylül, 38-45.
  • Kaymakcı A., Ayrılmış N. and Akbulut T. (2014). Dış cephe kaplamalarina ekolojik bir yaklaşim: ahşap polimer kompozitler, 7. Ulusal Çatı & Cephe Sempozyum, Yıldız Teknik Üniversitesi, İstanbul, Türkiye, 3-4 Nisan.
  • Ratwani M.M. (2010). Composite materials and sandwich structures- A primer. Rto-En-Avt., 156, 1-16.
  • Yıldız F., Aydın F. and Meydan U., Honeycomb, http://muhendislik.istanbul.edu.tr/, (March, 2018).
  • Chandradass J., Ramesh Kumar M. and Velmurugan R. (2008). Effect of clay dispersion on mechanical, thermal and vibration properties of glass fiber-reinforced vinyl ester composites. J. Reinf. Plast. Compos., 27, 1585-1601.
  • Cabrera N.O., Alcock B. and Peijs, T. (2008). Design and manufacture of all-PP sandwich panels based on co-extruded polypropylene tapes. Composites Part B, 39, 1183-1195.
  • Xu G., Yang F., Zeng T., Cheng S. and Wang Z. (2016). Bending behavior of graded corrugated truss core composite sandwich beams. Compos. Struct., 138, 342-351.
  • Lascoup B., Aboura Z., Khellil K. and Benzeggagh M. (2006). On the mechanical effect of stitch addition in sandwich panel. Compos. Sci. Technol., 66, 1385-1398.
  • Brandt J., Drechslef K. and Arendtsb, F.J. (1996). Mechanical performance of composites based on various three-dimensional woven-fibre preforms. Compos. Sci. Technol., 56, 381-386.
  • Guan Z.W., Aktas A., Potluri P., Cantwell W.J., Langdon G. and Nurick G.N. (2014). The blast resistance of stitched sandwich panels. Int. J. Impact Eng., 65, 137-145.
  • Meo M., Vignjevic R. and Marengo G. (2005). The response of honeycomb sandwich panels under low-velocity impact loading. Int. J. Mech. Sci., 47, 1301-1325.
  • Yetim A., Geri dönüşüm sektörünün dünyadaki genel görünümü ve Türkiye’deki durumu, İzmir Ticaret Odası, Ar-Ge Bülten, http://www.izto.org.tr/, (March, 2018).
  • ASTM D792-2013 Standard Test Methods for Density and Specific Gravity (Relative Density) of Plastics by Displacement (2013). American Society for Testing and Materials, USA.
  • ASTM D3171-2015 Standard Test Methods for Constituent Content of Composite Materials (2015). American Society for Testing and Materials, USA.
  • ASTM C393-16 Standard Test Method for Core Shear Properties of Sandwich Constructions by Beam Flexure (2016). American Society for Testing and Materials, USA.
  • ASTM D7136-15 Standard Test Method for Measuring the Damage Resistance of a Fiber-Reinforced Polymer Matrix Composite to a Drop-Weight Impact Event (2015). American Society for Testing and Materials, USA.
  • ASTM D790-1990 Standard Test Methods for Flexural Properties of Unreinforced and Reinforced Plastics and Electrical Insulating Materials (1990). American Society for Testing and Materials, USA.
There are 18 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Subjects Engineering
Journal Section Research Articles
Authors

Gaye Kaya 0000-0003-1866-4799

Neslihan Hayta This is me 0000-0003-1008-0887

Publication Date December 20, 2019
Published in Issue Year 2019 Volume: 31 - Özel Sayı II:

Cite

APA Kaya, G., & Hayta, N. (2019). Mechanical and Impact Properties of Packaging-Waste/E-Glass/Epoxy Sandwich Composites for Construction Applications. International Journal of Advances in Engineering and Pure Sciences, 31, 84-91. https://doi.org/10.7240/jeps.539136
AMA Kaya G, Hayta N. Mechanical and Impact Properties of Packaging-Waste/E-Glass/Epoxy Sandwich Composites for Construction Applications. JEPS. December 2019;31:84-91. doi:10.7240/jeps.539136
Chicago Kaya, Gaye, and Neslihan Hayta. “Mechanical and Impact Properties of Packaging-Waste/E-Glass/Epoxy Sandwich Composites for Construction Applications”. International Journal of Advances in Engineering and Pure Sciences 31, December (December 2019): 84-91. https://doi.org/10.7240/jeps.539136.
EndNote Kaya G, Hayta N (December 1, 2019) Mechanical and Impact Properties of Packaging-Waste/E-Glass/Epoxy Sandwich Composites for Construction Applications. International Journal of Advances in Engineering and Pure Sciences 31 84–91.
IEEE G. Kaya and N. Hayta, “Mechanical and Impact Properties of Packaging-Waste/E-Glass/Epoxy Sandwich Composites for Construction Applications”, JEPS, vol. 31, pp. 84–91, 2019, doi: 10.7240/jeps.539136.
ISNAD Kaya, Gaye - Hayta, Neslihan. “Mechanical and Impact Properties of Packaging-Waste/E-Glass/Epoxy Sandwich Composites for Construction Applications”. International Journal of Advances in Engineering and Pure Sciences 31 (December 2019), 84-91. https://doi.org/10.7240/jeps.539136.
JAMA Kaya G, Hayta N. Mechanical and Impact Properties of Packaging-Waste/E-Glass/Epoxy Sandwich Composites for Construction Applications. JEPS. 2019;31:84–91.
MLA Kaya, Gaye and Neslihan Hayta. “Mechanical and Impact Properties of Packaging-Waste/E-Glass/Epoxy Sandwich Composites for Construction Applications”. International Journal of Advances in Engineering and Pure Sciences, vol. 31, 2019, pp. 84-91, doi:10.7240/jeps.539136.
Vancouver Kaya G, Hayta N. Mechanical and Impact Properties of Packaging-Waste/E-Glass/Epoxy Sandwich Composites for Construction Applications. JEPS. 2019;31:84-91.